Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Two vast and trunkless legs of stone => Topic started by: UB on June 13, 2014, 12:55:38 AM

Title: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 13, 2014, 12:55:38 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 19, 2013, 07:32:10 PM
So, we need 20% more compressed air than we have, for the emergency replacement jetmill (the old one went boom).  So we disconnect the power feed to #2 6' ball mill, string 200 feet of cable for 480VAC/220 amps to the supplementary compressor until Building K's new motor control center comes online next week (then switch over and reinstall the 6' ball mill), THEN run 2 air driers in parallel to make up for the fact that I don't have any driers that are big enough, MEANWHILE cutting steel to make the new jetmill PHYSICALLY fit where it has to go, AND THE WHOLE TIME, I have Japanese engineers all over the kiln Filthy Assistant trashed, because AFTER the repair, burner #9 skin temperature shot to 600 Centigrade, burned through, cooked the gas line, which in turn flashed the conduit next to it, and shorted out the entire kiln MEANING that the temperature crashed, and the refractory brick marched 3 feet out the ass end of the kiln WHICH IN TURN tore the conveyor to bitty pieces.

All of this has to be operational by Tuesday at 2PM.

But that's okay, BECAUSE

*pant, pant, wheeze*

WE'RE GODDAMN MAINTENANCE APES, AND WE CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING.

TGRR,
Back to work!  WARP FACTOR 9, JACKASSES!

Um, this seems suspiciously like an excerpt from something that an engineer would say prior to: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219  (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219)  :(

Pssst.... http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822  (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822) Makes us think twice about what we think we know. 

Ultimately, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE) everything we know is wrong, aye?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 13, 2014, 01:12:04 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 12:55:38 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 19, 2013, 07:32:10 PM
So, we need 20% more compressed air than we have, for the emergency replacement jetmill (the old one went boom).  So we disconnect the power feed to #2 6' ball mill, string 200 feet of cable for 480VAC/220 amps to the supplementary compressor until Building K's new motor control center comes online next week (then switch over and reinstall the 6' ball mill), THEN run 2 air driers in parallel to make up for the fact that I don't have any driers that are big enough, MEANWHILE cutting steel to make the new jetmill PHYSICALLY fit where it has to go, AND THE WHOLE TIME, I have Japanese engineers all over the kiln Filthy Assistant trashed, because AFTER the repair, burner #9 skin temperature shot to 600 Centigrade, burned through, cooked the gas line, which in turn flashed the conduit next to it, and shorted out the entire kiln MEANING that the temperature crashed, and the refractory brick marched 3 feet out the ass end of the kiln WHICH IN TURN tore the conveyor to bitty pieces.

All of this has to be operational by Tuesday at 2PM.

But that's okay, BECAUSE

*pant, pant, wheeze*

WE'RE GODDAMN MAINTENANCE APES, AND WE CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING.

TGRR,
Back to work!  WARP FACTOR 9, JACKASSES!

Um, this seems suspiciously like an excerpt from something that an engineer would say prior to: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219  (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219)  :(

Pssst.... http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822  (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822) Makes us think twice about what we think we know. 

Ultimately, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE) everything we know is wrong, aye?

Fuck off.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 13, 2014, 01:19:56 AM
At this point, you are going to put me to sleep.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 13, 2014, 01:30:00 AM
Thread split, please.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 13, 2014, 01:47:47 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 13, 2014, 01:30:00 AM
Thread split, please.

...................................... the end ................................
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞ on June 13, 2014, 01:55:33 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 12:55:38 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 19, 2013, 07:32:10 PM
So, we need 20% more compressed air than we have, for the emergency replacement jetmill (the old one went boom).  So we disconnect the power feed to #2 6' ball mill, string 200 feet of cable for 480VAC/220 amps to the supplementary compressor until Building K's new motor control center comes online next week (then switch over and reinstall the 6' ball mill), THEN run 2 air driers in parallel to make up for the fact that I don't have any driers that are big enough, MEANWHILE cutting steel to make the new jetmill PHYSICALLY fit where it has to go, AND THE WHOLE TIME, I have Japanese engineers all over the kiln Filthy Assistant trashed, because AFTER the repair, burner #9 skin temperature shot to 600 Centigrade, burned through, cooked the gas line, which in turn flashed the conduit next to it, and shorted out the entire kiln MEANING that the temperature crashed, and the refractory brick marched 3 feet out the ass end of the kiln WHICH IN TURN tore the conveyor to bitty pieces.

All of this has to be operational by Tuesday at 2PM.

But that's okay, BECAUSE

*pant, pant, wheeze*

WE'RE GODDAMN MAINTENANCE APES, AND WE CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING.

TGRR,
Back to work!  WARP FACTOR 9, JACKASSES!

Um, this seems suspiciously like an excerpt from something that an engineer would say prior to: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219  (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219)  :(

Pssst.... http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822  (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822) Makes us think twice about what we think we know. 

Ultimately, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE) everything we know is wrong, aye?

What did you think you were doing with this post?

Because what I'm seeing is someone completely missing the point, dull threadjackery, and a played out troll style.

1/10.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 13, 2014, 02:36:27 AM
Quote from: Net (+1 Hidden) and 5 guests on June 13, 2014, 01:55:33 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 12:55:38 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 19, 2013, 07:32:10 PM
So, we need 20% more compressed air than we have, for the emergency replacement jetmill (the old one went boom).  So we disconnect the power feed to #2 6' ball mill, string 200 feet of cable for 480VAC/220 amps to the supplementary compressor until Building K's new motor control center comes online next week (then switch over and reinstall the 6' ball mill), THEN run 2 air driers in parallel to make up for the fact that I don't have any driers that are big enough, MEANWHILE cutting steel to make the new jetmill PHYSICALLY fit where it has to go, AND THE WHOLE TIME, I have Japanese engineers all over the kiln Filthy Assistant trashed, because AFTER the repair, burner #9 skin temperature shot to 600 Centigrade, burned through, cooked the gas line, which in turn flashed the conduit next to it, and shorted out the entire kiln MEANING that the temperature crashed, and the refractory brick marched 3 feet out the ass end of the kiln WHICH IN TURN tore the conveyor to bitty pieces.

All of this has to be operational by Tuesday at 2PM.

But that's okay, BECAUSE

*pant, pant, wheeze*

WE'RE GODDAMN MAINTENANCE APES, AND WE CAN DO FUCKING ANYTHING.

TGRR,
Back to work!  WARP FACTOR 9, JACKASSES!

Um, this seems suspiciously like an excerpt from something that an engineer would say prior to: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219  (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12720219)  :(

Pssst.... http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822  (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822) Makes us think twice about what we think we know. 

Ultimately, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE) everything we know is wrong, aye?

What did you think you were doing with this post?

Because what I'm seeing is someone completely missing the point, dull threadjackery, and a played out troll style.

1/10.

It was kind of amusing, having some infant lecture me on how shit works in an industrial setting.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on June 13, 2014, 06:44:15 AM
See also: No Cain, there are no Iranian hackers, hackers are Chinese.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 13, 2014, 07:32:26 AM
I can't believe this twit thinks she's clever with crap like this.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 13, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
Oh, my, how flattering. Instead of conveying the understanding that many more of my responses are mirroring the common discussions had and are laced with sarcasm... I get promoted with being a lecturing twit who assumes to know more than anyone else.   :(   

I dont mind the shit shovelling nor the apparent escort away from participating within certain threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable of characters bring to light potentially insightful thoughts.

I wouldn't be much of a bragard toward industrial engineering, ha! Im a clerk from the lowest of estate.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Luna on June 13, 2014, 11:37:28 PM
You have apparently not learned to refrain from shitting on the carpet.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Drake75 on June 14, 2014, 12:05:59 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
This flattered me. Instead of someone saying some of my responses are mirroring the discussions and are sarcastic... I get promoted to being a lecturing fool who believes more than anyone else.    :)   

I don't take offense to shoveling shit nor being given my own threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable characters can bring me potentially insightful thoughts.

I've got no experience with industrial engineering, to brag about! I'm a desk worker at the bottom of a pyramid.

Did I paraphrase correctly? Do tell me off.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 12:48:15 AM
Quote from: Drake75 on June 14, 2014, 12:05:59 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
This flattered me. Instead of someone saying some of my responses are mirroring the discussions and are sarcastic... I get promoted to being a lecturing fool who believes more than anyone else.    :)   

I don't take offense to shoveling shit nor being given my own threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable characters can bring me potentially insightful thoughts.

I've got no experience with industrial engineering, to brag about! I'm a desk worker at the bottom of a pyramid.

Did I paraphrase correctly? Do tell me off.

Horridly narcissistic, aye? Suppose we should shed this skin soon, we've become blind by it.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 12:51:30 AM
Quote from: Luna on June 13, 2014, 11:37:28 PM
You have apparently not learned to refrain from shitting on the carpet.

Haha... it is a common assumption that the one caught "present" is the one guilty.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
NET:   
Than you for asking.... because I wasn't intentionally being a troll. 

I was showing how my head works at times. TGRR wrote several pieces in the original thread that reminded me very much of a previous discussion I was a part of in a basement one evening. Instead of practicing the electric slide and welding their lightsabers,  a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program. Some countries dont have the beneficial yet accursed abundance of nonrenewable fossil fuels... but they bring to light an important point from the angles through which they work to accomplish feats that are awe-inspiring. 

