Bump for revamping and use elsewhere.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Faust on December 27, 2024, 05:24:35 PMThat's a good point they can do a whole pile of awful in a very short space of time and then blame the civilian advisor who was out of his depth.
I didn't think about that but they can pile that high
Quote from: Bruno on December 27, 2024, 05:37:49 AMI, for one, would like too see the maximum positive outcome from this event.
I don't see the need for any further loss of life from either the bourgeoisie (including the petit bourgeoisie (who was the recipient of this latest action)) or the proletariat (that's YUO!)
Quote from: Faust on December 27, 2024, 04:06:29 PMThey got what they needed out of him, 100mil for the war chest, they have used him and will now discard him.
Quote from: Pergamos on December 25, 2024, 05:21:24 PMQuote from: Brother Mythos on December 21, 2024, 11:21:58 PMI admit it, I love making fun of Steve Bannon. Still, there are times when I unexpectedly find myself in agreement with a political enemy on a particular issue, even though we're both seeking totally different "big picture" end results. And, what Bannon had to say in the following article is one of those times:
"'We have to increase taxes on the wealthy': Steve Bannon"
I gave up trying to find a couple of succinct quotations that clearly summarize the contents of this article. Nevertheless, Bannon does clearly explain why he advocates taxing the rich. Further, Bannon's calculated appeal to populism is something the Democratic Party, leftists, etc. need to study and emulate.
I think if Trump followed this playbook, increased corporate taxes and taxes on the wealthy, along with actual middle class tax cuts, whether that's the over time and tip ones Bannon is talking about, or simply reducing income tax on the lower tax tiers, that he'd be setting up the kind of long term thing Bannon also talks about. Even if the middle class ended up paying more in taxes, because of tariffs.
However I can't imagine that's what's actually going to happen. The tax plan that I am hearing about includes more cuts for the wealthy and from what I hear the overtime tax cut consists of removing mandatory overtime pay. Those actions will alienate the folks who supported him and probably lead to Democrats taking Congress in the midterms.
Quote from: Faust on December 23, 2024, 07:50:19 PMQuote from: Doktor Howl on December 23, 2024, 07:39:44 PMThe Resistance™ is already a neutered, safe, shrink-wrapped Conspiracy™ product. The Church of Discordia doesn't exist. The Subgeniuses are too old to care, and Lemmy is dead.
Yeah at the moment the "resistance" and discordia are looking less and less like a savior,
Hell the church of the shrike is looking more like it has some kind of well being for us
Quote from: Pergamos on December 20, 2024, 05:34:14 PMQuote from: Brother Mythos on June 20, 2024, 11:54:31 PMI have never fired a rifle equipped with a bump stock. But, it is my understanding that bump stocks severely reduce the accuracy of such a rifle. So, that make a rifle equipped with a bump stock unsuitable for target shooting. In any case, automatic, and even semi-automatic rifles can not be legally used for hunting game in, at least, my state. (There used to be an exception allowing handicapped hunters to use semi-automatic rifles, and that exception may still exist.)
So, what is a rifle equipped with a bump stock actually good for? Well, as has already been well proven, it's a great choice for an indiscriminate mass shooter.
"Republicans block bill to outlaw bump stocks for rifles after Supreme Court lifts Trump-era ban"
As per this article:
"WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans blocked bipartisan legislation Tuesday that would have outlawed bump stocks after the Supreme Court struck down a ban on the rapid-fire gun accessory used in the deadliest shooting in modern U.S. history.
Democrats tried to force a voice vote on the bill to ban bump stocks, a tactic often used by both parties when they know that they don't have the votes to pass legislation but want to bring an issue to the Senate floor. The bill, sponsored by Sens. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, would ban the sale of the devices, similar to the rule issued by President Donald Trump's administration after a gunman in Las Vegas attacked a country music festival in 2017 with semiautomatic rifles equipped with the accessories."
And, as per further along in this article:
"Nebraska Sen. Pete Ricketts objected for Republicans, blocking an immediate vote on the bill. He called the legislation a "gun grabbing overreach" that could be interpreted to include other gun accessories beyond bump stocks."
Here's this link: Republicult™ Blocks Bill Outlawing Bump Stocks
As surviving a mass shooting, as well as initiating one, is becoming something a 'rite of passage' in the US of A, the Republicult™ is certainly doing its part to make sure it actually becomes another 'Merican tradition.
someone facing a lynch mob is also an "indiscriminate mass shooter" That particular situation gets ignored by Dems and GOP both, but an automatic weapon is extremely nice to have if you are facing a mob.