It's that time of year again...

[AFK]

I want a cease and desist on posting my name.

Certainly, pull the article it was quoted from, because right now its in the public domain.

I was hoping for something a little more ethical from you.  You realize the precedent that is being established right? 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I've posted where I work,

Hey, this IS fun. 

DOUR,
Two can play at the selective quoting thing.

[Pæs]

I want a cease and desist on posting my name.

Certainly, pull the article it was quoted from, because right now its in the public domain.

I was hoping for something a little more ethical from you.  You realize the precedent that is being established right?

nope

[The Good Reverend Roger]

All because I didn't fall over myself apologizing when I didn't know a thread was linked to people messing with his father.

Is that a valid excuse to post someone's PI?

1.  I didn't post your PI.

2.  You are a smug little bastard that saw fit to LECTURE when shit happened to other people.  Boo hoo hoo, shitstain.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I want a cease and desist on posting my name.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

DOUR has assembled enough of my information

 

Yes, making that Youtube video of you was pure evil genius on my part.

[AFK]

All because I didn't fall over myself apologizing when I didn't know a thread was linked to people messing with his father.

Is that a valid excuse to post someone's PI?

1.  I didn't post your PI.

Yes you did, and boasted about it as being revenge for, oh my, shortening your name.  Which you did selectively, which I think is something you were just whining about in Nigel's thread.

2.  You are a smug little bastard that saw fit to LECTURE when shit happened to other people.  Boo hoo hoo, shitstain.

That's been proven to be a lie. 

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

DOUR has assembled enough of my information

 

Yes, making that Youtube video of you was pure evil genius on my part.

Funny how he was totally "not concerned" about it when I pointed out that bragging about the article would be all anyone needed to find out what his name is and where he works.

Concerned, not concerned, concerned, not concerned. It's dizzying.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

All because I didn't fall over myself apologizing when I didn't know a thread was linked to people messing with his father.

Is that a valid excuse to post someone's PI?

1.  I didn't post your PI.

Yes you did, and boasted about it as being revenge for, oh my, shortening your name.  Which you did selectively, which I think is something you were just whining about in Nigel's thread.

2.  You are a smug little bastard that saw fit to LECTURE when shit happened to other people.  Boo hoo hoo, shitstain.

That's been proven to be a lie.

Nope.

You fucking lectured.  Shall I quote you, you smarmy little bastard?   

And I called out demo squid on the name thing, though I didn't notice everyone who did it.  How CLEVER of me to go back in time and do such a thing, eh?

[AFK]

Well, that was when I had thought people here had some ethics.  DOUR has proven me wrong.  You are right, I should've been more careful with his type hanging around here.

[Faust]

I want a cease and desist on posting my name.

Certainly, pull the article it was quoted from, because right now its in the public domain.

I was hoping for something a little more ethical from you.  You realize the precedent that is being established right?

I'm weighing it up. The fact is they didn't take it from someone's facebook page. It came from an article by an expert in the field of drugs control, readily available, and used, primarily here in a discussion on drug control.

Like it or not you are a public figure now.

Let me try to create a hypothetical example; say for example a writer had published a shitty book. For the sake of argument we'll call him Benny Mack.
We discuss and review the book, and in our personal tastes we don't like it. He shows up to talk about the book and we discuss it with him.

Now if he was to choose then to say no how dare you insult my book: remove my name from this site, I'd be very confused. He put it in the public domain for consumption, and can't react shocked and tell them they as a group may not refer to him by name when discussing this book.

You've mixed work and internet discussions and it's not gone well. A lot of people here don't agree with your views.

I don't think your kids are in the slightest danger from your name being quoted from a news article you were interviewed for, If I was, it would be gone already.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

DOUR has assembled enough of my information

 

Yes, making that Youtube video of you was pure evil genius on my part.

Funny how he was totally "not concerned" about it when I pointed out that bragging about the article would be all anyone needed to find out what his name is and where he works.

Concerned, not concerned, concerned, not concerned. It's dizzying.

I don't worry about his concern.  He's part of the mechanism that puts kids in prison.  Also, he's a shitbird on a personal level.

No sympathy, here.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Well, that was when I had thought people here had some ethics.  DOUR has proven me wrong.  You are right, I should've been more careful with his type hanging around here.

I really need to get a white cat, that I can hold and pet while I plot my evil.

[Count Chocula]

I want a cease and desist on posting my name.

 

[AFK]

I want a cease and desist on posting my name.

Certainly, pull the article it was quoted from, because right now its in the public domain.

I was hoping for something a little more ethical from you.  You realize the precedent that is being established right?

I'm weighing it up. The fact is they didn't take it from someone's facebook page. It came from an article by an expert in the field of drugs control, readily available, and used, primarily here in a discussion on drug control.

Like it or not you are a public figure now.

Let me try to create a hypothetical example; say for example a writer had published a shitty book. For the sake of argument we'll call him Benny Mack.
We discuss and review the book, and in our personal tastes we don't like it. He shows up to talk about the book and we discuss it with him.

Now if he was to choose then to say no how dare you remove my name from this site, I'd be very confused. He put it in the public domain for consumption, and can't react shocked and tell them they as a group may not refer to him by name when discussing this book.

You've mixed work and internet discussions and it's not gone well. A lot of people here don't agree with your views.

I don't think your kids are in the slightest danger from your name being quoted from a news article you were interviewed for, If I was, it would be gone already.

And what about Bear's public declarations?  On YOUR site?