Most would agree that such progress comes from years of study and more than even an adept wisdom in the applications of both failed and successful experiments. Im kinda more of the slant that some minds are more sensitive toward not only the discovery but also of variant levels of recognition, like a type of confirmation, of sorts, toward certain phenomena, anomalies, energies, etc. Such sensitive minds are able to, perhaps, better mirror the power witnessed and, um, produce or replicate a manufactured representation.

Anyways. Im also kinda warped in the way that buildings talk. Architectural designs and some of the dead or nearly dead languages remind me of a type of automatic programming that, though does not have to be self-destructive or self-detonating, sometimes become so because of a possible spiritual state of st agnancy that reads such design as a threat or future threat

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Drake75 on June 14, 2014, 02:13:24 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 12:48:15 AM
Quote from: Drake75 on June 14, 2014, 12:05:59 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
This flattered me. Instead of someone saying some of my responses are mirroring the discussions and are sarcastic... I get promoted to being a lecturing fool who believes more than anyone else.    :)   

I don't take offense to shoveling shit nor being given my own threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable characters can bring me potentially insightful thoughts.

I've got no experience with industrial engineering, to brag about! I'm a desk worker at the bottom of a pyramid.

Did I paraphrase correctly? Do tell me off.

Horridly narcissistic, aye? Suppose we should shed this skin soon, we've become blind by it.

If we're really that horrifying, I say we run around in this skin until it's effect wears off.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:26:54 AM
That "aye" is pretentious as fuck.   :lulz:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:28:04 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
Oh, my, how flattering. Instead of conveying the understanding that many more of my responses are mirroring the common discussions had and are laced with sarcasm... I get promoted with being a lecturing twit who assumes to know more than anyone else.   :(   

I dont mind the shit shovelling nor the apparent escort away from participating within certain threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable of characters bring to light potentially insightful thoughts.

I wouldn't be much of a bragard toward industrial engineering, ha! Im a clerk from the lowest of estate.

"Bragard"?

And I have already explained the rule concerning thread splits.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.


Careful, dear, we may agree. And I didn't say they were my friends. To the contrary, I maintain very few.

The petroleum technology should be given to the Iranians. Im not aware of the reasons its being withheld, if it is to the extent that prohibits their potential progress.

The link where you've explained thread splits?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 14, 2014, 01:14:05 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.

Engineers will agree with you. Many biologists won't. "Safe" is only for a given value, and a given span of time. Personally, I think nuclear is a bad idea, because humans.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 14, 2014, 01:15:37 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.


Careful, dear, we may agree. And I didn't say they were my friends. To the contrary, I maintain very few.

The petroleum technology should be given to the Iranians. Im not aware of the reasons its being withheld, if it is to the extent that prohibits their potential progress.

The link where you've explained thread splits?

I'll give you a hint. Is the thread about you? No? Then if your post attempts to make it about you, it will be split.

Most people don't need this much explaining.

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 14, 2014, 01:17:22 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 13, 2014, 10:01:32 PM
Oh, my, how flattering. Instead of conveying the understanding that many more of my responses are mirroring the common discussions had and are laced with sarcasm... I get promoted with being a lecturing twit who assumes to know more than anyone else.   :(   

I dont mind the shit shovelling nor the apparent escort away from participating within certain threads... but I have learned that even the more questionable of characters bring to light potentially insightful thoughts.

I wouldn't be much of a bragard toward industrial engineering, ha! Im a clerk from the lowest of estate.

Don't flatter yourself; you're an attention whore, and that's about it.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 14, 2014, 01:25:51 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
NET:   
Than you for asking.... because I wasn't intentionally being a troll.

I was showing how my head works at times. TGRR wrote several pieces in the original thread that reminded me very much of a previous discussion I was a part of in a basement one evening. Instead of practicing the electric slide and welding their lightsabers,  a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program. Some countries dont have the beneficial yet accursed abundance of nonrenewable fossil fuels... but they bring to light an important point from the angles through which they work to accomplish feats that are awe-inspiring.

Most would agree that such progress comes from years of study and more than even an adept wisdom in the applications of both failed and successful experiments. Im kinda more of the slant that some minds are more sensitive toward not only the discovery but also of variant levels of recognition, like a type of confirmation, of sorts, toward certain phenomena, anomalies, energies, etc. Such sensitive minds are able to, perhaps, better mirror the power witnessed and, um, produce or replicate a manufactured representation.

Anyways. Im also kinda warped in the way that buildings talk. Architectural designs and some of the dead or nearly dead languages remind me of a type of automatic programming that, though does not have to be self-destructive or self-detonating, sometimes become so because of a possible spiritual state of st agnancy that reads such design as a threat or future threat

Nobody cares about you nearly as much as you do.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 14, 2014, 01:27:58 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:31:15 AM
a few guys started a tongue tango on the detrimental hazards of nuclear plants and one or two of the group only had a head knowledge of weaponry and defense, seemingly to dismiss the nuclear technology as a viably important energy program.

Your friends are retarded.

Nuclear energy can be made safe.  It's just a matter of forcing the industry to do so.


Careful, dear, we may agree. And I didn't say they were my friends. To the contrary, I maintain very few.

God, what a surprise.  :lol:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 01:51:58 PM
Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

:(   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:08:58 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:51:58 PM
Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

:(   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.

It's no as even having going to the level of being was however.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 14, 2014, 05:15:52 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:08:58 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:51:58 PM
Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

:(   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.

It's no as even having going to the level of being was however.

Aye. I see you speak auto corrected jibberish as well. Duck, duck.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 12:03:23 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

Is that a yes or a no?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 01:13:13 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 12:03:23 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

Is that a yes or a no?

Well. You seem so confident in drawing your own conclusions. It likely wouldn't matter.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
I'll take that as a "too chickenshit to bother with".

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:55:03 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 01:51:58 PM
Maybe the consequences have personalities becoming misconstrued by preemptive judgement and labeling is what causes the traverses that seem impossible to figure out. Instead of thinking you know so much why not ask and allow personable exchanges to help in better identifying the potential presumptuousness of assuming others who are self explanatory as self indulgent, blind to the world, fact extractors.

:(   I merely have few friends because when I'm not at work I stay home. Happily and very content.

Have you even really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:56:34 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

I don't know if you're aware of this, but you don't have to be a fake pissing-match caricature. You can be a real person here, it's OK.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on June 15, 2014, 04:13:18 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:56:34 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

I don't know if you're aware of this, but you don't have to be a fake pissing-match caricature. You can be a real person here, it's OK.

Seriously, Inge. If you'd stop shitting on the doorstep every day, you'd probably find us to be more enjoyable company if you're going to roost on the porch anyway.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 02:48:31 PM
Compliancy can be quite the bitch.

Quote from: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 15, 2014, 06:20:59 AM

.........................................................

How in the fucking world could that God speak to mankind. Can God tell jokes? Of course she can. You just don't get them.

.........................................................

Ignore me at your own risk, just don't be surprised when the whole cosmos is laughing and you just don't get the "joke". Because guess what, that is the joke. Think about that one for a bit, its a real side splitter.

About like a 2x4 to the head.

Sadly, it seems before a third party candidate will succeed in our Presidential campaign, there may have to be various other parties taken more seriously as potential considerations. *dunno* As for taking other parties more seriously, the permanent UN members are in an opportune position to set and be an example... whether our decisions represent the worse or the best toward global influence is up to the discretionary perception of those who are either directly or indirectly affected by our presence. The side splitter, in and by deed, may be that the US, in adherently patriot manner, proclaims herself to be *special*. It may not be as flattering by some accord as the patriotic heart of hearts steadfastly holds so dear.

A fool's flattery may be found painful.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 02:55:09 PM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on June 15, 2014, 04:13:18 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:56:34 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

I don't know if you're aware of this, but you don't have to be a fake pissing-match caricature. You can be a real person here, it's OK.

Seriously, Inge. If you'd stop shitting on the doorstep every day, you'd probably find us to be more enjoyable company if you're going to roost on the porch anyway.

Admittedly, I did come in with an embarrassingly rude aire. I regretted to have confused TGRR with someone I knew prior, but I explained to him. Once the role was initiated, however, it seemed the flow of conversation was inevitable. I found this an invaluable lesson both on and off the board.

Gravitating from personalizing every response I make, as I'm genuinely not self-serving.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 03:01:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
I'll take that as a "too chickenshit to bother with".

SHIT damn. SHIT has got to be the favored word with most posters who bother to respond with me.

IF I use endearments, it's of little respect to who you are and more influenced by the flow of conversation and the intent of influence desired. Though I likely came in with a collection of nooses around my neck, chickenwire is not one.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:28:53 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 02:55:09 PM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on June 15, 2014, 04:13:18 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:56:34 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

I don't know if you're aware of this, but you don't have to be a fake pissing-match caricature. You can be a real person here, it's OK.

Seriously, Inge. If you'd stop shitting on the doorstep every day, you'd probably find us to be more enjoyable company if you're going to roost on the porch anyway.

Admittedly, I did come in with an embarrassingly rude aire. I regretted to have confused TGRR with someone I knew prior, but I explained to him. Once the role was initiated, however, it seemed the flow of conversation was inevitable. I found this an invaluable lesson both on and off the board.

