Quote from: CBXTN on July 29, 2016, 10:46:11 PM
With this in mind, it makes me curious about other types of "sexual deviancy" which can be quickly criminalized. Anything considered "weird" (outside the standard state-sanctioned sexual conduct) could be used as leverage against people.
Quote from: Pergamos on July 29, 2016, 11:39:01 PM
The difference, at least as far as a live animal is concerned, is that an animal can't legally consent. I know the law in WA used to be against sex with a resisting animal. I think that was changed after the fellow died of an overdose of horse dick.
You are right, animals cannot grant or withhold consent (I wrote briefly on the double standard of Zoophilia and Industrial meat in another thread, please check it out if you can).
But the general point I was making for this topic is that it is too easy to target a paraphilia and outlaw it - even if consent is involved. Doesn't Great Britain have a law which bans all types of necrophilic pornography, including fantasy necrophilia (like ridiculous films of people mating with sexy bodies covered in fake blood)?