?????
I disagree.
WE ARE RETORT!
I see your point. Does this not constitute indecent exposure?
I nominate this thread be included in Lollercaust, minus this post of course.
Wow, lollercaust still isn't out?
Err, well, actually, I'm not entirely sure. I was just assuming.
It isn't out yet. But I would be amused to see the above witty and vibrant debate in Lollercaust.
Quote from: ten ton mantis on August 18, 2008, 01:03:41 AM
Wow, lollercaust still isn't out?
Yeah, I got roped into putting a book together...
I did make it into a poster but it needs more work.
I have a highly experimental pamphloster I'm still developing that's going to be fucking fantastic and will piss off a lot of people. But I decided that if the lollercaust material isn't lulzy enough, I'm going to have to start fabricating lulz at the expense of the content.
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
D.A.N., you are clearly UNHELLO.
LMNO
-WEEEOOO.
Quote from: D.A.N on August 20, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
That's odd. I think it's the best username in the history of usernames and that it is highly doubtful any username will ever get close to this level of epic win ever again in the future, DAN.
Quote from: Netaungrot on August 20, 2008, 09:36:26 PM
Quote from: D.A.N on August 20, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
That's odd. I think it's the best username in the history of usernames and that it is highly doubtful any username will ever get close to this level of epic win ever again in the future, DAN.
I agree with Net. I believe the general consensus among top Epicwinologists is that "Buddha's Ghost Penis" is the closest thing to absolute win (the maximum attainable amount of win) that has yet been achieved.
Quote from: Cainad on August 20, 2008, 10:14:29 PM
Quote from: Netaungrot on August 20, 2008, 09:36:26 PM
Quote from: D.A.N on August 20, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
That's odd. I think it's the best username in the history of usernames and that it is highly doubtful any username will ever get close to this level of epic win ever again in the future, DAN.
I agree with Net. I believe the general consensus among top Epicwinologists is that "Buddha's Ghost Penis" is the closest thing to absolute win (the maximum attainable amount of win) that has yet been achieved.
Plus, it's popular with the ladies.
Quote from: D.A.N on August 20, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
I do believe this constitutes stepping.
Quote from: Davedim on August 21, 2008, 12:25:02 PM
Quote from: D.A.N on August 20, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
I do believe this constitutes stepping.
Do never. This will go down in history as the worst mistake since he went to Supercuts.
What's d.a.n. stand for, anyway?
You?
Quote from: D.A.N on August 20, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
@Buddha's Ghost penis
(This has nothing to do with your topic)I just wanted to say I really hate your username
oh boy that wasn't a good idea. sometimes the the budda you meet on the road is pai mei
If this post was half as smart as it seems then it would seem twice as smart as it is.
Quote from: Cainad on August 20, 2008, 10:14:29 PMI agree with Net. I believe the general consensus among top Epicwinologists is that "Buddha's Ghost Penis" is the closest thing to absolute win (the maximum attainable amount of win) that has yet been achieved.
but ... i have a Psyonetiks pamphlet right here that says Psyonetiks is made of 100% pure mittens and win?
that,
and it's only 98% as expensive as Scientology!
whereas, Buddha's Ghost Penis, i simply
know i cannot afford.
Quote from: triple zero on August 29, 2008, 12:19:40 PM
Quote from: Cainad on August 20, 2008, 10:14:29 PMI agree with Net. I believe the general consensus among top Epicwinologists is that "Buddha's Ghost Penis" is the closest thing to absolute win (the maximum attainable amount of win) that has yet been achieved.
but ... i have a Psyonetiks pamphlet right here that says Psyonetiks is made of 100% pure mittens and win?
that, and it's only 98% as expensive as Scientology!
whereas, Buddha's Ghost Penis, i simply know i cannot afford.
Yuo got phooled by trick statistics.
Sure, you can say it's 100% mittens and win, but in what proportions? According my spectroROFLmeter, Psyonetiks is 60% mittens, 40% win. A hefty amount of win, but nowhere near absolute win.
Quote from: Cainad on August 29, 2008, 05:26:19 PM
Quote from: triple zero on August 29, 2008, 12:19:40 PM
Quote from: Cainad on August 20, 2008, 10:14:29 PMI agree with Net. I believe the general consensus among top Epicwinologists is that "Buddha's Ghost Penis" is the closest thing to absolute win (the maximum attainable amount of win) that has yet been achieved.
but ... i have a Psyonetiks pamphlet right here that says Psyonetiks is made of 100% pure mittens and win?
that, and it's only 98% as expensive as Scientology!
whereas, Buddha's Ghost Penis, i simply know i cannot afford.
Yuo got phooled by trick statistics.
Sure, you can say it's 100% mittens and win, but in what proportions? According my spectroROFLmeter, Psyonetiks is 60% mittens, 40% win. A hefty amount of win, but nowhere near absolute win.
Since the re-branding it's 100% PURE FUCKING WIN! now.
And 98% cheaper than Scientology.