Gravitating from personalizing every response I make, as I'm genuinely not self-serving.

Actually, no, the flow of conversation was not inevitable. Lots of people get off to a bad start here, but things get better when they STOP playing one-upsmanship games and thinking they're being witty with antagonistic repartee, or using every thread on the board as a personal blog. Stop blaming some irreversible previous moment in time for your rubbing people the wrong way, start talking to people here like they're people and not a game, and you'll get along just fine.

For the record, TGRR was being completely sincere when he offered to let you know where you were going wrong. And we tend to think highly here of people who can swallow their monkey-ass pride, receive criticism, and move on. Every one of us has made an ass of ourselves, been embarrassed, and got over it by standing up on two legs and being better bipeds than we were before.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:32:18 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 03:01:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
I'll take that as a "too chickenshit to bother with".

SHIT damn. SHIT has got to be the favored word with most posters who bother to respond with me.

IF I use endearments, it's of little respect to who you are and more influenced by the flow of conversation and the intent of influence desired. Though I likely came in with a collection of nooses around my neck, chickenwire is not one.

I think I have pinpointed your problem.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 03:46:02 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:32:18 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 03:01:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
I'll take that as a "too chickenshit to bother with".

SHIT damn. SHIT has got to be the favored word with most posters who bother to respond with me.

IF I use endearments, it's of little respect to who you are and more influenced by the flow of conversation and the intent of influence desired. Though I likely came in with a collection of nooses around my neck, chickenwire is not one.

I think I have pinpointed your problem.

Somehow, it seems you've missed the rest of the comment. It wasn't written to intend a minimizing of character or poster. 
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 04:31:19 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 03:46:02 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:32:18 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 03:01:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
I'll take that as a "too chickenshit to bother with".

SHIT damn. SHIT has got to be the favored word with most posters who bother to respond with me.

IF I use endearments, it's of little respect to who you are and more influenced by the flow of conversation and the intent of influence desired. Though I likely came in with a collection of nooses around my neck, chickenwire is not one.

I think I have pinpointed your problem.

Somehow, it seems you've missed the rest of the comment. It wasn't written to intend a minimizing of character or poster.

No, it just revealed that you don't really care about other people's individuality or preferences or feelings.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 05:07:48 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 02:55:09 PM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on June 15, 2014, 04:13:18 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:56:34 AM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 14, 2014, 05:07:40 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 14, 2014, 11:51:41 AM

Careful, dear,

I'm gonna ask you up front if you plan to continue using pet names with me.  Please let me know, so I can decide whether or not I plan to respond to you at all.

Pet names?

Where I come from, its a term of endearment.   :evil:

I don't know if you're aware of this, but you don't have to be a fake pissing-match caricature. You can be a real person here, it's OK.

Seriously, Inge. If you'd stop shitting on the doorstep every day, you'd probably find us to be more enjoyable company if you're going to roost on the porch anyway.

Admittedly, I did come in with an embarrassingly rude aire. I regretted to have confused TGRR with someone I knew prior, but I explained to him. Once the role was initiated, however, it seemed the flow of conversation was inevitable. I found this an invaluable lesson both on and off the board.

Gravitating from personalizing every response I make, as I'm genuinely not self-serving.

This is an utter load of bullshit.  *I* argued for everyone to give you another chance.  YOU took that as a sign of weakness and immediately attacked. 

You are a liar.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 05:12:50 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:28:53 PM
For the record, TGRR was being completely sincere when he offered to let you know where you were going wrong.

And Inge sure showed me, right?

From zero to "Holist" in one post.  We already have a holist.  I'm gonna go troll teabaggers while this gets sorted, except to post LDW and Andrew stuff.  And mercilessly split any fuckery that holist junior here decides to put it those threads.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 05:32:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 05:12:50 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:28:53 PM
For the record, TGRR was being completely sincere when he offered to let you know where you were going wrong.

And Inge sure showed me, right?

From zero to "Holist" in one post.  We already have a holist.  I'm gonna go troll teabaggers while this gets sorted, except to post LDW and Andrew stuff.  And mercilessly split any fuckery that holist junior here decides to put it those threads.

I think I might just ignore crInge. I tried to give it some decent advice but doesn't seem worth expending any more effort on... it's one of those "nobody else is a real person and everything is someone else's fault" types, and there's no reaching those. 
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 05:48:27 PM
Appreciative of the loss of distractions. 

Business, it is, as usual.

Adventures await.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 06:03:14 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 04:31:19 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 03:46:02 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 03:32:18 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 03:01:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 02:47:19 AM
I'll take that as a "too chickenshit to bother with".

SHIT damn. SHIT has got to be the favored word with most posters who bother to respond with me.

IF I use endearments, it's of little respect to who you are and more influenced by the flow of conversation and the intent of influence desired. Though I likely came in with a collection of nooses around my neck, chickenwire is not one.

I think I have pinpointed your problem.

Somehow, it seems you've missed the rest of the comment. It wasn't written to intend a minimizing of character or poster.

No, it just revealed that you don't really care about other people's individuality or preferences or feelings.

My emotional constipation, eh, is as obvious as your intuitive perception, however formed. It seems irrevocably misaligned and completely out of joint with the plausible possibility of fallacious assumptions.

Maybe you've granted me with the inattentive snubbing you've promised and I may stroll off on my fool's trolley without bothering your Majesty any further?

*kisses* TRRN
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 15, 2014, 06:06:59 PM
Inge. I would like to take a brief moment in the official Inge thread to express my appreciation for the content that you, Inge, bring to this internet site. First off let me convey the understanding of how your posts mirror common discussion and are laced with your signature Inge wit. Judging from your speech pattern and thought patterns mirrored by said speech patterns I can deduce that you, like I and so many others on these fine internets, are a supreme gentleman. Apologies if you are in fact a supreme gentlewoman.

Now if you would, help me parse the failure and successes of some recent experiments of mine. At the local dispensary of cheap foodstuffs and other assorted essential goods there is a woman of considerable interest to me both erotic and emotional. A cumly  woman in her 50s, with long flowing dyed black hair and moderate but respectable birthing hips. I have tried several times to woo her into sexual coitus with demonstrations of my supreme mastery of gentlemanship. I always say thank you when given change, and on one occasion I held the door open for her. In all such incidents I expected obligitory exchanging of pleasantries  would lead to erotic gratification but to no avail! Harken, my dearest confidant, how forsooth have I been blind to the finer mysteries of the womanly species. Please, Inge, aid me in my quest to continue the genetic line of my forefathers, I beg it of you.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 06:12:38 PM
Aye.  I suppose that's well deserving.

Im still not a fan.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 15, 2014, 06:18:03 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 06:12:38 PM
Aye.  I suppose that's well deserving.

Im still not a fan.

Aye. But surely someone of your intellectual stature can afford a few drippings of constructive criticism from the great wellspring of your mind, aye? Please, grace me with your thought patters translated into internet words, aye.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
 :lulz:

That was worthy of the late Doktor Phox.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 07:34:48 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
:lulz:

That was worthy of the late Doktor Phox.

The new guy is a weirdo, but he's a weirdo with style.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 07:35:11 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 07:34:48 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
:lulz:

That was worthy of the late Doktor Phox.

The new guy is a weirdo, but he's a weirdo with style.

I'm digging it.   :lol:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 08:28:50 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 07:35:11 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 15, 2014, 07:34:48 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
:lulz:

That was worthy of the late Doktor Phox.

The new guy is a weirdo, but he's a weirdo with style.

I'm digging it.   :lol:

Digging the Dok's box?

Um, then living it up from within my own thread in respect to TRRN's dubbed, *cringe*.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 15, 2014, 10:01:16 PM
Quote from: Inge on June 15, 2014, 09:49:10 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 09:39:36 PM
I wish admins could use the ignore feature.

PD is not my favorite place at the moment.

Does it make you wanna get up off your arse and do something, um, like... cut the grass, wash the dish, make your own bed?  :lulz:

I suppose any noob block wouldn't help.

There's still no beer here.

Aye, but what good is beer to you when the quantum tubules of your brain are still out of whack? Inge, imagine for a moment that you are in a car traveling at 1/3 the speed of light through a frictionless plane. Now imagine that you are dragging some poor sap who owes the boss money by a chain. Assuming of course that your headlights are both on and that C is a constant in this theoretical universe, at what point does he scream "STOP! STOP! ILL TELL YOU WHERE I BURIED THE DIAMONDS!"?

Please explain your answer, and rephrase the question in your answer. There will be a quiz.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 10:05:10 PM
Inge is now UB.  She has also changed her avatar.  Tricksey, these internet nutcases.

I have locked the ability of users to change their names.  If anyone other than Inge/UB has a reason to want to change their screen name, PM me.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 10:38:52 PM
Quote from: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(color=limegreen]weed[/color]) link=topic=36614.msg1348029#msg1348029 date=1402866076]

Aye, but what good is beer to you when the quantum tubules of your brain are still out of whack? Inge, imagine for a moment that you are in a car traveling at 1/3 the speed of light through a frictionless plane. Now imagine that you are dragging some poor sap who owes the boss money by a chain. Assuming of course that your headlights are both on and that C is a constant in this theoretical universe, at what point does he scream "STOP! STOP! ILL TELL YOU WHERE I BURIED THE DIAMONDS!"?

