Supporters of one of the most absurd teabaggers, Rand Paul, turned violent last night. (http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/male-rand-paul-supporter-stomps-head-of-female-moveon-member-outside-debate.php?ref=fpa). After throwing a woman to the ground, several men began to physically kick her.
(http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2010/10/randpaulviolence102510-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg)
WE HAS NAZIS!
Here's the brave lads who dealt with that fiendish 90 pound woman:
(http://www.balloon-juice.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/randpaulattackerdonttreadonme-981x1024-287x300.jpg)
She obviously has the wrong values.
Rand Paul has described the incident as "a little excitement".
Boys will be boys, and all.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/paul-stops-short-of-condemning-attack-on-moveon-protester.php
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 12:27:05 AM
Here's the brave lads who dealt with that fiendish 90 pound woman:
(http://www.balloon-juice.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/randpaulattackerdonttreadonme-981x1024-287x300.jpg)
Richter, what the hell have you been up to?
Oh, fucking HELL. :x I can't believe Paul didn't at least try to distance himself from this... FUCK.
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on October 27, 2010, 12:52:18 AM
Oh, fucking HELL. :x I can't believe Paul didn't at least try to distance himself from this... FUCK.
Rand Paul has always been a bit of a Nazi. He hates Jews and brown people, has his thugs kick the shit out of anyone who disagrees with him, the whole works.
The sad thing is is that you called someone a Nazi and backed it up with specific Nazi examples. :x
Quote from: Doktor Blight on October 27, 2010, 01:05:53 AM
The sad thing is is that you called someone a Nazi and backed it up with specific Nazi examples. :x
I'm not sure I understand why you're calling that sad.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 01:31:55 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on October 27, 2010, 01:05:53 AM
The sad thing is is that you called someone a Nazi and backed it up with specific Nazi examples. :x
I'm not sure I understand why you're calling that sad.
It's real easy to throw around the other N word... the fact that someone has to use it accurately and back up the usage is sad.
(http://i476.photobucket.com/albums/rr126/TGRR/teabaggers1-1.jpg)
You know, I recall several years ago saying that, as bad as things were in the USA, at least it wasn't a direct re-run of the end of the Roman Republic yet, because politicians didn't have personal armies throwing their weight around and picking fights on the campaign trail.
:x
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 03:54:26 AM
You know, I recall several years ago saying that, as bad as things were in the USA, at least it wasn't a direct re-run of the end of the Roman Republic yet, because politicians didn't have personal armies throwing their weight around and picking fights on the campaign trail.
:x
We don't fuck around, Cain. What took the Romans 50 years to descend to, we can slide under in less than 10.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/26/AR2010102600992.html
Turns out the guy doing the stomping wasn't just
any Rand supporter, he was his Bourbon County coordinator.
But he's apologized (http://feeds.wonkette.com/click.phdo?i=da3dd760a0fb9f3c7bda80cb762b3acc), so it's all OK!
QuoteThat guy who smashed some MoveOn lady's head with his foot is "sorry that it came to that" and says he apologizes "if it appeared overly forceful." Oh yes, it may have appeared that way, but this is actually the way Kentucky gentlemen greet members of the opposite sex. It's a cultural thing you don't understand, but this man was forced to get that girl on the ground and stomp on her, out of custom and out of his undying love for America's most important uncertified ophthalmologist. "I was concerned about Rand's safety," Tim Profitt said. Awwww! Nobody puts Rand in a corner! How sweet! Also, it turns out this guy is actually Rand's "Bourbon County coordinator" and now "is currently being served with a criminal summons ordering him to appear before a Fayette County District Court Judge." So the two of them can chuckle about this over mint juleps.
Edit: the supreme irony of a man wearing a "don't tread on me" badge giving a stomping to a woman has only just occured to me, incidentally.
That wasn't an apology.
