WAR IN THE SUN
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN1.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN2.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN3.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN4.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN5.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN6.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN7.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN8.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN9.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN10A.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN10X.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN11.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN12.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN13.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN14.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/SUN16.gif)
Ms. Thelema XXX (http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/THELEMA.gif)
Mother Fucker
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUPR/motherfucker.jpg)
Bhumi Sparsa
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/FREE.gif)
Magic Chao
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/VOCWEB.jpg)
Mass O'Phoenix
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/MQ9AD.jpg)
Bard O'Dummy
(http://www.buddhafart.com/ULYSSES/WILL.jpg)
Well apart from the fact that the speed of light is constant, whether you move towards it or not, I actually quite enjoyed this. (the first one)
Quote from: Payne on June 06, 2007, 04:31:38 AM
Well apart from the fact that the speed of light is constant, whether you move towards it or not, I actually quite enjoyed this. (the first one)
Thank you, Payne.
Right yeah the speed of light is a constant regardless, but it would appear to reach the individual traveling towards it before it would the individual traveling away from it when observed by someone in relative motion. Though only at speeds beyond reason for the example and the difference in time would be undetectable to the naked eye, but even still a consequence of light speed involves such non-simultaneous events. Or so I think!
Like the train and the lightning Einstien was talking about....
:mittens:
There's some way cool stuff in there! I particularly like
Mother Fucker
and
Bard O'Dummy
:mittens:
i liked this. pretty pictures. not sure if what they say really holds up though (i didnt quite follow it), but i enjoyed it nonetheless.
Cool stuff. My head's a little to squishy this morning to follow the science but I'm sure it'll come to me later. good show and welcome.
It should also be noted that I should have just left it at a comment on the purdy pictures as well, last night.
My head was not quite cleared yet from the deleterious effects of alcohol, and booze and science do not mix.
But anyhoo, very purdy, pardner,
I don't know if Mrs Thelema is SFW, though.
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 03:20:56 PM
I don't know if Mrs Thelema is SFW, though.
damn yuo and yuor prudish work environments!
that is one thing i seriously don't understand, but i'll write it up to some american grayness or something. if on the one hand you are allowed to surf the web, read forums and even view rather disturbing pictures, but as soon as there's a naked nipple visible you run the risk of getting fired over it?
i mean, it's okay i don't want people getting fired, so i don't mind playing along with the rules, but i seriously don't understand how "ms Thelema" is not ok (cause she's nekkid under all those tattoos) where some of the utter filth posted in other threads goes right past the eyes of your boss "ohh some huge deformed camel toe woman, that's okay, regular work stuff, that" ? and that 777-guy saying "testicles" ? and some of those deformed baby pictures?
Well, let's put it this way:
Most of us at work aren't supposed to be on the internet in the first place. I know, we're such rule-breakers!
Anyway, if a manager was to come along and see Mooseknuckle, we'd get in trouble, and maybe fired for violating company policy.
However, if they were to come along and see an exposed breast, or anything blatantly sexual, we would immediately be fired for violating the sexual harassment policy.
I don't think it's as much as we're "allowed" to do it, as our bosses don't really know what we're doing. At least in my case. But if my boss were to pop in and surprise me, I would rather them see some texts then some tits.
yeah what LMNO said.
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 03:52:55 PMAnyway, if a manager was to come along and see Mooseknuckle, we'd get in trouble, and maybe fired for violating company policy.
However, if they were to come along and see an exposed breast, or anything blatantly sexual, we would immediately be fired for violating the sexual harassment policy.
ooookay.
how is this sexual harassment? who is it harassing?
or is "sexual harassment policy" sort of the catch-all name for .. no what is it?
i thought sexual harassment policy meant something like that if Suu would be your collegue and she would ask you to stop making those lewd remarks (yea, if hypothetically she'd get sick of the attention or something :lol:) you oughta stop doing it -- or else get fired (or sanctioned)
but, apart from that, well if i understand correctly what you're saying, for your average boss nipples would be per default more worse than, say, a motorcycle-crash.jpg -- still think that's kind of weird, but i'll strike it up to culture or something.
heh what i sometimes did when i was working in an office was to turn off the stylesheet (opera shift-G, firefox view>page style>no style) and images (opera shift-I, firefox somewhere in the preferences) and it would look just like i was reading some boring long ass IT-related website comparing one sort of software whatchamacallit to the other. cause IMO getting caught with either kinds of images on the screen would be reason to, not get fired, but at least be considered "not working".
also writing the replies in Word (or in my case, my code-editor PSPad), makes it seem you're not browsing the net, plus doubles as you don't lose long replies there quickly :)
In the US, it's called a "hostile working environment".
