I know everything on here is ridiculous anyway, but really?
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_obesity
tl;dr- Adopting atheism will turn you into a fat lesbian. Lesbianism was specifically pointed out for reasons beyond me.
Do we have anyone here actively editing Conservapedia?
There are levels of stupidity even too high for me to consider.
Conservapedia is one of them. I find them more dismal than lulzworthy. It's like watching mankind march back into the primordial ooze.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 03:32:58 AM
There are levels of stupidity even too high for me to consider.
Conservapedia is one of them. I find them more dismal than lulzworthy. It's like watching mankind march back into the primordial ooze.
I get a good laugh out of them every so often, but I usually just give an article a cursory glance. This was the first time I clicked around a bit.
I read the first paragraph and I don't even want to read such a heap of stupid right now. It's almost as bad as one of my posts. (ok, read it)
I'm not particularly religious, and I have to work my ass off, or take medications notorious for weight gain, to gain any weight (note: I'm not complaining)... Explain that, conservafuckers.
And WTF does Chuck Norris have to do with this shit? Freaking idiots. Plus, having spent some time watching Jaba the Hut clones ooze and slide out of their vehicles and roll towards church on many a sunday morning, I completely disbelieve this trash... On the other side, it's unbelievably funny just how dumb it is...
Quote from: Fujikoma on December 29, 2010, 03:59:37 AM
I read the first paragraph and I don't even want to read such a heap of stupid right now. It's almost as bad as one of my posts. (ok, read it)
I'm not particularly religious, and I have to work my ass off, or take medications notorious for weight gain, to gain any weight (note: I'm not complaining)... Explain that, conservafuckers.
And WTF does Chuck Norris have to do with this shit? Freaking idiots. Plus, having spent some time watching Jaba the Hut clones ooze and slide out of their vehicles and roll towards church on many a sunday morning, I completely disbelieve this trash... On the other side, it's unbelievably funny just how dumb it is...
Precisely. I was under the assumption that Christianity turns you into a fat teabagger.
Maybe its just the sample ive been exposed to, but lesbians do seem to be on the heavier spectrum.
Quote from: Fujikoma on December 29, 2010, 03:59:37 AM
I read the first paragraph and I don't even want to read such a heap of stupid right now. It's almost as bad as one of my posts. (ok, read it)
I'm not particularly religious, and I have to work my ass off, or take medications notorious for weight gain, to gain any weight (note: I'm not complaining)... Explain that, conservafuckers.
And WTF does Chuck Norris have to do with this shit? Freaking idiots. Plus, having spent some time watching Jaba the Hut clones ooze and slide out of their vehicles and roll towards church on many a sunday morning, I completely disbelieve this trash... On the other side, it's unbelievably funny just how dumb it is...
:weary:
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on December 29, 2010, 04:03:00 AM
Maybe its just the sample ive been exposed to, but lesbians do seem to be on the heavier spectrum.
:crankey:
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on December 29, 2010, 04:03:00 AM
Maybe its just the sample ive been exposed to, but lesbians do seem to be on the heavier spectrum.
Most of the ones I know tend to be rather skinny. It probably has to do with geographic location. Either way, it's totally irrelevant to atheism.
Quote from: Joh'Nyx on December 29, 2010, 04:03:00 AM
Maybe its just the sample ive been exposed to, but lesbians do seem to be on the heavier spectrum.
They have to average out with kd lang.
That website is satire right?
Cause that was the funniest piece of shit I've read all week.
Quote from: Sir Squid Diddimus on December 29, 2010, 04:16:24 AM
That website is satire right?
Cause that was the funniest piece of shit I've read all week.
Nope. It's for reals.
People really think like that.
Here in The Church, we call them "liars for Jesus".
:lulz: No they don't quit pullin my leg
Naturally, there's gotta be at least one person throwing crap in there for parody, but it gets lost under the rest of it. They don't even try to hide their bias.
Quote from: Sir Squid Diddimus on December 29, 2010, 04:18:59 AM
:lulz: No they don't quit pullin my leg
No, for real. It's like a whole battalion of Sarah Palins. No shit. Go look around.
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 29, 2010, 04:19:50 AM
Naturally, there's gotta be at least one person throwing crap in there for parody, but it gets lost under the rest of it. They don't even try to hide their bias.
Um, if you read their front page, they BRAG about their bias.
They exist to counterbalance the liberal bias of facts.
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 29, 2010, 04:19:50 AM
Naturally, there's gotta be at least one person throwing crap in there for parody, but it gets lost under the rest of it. They don't even try to hide their bias.
Bias? What bias? It seemed completely evenhanded to me.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 04:20:27 AM
Quote from: Sir Squid Diddimus on December 29, 2010, 04:18:59 AM
:lulz: No they don't quit pullin my leg
No, for real. It's like a whole battalion of Sarah Palins. No shit. Go look around.