Please explain your answer, and rephrase the question in your answer. There will be a quiz.

The problem with influential media is that no one is talking about diamond [minds] or middle eastern [hidden] secrets. Everyone wants to believe it is about oil because of the seemingly irrevocable dependency upon oil.

[quote author=The Good Reverend Roger link=topic=36614.msg1348030#msg1348030 date=1402866310]
Inge is now UB.  She has also changed her avatar.  Tricksey, these internet nutcases.

I have locked the ability of users to change their names.  If anyone other than Inge/UB has a reason to want to change their screen name, PM me.
[/quote]

No one from within this board is so dimwitted as to need such an explanation.

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 15, 2014, 11:22:27 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 15, 2014, 10:05:10 PM
Inge is now UB.  She has also changed her avatar.  Tricksey, these internet nutcases.

I have locked the ability of users to change their names.  If anyone other than Inge/UB has a reason to want to change their screen name, PM me.

Luckily, the ignore feature keeps track of that sort of thing so I don't have to. :lol:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 15, 2014, 11:45:47 PM
It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood...

http://www.gofishing.co.uk/Angling-Times/Section/News--Catches/General-News/260lb-catfish-caught-in-Italy/ (http://www.gofishing.co.uk/Angling-Times/Section/News--Catches/General-News/260lb-catfish-caught-in-Italy/)

Irascible pontificating be damned.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on June 16, 2014, 11:39:55 PM
Semi-decent troll, but a little too visibly posting snarky attacks and then retreating into nonsense and "I have no idea what anyone is saying" to weather the storm of responses.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 16, 2014, 11:49:37 PM
Quote from: Pæs on June 16, 2014, 11:39:55 PM
Semi-decent troll, but a little too visibly posting snarky attacks and then retreating into nonsense and "I have no idea what anyone is saying" to weather the storm of responses.

Its big failing is that it's tedious.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 17, 2014, 09:08:33 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 16, 2014, 11:49:37 PM
Quote from: Pæs on June 16, 2014, 11:39:55 PM
Semi-decent troll, but a little too visibly posting snarky attacks and then retreating into nonsense and "I have no idea what anyone is saying" to weather the storm of responses.

Its big failing is that it's tedious.

No longer on ignore?

:)

It was a clown. Im no clown.... er, rather, eh, I suppose I could be if asked nicely enough.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 17, 2014, 12:19:41 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 09:08:33 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 16, 2014, 11:49:37 PM
Quote from: Pæs on June 16, 2014, 11:39:55 PM
Semi-decent troll, but a little too visibly posting snarky attacks and then retreating into nonsense and "I have no idea what anyone is saying" to weather the storm of responses.

Its big failing is that it's tedious.

No longer on ignore?

:)

It was a clown. Im no clown.... er, rather, eh, I suppose I could be if asked nicely enough.

Nigel was responding to Paes there, not you... I would imagine, knowing Nigel as I do, that if she had you on ignore, you're staying there.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Cain on June 17, 2014, 12:25:56 PM
Hell, I'd put her on ignore if not for the whole "admins can't ignore people lol" thing. 

I just have to do it the old fashioned way.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 17, 2014, 12:27:39 PM
Quote from: Cain on June 17, 2014, 12:25:56 PM
Hell, I'd put her on ignore if not for the whole "admins can't ignore people lol" thing. 

I just have to do it the old fashioned way.

At least there is the sense of accomplishment which accompanies the old fashioned way.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 17, 2014, 05:17:38 PM
 :the king is not amused:

:shock:

الاستمتاع بيومك، المتمردين
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Ben Shapiro on June 17, 2014, 05:25:30 PM
My ass hurts.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 17, 2014, 05:28:34 PM
Quote from: George Edger Dingleburry on June 17, 2014, 05:25:30 PM
My ass hurts.

That means it's working.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 17, 2014, 07:51:44 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 05:17:38 PM
:the king is not amused:

:shock:

الاستمتاع بيومك، المتمردين

لديك جوجل ترجمة المهارات تثير الإعجاب
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 18, 2014, 01:47:55 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 09:02:12 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on December 18, 2012, 06:14:58 AM
I think Paes got a case of the Holies.  :lulz:

Someone please explain what "Holies" is being referred to as?  Haha. Even if in another thread.

I'd explain, but you'll just snark...And I can get all the snark I want at tumblr or reddit.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 18, 2014, 02:02:12 PM
Quote from: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 17, 2014, 07:51:44 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 05:17:38 PM
:the king is not amused:

:shock:

الاستمتاع بيومك، المتمردين

لديك جوجل ترجمة المهارات تثير الإعجاب

     
      أنا لا استعمل جوجل ولكن البعض الآخر قد. أنا بالتناوب مع مجموعة من المترجمين بسبب العيوب المحتملة. أيضا، بعض أفضل مع الكلمات ولكن تفشل مع الفقرات.




Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 18, 2014, 10:34:39 PM
Quote from: UB on June 18, 2014, 02:02:12 PM
Quote from: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 17, 2014, 07:51:44 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 05:17:38 PM
:the king is not amused:

:shock:

الاستمتاع بيومك، المتمردين

لديك جوجل ترجمة المهارات تثير الإعجاب

     
      أنا لا استعمل جوجل ولكن البعض الآخر قد. أنا بالتناوب مع مجموعة من المترجمين بسبب العيوب المحتملة. أيضا، بعض أفضل مع الكلمات ولكن تفشل مع الفقرات.

كنت وضعت الكثير من الجهد في كونه الرقبة القرف. في الملهم تقريبا.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 18, 2014, 10:39:48 PM
بكل جدية، ليس لدى الوقت للحديث الحلو أي شخص في الفروسية رومانسية
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 12:13:55 AM
And then Inge was a poptart.

Cain, check it out.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 19, 2014, 01:27:35 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 18, 2014, 01:47:55 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 09:02:12 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on December 18, 2012, 06:14:58 AM
I think Paes got a case of the Holies.  :lulz:

Someone please explain what "Holies" is being referred to as?  Haha. Even if in another thread.

I'd explain, but you'll just snark...And I can get all the snark I want at tumblr or reddit.

Well, when I first joined, I was given a test and it only seemed fitting that I return the favor.

The gauges have been set and levels observed. I have little use to be snarky now.

(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/SWC.jpg)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:23:52 AM
Quote from: UB on June 19, 2014, 01:27:35 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 18, 2014, 01:47:55 PM
Quote from: UB on June 17, 2014, 09:02:12 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on December 18, 2012, 06:14:58 AM
I think Paes got a case of the Holies.  :lulz:

Someone please explain what "Holies" is being referred to as?  Haha. Even if in another thread.

I'd explain, but you'll just snark...And I can get all the snark I want at tumblr or reddit.

Well, when I first joined, I was given a test and it only seemed fitting that I return the favor.

The gauges have been set and levels observed. I have little use to be snarky now.

(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/SWC.jpg)

Have I restricted your speech, poptart?  Have I said that it is an outrage?

No.  I have merely laughed at you, and been a little annoyed at your constant stalking.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:25:56 AM
Also, there was no "test".  You came on the board acting like an asshole, and you've been that way ever since.

Poptart.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 19, 2014, 02:33:37 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:25:56 AM
Also, there was no "test".  You came on the board acting like an asshole, and you've been that way ever since.

Poptart.

To the contrary, dear, there was and it's okay. I've not been an asshole. I've offended a few but far fewer than I've been offended by. It's just a turn on words.

"Poptarts? Did someone say Poptarts?" :)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:40:09 AM
Quote from: UB on June 19, 2014, 02:33:37 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:25:56 AM
Also, there was no "test".  You came on the board acting like an asshole, and you've been that way ever since.

Poptart.

To the contrary, dear, there was and it's okay. I've not been an asshole. I've offended a few but far fewer than I've been offended by. It's just a turn on words.

"Poptarts? Did someone say Poptarts?" :)

:showus:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Salty on June 19, 2014, 03:33:03 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:40:09 AM
Quote from: UB on June 19, 2014, 02:33:37 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 19, 2014, 02:25:56 AM
Also, there was no "test".  You came on the board acting like an asshole, and you've been that way ever since.

Poptart.

To the contrary, dear, there was and it's okay. I've not been an asshole. I've offended a few but far fewer than I've been offended by. It's just a turn on words.

"Poptarts? Did someone say Poptarts?" :)

:showus:

:walken:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 19, 2014, 12:09:26 PM
With regards to UB:
(http://shopandsaveonline.com.au/images/pledgecleanrevitalise.jpg)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Raz Tech on June 19, 2014, 02:39:43 PM
I hope that today, as you're walking down the street, doing whatever it is that I'm sure you can't wait to tell everyone about, a simple thought hits you.  That thought should be hey, why have I spent so much time on an internet forum being an officious, self-centered, and generally incorrigible person. From there, you will continue your day, doing whatever dull shit you think everyone should be so eager to hear about.  But all that time, the thought will be there, nagging in the back of your head, forcing you to contemplate your life's worth.  When you finally make it to wherever you live, the thought has overtaken you, and you realize that nothing good can come of this without change.  So you resolve to make life better for everyone you come into contact with.  You realize that not everything should be about you, and that you can play a greater part.  You become so excited by this notion that you immediately run outside to volunteer at your local soup kitchen, but you are promptly struck by a bus.

