News:

MysticWicks endorsement: "At least Satanists HAVE a worldview. After reading this thread, I'm convinced that discordians not only don't, but will actively mock anyone who does."

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - The Johnny

#3196

I think a giraffe; but i think it would take a while.
#3198
Quote from: Ascoe on January 08, 2010, 08:41:10 AM
:eek: :fnord:

I'm not sure about the NWS rules here, so i'll just post a link.

NWS NWS (as nws as mspaint gets anyway)
http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs38/f/2008/318/d/1/d1c3d4a285dae2330464dfa96aefcf37.jpg

hopefully you pd/f'ers find it as funny as i do ;x

One of them should actually be a vagina...
#3199

Noses with frost-bite are just a small price to pay for "Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité"

P.S. It's not coincidence it does not say "Sororité" in the national motto.
#3200
Techmology and Scientism / Re: Minecraft: It's awesome.
January 08, 2010, 03:03:47 AM

McAfee failed.

Im planning on buying a subscription for BitDefender, for all this madness started 2 months after it expired.
#3201
Techmology and Scientism / Re: Minecraft: It's awesome.
January 08, 2010, 03:00:06 AM
Quote from: Slanket the Destroyer on January 08, 2010, 02:52:37 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 07, 2010, 09:17:53 PM
Quote from: Slanket the Destroyer on January 07, 2010, 07:22:22 PM
Update your javas?

I did just before trying. Idk, this computer sucks and is infected.

Meh.

You're still using an infected machine? Shit man, just format it.

These drunk bums of a technician monkeys are distracted by the holidays of the "Three Magus that brought gifts to Baby Jesus", so they havent replaced my fried power source; thus, they let me borrow a computer from their cyber-cafe, and i properly infected it.  :| And im not gonna bother fixing something thats not mine.
#3202
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 02:50:05 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 02:42:27 AM
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 02:32:00 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 02:18:55 AM
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 01:41:50 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 01:26:21 AM

Still, not allowing them to wear what they want on the street is completely off-the-wall, over-the-top.

What if I decided to take a stroll in front of your house wearing a big bulky jacket covering something up,  with, what is that...WIRES!?  What is this thing in my hand here with the switch on it for...

I am not comparing the wearing of a burqa with suicide bombers, but there are legitimate reasons for not allowing people to wear certain things in certain places, and if you test me, I will always find a way to be over the top in my clothes.

If you arent comparing burqa wearers to suicide bombers, then your example makes no sense.

Your right, muslims should only wear transparent ponchos so they dont blow us up.

My jacket was directed at you.  I can understand restrictions on people wearing certain clothes in certain places.  I don't see how that makes no sense.  Some things are a no-no.  If you saw me in front of your home wearing my previously described jacket, you think I should be left alone?

I still think a woman being told that she is not allowed to wear attire suiting her religious beliefs in public is fucking stupid.  Just outlaw religion and make it easier.

If you were just standing there, whatever. If when i exited my apartment complex you stared at me creepily id keep an eye out for you, while i walk towards wherever im going. You could very well be covered in tar and feathers and i wouldnt mind.

Besides, suicide bombers dont wait, they just strike.

And you dont need a burqa to hide plastic explosives, it more than well fits in said backpack i mentioned.

As I said, I think a burqa is fine.  If I saw some asshole in my neighborhood wearing my jacket I would beat the shit out of him and take my jacket back.  If I saw someone I thought might have a bomb I would get my family out of the area, then inform the police "there was a guy walking around outside with a big bulky jacket covering something, with wires, and a switch in his hand."

:lulz: lol wtf

NO, I WOULD RUN TOWARDS HIM IN FULL SPEED, THROW SOME DUST IN HIS FACE TO BLIND HIM, THEN TACKLE HIM AND STRUGGLE TO GET THE SWITCH OFF HIS HAND, PUNCH HIM UNTIL HES UNCONSCIOUS, THEN STRANGLE THE DIRTY SAND NIGGER WITH THE WIRE - THEN ID GET MEDALS AND GET THE KEY TO THE CITY.
#3203

And im not sure, but i think you can fit enough C4 up your rectum to kill a dozen people.

So the "banning clothing" for Safetytm doesnt make much sense to me.
#3204
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 02:32:00 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 02:18:55 AM
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 01:41:50 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 01:26:21 AM

Still, not allowing them to wear what they want on the street is completely off-the-wall, over-the-top.

What if I decided to take a stroll in front of your house wearing a big bulky jacket covering something up,  with, what is that...WIRES!?  What is this thing in my hand here with the switch on it for...