Expect to see a lot more of this
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/27/us/politics/27fraud.html?_r=1&ref=politics
QuoteTea Party members have started challenging voter registration applications and have announced plans to question individual voters at the polls whom they suspect of being ineligible.
In response, liberal groups and voting rights advocates are sounding an alarm, claiming that such strategies are scare tactics intended to suppress minority and poor voters.
In St. Paul, organizers from the Tea Party and related groups announced this week that they were offering a $500 reward for anyone who turned in someone who was successfully prosecuted for voter fraud.
The group is also organizing volunteer "surveillance squads" to photograph and videotape what it suspects are irregularities, and in some cases to follow buses that take voters to the polls.
In Milwaukee last week, several community groups protested the posting of large billboards throughout the city that show pictures of people behind jail bars under the words "We Voted Illegally." The protesters said the posters — it was not clear who paid for them — were intended to intimidate people from voting.
In Houston, a Tea Party group called the King Street Patriots recently accused a voter registration group, Houston Votes, of turning in voter registration applications with incorrect information.
Naturally, so-called "voter intimidation" was in fact not only Constitutionally protected, but sanctioned by Jefferson, Washington and Jesus, when they drew up the Constitution together.
Well, this is consistent with their message of "taking back their America". That is, to take it away from anyone who is poor or the wrong color.
Incidentally, a little birdie tells me that there was a thread on FreeRepublic comparing the MoveOn woman being stomped by Rand's budding Self-Reliant Ubermeschen to, get this, Squeaky Fromme.
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 03:00:22 PM
Incidentally, a little birdie tells me that there was a thread on FreeRepublic comparing the MoveOn woman being stomped by Rand's budding Self-Reliant Ubermeschen to, get this, Squeaky Fromme.
I saw that on CI. LOL.
Which has reminded me, I need to reg over there still.
Rand is still apparently leading the race, btw
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 03:34:30 PM
Which has reminded me, I need to reg over there still.
Rand is still apparently leading the race, btw
Of course. The people that like him aren't gonna care... and the people that care weren't gonna vote for him anyway.
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:47:25 PM
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
This, of course, excuses the whole thing?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:52:15 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:47:25 PM
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
This, of course, excuses the whole thing?
Nothing excuses that fuck from mashing his foot down on her. Or from those men tackling her.
She was going to be restrained, it just should have been done by the private security trained and paid to do that sort of thing.
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:54:03 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:52:15 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:47:25 PM
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
This, of course, excuses the whole thing?
Nothing excuses that fuck from mashing his foot down on her. Or from those men tackling her.
She was going to be restrained, it just should have been done by the private security trained and paid to do that sort of thing.
Okay, that's reasonable.
How do you feel about Rand Paul's statement on the subject?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:55:05 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:54:03 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:52:15 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:47:25 PM
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
This, of course, excuses the whole thing?
Nothing excuses that fuck from mashing his foot down on her. Or from those men tackling her.
She was going to be restrained, it just should have been done by the private security trained and paid to do that sort of thing.
Okay, that's reasonable.
How do you feel about Rand Paul's statement on the subject?
As limp as my dick thinking about carrot top naked (FUCK YOU RWHN!)
He should have immediately condemned their action and said that's not the sort of behavior he wants in his supporters.
His father would have come out and condemned it and the people that would do that sort of thing.
Interesting hypothetical would be how it would be being portrayed if it had been his security detail that ended up having to restrain her. There was going to be video of restraint, but likely without a stomping. We'll never know, but as a Senate candidate, I'm pretty sure he's been assigned a SS detail (not sure about that and have to look it up) and they're not known for their restraint when protecting politicians.
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 05:05:14 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:55:05 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:54:03 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:52:15 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:47:25 PM
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
This, of course, excuses the whole thing?
Nothing excuses that fuck from mashing his foot down on her. Or from those men tackling her.
She was going to be restrained, it just should have been done by the private security trained and paid to do that sort of thing.
Okay, that's reasonable.