Unfortunately, this is a best case scenario, and is impossible as it permits the idea of you having thoughts of any kind.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Luna on June 19, 2014, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

Magick.

They just hope to be able to slip it under the bullshit radar for long enough to finish the sentence before being punched in the throat.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 19, 2014, 03:03:27 PM
Quote from: Luna on June 19, 2014, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

Magick.

They just hope to be able to slip it under the bullshit radar for long enough to finish the sentence before being punched in the throat.

That's not even where the pineal gland is located!
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Luna on June 19, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 03:03:27 PM
Quote from: Luna on June 19, 2014, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

Magick.

They just hope to be able to slip it under the bullshit radar for long enough to finish the sentence before being punched in the throat.

That's not even where the pineal gland is located!

It is exceptionally effective in keeping the jibber jabber down while one digs for the pineal gland with a sharp object.  Through the back of the neck is the easy way, up the nose with a marlinspike is trickier, but less messy.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 19, 2014, 03:10:37 PM
Quote from: Luna on June 19, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 03:03:27 PM
Quote from: Luna on June 19, 2014, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

Magick.

They just hope to be able to slip it under the bullshit radar for long enough to finish the sentence before being punched in the throat.

That's not even where the pineal gland is located!

It is exceptionally effective in keeping the jibber jabber down while one digs for the pineal gland with a sharp object.  Through the back of the neck is the easy way, up the nose with a marlinspike is trickier, but less messy.

This is why I like you.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Luna on June 19, 2014, 03:13:08 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 03:10:37 PM
Quote from: Luna on June 19, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 03:03:27 PM
Quote from: Luna on June 19, 2014, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

Magick.

They just hope to be able to slip it under the bullshit radar for long enough to finish the sentence before being punched in the throat.

That's not even where the pineal gland is located!

It is exceptionally effective in keeping the jibber jabber down while one digs for the pineal gland with a sharp object.  Through the back of the neck is the easy way, up the nose with a marlinspike is trickier, but less messy.

This is why I like you.

:thanks:

A girl has to be practical.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:42:13 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

I swear there's a word for that. I was going to suggest cosmic treacle but then I remembered that I was just ripping that off Brian Cox and that it's a real thing.

Some hippies call it mana. You could also go with phlogiston, because that's funnier.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:44:01 PM
Oh, yeah, there's also akasha or ether.

I swear I'm forgetting one, though.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Sita on June 19, 2014, 04:45:54 PM
I've heard chi used in reference to energy before
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:49:28 PM
Quote from: Sita on June 19, 2014, 04:45:54 PM
I've heard chi used in reference to energy before

That might be the one.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed) on June 19, 2014, 04:52:27 PM
Kundalini?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:55:11 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 12:09:26 PM
With regards to UB:
(http://shopandsaveonline.com.au/images/pledgecleanrevitalise.jpg)

Way ahead of you. She came in on the offensive, and now she's following people around on the board who clearly don't want to engage with her, posting in their threads, trying to bait them, and playing the victim. She was given good and sincere advice about cutting the games and being a real person, and has chosen instead to continue the sophomoric role-playing. It's obnoxious and juvenile.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 19, 2014, 04:58:19 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:42:13 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

I swear there's a word for that. I was going to suggest cosmic treacle but then I remembered that I was just ripping that off Brian Cox and that it's a real thing.

Some hippies call it mana. You could also go with phlogiston, because that's funnier.

"Cosmic Treacle". That is an amazing term. I'm going to try to remember that.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: LMNO on June 19, 2014, 05:28:27 PM
"Orgone"
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 19, 2014, 05:38:22 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on June 19, 2014, 05:28:27 PM
"Orgone"

Stop it, you're turning me on.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 19, 2014, 08:54:11 PM
 :oops: That concept is part of my thought-vocabulary... (sophabulary? Yeah that sounds right.)
I will need to do some self reflection. AGAIN.
Sigh, sentience is a sisyphean task.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 19, 2014, 08:56:32 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:55:11 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 12:09:26 PM
With regards to UB:
(http://shopandsaveonline.com.au/images/pledgecleanrevitalise.jpg)

Way ahead of you. She came in on the offensive, and now she's following people around on the board who clearly don't want to engage with her, posting in their threads, trying to bait them, and playing the victim. She was given good and sincere advice about cutting the games and being a real person, and has chosen instead to continue the sophomoric role-playing. It's obnoxious and juvenile.
You often are.

Oh well, we tried.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 19, 2014, 09:04:23 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 08:54:11 PM
:oops: That concept is part of my thought-vocabulary... (sophabulary? Yeah that sounds right.)
I will need to do some self reflection. AGAIN.
Sigh, sentience is a sisyphean task.

What, orgone?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 19, 2014, 11:38:52 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 08:56:32 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:55:11 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 12:09:26 PM
With regards to UB:
(http://shopandsaveonline.com.au/images/pledgecleanrevitalise.jpg)

Way ahead of you. She came in on the offensive, and now she's following people around on the board who clearly don't want to engage with her, posting in their threads, trying to bait them, and playing the victim. She was given good and sincere advice about cutting the games and being a real person, and has chosen instead to continue the sophomoric role-playing. It's obnoxious and juvenile.
You often are.

Oh well, we tried.

:oops:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 19, 2014, 11:49:24 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 04:58:19 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 19, 2014, 04:42:13 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 02:51:31 PM
So, you know when woo-woo fanatics casually use the word "energy" to refer to something they can't describe, while not having a very firm grasp on what the scientific definition of "energy" actually is?  Is there a proper word for what they are usually trying to describe?

This is a vague question, I know, but it's difficult to put into words what I am trying to ask.  If anyone thinks they know what I am trying to ask, please feel free to answer me.  If you know the answer.

-Hoopla the Vast, Cool, and Unsympathetic

I swear there's a word for that. I was going to suggest cosmic treacle but then I remembered that I was just ripping that off Brian Cox and that it's a real thing.

Some hippies call it mana. You could also go with phlogiston, because that's funnier.

"Cosmic Treacle". That is an amazing term. I'm going to try to remember that.

I love it. I don't really understand the Higgs Field, but what little I do grasp is pretty mind-boggling.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 02:47:01 AM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 12:09:26 PM
With regards to UB:
(http://shopandsaveonline.com.au/images/pledgecleanrevitalise.jpg)

Appreciative. However, somehow it seems a super sonic power washer for waterboarding would be the flavor of choice for some on board. *dunno*

No one is ahead of you, don't believe such rubbish. It's ebb and flow for us all.

It wasn't too difficult to scare some away and if certain members of the board cannot overcome the obstacle of my entrance, I feel no ill will, and I understand.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on June 20, 2014, 02:53:09 AM
Can this stuff be banished from my very serious PSA thread and into some wasteland of fail and irrelevance forever?

That is to say, a rare request for thread split please. I believe there is a very fine LIMITED thread for Inge to exist in.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 20, 2014, 02:59:20 AM
Quote from: Pæs on June 20, 2014, 02:53:09 AM
Can this stuff be banished from my very serious PSA thread and into some wasteland of fail and irrelevance forever?

That is to say, a rare request for thread split please. I believe there is a very fine LIMITED thread for Inge to exist in.

Done .
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 03:10:20 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 20, 2014, 02:59:20 AM
..................
Done .

And within five minutes, imagine THAT.

http://youtu.be/rjE0TWYUfrM  (http://youtu.be/rjE0TWYUfrM)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 03:48:41 AM
Quote from: Pæs on June 20, 2014, 02:53:09 AM
Can this stuff be banished from my very serious PSA thread and into some wasteland of fail and irrelevance forever?

That is to say, a rare request for thread split please. I believe there is a very fine LIMITED thread for Inge to exist in.

Minge is just so fascinated with itself that it assumes everyone else must be, as well. It's wrong. :lol:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 03:56:19 AM
(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/rehab.jpg)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on June 20, 2014, 05:06:42 AM
Nobody is pretending to.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Drake75 on June 20, 2014, 06:02:12 AM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 03:56:19 AM
(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/rehab.jpg)
I've decided to create a new comic book character.
This character exists only as a thought.
When the character is in the head of a person, she can send impulses through her host to make them move.
She exists in the same place as the thoughts, emotions, and senses of the person, and can be spread in the same way thoughts are spread between people.
When spread to another head with thoughts in it, she is born again and anything that may have changed her in the first head will not have affected her in the new head.
I call her Ego.
She believes the first head she appeared in was the head of a long dead primate.
Sometimes she is born in a head that doesn't have other thoughts in it, gets bored, and tries making new ones from all the strange senses flying through the hosts mind.
Sometimes Ego is born into a head that never finds a thought that lets her notice others of herself  existing in other heads, sometimes this means she lives alone forever.

It makes me sad to think one of us does not understand that some Egos see nothing new, exciting, or interesting in one another anymore, and that we may be cursed to existing as neophiliacs.

How would I view that picture? Do you care about how you viewed it through your second set of eyes?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 12:10:11 PM
(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/uranus-full-size-e1300751334882.jpg)


"Texts and descriptions are fine and dandy, but to see [the planet] Uranus for what it is is another thing entirely. Enjoy..."