This made me frown for real. :sad:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_obesity#YouTube_atheism_and_obesity
This website is so surreal.
Also,
http://www.conservapedia.com/Discordianism
I am highly disappointed at how objective and non-biased this article is.
Quote from: Sir Squid Diddimus on December 29, 2010, 04:25:35 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 04:20:27 AM
Quote from: Sir Squid Diddimus on December 29, 2010, 04:18:59 AM
:lulz: No they don't quit pullin my leg
No, for real. It's like a whole battalion of Sarah Palins. No shit. Go look around.
This made me frown for real. :sad:
Like I said, watching mankind crash back into the ooze would amuse me, but watching them deliberately march back in is depressing.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 04:21:00 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 29, 2010, 04:19:50 AM
Naturally, there's gotta be at least one person throwing crap in there for parody, but it gets lost under the rest of it. They don't even try to hide their bias.
Um, if you read their front page, they BRAG about their bias.
They exist to counterbalance the liberal bias of facts.
Can't find it. I just see a big steaming pile of poo.
Mother of God,
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project
Its a project to remove liberal bias from the BIBLE.
Quote from: Lord Glittersnatch on December 29, 2010, 04:26:24 AM
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_obesity#YouTube_atheism_and_obesity
This website is so surreal.
Also,
http://www.conservapedia.com/Discordianism
I am highly disappointed at how objective and non-biased this article is.
Just went to the author's page (Kristen something or other), in a hopeful state of mind.
I was crushingly disappointed.
It's endless quotes from RAW, Hill, etc, amongst which is "When dogma enters the brain, all intellectual activity ceases" -- Robert Anton Wilson...
...Sans irony.
Quote from: Lord Glittersnatch on December 29, 2010, 04:28:50 AM
Mother of God,
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project
Its a project to remove liberal bias from the BIBLE.
Yeah, that's been around a while. Ain't it cool? :lulz:
Apparently, "Thou shalt not take the Lord's name in vain" is just a little too much for them to grasp.
Glittersnatch, I'm surprised you haven't come across this site before.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 04:21:00 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 29, 2010, 04:19:50 AM
Naturally, there's gotta be at least one person throwing crap in there for parody, but it gets lost under the rest of it. They don't even try to hide their bias.
Um, if you read their front page, they BRAG about their bias.
They exist to counterbalance the liberal bias of facts.
Ye Gods. You've got to realize that Conservipedia has been consistently and successfully trolled by nearly the entire user base of Uncyclopedia, and they've gotten really really good at slipping stuff just under the right-wing-nut radar.
Read: http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Conservipedia
And then go read those articles that confused you. Then 'Hail Eris' for the gift of divine confusion.
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 29, 2010, 04:33:32 AM
Glittersnatch, I'm surprised you haven't come across this site before.
I have actually, I just never witnessed this sort of madness before.
THE BIBLE IS NOT CONSERVATIVE ENOUGH FOR THEM.
Quote from: Lord Glittersnatch on December 29, 2010, 05:11:48 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 29, 2010, 04:33:32 AM
Glittersnatch, I'm surprised you haven't come across this site before.
I have actually, I just never witnessed this sort of madness before.
THE BIBLE IS NOT CONSERVATIVE ENOUGH FOR THEM.
:lulz: It is a pretty funny concept.
More lulz: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Conservapedia
Quote from: Telarus on December 29, 2010, 05:21:08 AM
More lulz: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Conservapedia
Every time I go to encyclopediadramatica they have more and more ads.
Within a years time I expect the entire page to be consumed by them.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 04:29:07 AM
Quote from: Lord Glittersnatch on December 29, 2010, 04:26:24 AM
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_obesity#YouTube_atheism_and_obesity
This website is so surreal.
Also,
http://www.conservapedia.com/Discordianism
I am highly disappointed at how objective and non-biased this article is.
Just went to the author's page (Kristen something or other), in a hopeful state of mind.
I was crushingly disappointed.
It's endless quotes from RAW, Hill, etc, amongst which is "When dogma enters the brain, all intellectual activity ceases" -- Robert Anton Wilson...
...Sans irony.
that website looks like it was written in the late 90's. I haven't seen one like that in years.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 29, 2010, 04:17:56 AM
Quote from: Sir Squid Diddimus on December 29, 2010, 04:16:24 AM
That website is satire right?
Cause that was the funniest piece of shit I've read all week.
Nope. It's for reals.
People really think like that.
Here in The Church, we call them "liars for Jesus".
Some people think this is Andrew Schafly rebelling against his mother by being a covert troll.
There is no actual evidence for this, mind, but it's an amusing idea nontheless, like the idea Ann Coulter may in fact just be a liberal woman trolling everyone to make conservatives look bad.