That is, while a car crash jpg would be uncomfortable, titsgalore.com would be sexist, which would make the company vulnerable to a lawsuit.
It's all about the money.
it would be considered "sexual harrassment" because you are potentially exposing other employees to things they don't want to see and may be offended by. It's the same idea as telling a sexually suggestive or "lewd" joke to an employee and them getting offended. The co-worker doesn't expect to be subjected to that kind of material at their place of employment.
The sex being worse than violence thing is defo a throwback to xist morality bullshit.
Showing a tortured and dying fucker, with nails through his hands and feet is a pleasant and inspiring image for teh children but a nipple is so evil that even saying it out loud will corrupt their tiny minds for evar.
Wheres my titties on tevee rant when I need it?
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on June 06, 2007, 04:12:41 PMit would be considered "sexual harrassment" because you are potentially exposing other employees to things they don't want to see and may be offended by. It's the same idea as telling a sexually suggestive or "lewd" joke to an employee and them getting offended. The co-worker doesn't expect to be subjected to that kind of material at their place of employment.
.. but surely, just like the creationist christian fundies against science, this is the exception rather than the rule right?
right? right?
cause just what Silly says, in general i would be much more offended by stories and/or pictures of torture/violence/etc than collegues discussing lewd jokes, sexual topics (moves/techniques), etc. because that's just natural. well maybe not when you have a meeting with an important client, but that's also not the time to start talking about severed limbs and shit.
are women on the workplace allowed to talk about their menstruation cycle by the way? just wondering. because that's some shit i sometimes seriously don't want to hear, but then again, i respect their freedom to be able to :lol:
an even more direct example is (not really related to workplace ethics), so far i managed to "dull" myself into being able to view goatse, tubgirl, meatspin, lemonparty etc with a neutral point of view, i could easily spend 30 mins photoshopping someone's face in goatse's ass without getting nauseous or anything. it's just people with a disgusting fetish.
on the other hand, there are pictures on rotten.com that show dead people with half of their heads blown off (the motorcycle.jpg and others), really gets me sick within a few seconds and i have no desire to "dull" myself from it either. there was this one time when i had this great idea for a photoshop collage of some lame joke involving a milka cow and a palestine teenage suicide bomber (dont ask--it's a really lame dutch word joke based on a commercial), so i went on googling for images of palestine teenage suicide bombers .. if you click to the journalist world press photo stuff .. yay real world severed bloody limbs all around! uglyness of war! poor little kids with shrapnel wounds but without family! very quickly i decided this joke was definitely in bad taste, even for me.
Quote from: triple zero on June 06, 2007, 04:41:31 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on June 06, 2007, 04:12:41 PMit would be considered "sexual harrassment" because you are potentially exposing other employees to things they don't want to see and may be offended by. It's the same idea as telling a sexually suggestive or "lewd" joke to an employee and them getting offended. The co-worker doesn't expect to be subjected to that kind of material at their place of employment.
.. but surely, just like the creationist christian fundies against science, this is the exception rather than the rule right?
right? right?
cause just what Silly says, in general i would be much more offended by stories and/or pictures of torture/violence/etc than collegues discussing lewd jokes, sexual topics (moves/techniques), etc. because that's just natural. well maybe not when you have a meeting with an important client, but that's also not the time to start talking about severed limbs and shit.
you would think so wouldn't you? But when you get down to it I think it's like LMNO says, about money. It's a vehicle for someone with a grudge against a company, or someone in a company, to act. I think there probably are some adults out there, for whatever reason, truly are offended by "sexual" imagery, but I think these same people would probably be uptight by violence as well. But the sexual harrasment has become a sort of slam-dunk thing legally. Companies are real hard-core about making sure their employees are trained on sexual harassment, because if they are not it can become ammunition against the company.
Quote from: triple zero on June 06, 2007, 04:41:31 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on June 06, 2007, 04:12:41 PMit would be considered "sexual harrassment" because you are potentially exposing other employees to things they don't want to see and may be offended by. It's the same idea as telling a sexually suggestive or "lewd" joke to an employee and them getting offended. The co-worker doesn't expect to be subjected to that kind of material at their place of employment.