Beautiful. Potentially explosive regardless of being identified as the third of the gas giants. Compelling rings of 13 (respectfully).

Perception evolves, necessarily, and even if the base ego doesn't change... small measures of influence is planted allowing further potential to develop and will manifest through time, however, sometimes only in the way that change is recognizable in retrospect and upon reflection. *hearts* as *heads*
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 20, 2014, 02:44:49 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 09:04:23 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 08:54:11 PM
:oops: That concept is part of my thought-vocabulary... (sophabulary? Yeah that sounds right.)
I will need to do some self reflection. AGAIN.
Sigh, sentience is a sisyphean task.

What, orgone?
"Energy" as in, an unmeasurable part of your being that can be depleted, supressed, increased etc. etc.
I never really thought about it, kinda embarrasing.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 03:17:24 PM

I can't see the post, but I assume minge was taking this moment to remind us that it totally has sex, because it's so confident that we care and would like to know about its kinks.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 03:18:06 PM
Have I ever mentioned how little I like people with borderline personality disorder?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 20, 2014, 05:47:10 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 20, 2014, 03:18:06 PM
Have I ever mentioned how little I like people with borderline personality disorder?

When it comes right down to it, they're boring.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:09:58 PM
Quote from: Drake75/
I've decided to create a new comic book character.
This character exists only as a thought.
When the character is in the head of a person, she can send impulses through her host to make them move.
She exists in the same place the thoughts, emotions, and senses of the person, and can be spread in the same way thoughts are spread between people.
When spread to another head with thoughts in it, she is born again and anything that may have changed her in the first head will not have affected her in the new head.
I call her Ego.
She believes the first head she appeared in was the head of a long dead primate.
Sometimes she is born in a head that doesn't have other thoughts in it, gets bored, and tries making new ones from all the strange senses flying through the hosts mind.
Sometimes Ego is born into a head that never finds a thought that lets her notice others of herself  existing in other heads, sometimes this means she lives alone forever.

It makes me sad to think one of us does not understand that some Egos see nothing new, exciting, or interesting in one another anymore, and that we may be cursed to existing as neophiliacs.

How would I view that picture? Do you care about how you viewed it through your second set of eyes?

I really struggled with the term as I couldn't grasp the correlation between the suggested personality disorder and being a neophiliac until google gave me a better understanding of the interpretation.

Neophiliacs bring potential. To some, it may be disregarded and yet to others, as I am guilty of, to sense some such familiar presence(s) within the minds of others and suggest that they are fucked in the head. Its rude in retrospect and it has forced further recognition on basic values. While I can directly relate to the term in the way that I thrive with intellectual curiosity, I genuinely cringe and mourn over spending money or excessive wastefulness.

I suppose to sometimes look in the mirror and not usually recognize my own appearance or to study life long partners with new wonder may very well seem to represent a mental disturbance and/or personality disorder, however, just as you mentioned, there are those that never do and they seem damned to me.

One of the most difficult realizations has been that such allows the potential for a stifling stagnancy that be more detrimental than any destructive force of change that may accur. Better understanding Individual perception is an undeniable key in the important beneficial balances coupled with the necessary hindrances, accordingly.

Im still reading...      http://brainimmune.com/novelty-seeking-the-adventurous-neophiliacs-and-well-being/  (http://brainimmune.com/novelty-seeking-the-adventurous-neophiliacs-and-well-being/)

*excited* for you to share more about your character as she develops.   *hearts* as *heads*
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 20, 2014, 06:14:42 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:09:58 PM
Quote from: Drake75/
I've decided to create a new comic book character.
This character exists only as a thought.
When the character is in the head of a person, she can send impulses through her host to make them move.
She exists in the same place the thoughts, emotions, and senses of the person, and can be spread in the same way thoughts are spread between people.
When spread to another head with thoughts in it, she is born again and anything that may have changed her in the first head will not have affected her in the new head.
I call her Ego.
She believes the first head she appeared in was the head of a long dead primate.
Sometimes she is born in a head that doesn't have other thoughts in it, gets bored, and tries making new ones from all the strange senses flying through the hosts mind.
Sometimes Ego is born into a head that never finds a thought that lets her notice others of herself  existing in other heads, sometimes this means she lives alone forever.

It makes me sad to think one of us does not understand that some Egos see nothing new, exciting, or interesting in one another anymore, and that we may be cursed to existing as neophiliacs.

How would I view that picture? Do you care about how you viewed it through your second set of eyes?

Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.

Yadda yadda yadda.  Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.  Yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.

Yadda yadda yadda  yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.

Yadda yadda yadda  yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda, yadda.

Yadda yadda yadda...      http://brainimmune.com/novelty-seeking-the-adventurous-neophiliacs-and-well-being/  (http://brainimmune.com/novelty-seeking-the-adventurous-neophiliacs-and-well-being/)

*Yadda*  yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda.   *yadda* yadda *yadda*


(http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h183/Jenne73/STFU-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:17:35 PM
Is this the Hoopla thread, as well?

She'esh.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 20, 2014, 06:22:00 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:17:35 PM
Is this the Hoopla thread, as well?

She'esh.

Every thread is the Hoopla thread, you poor deluded fool.  But, I was just trying to give you some helpful advice... if nothing else, I am a helpful motherfucker.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 20, 2014, 06:22:00 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:17:35 PM
Is this the Hoopla thread, as well?

She'esh.

Every thread is the Hoopla thread, you poor deluded fool.  But, I was just trying to give you some helpful advice... if nothing else, I am a helpful motherfucker.

I'm certain to not have mentioned you being less.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 20, 2014, 06:43:52 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 20, 2014, 06:22:00 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:17:35 PM
Is this the Hoopla thread, as well?

She'esh.

Every thread is the Hoopla thread, you poor deluded fool.  But, I was just trying to give you some helpful advice... if nothing else, I am a helpful motherfucker.

I'm certain to not have mentioned you being less.

Is english your first language?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:50:38 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 20, 2014, 06:43:52 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 20, 2014, 06:22:00 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:17:35 PM
Is this the Hoopla thread, as well?

She'esh.

Every thread is the Hoopla thread, you poor deluded fool.  But, I was just trying to give you some helpful advice... if nothing else, I am a helpful motherfucker.

I'm certain to not have mentioned you being less.

Is english your first language?

Are you suggesting otherwise? Specify what you mean exactly by 'first language' for me, please. Communicable exchanges require shared levels of discipline. Its uncommon to know but its rare to understand. 
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 20, 2014, 06:51:50 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:50:38 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 20, 2014, 06:43:52 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 20, 2014, 06:22:00 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:17:35 PM
Is this the Hoopla thread, as well?

She'esh.

Every thread is the Hoopla thread, you poor deluded fool.  But, I was just trying to give you some helpful advice... if nothing else, I am a helpful motherfucker.

I'm certain to not have mentioned you being less.

Is english your first language?

Are you suggesting otherwise? Specify what you mean exactly by 'first language' for me, please. Communicable exchanges require shared levels of discipline. Its uncommon to know but its rare to understand.

You talk pretty fancy, but if you don't know what 'first language' means I'm going to have to be forced to assume you're not the sharpest spoon in the drawer.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:54:56 PM
Thinkfully.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: hooplala on June 20, 2014, 06:56:07 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 06:54:56 PM
Thinkfully.

Is english your first language?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 07:52:33 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 20, 2014, 05:47:10 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 20, 2014, 03:18:06 PM
Have I ever mentioned how little I like people with borderline personality disorder?

When it comes right down to it, they're boring.

Interminably tedious.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 08:32:59 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
When it comes right down to it, they're boring.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-history-of-boredom-138176427/   (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-history-of-boredom-138176427/)

Haha!   :-*

http://youtu.be/YtXbgjj-7i0   (http://youtu.be/YtXbgjj-7i0)
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 08:43:53 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 20, 2014, 02:44:49 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 09:04:23 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 08:54:11 PM
:oops: That concept is part of my thought-vocabulary... (sophabulary? Yeah that sounds right.)
I will need to do some self reflection. AGAIN.
Sigh, sentience is a sisyphean task.

What, orgone?
"Energy" as in, an unmeasurable part of your being that can be depleted, supressed, increased etc. etc.
I never really thought about it, kinda embarrasing.

Energy is totally measurable, wherein lies the difference.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 09:04:50 PM
Does that affect the way you vote?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on June 20, 2014, 09:39:40 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 12:10:11 PM
(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/uranus-full-size-e1300751334882.jpg)


"Texts and descriptions are fine and dandy, but to see [the planet] Uranus for what it is is another thing entirely. Enjoy..."

Beautiful. Potentially explosive regardless of being identified as the third of the gas giants. Compelling rings of 13 (respectfully).

Perception evolves, necessarily, and even if the base ego doesn't change... small measures of influence is planted allowing further potential to develop and will manifest through time, however, sometimes only in the way that change is recognizable in retrospect and upon reflection. *hearts* as *heads*

You're an asshole and appear to now be deliberately spamming threads.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 11:03:57 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 20, 2014, 10:53:48 PM
Quote from: Cain on June 20, 2014, 03:12:45 PM
Interestingly enough, ISIS say their aim is to undo Sykes-Picot, probably the quintessential 20th century approach to foreign policy.

