Messages

Lev{atation}? 9:27 8/22 2011

That was in response to your link, although if time slows down as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't that make light timeless?

3:21 B lemme get back 2this Later /-/Ub' 8/22 Monday

Re: MATLAB ? 2010 ? 2011 ?  (Read 1083 times)
Reply #62 on: Today at 03:21:08 AM
Quote from: rong on Yesterday at 03:24:22 PM
That was in response to your link, although if time slows down as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't that make light timeless?

3:21 B lemme get back 2this Later /-/Ub' 8/22 Mon
things seen & things UNscene ?  Religion?
once upon a time i was in the Navy & I Levatede at that
TIME, i'LL try to find a link to the event and include A LiNk Later
In Navy? i Levated in a gravity wave pod? in a Gravity wave
pod time dialiats (events slow) Light entering the EYE has longer to
form an image on the retna and so object become very detailed & sharp
the problem arose upon the LEAVING the POD. the time
DiLaTion was reversed & thUS a moment of time compression took place
Velocity (of rate times TIME = Distance) increased into eXponentials

new color to be added later. the ResuLt was extream forces were encountered
opun landing & solid steal welds neay broken (ouch} My point is this
I do NOT believe in the ScientisT'$ belief in the HoLLyNess of the
:"SECOND": WHether they use cgs or MKS . to me ever S is different

in the same way as ever Month is etc. I use Milli Second as My Std
Unit to avoid aLL ScientISt$ and do NOT USe S in its normaL role.
Back to the Question. is light Timeless? My guess is some R & some
R not it depends of from whence they come & where they  aRe headed

i did try to look at a spectrum off of a CD | it sure was Bright?
much brigter than i was expecting. and rather smaLL ----- & I saw
no absorbtion LiNe it Looked continIOUs to me ( i guess because of
dimemention? i donno, My eQUipment does NOT resolve the Lines

The QUestions aRe beyound my ability to grasp (I have no POD
generater to place Light in, to slow it & comprehend its duRation?
whether it has been streached & painted BLUE or compressed & painted
RED { that is probably backwards ) Blue(compressed) Red(streched)

4:56AM pdT for post at 4B? 3 min late

If time were to stop, how long would it stop for?

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html {source

you're trying to compare the spectrum of light that has been reflected, and therefore has travelled farther and is therefore older to light directly from the source to see if it has changed?

how can you be certain the change spectrum is due to change in the source and not due to the nature of the "mirror?"

might be better to put 2 collectors roughly in line at different distances from the source.

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/102715-Lunar-Distance?p=1912527#post1912527
HYPERLINKED version of the above line
9:20B? 8/21 BROWN actually i AM not sure exactly what i AM
TRYING TO DO?  yes measure direct vs reflected! however 1st the SC must
be discovered? it seams reasonable to me that one or more may in fact
exist. its just a matter of fine tuning over a long time frame to calibrate out
the parameters involved in such an  approach to the questions. WHO wiLL it
be? NasTa? i rather doubt this aLso. Most likely some AMature wiLL find 1.

20110820 PM May as weLL troLL on about
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html
My guess is that sCALE ?"COMPRESSION"? eXists 1(RED) nm not = 1(blue)
red being more tightly packed BLUE end spread  (some form of Log}?
-
Further my guess is the cottam_image was obtained using ?"PRism"?
Further that Prism & defraction do NOT calibrate to the same LOG
= =
thUS the Question arises do glass & Quartz use the same LOG scale ?plastic
: : :
OK never mind its AAstronomy (RIGHT}?  andI for one doubT aLL of it,
beginning with THE HubbLe (1 l}? 4me there is no reason to 'poise
Big is getting Bigger & not to Theroize SmaLL is geting Smaller
? ? ? ?
My guess about RED SHIFT {if eXists) as atom shrinks (over Time}
that as time passes the emission lines change too.-. So U C ive
my way of looking at it. It is deffinatly NOT their way. OK? what
was the point anyway. 4me it makes no sence whatsoever that .-T.
/TilT\
galaxies biLLions of years ago Look exactly the same as the ones
seen today. are asTronomers simply looking at a house of mirrows
a calidoscope of the same object being reflected over multipuLL
pathways. talk abouT aTmospheric alterations How about Big 1'$
~bt~
aLLright: I'Z attempting to find something i call "SC"
Solor Chronology ( a time variable ?absorbtion? Line ) to use
as a clock. such that it (SC) could be used to measure distance
(light distance) to the Moon Venus Mars Jupiter etc etc
.BB.
of couse i do not know if SC can be found (my guess is yes it can
{and easiLy once some one tries to find 'Er | the Big gimmy is
would SC be retained in the reflected light from Venus? etc
Venus seams to be the most likeLy object for wE beginners of This?

`

Actually, after a quick analysis using those sodium lines and the E line (not much data I know, but I just wanted a quick check), leads me to believe that it may be linear.