.. but surely, just like the creationist christian fundies against science, this is the exception rather than the rule right?
right? right?
cause just what Silly says, in general i would be much more offended by stories and/or pictures of torture/violence/etc than collegues discussing lewd jokes, sexual topics (moves/techniques), etc. because that's just natural. well maybe not when you have a meeting with an important client, but that's also not the time to start talking about severed limbs and shit.
are women on the workplace allowed to talk about their menstruation cycle by the way? just wondering. because that's some shit i sometimes seriously don't want to hear, but then again, i respect their freedom to be able to :lol:
an even more direct example is (not really related to workplace ethics), so far i managed to "dull" myself into being able to view goatse, tubgirl, meatspin, lemonparty etc with a neutral point of view, i could easily spend 30 mins photoshopping someone's face in goatse's ass without getting nauseous or anything. it's just people with a disgusting fetish.
on the other hand, there are pictures on rotten.com that show dead people with half of their heads blown off (the motorcycle.jpg and others), really gets me sick within a few seconds and i have no desire to "dull" myself from it either. there was this one time when i had this great idea for a photoshop collage of some lame joke involving a milka cow and a palestine teenage suicide bomber (dont ask--it's a really lame dutch word joke based on a commercial), so i went on googling for images of palestine teenage suicide bombers .. if you click to the journalist world press photo stuff .. yay real world severed bloody limbs all around! uglyness of war! poor little kids with shrapnel wounds but without family! very quickly i decided this joke was definitely in bad taste, even for me.
I see it all as just a pictorial representation of stuff that atoms and molecules can do when subjected to specific circumstances.
This level of detachment may sound callous but the alternative is much worse imo - if you are affected by any kind of image then you are liable to be manipulated by such means. Led by the nose. Terrified with images of bad or tantalised by images of good.
A dead body is just a bunch of meat.
in the states at least,
people aren't nice and cautious because they're good people
it's out of fear of being sued.
McDonalds doesn't put warnings about the heat of their coffee because they're worried about you getting burned - they're worried about you suing them.
Though torture pics may seem morally worse than a nipple,
legally the nipple is sexual harassment
and the torture pics are just distasteful
yeah, it doesn't really make logical sense, but these rules arose from bad situations. I'm sure there were workplaces where women were intimidated by nude calendars, sexist jokes, leering, etc. So now we all lose a little bit of freedom to prevent the really extreme circumstances.
Trying to legislate about shit like that tends to lead to utter overkill. Takes away your rights a wafer thin slice at a time.
Comedy took a major stand against 'political correct' for the simple reason that there is no joke, either in existence or theoretically possible, that wont offend some whining fucking idiot.
Judges shouldn't be so fucking lazy - treat shit on a case by case basis like they're paid so much to do.
"He tried to rape me in the stationary cupboard" vs "He had a topless chick as a desktop background and I saw it and felt degraded"
Tits look nice. Looking at them cheers a lot of guys up. Get over it.
I know I'm not gonna convince you, but sexual harassment and the casusal degradation of women in the workplace is not only real, but can be devestating to the woman it's directed at.
Like I said, it's obvious I'm not gonna change your mind, I just had to say it.
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 06:06:56 PM
I know I'm not gonna convince you, but sexual harassment and the casusal degradation of women in the workplace is not only real, but can be devestating to the woman it's directed at.
Like I said, it's obvious I'm not gonna change your mind, I just had to say it.
I've seen it, tbh, but I'm damned if I'll accept that having a nude calendar on the wall is degrading. It
can be and, in a great many cases, it probably is but where do you draw the line? Is the Venus de Milo porn? How about a pre raphaelite print, complete with nipples or a David Bailey nude?
K so a playboy centerfold would defo be considered degrading to women, right?
Fuck that shit. I'd say it might be, would depend on who had it hanging on their office wall or who saw it.
I think the idea is that it doesn't have to be hanging up at work. People should be able to be into those kinds of things but perhaps the work place, where others may be subjected to it, isn't the proper place for display. Another example, I love listening to loud, heavy metal music, but out of respect for my co-workers, I don't play it in my office because I know it could be annoying to them. However, if they were to come visit me at home, it's a different arena. I display what I want, I play what I want, etc., etc. Visiting someone at their home is voluntary, going to work usually isn't.
