Messages

basically the military as an entity is an admission of failure by the human race

www.principiadiscordia.com/horns.aiff

the cat is for me and the rest if for your posts

Yes, sadly.

Reeeeallyyy?   
Wow.. I mean.. fuck man..
wow.. 

There is also a NAMBLA (North American Marlon Brando Lookalike Association) that is fully active in the USA.

Je je je je je theyre kewl.
You feel like cheesing?
I wonder if that really works 

there is really only one way to find out, please fetch me a cat, a pair of tongs, rubber gloves and a vat of acid.

yeah, I don't really read anything you say anymore since you posted those dumb creepy messages about suu

to me the internet is the last untamed land. if you post your grief, then people will respond out of grief, thats why their messages are harsh. I try to keep things surreal, and I like to bring out the surreal responses. I think joy attracts joy, so I vent my toxins(through trolling or lj style posting) away from where I stay. I hate having to vent within a forum I post on frequently

I missed this thread.
purple eris made me giggle I hope she comes back.

If an antiproton travelling forward in time is equivalent to a proton travelling backward in time

what makes you say this is the case?

THIS IS JUST A THINLY VIALED ATTEMPT TO GET MYSTERY SHOPPERS.


next stop operation mindfuck door to door salesman... hrm... worked for "Bob"

I have never thought about it that way. I should have thought that in order to anticipate the reaction of others you would have to study them closely instead of finetunig yourself.

Unless you are talking about manipulation, which of course is useful.

Its both observation and analysis and fine tuning the self. One cant go without the other. Manipulation would only come into it if you need to manipulate someone.

Part of that are your implications. What is it that you'd rather hint at subtly, why do you prefer not to outright say something. Which are the implication that make you not talk about something at all?

You believe you know those reasons? Good for you. Do you want to compare your findings with mine? Would you want me to tell you how accurate, how truthful you are with yourself?

What really interests me however is what you leave out completely. What you say about every topic that you choose to talk about is but a fragment of a larger context. I know that, living in time as you do, you have to choose something. Still: Why did you pick the fragment you picked and not an entirely different one? Not the almost identical next one? Why did you pick it now, and since we are at it, how did you pick it? Circumstances and personality, you say? Well, of course. Why do you think do I care?

On a more serious note, the subtle nuances of what choice of words and mannerisms a person uses to convey their thoughts has been on my mind for a great deal of time, my father was always precise and terse with every message he would express, vocally and physically, the only time I could really figure out what was going on in is head was when he was angry.
I would love to master my own expressions, manorisms to the point that not only could I express myself the way I want to, but be able to know another persons reactions before even beginning to communicate.

sounds like an invitation to go on msn and talk at you, Finally, a willing participant.

most concepts of non linear time come back to  different rates of time passing in two places, the topic is pretty much a dead end, the only feasible application of time travel would be use the accelerated flow of time due to speed.

The applications of this to the fishing industry would be enormous. If you could accelerate freshly caught fish to the speed of light its amount of time in transit would seem far less then the rest of the world, and would not spoil as quickly (ignoring the fact that it would arrive at its target destination pretty much instantaneously because of its speed).

So to summarize, I feel all fish should be fired around the world in rockets.

This has been illustrated not only in physical models of time, but I think there are a lot of ways it can be illustrated on more philosophical terms.  There are probably tons of zen koans about time which illustrate the illusory nature of "common sense causality".

Speaking as a physics student, would you please tell me what the hell you are talking about?  FYI Jumping to philosophy and zen koans (that you didn't specify either) is not considered reasoning.

Philosophical discourse and zen koans exist which refer to the non-linearity of time.

oh dear

ugh....

In the morning I'll post some form of response to this