Why? Because it doesn't seem to be set up for our convenience?
Who ever says we're the main characters?
If they're omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent, then they're knowingly subjecting innocent people to undue amounts of horror. That makes them a complete sack of shit. It's much less to do with convenience.
I would argue that "We aren't the main characters" isn't a defense for universal neglect. When applied elsewhere, that concept is immoral.
For all we know, God is actually a nice guy that just wasn't paying attention. But that's not how you bet.
Any being that pushes life into the world (And intends for it to live a full life) is partially responsible for that life's developmental and environmental conditions. If you control the type of environment that a life is brought up in, you are responsible for the results. In other words, if you buy a pet or have a kid, and leave either in the wilderness to die/live on its own, you're an abusive sack of shit. This is obvious to everyone here, and I would think this concept would apply to any being.
And let's say for a moment that maybe the Creator wanted or expected us to die immediately, or intended to abort us, if you will.
This certainly isn't a humane way of doing it.
My point is, if there is a Creator, what they've done is irredeemable in all respects. Even if they've not been paying attention, they should've known (If they were capable of creating a universe) that life could've been generated, and that it could suffer if neglected. As careless and silly as humans are, they at least have the ability (And urge, in most cases) to care for their own.
Also, at the moment, I'm not sure I'm very adept at reading certain social queues, including tone and attitude in my own post. I removed and edited what I could find, but if anything in here seems confrontational or rude, please ignore it. I like these discussions, and am not trying to fight. The weed I had last night was fucking purple. I'm a little hazy right now.