How do you feel about Rand Paul's statement on the subject?
As limp as my dick thinking about carrot top naked (FUCK YOU RWHN!)
He should have immediately condemned their action and said that's not the sort of behavior he wants in his supporters.
His father would have come out and condemned it and the people that would do that sort of thing.
Interesting hypothetical would be how it would be being portrayed if it had been his security detail that ended up having to restrain her. There was going to be video of restraint, but likely without a stomping. We'll never know, but as a Senate candidate, I'm pretty sure he's been assigned a SS detail (not sure about that and have to look it up) and they're not known for their restraint when protecting politicians.
Two things:
1. The sins of the son are not the sins of the father. Ron Paul isn't responsible for what happened.
2. He does not have an SS detail. What he has is an Altamont-esque "detail" of thugs.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 05:11:55 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 05:05:14 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:55:05 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:54:03 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 27, 2010, 04:52:15 PM
Quote from: The Dancing Pickle on October 27, 2010, 04:47:25 PM
sooo, did she really expect to be able to get her picture taken with him, holding that sign??
really?
I'm figuring she would probably have been restrained by security if those shit necks hadn't done it first.
I get the feeling she was going for a publicity stunt. period. picture or no.
mission accomplished!
This, of course, excuses the whole thing?
Nothing excuses that fuck from mashing his foot down on her. Or from those men tackling her.
She was going to be restrained, it just should have been done by the private security trained and paid to do that sort of thing.
Okay, that's reasonable.
How do you feel about Rand Paul's statement on the subject?
As limp as my dick thinking about carrot top naked (FUCK YOU RWHN!)
He should have immediately condemned their action and said that's not the sort of behavior he wants in his supporters.
His father would have come out and condemned it and the people that would do that sort of thing.
Interesting hypothetical would be how it would be being portrayed if it had been his security detail that ended up having to restrain her. There was going to be video of restraint, but likely without a stomping. We'll never know, but as a Senate candidate, I'm pretty sure he's been assigned a SS detail (not sure about that and have to look it up) and they're not known for their restraint when protecting politicians.
Two things:
1. The sins of the son are not the sins of the father. Ron Paul isn't responsible for what happened.
2. He does not have an SS detail. What he has is an Altamont-esque "detail" of thugs.
1. didn't say they were.
2. yeah, I said I wasn't sure if it was SS. now I'm actually wondering what senate candidates do for security (other than Joe Miller, who apparently prefers to use active duty military)
ill do some research when I get off work, swamped today.
Woah, shit just got serious
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-wants-an-apology-from-woman-he-assaulted.php
I predict this will now erupt into Teabagger/MoveOn gang warfare, much like the Tupac/Biggie feud of the 90s.
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 06:08:11 PM
Woah, shit just got serious
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-wants-an-apology-from-woman-he-assaulted.php
I predict this will now erupt into Teabagger/MoveOn gang warfare, much like the Tupac/Biggie feud of the 90s.
Jesus, what a cheeky bastard.
At least they finally cited him.
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 06:08:11 PM
Woah, shit just got serious
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-wants-an-apology-from-woman-he-assaulted.php
I predict this will now erupt into Teabagger/MoveOn gang warfare, much like the Tupac/Biggie feud of the 90s.
Holy shit, that is the ultimate example of "she made me do it". Makes the hair on my neck stand up.
I love how the conservatives are now claiming the full video shows the girl behaving badly... I just watched it and saw nothing at all to support the allegations against her.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/conservatives-tout-new-video-of-stomping-video.php?ref=dcblt
Looks like she was behaving like the crowd and some guys moshed her. Pathetic.
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on October 27, 2010, 09:20:32 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 06:08:11 PM
Woah, shit just got serious
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-wants-an-apology-from-woman-he-assaulted.php
I predict this will now erupt into Teabagger/MoveOn gang warfare, much like the Tupac/Biggie feud of the 90s.