Well, here's the question:
If you ran a company, and you knew you could get sued into bankruptcy for sexual harassment, where would you draw the line?
Notice I didn't ask what you think is acceptable, but rather, how much would you want to risk your business.
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 06:20:58 PM
Well, here's the question:
If you ran a company, and you knew you could get sued into bankruptcy for sexual harassment, where would you draw the line?
Notice I didn't ask what you think is acceptable, but rather, how much would you want to risk your business.
I'd play it so safe I'd have the wommenz wearing burkas in case they excited the men too much
Quote from: SillyCybin on June 06, 2007, 05:05:52 PM
I see it all as just a pictorial representation of stuff that atoms and molecules can do when subjected to specific circumstances.
This level of detachment may sound callous but the alternative is much worse imo - if you are affected by any kind of image then you are liable to be manipulated by such means. Led by the nose. Terrified with images of bad or tantalised by images of good.
A dead body is just a bunch of meat.
So, you're saying that for you me typing the words "baby rape" is exactly the same thing as posting a picture of it?
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 06:20:58 PMWell, here's the question:
If you ran a company, and you knew you could get sued into bankruptcy for sexual harassment, where would you draw the line?
Notice I didn't ask what you think is acceptable, but rather, how much would you want to risk your business.
i admit i completely forgot about the sueing trigger-happieness over there.
certainly it's logical reasoning, but it almost sounds like you're defending it, maybe i'm reading it wrong though.
isn't this one of the things we ought to be fighting as discordians? cause for me, i'd rather not work at a company (or for the same matter run such a company) where sexual harassment means being robbed of your freedom of expression and comfort at a workplace.
in "public office buildings" (town councils, libraries, universities etc) here, there's posters up about sexual harassment ("intimidation" as it's called here). but all of them tell people to go to some "trust-person" if they have complaints, and the first step is always to try and work it out with the parties involved. (and yes, if that doesn't work, for example due to a skewed power relation, there will be sueing. but only then)
i like that approach much better. not having a taboo on these kinds of things also helps collegues appreciate eachother as
human beings instead of "rabotniks". these are people you spend the larger part of your day with, they don't need to be your friends, but you also shouldn't need a legal system to manage yourself in yet another social setting.
also let it be known that i fully appreciate that cerain people can handle more than others, what is a simple "oh you guys" lewd joke to one, can indeed feel like harassment to another. same with the "an hero" jokes over here. the trick is to have mutual respect for eachother, instead of fear for another's lawyer. because, really, having the threat of being sued hanging over your head all the time, now that's
harassment.
and RWHN, you speak about heavy metal music. do they have the radio on instead, or is it just the slight buzzing of fans and office noises? because that, imo, would be much worse, forcefully being subjected to listening to advertisements while i work! well either way, that's what headphones are for, imo.
Quote from: triple zero on June 06, 2007, 09:06:28 PM
and RWHN, you speak about heavy metal music. do they have the radio on instead, or is it just the slight buzzing of fans and office noises? because that, imo, would be much worse, forcefully being subjected to listening to advertisements while i work! well either way, that's what headphones are for, imo.
No, I have my own radio in my office, so I can pretty much play what I want. It's just that I'd rather not disturb my co-workers with my acquired taste. But that's because I like my co-workers, it's not out of fear of being fired or anything. Instead I play flamenco, irish music, and some other new agey stuff which I do enjoy. My co-workers seem to like it too, they are always dropping by for no reason.
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 07:34:35 PM
Quote from: SillyCybin on June 06, 2007, 05:05:52 PM
I see it all as just a pictorial representation of stuff that atoms and molecules can do when subjected to specific circumstances.
This level of detachment may sound callous but the alternative is much worse imo - if you are affected by any kind of image then you are liable to be manipulated by such means. Led by the nose. Terrified with images of bad or tantalised by images of good.
A dead body is just a bunch of meat.
So, you're saying that for you me typing the words "baby rape" is exactly the same thing as posting a picture of it?
In principle yes. In practice no.
We all got our hangups.
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on June 06, 2007, 09:14:33 PM
No, I have my own radio in my office, so I can pretty much play what I want. It's just that I'd rather not disturb my co-workers with my acquired taste. But that's because I like my co-workers, it's not out of fear of being fired or anything. Instead I play flamenco, irish music, and some other new agey stuff which I do enjoy. My co-workers seem to like it too, they are always dropping by for no reason.
of course. i would do the same thing.
but also when i have friends coming over, i'm not hitting them with my collection of abstract IDM and breakcore, but play them some shpongle/psydub, ambient and funky electro disco.