ABOVE R My attempts to fathom the $cale / i do not think it
LiNEar however mY 1st approach WAS: sorry to be Miss Leading
again any help UNderstanding ANY of this taiL appriciate GrEAT.Ly

5:15 AM Friday 8/19 movie? TIME TO START OVER read down  {DUNE /skiped it
8/20 E. Ha Br 3:33 rock video byoR 09:39:29 AM MIT A mus
|| http://webcast.berkeley.edu/playlist#c,d,Chemistry,8281161AAFAE4A57
|| http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=438294754
8/21 the trip east to the Ha Br went weLL it was Hot/Sultry
the river Gage as 5-6' but the scale was muddy & unreadable boats few birds
8/25 EasiLy distracted AC
8/28 green chair broken intwo
9/2 xp rebootED trying to REMember logIn's.
9/3 thinkN 'bout the KirK video { ? U To B 16St.Sq 8:30Mn
9/4.7AM 211D CROW on roof Ladder 6:11PM Bird at bird plant

9:39 B ?
the problem being
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html
-
if i were to Write Dr.
and ask about the ORange lines
SHE {without doubt) would contact athorities {{ etc etc ))
thus: for me to get from NasTa {{{ for eXample }}} the Time sequence
= ==
10:24 of Lunar distance? (Comprenda'? :// Click X 4 LiNk2
:: :
1 find SolorChronology { like dendrachronology {{ only from Solar Spectral Lines
2 find out if SC exists in solar light reflected from the moon { OR if its Lost
3 compute the difference in time direct Sun to Earth & Sun - Moon - Earth =
? ? ? ?
My guess is that (SC) eXists, probably not in the visual spectrum
it wiLL probably have To wait for the radio Ometers to tune in the Solar Spectrum
and then find the Variable to be USed ? an obsorbtion in the nano meter part ?
TBC? 11:11amB current guess  = SC location @ `sORbtion at 2.4gHz, 41-44 nm

My sinceer Opollogy for being Miss Leading see bottom LiNE

The connection has timed out ? ay at 07:15:40 AM
PRoblem with R thUS moving along to 20110817 8:11:11.111 pd T
BOTTOM UP ^

Is that a transit diagram of intensity?

No? this is a (Click_X) StiLL as far as I know (1T)

OK: what is it?
Listen WHAT i'LL try to find is the Variable
the change in the intensity (OR position) of the 2? (Comprenda'?

ay at 08:10:05 AM
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html (Origional)


The connection has timed out ? ay at 07:15:40 AM
PRoblem with R thUS moving along to 20110817 8:11:11.111 pd T
BOTTOM UP ^

http://www.meetup.com/The-Ark-of-Presence-Portlandia-Meetup-Group/events/29222621/

P/P U R L ized

http://www.meetup.com/portland-r-user-group/messages/boards/thread/14759261/#51352041

R U R L ized

Only Ocasionally { there are rounds when ROUNDs simply do NOT work.

Are quakes really this predictable?  

LimeGreen 2011 8/13   read top down
CLICK color=QUAKE [X]=File$ Not Found   [X]= 7/25 7/31 8/1 8/11 8/??
read
0094 8/17 35.961°N, 139.703°E Depth   81.6 km (50.7 miles)
0095 8/17 36.206°N, 140.039°E Dept89.3 km (55.5 miles)
0097 8/18  .-. 37.667°N, 141.747°E Depth 39.1 km (24.3 miles) 10B/19?5U
= = = = I DO doubt ThaT ^ .-.'
0098 8/19 6.3 37.673°N, 141.716°E Depth 43.6 km (27.1 miles) 8/20 10 pd 9B
0101 8/20 4.8 38.629°N, 141.835°E Depth 35.4 km (22.0 miles) 1:01B
0102 8/20U 5 38.695°N, 141.818°E Depth   52.2 km (32.4 miles)2:10,15&51B/21
0104 8/21U 4.5 36.845°N, 140.388°E Depth   54.2 km (33.7 miles)2:50B8/22 & 4:04
0109 8/25 side note 8:56B KC NW
0118 8/27 4.9 37.072°N, 141.095°E Depth   56.1 km (34.9 miles)
^ this one probably will be REMoved as its maybe not in the F line {donno thou
0123 8/31 4.7 38.472°N, 141.790°E Depth   54.5 km (33.9 miles)
^ THIS ONE OS PROBABLY STRETCHING THIS 1 4 1 LINE A BIT FAR North?
9/3 4.7 35.780°N, 139.389°E Depth   95.2 km (59.2 miles)
^ that 1 is in the HoMe park Thus i do doubt the #'$ e$pCIAllY the km v miles D

FIVE 9/1 #5 9/1 4am, 2 5.5
FOUR should be enough for my Mth LeveL see U at 16th
#4 {deleted 9/1 20110813 2
#3 8/13 6:52 20110813 1
post2 20110420 April & index
post1 10/10/10 Starting points for R? P/P8

Rin_13161701 Photos

IT DOES NOW (11-12AM pdT) ThaT for now at least R '$ is Inop
thus the Salmon St bench {shadey side of street) at 16th wiLL be Space/Place
a mail box will be ATTached behind the Bench for R messAGEas /-/U? 10:36B
20111001 UNable to log in PW REQUEST:
20110815 IT LOOKS TO ME AS THOUGH IV FOUND A SITE TO DO MAth Maybe /-/

FULL12-27NEW Moon

Thu Sep 22/06:17 AM 4 60 10 above SW 39 above E best ever

Fri Aug 26/09:26 PM 2 45 27 above NW    31 above ENE {:26-28
Wed Aug 31/09:24 PM 3 20 14 above W    17 above SSW seen \ Not recorded

?18?_the sight time has moved from AM to PM (xpect delay
page begins with NEWS of the loss of the supplys' rocket ? ^ read bottom UP ^

8/2 top down v




8/5 10:40pdT 2nd reboot searching 4 disruptions
8/9 MARKET? SIEX move -./