Zilch.
Or Kill Me.
Or Kill Me.
News: 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765 10946 17711 28657, motherfuckers.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuoteA child in the sixth grade in a Sunday School in New York City, with the encouragement of her teacher, wrote to Einstein in Princeton on 19 January I936 asking him whether scientists pray, and if so what they pray for. Einstein replied as follows on 24 January 1936:
I have tried to respond to your question as simply as I could. Here is my answer.
Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the actions of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a supernatural Being.
However, it must be admitted that our actual knowledge of these laws is only imperfect and fragmentary, so that, actually, the belief in the existence of basic all-embracing laws in Nature also rests on a sort of faith. All the same this faith has been largely justified so far by the success of scientific research.
But, on the other hand, every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe -- a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive.
It is worth mentioning that this letter was written a decade after the advent of Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy and the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics with its denial of strict determinism.
QuoteThe next excerpt is a letter written by Einstein in response to a 19-year-old Rutger's University student, who had written to Einstein of his despair at seeing no visible purpose to life and no help from religion.
In responding to this poignant cry for help, Einstein offered no easy solace, and this very fact must have heartened the student and lightened the lonely burden of his doubts. Here is Einstein's response. It was written in English and sent from Princeton on 3 December 1950, within days of receiving the letter:
I was impressed by the earnestness of your struggle to find a purpose for the life of the individual and of mankind as a whole. In my opinion there can be no reasonable answer if the question is put this way. If we speak of the purpose and goal of an action we mean simply the question: which kind of desire should we fulfill by the action or its consequences or which undesired consequences should be prevented? We can, of course, also speak in a clear way of the goal of an action from the standpoint of a community to which the individual belongs. In such cases the goal of the action has also to do at least indirectly with fulfillment of desires of the individuals which constitute a society.
If you ask for the purpose or goal of society as a whole or of an individual taken as a whole the question loses its meaning. This is, of course, even more so if you ask the purpose or meaning of nature in general. For in those cases it seems quite arbitrary if not unreasonable to assume somebody whose desires are connected with the happenings.
Nevertheless we all feel that it is indeed very reasonable and important to ask ourselves how we should try to conduct our lives. The answer is, in my opinion: satisfaction of the desires and needs of all, as far as this can be achieved, and achievement of harmony and beauty in the human relationships. This presupposes a good deal of conscious thought and of self-education. It is undeniable that the enlightened Greeks and the old Oriental sages had achieved a higher level in this all-important field than what is alive in our schools and universities.
QuoteAn ideology is a set of aims and ideas, especially in politics. An ideology can be thought of as a comprehensive vision, as a way of looking at things (compare Weltanschauung), as in common sense (see Ideology in everyday society below) and several philosophical tendencies (see Political ideologies), or a set of ideas proposed by the dominant class of a society to all members of this society. The main purpose behind an ideology is to offer change in society through a normative thought process. Ideologies are systems of abstract thought (as opposed to mere ideation) applied to public matters and thus make this concept central to politics. Implicitly every political tendency entails an ideology whether or not it is propounded as an explicit system of thought.
... Psychological research[5] increasingly suggests that ideologies reflect motivational processes, as opposed to the view that political convictions always reflect independent and unbiased thinking. Research in 2008[5] proposed that ideologies may function as prepackaged units of interpretation that spread because of basic human motives to understand the world, avoid existential threat, and maintain valued interpersonal relationships. The authors conclude that such motives may lead disproportionately to the adoption of system-justifying worldviews. Psychologists have generally found that personality traits, individual difference variables, needs, and ideological beliefs seem to have a common thread. For instance, a meta-analysis by Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, and Sulloway in 2003 analyzed 88 studies from 12 countries, with over 22,000 subjects, and found that death anxiety, intolerance of ambiguity, lack of openness to experience, uncertainty avoidance, need for cognitive closure, need for personal structure, and threat of loss of position or self-esteem all contribute to the degree of one's overall political conservatism.[6] The researchers suggest that these results show that political conservatives stress resistance to change and are motivated by needs that are aimed at reducing threat and uncertainty. According to Robert Altemeyer and other researchers, individuals that are politically conservative tend to rank high on Right-Wing Authoritarianism, as measured by Altemeyer's RWA scale.[7] Psychologist Felicia Pratto and her colleagues have found evidence to support the idea that a high Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) is strongly correlated with conservative political views.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology
Quote from: Antonymous on December 27, 2008, 09:11:15 PM
What? Morality is "programming." (though we shouldn't stretch that metaphor of the brain as a computer too thin)
Also note the difference between immorality and amorality.
