Keep your stupid questions to your stupid self.

[Dysfunctional Cunt]

Is there some kind of grading system in place since I last looked in here?

Yes.  The English are given leeway, on account of being from England.

They need it. However, I see they are not making good use. Wrath may be called for.

AND THEN LONDON FELL INTO THE THAMES.   

And melted?

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Is there some kind of grading system in place since I last looked in here?

Yes.  The English are given leeway, on account of being from England.

They need it. However, I see they are not making good use. Wrath may be called for.

AND THEN LONDON FELL INTO THE THAMES.   

And melted?

And shattered on the surface.  The Thames is a teensy bit polluted.

[BadBeast]

Is there some kind of grading system in place since I last looked in here?

Yes.  The English are given leeway, on account of being from England.

They need it. However, I see they are not making good use. Wrath may be called for.

AND THEN LONDON FELL INTO THE THAMES.   

And melted?

And shattered on the surface.  The Thames is a teensy bit polluted.

As of now, the Thames is remarkably clean in comparison to what it was. In fact, it's probably at it's cleanest for 6 or 7 hundred years. There are now naturally occurring Brown Trout
in it's upper tributaries, and this means that Sea Trout must be running up it's entirety. And Sea Trout need the water to be of a much better quality than most fish. And they are  pretty selective over where they breed, (clean, deep gravel runs) also, if their offspring are staying in freshwater
(Sea Trout are exactly the same species as Brown Trout, Salmo Trutta Ferox) it means the habitat must be productive, able to support food species, and be clean enough to breed in.
Ok, I know the colour of the Thames is like coffee, but that's just sediment and mud from the bottom. There's hardly any sewage dumped into it now until the river is way past London, and even then, it's been treated. I'd swim in it myself if I lived nearer. And enjoyed inflicting serious discomfort on myself.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

As of now, the Thames is remarkably clean in comparison to what it was. In fact, it's probably at it's cleanest for 6 or 7 hundred years.

England roont.   

[Telarus]

The last 3 posts don't have a question mark.



AND I LOVE IT

[Dysfunctional Cunt]

The last 3 posts don't have a question mark.



AND I LOVE IT

Why are you hating on question marks? 

They are squiggly... with a dot.

[Jenne]

Why is everyone noncompliant all of a sudden in this fread?

Is it not good enough to just ask questions?  Even when answering?

[Don Coyote]

Face why numb?

[BadBeast]

As of now, the Thames is remarkably clean in comparison to what it was. In fact, it's probably at it's cleanest for 6 or 7 hundred years.

.

England roont.   

There are still plenty of rivers here that are little more than stagnant ditches, full of sewage, and toxic industrial waste. Not as big as the Thames, but numerous enough. The Stour, for instance as it flows out of Wolverhampton, or the Dee, between Chester and Birkenhead. The Tyne is still particularly filthy as it goes past South Shields, spilling it's foulness into the North Sea. So although Father Thames has cleaned his act up, there are still very many germy shit filled ditches that you wouldn't want to be sharing a water table with, believe me.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

As of now, the Thames is remarkably clean in comparison to what it was. In fact, it's probably at it's cleanest for 6 or 7 hundred years.

.

England roont.   

There are still plenty of rivers here that are little more than stagnant ditches, full of sewage, and toxic industrial waste. Not as big as the Thames, but numerous enough. The Stour, for instance as it flows out of Wolverhampton, or the Dee, between Chester and Birkenhead. The Tyne is still particularly filthy as it goes past South Shields, spilling it's foulness into the North Sea. So although Father Thames has cleaned his act up, there are still very many germy shit filled ditches that you wouldn't want to be sharing a water table with, believe me.

The Fleet is still underground and rank, right?

[BadBeast]

As of now, the Thames is remarkably clean in comparison to what it was. In fact, it's probably at it's cleanest for 6 or 7 hundred years.

.

England roont.   

There are still plenty of rivers here that are little more than stagnant ditches, full of sewage, and toxic industrial waste. Not as big as the Thames, but numerous enough. The Stour, for instance as it flows out of Wolverhampton, or the Dee, between Chester and Birkenhead. The Tyne is still particularly filthy as it goes past South Shields, spilling it's foulness into the North Sea. So although Father Thames has cleaned his act up, there are still very many germy shit filled ditches that you wouldn't want to be sharing a water table with, believe me.

The Fleet is still underground and rank, right?

Absolutely! You don't want that fucker seeing the light of day. It still squits out under Blackfriars bridge, and even if the Thames is at high tide, and in spate, it's several shades more black gutshite in colour than the Thames. Or do you mean the Feet, behind Chesil Bank on the south coast? Stinks like fuck at low tide, but it's just mud, (and old bouncing bombs) with the occasional dead Angler bobbing around.

[The Commander]

Are the rivers in England cleaner than the rivers in Ohio?

[BadBeast]

Are the rivers in England cleaner than the rivers in Ohio?

Despite never having never been to Ohio, nor even sure if I could find it on a map, by using the same, progressive information gathering techniques employed by the Worlds major News Agencies, (making it up off the top of my head) I can say with every confidence that yes, the English rivers are indeed cleaner than the ones in Ohio. Although without having to rely on foundless speculation , I am unable to furnish any further details. 

[The Commander]

Are the rivers in England cleaner than the rivers in Ohio?

Despite never having never been to Ohio, nor even sure if I could find it on a map, by using the same, progressive information gathering techniques employed by the Worlds major News Agencies, (making it up off the top of my head) I can say with every confidence that yes, the English rivers are indeed cleaner than the ones in Ohio. Although without having to rely on foundless speculation , I am unable to furnish any further details. 

Maybe I am thinking of New York...I just remember there being stories about rivers up in the northeast that were catching on fire due to all the pollution.

What city am I thinking of? (trying to get thread back on track)

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Are the rivers in England cleaner than the rivers in Ohio?

Despite never having never been to Ohio, nor even sure if I could find it on a map, by using the same, progressive information gathering techniques employed by the Worlds major News Agencies, (making it up off the top of my head) I can say with every confidence that yes, the English rivers are indeed cleaner than the ones in Ohio. Although without having to rely on foundless speculation , I am unable to furnish any further details. 

Maybe I am thinking of New York...I just remember there being stories about rivers up in the northeast that were catching on fire due to all the pollution.

What city am I thinking of? (trying to get thread back on track)

Results of a very difficult process.