.. also works better when you're trying to have a discussion :)
Purty cool stuff! TFS!
yes, sorry for threadjacking, mr campbell
Quote from: rzasthole on June 06, 2007, 05:20:02 AM
Like the train and the lightning Einstien was talking about....
It seems so, yes! I got it from Brian Greene's "Elegant Universe"
Quote from: triple zero on June 06, 2007, 10:24:52 AM
:mittens:
i liked this. pretty pictures. not sure if what they say really holds up though (i didnt quite follow it), but i enjoyed it nonetheless.
Very glad you enjoyed. I sometimes favor brevity to thorough clarity. Just enough explanation to provoke some curiosity.
Quote from: Payne on June 06, 2007, 02:57:03 PM
But anyhoo, very purdy, pardner,
Appreciate that, Payne.
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on June 06, 2007, 01:54:24 PM
Cool stuff. My head's a little to squishy this morning to follow the science but I'm sure it'll come to me later. good show and welcome.
The science is a bit squishy itself Rev! A spoon full of medicine to help the sugar go down...
Quote from: LMNO on June 06, 2007, 03:20:56 PM
I don't know if Mrs Thelema is SFW, though.
Understood! Replaced Picture w/ a link.
Quote from: Jenne on June 06, 2007, 09:35:17 PM
Purty cool stuff! TFS!
Much obliged!
Quote from: triple zero on June 06, 2007, 09:36:12 PM
yes, sorry for threadjacking, mr campbell
No, no problem at all, what ever topics arise!
I thank everyone for their time.
Virgin & Pigeon
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/VIRGIN.jpg)
Bill Hicks w/ The Good News
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/BH1.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/BH2.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/BH3.gif)
Joseph Campbell Loves UGOD
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/JC1.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/JC2.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/JC3.gif)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/JC4.gif)
MCLUHAN
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MQ/MCLUHAN.gif)
lol the one about the acidhead is funny :)
the last b/w picture kind of reminds me of some absurdist webcomic i found somewhere, a guy who wrote (and drew) under erasure a lot .. his website was named something with 'stairs' in the title .. this information is probably useless to you, cause i lost the URL long time ago.
HUSTLE DOWN
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/HUSTLEDOWN.jpg)
BLACK ELK SPEAKS: Grrrl Shakti!
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/BES1.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/BES2.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/BES3.jpg)
DALRYADA
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/DAL.jpg)
ORGONE TREATMENT
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/ORGONETREATMENT.jpg)
QUANTUM PSYCHOLOGY "TODAY"
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/RAWMUSIC1.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/RAWMUSIC2.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/RAWMUSIC3.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/NOWNOW.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/TimeTravel.jpg) (http://www.catandgirl.com)
I liked the shifting letters.
Inundation of the Nile
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/INUNDATIONMS.jpg)
Big Justice
(http://www.buddhafart.com/MUP/KEYSMS.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/666_1.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/666_2.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/666_3.jpg)
Adapted from THE CANTOS OF EZRA POUND
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/CANTOS_FRAG_1.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/CANTOS_FRAG_2.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/CANTOS_FRAG_3.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/CANTOS_FRAG_4.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/CANTOS_FRAG_5.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/CANTOS_FRAG_6.jpg)
Glad to see you back with more art!
Thanks, Nigel!
It's great to be back. :fnord:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/SON_OF_ILLUMINATUS.jpg)
Very well done. I was just re-thinking the seeming paradoxes of relativity earlier today and stumbled upon this thread. Nice little synchronicity. I know that there have been experiments that support relativity but was there one conducted similar to the one in your comic? I would like to see a write up if anyone knows any good links/journals (I have access to journals online).
Quote from: Samuel Boone Johnson Thomas Frederik Douglas III on April 15, 2009, 04:02:33 AM
Very well done. I was just re-thinking the seeming paradoxes of relativity earlier today and stumbled upon this thread. Nice little synchronicity. I know that there have been experiments that support relativity but was there one conducted similar to the one in your comic? I would like to see a write up if anyone knows any good links/journals (I have access to journals online).
I believe maybe only "thought experiments" have gotten conducted in regards to the relativity of simultaneity.
