Another reason to hate the world. True or False?

[P3nT4gR4m]

My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?

Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?

If I had to guess, I'd say "No" to both questions

[hooplala]

Why do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?

Herp-da-derp... forums are about give and take.  Did you seriously expect to just state whatever you wanted without anyone answering?

[hooplala]

I just want you to know, that is why I am here to stay.

Let's not be hasty here...

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Well, I for one would like to thank Nigel for inviting the TDS freaks over.

Because I giggled my arse off all day.

[Resigned Obligatorily]

Thats a really lame emo-emote...
It apears to be perpendicular and not parrallel to the veins.

Why do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?

Herp-da-derp... forums are about give and take.  Did you seriously expect to just state whatever you wanted without anyone answering?

I did address that issue earlier, I said:

Am I supposed to raise a question, and then sit back and listen and just repeat, "Okay, Okay, Okay, Okay" over and over again? What would be the point of that?

Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.

How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when guys are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.



Literally all men care about.

1. How tall you are
2. How big your breasts are
3. How much money you make
4. How long your hair is
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How pretty you are


I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.

Thank you Nigel for the third version of the list, I'll keep all 3 in the same text file.
Male, female, and gender neutral.
Then putting said list into my file  hell folder.
(Where all obsolete notions go to die for eternity.)

Maybe this list should say, "All that shallow ingrates care about is."

Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.

How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when guys are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.



Literally all men care about.

1. How tall you are
2. How big your breasts are
3. How much money you make
4. How long your hair is
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How pretty you are


I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.

It's half tempting to post that on a couple of PUA forums just to see the reaction.

Lol....

"literally all XXXXXX" statements are never correct. Some people will always be too smart/brain damaged to conform to your chosen demographic.

Not to say a whole bunch of these things won't hold true for a large percentage, given that a large percentage of any group are usually idiots. Ask any anthropologist why the list makes sense and it's pretty straightforward monkey brain wiring. However, as we discussed recently, monkey brain wiring is not fixed. assume otherwise at your peril.

That sounds comforting; yet I am not yet convinced that people care about more than that.
Which leads to my discomfort in experiencing any form of agreement with said monkey.

Either you only care abut those things, in which case why does it bother you that other people are the same way?  Or else you care about more than that, in which case not all people are that way.

If the vast mojority of people were that way; why point out the few abnormalities and give the bulk of the population the credit?

I think this thread shows the real hilarity that results from echo chamber mentalities.  TDS is basically a pack of puerile little freaks who spend their time trying to out-edgy each other, vying for who can be the most misogynistic as a means of proving their bravery to the rest.

Then one of them wanders out from underneath their fart-huffing blanket and says something that is - in their eyes - perfectly normal.  And everyone laughs at him like he was some kind of sideshow geek.  Which, obviously, he is...Having spent a great deal of time and effort to make himself one.

Then come the excuses.  "I hate women because of trauma."  FFS.  He got his widdle heart chipped and that's a reason to hate ALL women.  Well done. Well fucking done.

Compare that to wossname, "Gonad" or whatever it was, also from TDS.  The FUNNIEST part is that they accuse US of being an echo chamber, despite records of us dismembering each other that go back 11 years.  Why are we an echo chamber?  Because we disagree with and mock their precious bigotries and their deeply-cherished cowardice.

Compare to tumblr oppression boards for cheap laughs.

The technical definition of a geek describes me quite well.
Calling that self deprecation would be insulting geeks of the world, careful!
(Sorry for the late reply, decided to enter sleep mode and then re-read all of this to get a seccond impression.)

Well, I for one would like to thank Nigel for inviting the TDS freaks over.

Because I giggled my arse off all day.

Because you are equating this human to a sideshow,
You have failed the TGRR humanity test, which consists of one question: 
"Are you able to view other humans as human?"

My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?

Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?

Maybe if they offered social skill classes in the first place people wouldn't be making lists like this.
It seems more like people are causing the deprecation to stray from the issue simply to make the point that the issue isn't worth their attention.
Then using that to conclude that I am somehow the same quality as my question.

a friend zone thing anyway.