And if Jordan is in their sights, as reports suggest it might be, then this is getting into old school empire-building territory.  An actual caliphate, controlling even the meagre Northern Iraqi and Raqqa oil supplies...it doesn't bear thinking about.  At least Saudi Arabia is constrained by the need to put its excess cash into London banks and property markets, but I somehow think a house in Kensington is not on the ISIS wishlist.

If you ever care to go into more detail on that, I'd be interested. The relative (un)involment of France depending on the situation seems to show that western powers still hold to Sykes-Picot largely, with slight shifts over the years but france=syria seems to still be alive and well and Russia as always has a relatively close eye on, well, everyone.


Um, for all the wisdom here, do we have any genetic specialists? Maybe its not a genetic lead, perhaps the term is, instead, genomic.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 11:09:28 PM
Quote from: Pæs on June 20, 2014, 09:39:40 PM
Quote from: UB on June 20, 2014, 12:10:11 PM
(http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz100/lolanicks/uranus-full-size-e1300751334882.jpg)


"Texts and descriptions are fine and dandy, but to see [the planet] Uranus for what it is is another thing entirely. Enjoy..."

Beautiful. Potentially explosive regardless of being identified as the third of the gas giants. Compelling rings of 13 (respectfully).

Perception evolves, necessarily, and even if the base ego doesn't change... small measures of influence is planted allowing further potential to develop and will manifest through time, however, sometimes only in the way that change is recognizable in retrospect and upon reflection. *hearts* as *heads*

You're an asshole and appear to now be deliberately spamming threads.

It's been doing this since it arrived, it's just getting more egregious about trying to MAKE EVERY THREAD A THREAD ABOUT INGE. Pretty much your typical derail-troll.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 20, 2014, 11:10:31 PM
It wants attention, and it knows that since I have it on ignore the only way I see its posts is when other people quote them.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 20, 2014, 11:53:22 PM
Maybe that is why they are sharing them.  :shocked:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 21, 2014, 12:08:01 AM
I didn't start this thread, but it's about me so I'm going to take the liberty of requesting a split so it won't get all shit up by the resident attention whore.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on June 21, 2014, 05:49:14 AM
Seconded as thread-maker.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 21, 2014, 05:01:46 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 20, 2014, 08:43:53 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 20, 2014, 02:44:49 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on June 19, 2014, 09:04:23 PM
Quote from: Regret on June 19, 2014, 08:54:11 PM
:oops: That concept is part of my thought-vocabulary... (sophabulary? Yeah that sounds right.)
I will need to do some self reflection. AGAIN.
Sigh, sentience is a sisyphean task.

What, orgone?
"Energy" as in, an unmeasurable part of your being that can be depleted, supressed, increased etc. etc.
I never really thought about it, kinda embarrasing.

Energy is totally measurable, wherein lies the difference.
I KNOW! I annoyed myself :(
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 10:34:08 AM
Sometimes recovery reminds us the importance of expression. Rehabilitation through artistic expression is admirable considering some other less flattering methods.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 10:39:56 AM
We are simply of different disciplines. Though I've watched TGRR and TRRN exchanges and I've done my homework on the brutal levels of board displayed hostility, I dont need to block any unfavorable or unflattering posters. I can handle the undiluted,  however convoluted.

Carry on.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 10:50:24 AM
Still nothing.  Alas.  Boredom reigns.  TRRN has atleast bestowed a few chew toys for my kennel...  She'll likely post complaining about teeth marks on her dildos next, though.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 12:06:59 PM
Insanity.  Craziness could be a type of shortcoming in retrospect. 
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 02:18:01 PM
UB us still blowing up my inbox.

I explained to her that PMing me is for admin purposes only.

So the fucking retard sent me the same old shit, only called me admin instead of TGRR.

:lulz:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 02:20:06 PM
And there's a lot of poop to clean up.

Fortunately, "cleaning the poop" means a couple of mouse clicks.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Cain on June 23, 2014, 04:30:03 PM
UB, desist from sending The Good Reverend Roger unsolicted PMs.  He has made it clear he does not want you contacting him but, unlike our users, is not able to block you due to his admin status.  Continued unsolicted PMs which do not have to do with his admin duties will be considered harassment and dealt with accordingly.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 04:33:19 PM
Quote from: Cain on June 23, 2014, 04:30:03 PM
UB, desist from sending The Good Reverend Roger unsolicted PMs.  He has made it clear he does not want you contacting him but, unlike our users, is not able to block you due to his admin status.  Continued unsolicted PMs which do not have to do with his admin duties will be considered harassment and dealt with accordingly.

Cain is too kind and typically well-spoken, as he has always been.

Let me rephrase that for the comprehension-impaired:  Inge/UB, if you PM me to convey information that does not have any direct bearing on the nuts & bolts running of this board, I will ban you.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Cain on June 23, 2014, 04:36:57 PM
YOU NO STOP PM ROGER, YOU NO USE KEYBOARD THINGIE TO WRITE BRAIN SPLOOGES ON FAUSTS INTERWEBS.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 04:39:38 PM
Quote from: Cain on June 23, 2014, 04:36:57 PM
YOU NO STOP PM ROGER, YOU NO USE KEYBOARD THINGIE TO WRITE BRAIN SPLOOGES ON FAUSTS INTERWEBS.

:lulz:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:54:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 02:18:01 PM
UB us still blowing up my inbox.

I explained to her that PMing me is for admin purposes only.

So the fucking retard sent me the same old shit, only called me admin instead of TGRR.

:lulz:

What a moronic fuck.

The PM questioned something that your boastful ass should have been able to answer.

Good day.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 04:57:08 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:54:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 02:18:01 PM
UB us still blowing up my inbox.

I explained to her that PMing me is for admin purposes only.

So the fucking retard sent me the same old shit, only called me admin instead of TGRR.

:lulz:

What a moronic fuck.

The PM questioned something that your boastful ass should have been able to answer.

Good day.

It questioned something user-to-user.  Addressing it as "admin" doesn't change that.

My boastful ass hates your ass.  Period.  There is at no point going to be any form of pandering to your oppositional defiant disorder on my part.  There will be no more PMs from you to me.  Well, there might be ONE more, but that will be what is known as a "self-correcting problem".

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
Unsolicited.... its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Whatta shit scooper he has been, so fortunate the board to have him.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:00:39 PM
For everyone else, her question more or less boiled down to:  "I am not required to get along with anyone to remain a member of this board, right?"

The answer is no, you are not required to do so, and still be a member of this board.  However, if you look through the peanut gallery, the vast majority of the people banned from this site were banned because they couldn't get along, and eventually did something to break one of the 6 rules.

This is something I have faith that you will do.  I have given you one more chance than normal with respect to the PM thing.  I did this BECAUSE I hate you, and therefore I want to make sure that you've been given every chance.  But that was the ass-end of my forebearance.  The next rules violation will be your last.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:01:53 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Your atrocious English aside, this is an accurate statement, and I have never once pretended otherwise.

Your point?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:05:33 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
Unsolicited.... its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Whatta shit scooper he has been, so fortunate the board to have him.

Rather him than you. Will you just take the fucking hint and fuck off already? No-one cares or even reads your shit. You're on ignore with pretty much all the active posters apart from me and the mods.

Have you considered Tumblr? Seriously.

No, seriously. Fuck off to tumblr.

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:07:07 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:05:33 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
Unsolicited.... its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Whatta shit scooper he has been, so fortunate the board to have him.

Rather him than you. Will you just take the fucking hint and fuck off already? No-one cares or even reads your shit. You're on ignore with pretty much all the active posters apart from me and the mods.

Have you considered Tumblr? Seriously.

No, seriously. Fuck off to tumblr.

What I love is that she came in and spammed every conversation with gibberish until said conversation went tits-up.  Then *I* am The Cancer That Is Killing PD.

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:13:48 PM
Well, yes.

Your responsibility for the world's wrongs has been documented extensively. It's all part of the lizard-person master plan along with raising global temperatures.

Why else, good readers, would a a HOLY MAN live in Tucson? Cold blooded, I'm fucking telling you.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:19:11 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:13:48 PM
Well, yes.

Your responsibility for the world's wrongs has been documented extensively. It's all part of the lizard-person master plan along with raising global temperatures.

Why else, good readers, would a a HOLY MAN live in Tucson? Cold blooded, I'm fucking telling you.

Damn right.  When the sun is up, I can run like a gazelle full of meth.  Air conditioning puts me into suspended animation.  This is why I rarely get any work done.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:30:04 PM
It's not just that as the only give away sign.

To start with, there's the venom. Your typical komodo dragon carries so much venom in it's bite scientists are still trying to argue which particular toxin does the deed first.

Your typical TGRR does not even need to bite to achieve this. He radiates it from every pore. It's what gives him that sheen. It's not SWEAT like you'd expect from a human in Tucson it's pure concentrated hate-shit in liquid form. Seeping from him. All the live long fucking day. Do you have any understanding of just how much danger you are in from being in the same fucking room as such a man?

Now what in sweet fuck do you think will happen when a TGRR open's IT'S mouth to bite something? Or even speak?

Well, firstly the jaw dislocates to properly consume/enunciate. This can be disturbing if not expected. It is not advised to try and help or push the jaw back into place because in case you fucking missed it, he's covered in hate-shit toxins.