I am not comparing the wearing of a burqa with suicide bombers, but there are legitimate reasons for not allowing people to wear certain things in certain places, and if you test me, I will always find a way to be over the top in my clothes.

If you arent comparing burqa wearers to suicide bombers, then your example makes no sense.

Your right, muslims should only wear transparent ponchos so they dont blow us up.

My jacket was directed at you.  I can understand restrictions on people wearing certain clothes in certain places.  I don't see how that makes no sense.  Some things are a no-no.  If you saw me in front of your home wearing my previously described jacket, you think I should be left alone?

I still think a woman being told that she is not allowed to wear attire suiting her religious beliefs in public is fucking stupid.  Just outlaw religion and make it easier.

If you were just standing there, whatever. If when i exited my apartment complex you stared at me creepily id keep an eye out for you, while i walk towards wherever im going. You could very well be covered in tar and feathers and i wouldnt mind.

Besides, suicide bombers dont wait, they just strike.

And you dont need a burqa to hide plastic explosives, it more than well fits in said backpack i mentioned.
#3205
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on January 08, 2010, 02:23:02 AM
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 01:41:50 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 01:26:21 AM

Still, not allowing them to wear what they want on the street is completely off-the-wall, over-the-top.

What if I decided to take a stroll in front of your house wearing a big bulky jacket covering something up,  with, what is that...WIRES!?  What is this thing in my hand here with the switch on it for...

I am not comparing the wearing of a burqa with suicide bombers, but there are legitimate reasons for not allowing people to wear certain things in certain places, and if you test me, I will always find a way to be over the top in my clothes.

It should totally be illegal to wear big bulky jackets. That'll teach people in Wisconsin to go outside in winter! They're all terrorists anyway.

And backpacks! Surely they are filled with drugs, korans and C4 !!!
#3206

Maybe he has some penis gripping fetish, and it was painfully delicious, but he got bored after a while and called for help.
#3207
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 01:41:50 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 01:26:21 AM

Still, not allowing them to wear what they want on the street is completely off-the-wall, over-the-top.

What if I decided to take a stroll in front of your house wearing a big bulky jacket covering something up,  with, what is that...WIRES!?  What is this thing in my hand here with the switch on it for...

I am not comparing the wearing of a burqa with suicide bombers, but there are legitimate reasons for not allowing people to wear certain things in certain places, and if you test me, I will always find a way to be over the top in my clothes.

If you arent comparing burqa wearers to suicide bombers, then your example makes no sense.

Your right, muslims should only wear transparent ponchos so they dont blow us up.
#3208
Quote from: Brotep on January 08, 2010, 01:27:56 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 01:08:55 AM
Just because their discourse is about "women's rights" and "secularism" doesnt mean its not christian zealots behind it.

For every shitty action theres a possible "reasonable" justification.

Christian ain't the only brand zealotry comes in.

Of course not, but in this context it seems to be so this kind.
#3209

Still, not allowing them to wear what they want on the street is completely off-the-wall, over-the-top.
#3210
Quote from: rygD on January 08, 2010, 01:22:02 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 01:13:19 AM
Quote from: -Kel- on January 08, 2010, 01:07:09 AM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 08, 2010, 12:16:31 AM

Do you think it would be ok for a private company as Wal Mart to declare "we do not hire blacks or women"?

Luckily enough there are Federal Anti Discrimination Laws in place so companies cannot do that, at least where I live.

In my home of SL,UT there was actually a battle going on against the LDS Church and the ACLU because the church bought a city block and made it private property. They turned it into a park, awwwww...but you cannot swear clothing that is lude and have naughty words on it, a gay couple got harassed by security even because they kissed http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=299&sid=8102922. But the ACLU lost because ITS PRIVATE PROPERTY. The owner has that right, just like people in their homes have a right to say "GTFO" if they don't like what you're doing. It's a two way street. Like you're remark about the Ku Kluxx Klan wearing their hoods, they have a right to on their own private property and on public lands, hell police even have to protect them when they march because IT IS A RIGHT. I would much rather be able to do what the fuck i want, then have that freedom taking from me all cause i don't want some asshole racist to have their freedoms taken away from them.

TWO WAY STREET!

ugh *steps off soapbox*

Parks, homes, members clubs/organizations fine.

Jobs or government,  i think not fine.

I know of no job that will allow you to go into your workplace and wear whatever you want.  Working from home perhaps, but all employers will likely have some policy.

Mmm, on that sense you do have a point, bureaucratic jobs have an all alienating dress code that doesnt distinguish culture, religion or personal taste.