481
Apple Talk / Re: Justin Bieber and Obama's evil spirits
« on: February 06, 2015, 12:01:53 pm »
I heard the lizard people can regrow appendages well into their thirties.
MysticWicks endorsement: "At least Satanists HAVE a worldview. After reading this thread, I'm convinced that discordians not only don't, but will actively mock anyone who does."
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I have laughed at things in the past and been told very straight-forwardly 'That's not funny.' Sometimes this reaction is constrained to just a strange look.
This confuses me every time. I think I just find the unexpected or different to be a lot more fun than some people and putting labels like 'bad' or 'good' on events seems like a waste of thought-power when laughing and waiting to see what will happen next is so interesting.
The point at which a topic becomes Serious Business is a mystery.
I can think of many exceptions to this. Laughing at EVERYTHING, or thinking that there is no such thing as "bad" or "good", makes you a sociopath.
Can I argue with that? Just a little?
First, I think you can believe in good and bad and still laugh at everything. You can be crying your heart out and still be laughing... you can be angry as fuck and still be laughing.
Second: calling 'good' and 'bad' arbitrary labels can be a sign of sociopathy... but I think it can also be a sign of the postconventional person. As Thaddeus Golas said:
"When your consciousness is open, any action you take in reference to evil has no more significance than digging a ditch to channel floodwaters from a house." - in The Lazy Man's Guide to Enlightenment
Which, don't get me wrong, is a fair bit of significance. In fact, it is all there is.
I'm going to posit that the myth of the BBC falls under that category as well.so, it's my understanding that this is, in fact, a myth. (based on research studies that i've heard about)
that gets me wondering why it is born out in porn, then. i mean there's some porn with white guys that have massive cocks, but not a ton. (big, to be sure, but not massive) there is, however, a bunch of BBC porn.
is this because the market doesn't want to see white guys that are extremely endowed? does it make white porn watchers feel lesser if it's another white guy so well hung, but if it's a black guy they can shrug it off because, "well, he's one of them"?
that's all i could figure.
This is fucked.