Really, if you happen to be near a TGRR, it's not so much what will kill you it's all about the when. REPENT FUCKERS. REPENT AND BE DAMNED ANYWAY BECAUSE FUCK YOU.

Regards,

Uncle Junkie.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:33:09 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:30:04 PM
It's not just that as the only give away sign.

To start with, there's the venom. Your typical komodo dragon carries so much venom in it's bite scientists are still trying to argue which particular toxin does the deed first.

Your typical TGRR does not even need to bite to achieve this. He radiates it from every pore. It's what gives him that sheen. It's not SWEAT like you'd expect from a human in Tucson it's pure concentrated hate-shit in liquid form. Seeping from him. All the live long fucking day. Do you have any understanding of just how much danger you are in from being in the same fucking room as such a man?

Now what in sweet fuck do you think will happen when a TGRR open's IT'S mouth to bite something? Or even speak?

Well, firstly the jaw dislocates to properly consume/enunciate. This can be disturbing if not expected. It is not advised to try and help or push the jaw back into place because in case you fucking missed it, he's covered in hate-shit toxins.

Really, if you happen to be near a TGRR, it's not so much what will kill you it's all about the when. REPENT FUCKERS. REPENT AND BE DAMNED ANYWAY BECAUSE FUCK YOU.

Regards,

Uncle Junkie.

Look at my smile, people.  Does it LOOK like the smile of a lizard?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:38:14 PM
Yes.

Yes, it does.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:42:48 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:38:14 PM
Yes.

Yes, it does.

Well, that's hardly my fault.  I was just doing what I do, doing my little dance, singing my little song, you know?  And then Hirley0 got on the dance floor and said

SHAKE THAT
First ^  Then V

And I did.  I didn't feel like I had any choice.  Between P-Funk and Hirley0, I became the man reptillian menace I am today.

Bootsy Collins did this to me.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 06:09:16 PM
Being covered in Funk is no excuse.

I'd tell you all about his other horrible attributes but it just seems to get you fan mail crazy people sending messages err,love letters from the derranged and strange um, important missives of no import, shit I mean spam.

People spam the fuck out of you.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 23, 2014, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 06:09:16 PM
Being covered in Funk is no excuse.

I'd tell you all about his other horrible attributes but it just seems to get you fan mail crazy people sending messages err,love letters from the derranged and strange um, important missives of no import, shit I mean spam.

People spam the fuck out of you.
And a Roger without fucks is even more hazardous to your health.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 06:59:33 PM
I dont suppose I could request a thread split. TGRR's precious reptilian ego could be stroked elsewhere.

*Disassociate*
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 07:05:50 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 06:59:33 PM
I dont suppose I could request a thread split. TGRR's precious reptilian ego could be stroked elsewhere.

*Disassociate*

Not in a limited thread.  That's the whole point of them.

Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: UB on June 23, 2014, 07:18:50 PM
Ahhh. ... so you actually had one.

I've overstayed my welcome, haven't made anyone cum in their pants, and am not a solicitor. ... have I broken enough of your rules and damaged your ego enough to be landed in the peanut gallery for the elephants to feed on?

The first day of Sumer was yesterday.

Farewell.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 07:20:06 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 07:18:50 PM
Ahhh. ... so you actually had one.

I've overstayed my welcome, haven't made anyone cum in their pants, and am not a solicitor. ... have I broken enough of your rules and damaged your ego enough to be landed in the peanut gallery for the elephants to feed on?

The first day of Sumer was yesterday.

Farewell.

You say farewell, but I suspect you are lying and will be back.

Sooner rather than later.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on June 23, 2014, 08:56:02 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 07:20:06 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 07:18:50 PM
Ahhh. ... so you actually had one.

I've overstayed my welcome, haven't made anyone cum in their pants, and am not a solicitor. ... have I broken enough of your rules and damaged your ego enough to be landed in the peanut gallery for the elephants to feed on?

The first day of Sumer was yesterday.

Farewell.

You say farewell, but I suspect you are lying and will be back.

Sooner rather than later.
Sadly, you will be proven right. I would really like one of these creeps to show some backbone and stay away just out of spite.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 09:46:55 PM
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-9/10417533_10152476123998718_2178187595121176091_n.jpg)

Emote-worthy?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 23, 2014, 10:32:05 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 04:57:08 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:54:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 02:18:01 PM
UB us still blowing up my inbox.

I explained to her that PMing me is for admin purposes only.

So the fucking retard sent me the same old shit, only called me admin instead of TGRR.

:lulz:

What a moronic fuck.

The PM questioned something that your boastful ass should have been able to answer.

Good day.

It questioned something user-to-user.  Addressing it as "admin" doesn't change that.

My boastful ass hates your ass.  Period.  There is at no point going to be any form of pandering to your oppositional defiant disorder on my part.  There will be no more PMs from you to me.  Well, there might be ONE more, but that will be what is known as a "self-correcting problem".

Jesus fucking fuck, what part of "no" does this aberrant putz not recognize? Continuing unwanted contact after it's been made clear it's unwanted is some rapey-stalkery bullshit, right there.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 23, 2014, 10:35:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:07:07 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:05:33 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
Unsolicited.... its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Whatta shit scooper he has been, so fortunate the board to have him.

Rather him than you. Will you just take the fucking hint and fuck off already? No-one cares or even reads your shit. You're on ignore with pretty much all the active posters apart from me and the mods.

Have you considered Tumblr? Seriously.

No, seriously. Fuck off to tumblr.

What I love is that she came in and spammed every conversation with gibberish until said conversation went tits-up.  Then *I* am The Cancer That Is Killing PD.

Well, she wants you, but you won't let her have you. Therefore, you are Teh Evul.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 10:58:19 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 23, 2014, 10:35:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:07:07 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:05:33 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
Unsolicited.... its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Whatta shit scooper he has been, so fortunate the board to have him.

Rather him than you. Will you just take the fucking hint and fuck off already? No-one cares or even reads your shit. You're on ignore with pretty much all the active posters apart from me and the mods.

Have you considered Tumblr? Seriously.

No, seriously. Fuck off to tumblr.

What I love is that she came in and spammed every conversation with gibberish until said conversation went tits-up.  Then *I* am The Cancer That Is Killing PD.

Well, she wants you, but you won't let her have you. Therefore, you are Teh Evul.

Maybe.  Her very first post to me, her first post on PD, was a bucket of hate.  So I'm inclined to think that she's just batshit.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on June 23, 2014, 11:36:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 10:58:19 PM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on June 23, 2014, 10:35:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 05:07:07 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on June 23, 2014, 05:05:33 PM
Quote from: UB on June 23, 2014, 04:59:07 PM
Unsolicited.... its obvious TGRR is a dweller of the lower mind.

Whatta shit scooper he has been, so fortunate the board to have him.

Rather him than you. Will you just take the fucking hint and fuck off already? No-one cares or even reads your shit. You're on ignore with pretty much all the active posters apart from me and the mods.

Have you considered Tumblr? Seriously.

No, seriously. Fuck off to tumblr.

What I love is that she came in and spammed every conversation with gibberish until said conversation went tits-up.  Then *I* am The Cancer That Is Killing PD.

Well, she wants you, but you won't let her have you. Therefore, you are Teh Evul.

Maybe.  Her very first post to me, her first post on PD, was a bucket of hate.  So I'm inclined to think that she's just batshit.

Oh, I didn't specify HOW she wants you. But it's obvious that she wants something. Your attention, your enmity, your respect, your defeat. Something.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Q. G. Pennyworth on July 02, 2014, 09:09:04 PM
Did this one finally vanish?
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on July 02, 2014, 09:50:36 PM
Quote from: Q. G. Pennyworth on July 02, 2014, 09:09:04 PM
Did this one finally vanish?

So far.  Until her triumphant return, yada yada yada.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Reginald Ret on July 03, 2014, 07:59:19 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on June 23, 2014, 09:46:55 PM
(https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-9/10417533_10152476123998718_2178187595121176091_n.jpg)

Emote-worthy?
pic broken.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Cain on July 04, 2014, 12:50:02 AM
I know where she is.  Inge has embraced Wicca.  Or Wicca.com, to be more precise.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Luna on July 04, 2014, 01:05:02 AM
Quote from: Cain on July 04, 2014, 12:50:02 AM
I know where she is.  Inge has embraced Wicca.  Or Wicca.com, to be more precise.

I'll bet they love her.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on July 04, 2014, 05:39:46 PM
Quote from: Cain on July 04, 2014, 12:50:02 AM
I know where she is.  Inge has embraced Wicca.  Or Wicca.com, to be more precise.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Pæs on July 05, 2014, 06:35:50 AM
Perfect.
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on July 05, 2014, 07:05:48 AM
Quote from: Cain on July 04, 2014, 12:50:02 AM
I know where she is.  Inge has embraced Wicca.  Or Wicca.com, to be more precise.

NIGHT COMPLETE.   :lulz:
Title: Re: Limited Inge thread: only while stocks last
Post by: Luna on July 05, 2014, 01:52:10 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on July 05, 2014, 07:05:48 AM
Quote from: Cain on July 04, 2014, 12:50:02 AM
I know where she is.  Inge has embraced Wicca.  Or Wicca.com, to be more precise.

NIGHT COMPLETE.   :lulz:

I suppose sending them a nice fruit basket is out of the question...