Holy shit, that is the ultimate example of "she made me do it". Makes the hair on my neck stand up.
"Kentucky"
"Teabaggers"
"21st Century America™"
Quote from: Ratatosk on October 27, 2010, 09:31:56 PM
I love how the conservatives are now claiming the full video shows the girl behaving badly... I just watched it and saw nothing at all to support the allegations against her.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/conservatives-tout-new-video-of-stomping-video.php?ref=dcblt
Looks like she was behaving like the crowd and some guys moshed her. Pathetic.
"The little lady was behaving badly... she just needed to be shown who was boss"
Quote from: The Lord and Lady Omnibus Fuck on October 27, 2010, 09:59:56 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on October 27, 2010, 09:31:56 PM
I love how the conservatives are now claiming the full video shows the girl behaving badly... I just watched it and saw nothing at all to support the allegations against her.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/conservatives-tout-new-video-of-stomping-video.php?ref=dcblt
Looks like she was behaving like the crowd and some guys moshed her. Pathetic.
"The little lady was behaving badly... she just needed to be shown who was boss"
"Females are only good for fucking and fucking up."
- Kentucky state motto.
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 06:08:11 PM
Woah, shit just got serious
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-wants-an-apology-from-woman-he-assaulted.php
I predict this will now erupt into Teabagger/MoveOn gang warfare, much like the Tupac/Biggie feud of the 90s.
QuoteProfitt also blamed the incident on his back pain.
:bacon:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ybenjamin/detail?entry_id=75637
One of the goons will probably wind up on the sex offender's list. :lulz:
Waiting for a better source.
If they had to go through the video frame by fram, there is a distinct possibility it was an accident, and he was just trying to get some leverage.
Not that that's any better, mind.
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on October 28, 2010, 04:12:42 AM
If they had to go through the video frame by fram, there is a distinct possibility it was an accident, and he was just trying to get some leverage.
Not that that's any better, mind.
It really doesn't look that way though. It would be slower if it was.
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on October 28, 2010, 04:12:42 AM
If they had to go through the video frame by fram, there is a distinct possibility it was an accident, and he was just trying to get some leverage.
Not that that's any better, mind.
Who cares? There is a greater than zero chance he'll spend the rest of his life on the pervert list.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 28, 2010, 04:31:25 AM
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on October 28, 2010, 04:12:42 AM
If they had to go through the video frame by fram, there is a distinct possibility it was an accident, and he was just trying to get some leverage.
Not that that's any better, mind.
Who cares? There is a greater than zero chance he'll spend the rest of his life on the pervert list.
Yes.
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 06:08:11 PM
Woah, shit just got serious
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-wants-an-apology-from-woman-he-assaulted.php
I predict this will now erupt into Teabagger/MoveOn gang warfare, much like the Tupac/Biggie feud of the 90s.
1)
that chick is crazy for being within 1000 feet of wherever/ whatever that was
2)
wtf?! those guys should be caned, tarred & hanged! who acts like that? that's like some weird gang rape alternate.
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 02:51:27 PM
Expect to see a lot more of this
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/27/us/politics/27fraud.html?_r=1&ref=politics
QuoteTea Party members have started challenging voter registration applications and have announced plans to question individual voters at the polls whom they suspect of being ineligible.
In response, liberal groups and voting rights advocates are sounding an alarm, claiming that such strategies are scare tactics intended to suppress minority and poor voters.
In St. Paul, organizers from the Tea Party and related groups announced this week that they were offering a $500 reward for anyone who turned in someone who was successfully prosecuted for voter fraud.
The group is also organizing volunteer "surveillance squads" to photograph and videotape what it suspects are irregularities, and in some cases to follow buses that take voters to the polls.
In Milwaukee last week, several community groups protested the posting of large billboards throughout the city that show pictures of people behind jail bars under the words "We Voted Illegally." The protesters said the posters — it was not clear who paid for them — were intended to intimidate people from voting.
