Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last

[Drake75]

This flattered me. Instead of someone saying some of my responses are mirroring the discussions and are sarcastic... I get promoted to being a lecturing fool who believes more than anyone else.       

I don't take offense to shoveling shit nor being given my own threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable characters can bring me potentially insightful thoughts.

I've got no experience with industrial engineering, to brag about! I'm a desk worker at the bottom of a pyramid.

Did I paraphrase correctly? Do tell me off.

Horridly narcissistic, aye? Suppose we should shed this skin soon, we've become blind by it.

If we're really that horrifying, I say we run around in this skin until it's effect wears off.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

That "aye" is pretentious as fuck.   

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Oh, my, how flattering. Instead of conveying the understanding that many more of my responses are mirroring the common discussions had and are laced with sarcasm... I get promoted with being a lecturing twit who assumes to know more than anyone else.      

I dont mind the shit shovelling nor the apparent escort away from participating within certain threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable of characters bring to light potentially insightful thoughts.

I wouldn't be much of a bragard toward industrial engineering, ha! Im a clerk from the lowest of estate.

"Bragard"?

And I have already explained the rule concerning thread splits.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.

[UB]

a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.

Careful, dear, we may agree. And I didn't say they were my friends. To the contrary, I maintain very few.

The petroleum technology should be given to the Iranians. Im not aware of the reasons its being withheld, if it is to the extent that prohibits their potential progress.

The link where you've explained thread splits?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.

Engineers will agree with you. Many biologists won't. "Safe" is only for a given value, and a given span of time. Personally, I think nuclear is a bad idea, because humans.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.

Careful, dear, we may agree. And I didn't say they were my friends. To the contrary, I maintain very few.

The petroleum technology should be given to the Iranians. Im not aware of the reasons its being withheld, if it is to the extent that prohibits their potential progress.

The link where you've explained thread splits?

I'll give you a hint. Is the thread about you? No? Then if your post attempts to make it about you, it will be split.

Most people don't need this much explaining.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Oh, my, how flattering. Instead of conveying the understanding that many more of my responses are mirroring the common discussions had and are laced with sarcasm... I get promoted with being a lecturing twit who assumes to know more than anyone else.      

I dont mind the shit shovelling nor the apparent escort away from participating within certain threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable of characters bring to light potentially insightful thoughts.

I wouldn't be much of a bragard toward industrial engineering, ha! Im a clerk from the lowest of estate.

Don't flatter yourself; you're an attention whore, and that's about it.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

NET:   
Than you for asking.... because I wasn't intentionally being a troll.

I was showing how my head works at times. TGRR wrote several pieces in the original thread that reminded me very much of a previous discussion I was a part of in a basement one evening. Instead of practicing the electric slide and welding their lightsabers,  a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program. Some countries dont have the beneficial yet accursed abundance of nonrenewable fossil fuels... but they bring to light an important point from the angles through which they work to accomplish feats that are awe-inspiring.

Most would agree that such progress comes from years of study and more than even an adept wisdom in the applications of both failed and successful experiments. Im kinda more of the slant that some minds are more sensitive toward not only the discovery but also of variant levels of recognition, like a type of confirmation, of sorts, toward certain phenomena, anomalies, energies, etc. Such sensitive minds are able to, perhaps, better mirror the power witnessed and, um, produce or replicate a manufactured representation.

Anyways. Im also kinda warped in the way that buildings talk. Architectural designs and some of the dead or nearly dead languages remind me of a type of automatic programming that, though does not have to be self-destructive or self-detonating, sometimes become so because of a possible spiritual state of st agnancy that reads such design as a threat or future threat

Nobody cares about you nearly as much as you do.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.

Careful, dear, we may agree. And I didn't say they were my friends. To the contrary, I maintain very few.

God, what a surprise. 

[UB]

Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.

It's no as even having going to the level of being was however.

[UB]

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   

[UB]

Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.

It's no as even having going to the level of being was however.

Aye. I see you speak auto corrected jibberish as well. Duck, duck.