YOU ARE RUNNING ON A METRIC FUCKTON OF BAD SIGNAL.

Literally all women care about.

1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are

THIS IS A SELF-DEFENSIVE DELUSION YOU HAVE LATCHED ON TO, EXPLAINING AWAY YOUR PAST REJECTION BY DEMONISING YOUR REJECTORS RATHER THAN TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PARTS OF YOURSELF THAT ARE DETESTABLE.

BY REDUCING WOMEN TO THESE CONCERNS, YOU CAN COMFORTABLE BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE OTHER REDEEMING QUALITIES WHICH WOULD MAKE YOU ATTRACTIVE IF ONLY WOMEN WERE NOT SO SHALLOW, BUT AT THE SAME TIME BETRAYING THE FACT THAT 'WINNING PERSONALITY' CANNOT BE ONE OF THESE REDEEMING QUALITIES.

I like the way you put that.
So belief in this would be a 'shell' to break out of.

I just want you to know, that is why I am here to stay.

Let's not be hasty here...

Are you referring to the 3 day troll fest mention in one of the locked threads?
Is that really that common for people to come here, participate, and get harassed for their efforts?

NOW STOP MOPING AND BETTER YOURSELF.

Much easier said than done. I am human, and I am sorry.
You are human, therefore you were once not bettered too.

I will continue down the path as fast as I can.

[Salty]

PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.

I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.

You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:



You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.

[Resigned Obligatorily]

You get your own reply Junkenstein.

Still waiting on this "interesting concept". This still appears to be idiocy.

The concept was executed poorly.

HEY GUYS, SMASHING MY BALLS WITH A HAMMER HURTS. SHOULD I CONTINUE?

Implying you have balls....

THIS FOOD CONTAINS NUTS AND I HAVE AN EXTREME ALLERGY. SHOULD I EAT IT?

Only if you don't enjoy life.

MY CAR IS ON FIRE. SHOULD I FIND ANOTHER MODE OF TRANSPORT?

Without fire, cars would not be possible. Don't be such a wimp.

[Pæs]

"It seems more like people are causing the deprecation to stray from the issue simply to make the point that the issue isn't worth their attention."

It doesn't seem like that to me at all. It seems to me more like you are rolling onto your belly and submitting at the first sniff of criticism, grovel grovel, "I am not worthy."

Communication can only happen among equals and you're not behaving like you consider yourself to be one of those.

AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE NOT GROVELLING, YOU'RE BEING INEFFECTIVELY ASSERTIVE BY WAY OF PASSIVE AGGRESSION AND COWARDLY LITTLE SNIPES LIKE "SUGAR CAIN". HOLY FUCKING BALLS.

[Resigned Obligatorily]

PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.

I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.

You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:



You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.

Well close your mind at your pleasure. I would hope you are judging points on their own merit, and not based on how you feel about the person saying them.

[Pæs]

Still desperately trying to find reasons why it might be unfair that people aren't engaging with you respectfully?

[Salty]

PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.

I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.

You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:



You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.

[Resigned Obligatorily]

Communication can only happen among equals and you're not behaving like you consider yourself to be one of those.

Wrong.

AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE NOT GROVELLING, YOU'RE BEING INEFFECTIVELY ASSERTIVE BY WAY OF PASSIVE AGGRESSION AND COWARDLY LITTLE SNIPES LIKE "SUGAR CAIN". HOLY FUCKING BALLS.

I just don't take it personally. You guys on the other hand, really seem to.
The reaction, "HOLLY FUCKING BALLS" , is exactly why called him that in the first place.

If they are just cowardly little snipes, then why would they effect you?
I would think someone proficient like yourself would be above such petty inaneness.

[Resigned Obligatorily]

PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.

I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.

You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:



You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.

I was never trying to show anyone anything. I was just being, "sexist and Racist" to shed light on why that is wrong, so kill me.

[Resigned Obligatorily]

Still desperately trying to find reasons why it might be unfair that people aren't engaging with you respectfully?

Whats the harm in trying? Don't know for sure until you try.

[Salty]

PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.

I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.

You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:



You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.