Quote"Phaedrus had once called metaphysics "the high country of the mind" – an analogy to the "high country" of mountain climbing. It takes a lot of effort to get there & more effort when you arrive, but unless you can make the journey you are confined to one valley of thought all your life. This high country passage through the Metaphysics of Quality allowed entry to another valley of thought in which the facts of life get a much richer interpretation. The valley spreads out into a huge fertile plain of understanding.
In this plain of understanding static patterns of value are divided into 4 systems: inorganic patterns, biological patterns, social patterns & intellectual patterns. They are exhaustive. That's all there are. If you construct an encyclopedia of 4 topics – Inorganic, Biological, Social & Intellectual – nothing is left out. No "thing," that is. Only Dynamic Quality, which cannot be described in any encyclopedia, is absent.
But although the 4 systems are exhaustive they are not exclusive. They all operate at the same time & in ways that are almost independent of each other.
This classification of patterns is not very original, but the Metaphysics of Quality allows an assertion about them that is unusual. It says they are not continuous. They are discrete. They have little to do with one another. Although each higher level is built on a lower one it is not an extension of that lower level. Quite the contrary. The higher level can often be seen to be in opposition to the lower level, dominating it, controlling it where possible for its own purposes.
This observation is impossible in a substance-dominated metaphysics where everything has to be an extension of matter. But now atoms & molecules are just 1 of 4 levels of static patterns of quality & there is no intellectual requirement that any level dominate the other 3.
An excellent analogy to the independence of the levels, Phaedrus thought, is the relation of hardware to software in a computer. ...
Quote"Hello!"
"Hello"
"do you like my hat?"
"no I do not like your hat. Goodbye."
"Goodbye."
-Dr. Seuss
Quote"... Anyone who was anyone in the ancient mythological world had to do a tour of duty in the Underworld. Inanna is the Sumerian queen of heaven who tricked her father into giving her the Tablets of Destiny, which contained the arts of astrology & other systems of divine navigation. Out of compassion, she gave them to humanity. ("Take 2 tablets, & call me after the millennium.")
Some versions of her story say that, compelled by her own intrepid curiosity, she decided to descend from the sky to the Underworld. Other versions say that she was tricked by an invitation from Eriskegal, Queen of the Underworld. Either way, before leaving she tells her friends that if she does not return within 60 days, they should 1st mourn her, then come rescue her.
As Inanna descends, at each of the 7 gates of the Underworld she is stripped of 1 of her attributes: her crown, her jewelry, her robes, her pride, her self-esteem – everything but her sense of humor. Finally she stands naked before Eriskegal, who fixes her with a stone-cold stare. Under this frigid gaze, all life leaves Inanna's body & she is hung as a corpse in the land of the dead.
60 days pass. In the above-world, all of creation goes into mourning except for Inanna's consort, Dumozi, the god of vegetation, who really whoops it up. Her concerned friends & father descend & negotiate a hostage release with Ersikegal. They finally broker a deal in which Inanna can return to the upper world as long as she sends down a replacement. Inanna says, "Hhhhmmm . . . I wonder who that will be? How about my charming husband who didn't shed a tear for me?"
Dumuzi the vegetative god had become a vegetable, a party vegetable, a veritable couch potato in need of an initiatory descent. So he is sent down as her replacement. In turn, Inanna negotiates his release for half the year, during which time the desert blooms.
In a similar tale from Greek mythology, Persephone descends to the Plutonian Underworld a young girl bust ascends a queen & a woman. ... "
- Making the Gods Work For You, The Astrological Language of the Psyche by Caroline W. Casey
QuoteWe will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
-Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species
QuoteLAW OF REQUISITE VARIETY
(1) the amount of appropriate selection that can be performed is limited by the amount of information available. (2) for appropriate regulation the variety in the regulator must be equal to or greater than the variety in the system being regulated. Or, the greater the variety within a system, the greater its ability to reduce variety in its environment through regulation. Only variety (in the regulator) can destroy variety (in the system being regulated). The law was formulated by Ross Ashby. (Umpleby)
Its two interpretations are: (1) The amount of appropriate selection that can be performed is limited by the amount of information available. More information might be wasted but less information results in arbitrary decisions (see chance). (2) To confine the variety in system with input, the regulator (see regulation) of that system must have at least as much variety available as the variety disturbing the system through its inputs. "Only variety (in the regulator) can destroy variety (in the system being regulated)" (Ashby). The LAW OF REQuired model-regulator identity is a more general version of the law of requisite variety. (Krippendorff)
http://pcp.lanl.gov/ASC/LAW_VARIE.html
QuoteIn Neurolinguistic Programming: "the Law of Requisite Variety in a given physical systems, is that part of the system with the greatest flexibility of behavior will control the system."
http://www.nlpworld.co.uk/glossary/l/law-of-requisite-variety
Quote"It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe in it".
George Carlin (1937 – 2008)