Here's a 2 minute animated video which explains Einstein's train/lightning thought experiment, which served as the original basis for the comic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wteiuxyqtoM
thanks!
bc
i missed this the first tiem around. LOVE YOUR STUFF, BC!!
Quote from: Bobby Campbell on April 17, 2009, 04:20:55 AM
I believe maybe only "thought experiments" have gotten conducted in regards to the relativity of simultaneity.
Seems like it would be an easy experiment to carry out these days. You could easily set up an "observer" (photoelectric censor) to be at stationary point that is equidistant between the instantaneous points at which the two "participants" (mirrors/sensors) would be when the light should reach them from a point stationary relative to the light source and two participants. You could even have them moving in opposite directions at high speeds to increase the effect.
Thank you kindly, Burns!
Makes sense to me, Samuel Boone Johnson Thomas Frederik Douglas III!
Wikipedia has this cool animated demonstration...
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/Relativity_of_Simultaneity_Animation.gif)
I need to update that comic, it's falling behind the times!
Here's a silly little design exercise I've started playing around w/over at the MLA, taking all the band names from the Ingolstadt Rock Concert scene in Illuminatus! and fabricating albums...
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF001.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF002.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF003.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF004.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF005.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF006.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF007.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF008.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF009.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF010.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF011.jpg)
:mittens: these are hilarious!
you really should do one for the AMA
Oh absolutely, Cramulus! Thanks for reminding me, neither them or even Clark Kent & The Supermen were on my list...
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF012.jpg)
Quote from: Bobby Campbell on May 17, 2009, 02:47:05 AM
Oh absolutely, Cramulus! Thanks for reminding me, neither them or even Clark Kent & The Supermen were on my list...
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF012.jpg)
Are you one of the Portland people? Just wondering because I didn't think ANYBODY had ever heard of Here Comes Everybody, but I used to work with the girl one of them, and their CDs were always all over the break room.
(Here Comes Everybody is originally a band from the Illuminatus! trilogy... )
Thanks for fielding that one, Cramulus!
I found the Portland band Here Comes Everybody on myspace, listening to them now, pretty good!
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OMF013.jpg)
Quote from: Cramulus on May 18, 2009, 10:19:42 PM
(Here Comes Everybody is originally a band from the Illuminatus! trilogy... )
No shit? I guess I should have talked to that girl more.
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OSIRIS_JONES_ICE_CREAM_1.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OSIRIS_JONES_ICE_CREAM_2.jpg)
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/OSIRIS_JONES_ICE_CREAM_3.jpg)
DUDE YES ~!~
:mittens:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/HAGBARD_CELINE.jpg)
This thread is so full of win!
:mittens:
Oh - and there's more on your site (http://www.bobbycampbell.net/) too - neat!
THANKS FP!
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/GURDJIEFF.jpg)
Do you have any of your stuff available on a hard copy? I suppose i could print it out but that would not be nearly as cool a, say, a graphic novel?
And eh Bobby, are those .CBZ files getting anywhere? :)
ETA: otherwise I could make them myself. Two days ago I successfully wrote a neat little crawler that made some web cartoons into a bunch of .CBZ's.
Soon on both counts, Burns & 000. Prob next weekend, thank you very much for your time & interest!
A couple copies of the new edition of RAW's "Wilhelm Reich in Hell" arrived at my house today, featuring artwork by yours truly.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/WILHELM_REICH_IN_HELL_COVER_WEB.jpg)
Available from New Falcon Publications (http://newfalconbooks.net/oscom/product_info.php?cPath=35_47&products_id=100&osCsid=03d2d51b57668310151de82ce81cbb42) and Amazon.com (http://www.amazon.com/Wilhelm-Reich-Robert-Anton-Wilson/dp/1561841080)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/WILHELM_REICH_INTRO_WEB.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/WILHELM_REICH_ACT_1_WEB.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/WILHELM_REICH_ACT_2_WEB.jpg)
Generally speaking it's probably asking a bit much to expect to get to correspond w/ your very favorite writer. Exceedingly so to imagine blundering into their home, burning one, and watching a Frankenstein movie. But to then endeavor to sit down and actually participate in the work, even in such a small way, absolutely unfathomable!
The lasagna remains flying, as per request.
bc
Wow, that's really damn cool!
:mittens:
They look LOVELY!!
Very much appreciated, fellas! :fnord:
I've more RAW artwork coming soon, but in the meanwhile how about some C.S. HYATT!?