In Houston, a Tea Party group called the King Street Patriots recently accused a voter registration group, Houston Votes, of turning in voter registration applications with incorrect information.
Naturally, so-called "voter intimidation" was in fact not only Constitutionally protected, but sanctioned by Jefferson, Washington and Jesus, when they drew up the Constitution together.
Fox News have jumped on the bandwagon, which suggests this is coming down from on-high. But remember, the Tea Party are a grassroots movement!
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/fox_news_sets_up_e-mail_for_voter_fraud_complaints.php
Quote from: Cain on October 28, 2010, 11:41:57 PM
Quote from: Cain on October 27, 2010, 02:51:27 PM
Expect to see a lot more of this
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/27/us/politics/27fraud.html?_r=1&ref=politics
QuoteTea Party members have started challenging voter registration applications and have announced plans to question individual voters at the polls whom they suspect of being ineligible.
In response, liberal groups and voting rights advocates are sounding an alarm, claiming that such strategies are scare tactics intended to suppress minority and poor voters.
In St. Paul, organizers from the Tea Party and related groups announced this week that they were offering a $500 reward for anyone who turned in someone who was successfully prosecuted for voter fraud.
The group is also organizing volunteer "surveillance squads" to photograph and videotape what it suspects are irregularities, and in some cases to follow buses that take voters to the polls.
In Milwaukee last week, several community groups protested the posting of large billboards throughout the city that show pictures of people behind jail bars under the words "We Voted Illegally." The protesters said the posters — it was not clear who paid for them — were intended to intimidate people from voting.
In Houston, a Tea Party group called the King Street Patriots recently accused a voter registration group, Houston Votes, of turning in voter registration applications with incorrect information.
Naturally, so-called "voter intimidation" was in fact not only Constitutionally protected, but sanctioned by Jefferson, Washington and Jesus, when they drew up the Constitution together.
Fox News have jumped on the bandwagon, which suggests this is coming down from on-high. But remember, the Tea Party are a grassroots movement!
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/fox_news_sets_up_e-mail_for_voter_fraud_complaints.php
I'm going to go out on a limb and predict record election day violence.
Colbert's take on the head-stomper: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/363503/october-27-2010/rand-paul-supporter-stomps-on-liberal-activist-s-head
:x :x :x I was talking to my stepdad about this and he supports the head stomper.
What does he support, exactly?
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on October 29, 2010, 01:15:09 AM
Colbert's take on the head-stomper: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/363503/october-27-2010/rand-paul-supporter-stomps-on-liberal-activist-s-head
DUDE MoveOn should wear "Don't Tread on Me" T-shirts at the next Rand Paul rally!
Quote from: Sigmatic on October 29, 2010, 10:37:20 PM
What does he support, exactly?
He essentially said that the lady had it coming.
Condolences.
Quote from: Hover Cat on October 29, 2010, 09:29:54 PM
:x :x :x I was talking to my stepdad about this and he supports the head stomper.
Show him some pictures:
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_uftmRIkAyHc/R1TZdrImtrI/AAAAAAAAAfQ/ozSUaUv_dQM/s1600-R/nazi_execution.jpg)
Does he think that Jew owes those Germans an apology?
Quote from: Doktor Howl on October 30, 2010, 03:32:34 AM
Quote from: Hover Cat on October 29, 2010, 09:29:54 PM
:x :x :x I was talking to my stepdad about this and he supports the head stomper.
Show him some pictures:
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_uftmRIkAyHc/R1TZdrImtrI/AAAAAAAAAfQ/ozSUaUv_dQM/s1600-R/nazi_execution.jpg)
Does he think that Jew owes those Germans an apology?
Unlike that 100 pound woman from MoveOn, that Jew isn't using brute force to muscle his way through a crowd so he can tackle somebody. She was obviously a menace.
(http://i476.photobucket.com/albums/rr126/TGRR/hahashowphp.jpg)