Quote from: Iptuous on February 15, 2010, 07:42:53 PMQuote from: Doktor Howl on February 15, 2010, 07:28:54 PM
No, it fucking is not. It is the department of the treasury's money, until such time as it is allocated, once you strip the rhetoric off of it. If you want it to be YOUR money, as in The Peoples' money, then I suggest you demand a representative that does more than a self-serving, cynical dog and pony show.
And yes, the Ron Paul crowd is more than pleased with the status quo.
Unless they'd like to lose highway maintenance. Or the military that protects us from the people we've raped for the last 200 years. Or sanitation, emergency services, yada yada yada.
What they AREN'T happy with, is having to PAY for these things. Well, too damn bad...reality is what is still there when you're done bitching, and the fact is, the bills DO have to be paid. If the Libertarians don't like it, they can fuck off to Somalia, where there are no horrible "laws" and "taxes". Or "roads" and "food" (the two ARE connected).
I would agree with you were it not for the fact that he votes against the bills. I don't see how you can call it a show if he's not voting for them.
As far as your examples of the RP crowd being pleased with the status quo, I would say that in large part they do want federal funding out of them... many/most of them to a greater degree than I do...
'if you don't like it, you can move to some other place...' huh. Where have I heard that rhetoric before?
1. Because he knows they'll pass anyway. It's like him voting against congressional pay raises, then taking the raise (by contrast, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin still accepts the same pay he received as a freshman, donating the difference to charities in his state after voting against the raises. There's other reasons to hate Feingold, though.).
2. So people in New York deserve good roads, but people in the Appalachias don't? And states should pay for constitutionally-mandated federal highways (article I, section 8, postal roads)?
3. Sure. But it's easier, and more fair, than dismantling a system others are using, because you don't want to pay the bills. If there's an existing system that is more to your liking already in place, why not use it? Sure, you'll die of cholera, but at least you won't have to pay for the CDC, or take it away from people who DO want it.