News:

Feel my amazing brain. Go on, touch it!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Anna Mae Bollocks

#8446
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on May 15, 2011, 06:22:36 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on May 15, 2011, 05:19:19 AM
Was Obi Wan fapping to porn, too?

With the force.  He'd just sit in outdoor cafes, you know, smiling.  Nobody ever caught on, because he had both hands on the table.

If I had the force, I wouldn't stop til I'd pulled the fucking thing off.

Yoda had the force, too...OH SHIT. Going to scrub my brain now.
#8447
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on May 15, 2011, 05:34:41 AM
Quote from: Anna Mae Bollocks on May 15, 2011, 05:31:45 AM
Now I'm gonna be wondering what the "doll factory" really is... :eek:

Something bad that happened 20 years or so ago.

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=22758.0

*shudders*

Might stay up awhile tonight...
#8448
Throw in the story at the end of Exodus 33 about the time Yahweh let Moses look at his ass. Just his ass, because Moses couln't have seen him from the front and lived.  :D

Literal-minded Bible-believing Christians NEED these things.  :lulz:
#8449
Now I'm gonna be wondering what the "doll factory" really is... :eek:
#8450
Was Obi Wan fapping to porn, too?
#8451
Quote from: Wyldkat on May 15, 2011, 02:46:17 AM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on May 14, 2011, 05:39:51 PM
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on May 14, 2011, 04:08:17 PM
Ohay, Guess what.


Assburgers at the Shroomery think all this is completely sensible.

QuoteSome douche Mod said:

It is frivolous because even taking the well-plead factual allegations to be true, the law does not provide for the relief requested (nor is their a sufficient argument for the creation of new law).  When you file a case with a prayer for relief that is not legally available on the basis of the facts, it is a waste of time.

The fundamental legal question is whether someone who has voluntarily joined and served on a government group has a first amendment right to refrain from expressing views for the government that they disagree with.  The related question is whether someone who fails to cheer as directed by the government due to personal feelings, and thereby has their invitation to the group retracted, has had their civil rights violated.


The law is clear that you do not have the right to speak your mind when voluntarily operating as a government agent.

Had the school retracted their invitation due to conduct outside of school, such as telling the world about how the boy raped her, or even prevented her from speaking about the matter during the school day when speech of a different viewpoint is allowed,  I would agree their would be a case.

So there's no special consideration even in extreme cases (IE being raped)?  FFS, there's more to this than simple free speech rights.

I'm wondering how much, "If she was raped it was her own fault" and "Just deal with it and stop whining" was tossed around...  This is ridiculous.  She's basically being punished for being a cheerleader and being raped by some guy on the sports team and having the balls to not just take it.

However, if she knew he was going to be playing and that she would not cheer for him she should have talked to her coach ahead of time, explained the situation and figured out a work around, like doing the motions, but not saying anything for example.  It would have saved her a lot of hassle.
:flush:

That's fuckin' bad. Even for a TCC fascimod.
#8452
Quote from: Wyldkat on May 14, 2011, 09:45:17 PM
I meant "rise above" more as in a "rise above a challenge" than any sort of enlightenment or transcendence.

Huh?
People rise TO a challenge. They rise ABOVE circumstances, etc. - which is the same as transcending.
#8453
TCC exists for when you're bored and have time to get your frustrations out by pissing off stupid people. Period.
#8454
Hmmm...I like that.
#8455
Quote from: Charley Brown on May 14, 2011, 09:19:05 PM
Quote from: Wyldkat on May 14, 2011, 09:09:39 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on May 14, 2011, 08:50:34 PM

You maintain that you have been striving for a year to change the board. Yet unjust admin practices continue, ego is the rule of the day, you talk about the behind the scenes things but there is no real evidence. Once a horse is dead, continued beating serve no purpose. Any of us here would have walked away by no later than the second unfair admin event. Yet you continue, so we are left to draw the conclusion that your position means more to you than your ideals.

You can see, following this train of thought why you are held in such low esteem.

Ok, thank you for explaining clearly, I appreciate that.  To clarify, I've been at TCC since around 1996.  The modding practices have swung in both directions, getting consistently more moderate as the years went by.  Since I'm not going to show screen shots of the admin board there is no way for me to support my claims and I understand that people here will not believe with out proof.  I obviously look at the world differently than the people here.  I am an idealist and that leads me to continue to try and reach those ideals, not give up and leave when things swing against those ideals.  It would be easier to leave, but to me it would be the same as abandoning a child just because there are behavior issues.

Pixie:  I ranted in the pornography thread about censorship.  I don't remember what if anything I said specifically about the veggies on the main boards and I have no idea how to do screenshots.  ETA Thanks BabylonHoruv

At this point I really think I've said everything I can about why I do what I do.  You are all welcome to whatever opinions you wish to hold.

Thanks, Charley Brown, for explaining rather than attacking.

Comparing a tyrannical forum to an abandoned child isn't going to cut it. I was a years long member of MW, like so many others here and rather than "try to fix what was beyond repair" like so many others here I left. Yes, I was permabanned, but the thread I started that led to my ban was deliberate.

Roger, Cain and myself walked away from admin positions at Shadows board when he started the same thing. I was going to walk away from EB&G because of the same thing but the owner unmodded me first.

I guess what I am trying to say is, no, we can not understand your willingness to accept that kind of behavior under the guise of trying to change it. We are indeed not idealists, we are realists, a part of Discordianism I suppose. We try very hard to see things as they really are, not what we would like fo0r them to be.
:mittens: :mittens: :mittens:
#8456
Two vast and trunkless legs of stone / Re: Sex.
May 14, 2011, 09:01:59 PM
I'm so grateful I didn't take that back door to MWAD when it was offered. *shudders*
#8457
MY INTERBUTTS! MINE MINE MINE!  :lulz:
#8458
Two vast and trunkless legs of stone / Re: Sex.
May 14, 2011, 08:56:30 PM
OMFG DON'T LET THEM BREED
#8459
Quote from: Wyldkat on May 14, 2011, 08:32:04 PM
I found it interesting to find the idea that we are all in our own separate prison (mental construct of the world, whatever a person wishes to call it) here.  I honestly hadn't expected it since many people seem to be so reactive to other people's thoughts and opinions.  That part goes directly counter the concept I learned.

Translation: I have viewed this through my grid and made it into something with shamanizm and teachers and stuff. I am looking for stuff you gais consider authoritative so I can do you like I do the tards at TCC. This might fit the bill, that's why I started this thread. Now Imma pull the WHY DO YOU CALL ME ON MY BULLSHIT WHEN EVERBUDDY JUST SEES THINGS AS A CONSTRUCT ANYWAYS? card. Hyuk, hyuk.
#8460
But Wyldkat's the GOOD one.
Like Swordie.