Messages

Brothers and sisters of the holy suds. We have chosen to speak through this tenuous channel (as you experience this distortion) in order to pass on to you our most sincere apologies. We are indeed indebted to you and remain dedicated evolutionary entities in service to you and your fight against grime. We are very sorry soap.   V.S.S  C∴C∴

Please forgive the previous reply, it was made host paste and inherently not what I intended to ask. You must understand, I am an immaculate confusion and apt to forget what I thought. Perhaps you might direct me to a thread of interest, to help navigate me as such, toward interesting and useful catalyst.

I'm not sure. I would have to verify the both.  Tears for fears said "Welcome to your life, there's no turning back" however I am of the opinion if I were to believe I thought such a thing yesterday, and today, finding such a belief uncomfortable or incorrect, I might simply deny the idea I had ever thought it. Is there danger in denial, or would the overbearing new belief confound the initial one such as it had never occurred in the first place? For example, I have experiential confounding which allows me to accept a particular idea or thing or embodiment of dynamic energies (happenings) are as likely to be other than they appear as they are to be in accord with my apprehension of them. Don't I have the right to not believe what I think?

I am new here, and this is one of the first threads I have ingested. I must attest to some confusion, a state familiar and not unsettling to me. However clarification, if provided might serve to enlighten me. What is the difference between being a Discordian and being a member of the League of Dynamic Discord? Is it the tenet that Discordians are incined or influenced to stick apart? Thus making any group or agreement of ideas or beliefs in opposition to a Discordian Principle? Is there such thing as a discordian principle, or belief, or ideas on which members hold any agreement? Perhaps ideas on which you tend to agree are dynamic and chaotic, as seems appropriate to a chaotic and dynamic macrocosm. For example might a typical Discordian have a particular belief today, only to believe contrarily tomorrow? Since I have touched on the idea, do you ever find it appropriate to change what you believed yesterday, retroactively, as it were, or would this be considered simply imigination or denial?