It looks like the new edition of "Undoing Yourself With Energized Meditation and Other Devices" (Featuring cover artwork by yours truly) is out and available for sale from New Falcon.
(http://newfalconbooks.net/oscom/product_info.php?products_id=40)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/UNDOING_YOURSELF_COVER_WEB.jpg)
"Of course, most people will think this book is only a joke. That's the biggest joke of all!"
– RAW
I've come to really enjoy Dr. Hyatt's style, which seems to me not unlike if Friedrich Nietzsche & Aleister Crowley worked together on Mad Magazine!
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/CS_HYATT.jpg)
I also have a few drawings in the new edition of Black Book Vol. 5. (http://newfalconbooks.net/oscom/product_info.php?products_id=143)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BLACK_BOOK_5.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_BLACK_BOOK_01.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_BLACK_BOOK_02.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_BLACK_BOOK_03.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_BLACK_BOOK_04.jpg)
OH woah, man, that's really fantastic all around!!!
Long overdue thanks, Burns!
Between work, school, and freelance I haven't been able to do much about prepping my stuff for collection or even continuation, but here's the latest I've got to bring:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_COVER.jpg)
Can't say I ever expected my name would end up on the cover of Christopher S. Hyatt's "The Psychopath's Bible" but here we are!
Available from New Falcon (http://newfalconbooks.net/oscom/product_info.php?products_id=92&osCsid=0f34604b51646af8593471952c99ce20) and Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/Psychopaths-Bible-Extreme-Individual/dp/1561841749).
This one features 13 new illustrations from me. (Scripted artwork on this one, but I still got to put my touch on em)
"All power to the brain. The creator of gods, ghosts, myths, fantasies, knowledge, beauty, and reference."
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_01.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_02.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_03.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_04.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_05.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_06.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_07.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_08.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_09.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_10.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_11.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_12.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_13.jpg)
oooh I like this one:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH'S_BIBLE_10.jpg)
it's pretty :)
I like ALL of them!
especially this one:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_07.jpg)
awesome work, bobby! And congrats on being on the cover of Hyatt's book!
BIP anyone? :mittens:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH%27S_BIBLE_08.jpg)
Right on, 000!
And very much obliged, Cramulus!
Though I should say that particular drawing is a redux of someone else's work from a previous edition:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PSYCHOPATH'S_BIBLE_ORIGINAL.jpg)
Thanks, P3nT4gR4m!
Feel free!
(The only contractual limitation I have is the art can't appear in another print book, otherwise it's all good!)
"THESE ARE THE EVENTS WHICH WILL SOON RESHAPE THE WORLD..."
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/NATURE%27S_GOD_COVER.jpg)
Available from New Falcon Publications (http://newfalconbooks.net/oscom/product_info.php?products_id=89) and Amazon.com (http://www.amazon.com/Natures-God-Historical-Illuminatus-Chronicles/dp/1561841641)
I was actually reading this for my own enjoyment when I got the call to work on the new edition. It was awesome to work on this book as I was reading it. The game got real in Philadelphia!
This was the last book of fiction that RAW wrote, and it totally rules, I hope I did it justice.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/NATURE%27S_GOD_BOOK_1.jpg)
"oh, bejesus, Seamus thought, General Washington has been knock-knock-knocking again."
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/NATURE%27S_GOD_BOOK_2.jpg)
I'm finishing up artwork for "The Earth Will Shake" & "The Widow's Son" this weekend.(Volumes 1 & 2 of the Historical Illuminatus Chronicles) The lasagna remains airborne, Go Phils!
BONUS RAW POP ART!
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/RAW_POP_ART.jpg)
Very intoxicating artwork. I love the clashing colors, and I appreciate some of the psychedelic/religious motifs you use (like characters with 3 heads for instance). Your black and white drawings have very detailed textures that I enjoy. I wish I could draw as well as you.
You might want to consider changing permissions on your topic though. Anybody could just read, write, and execute!
Thanks, Malvarma!
I appreciate your generous estimations. :fnord:
Not sure what you mean about topic permissions?
Bobby, it's a Linux file permission geek joke, 777 is the unix file permission code for "world read/wriite/execute access". Often when shit doesn't work on Linux, it's to do with these permissions, and the easiest way to solve it is just to set the file's permissions to chmod 777, which allows everything. Of course it's also the least secure setting.
Oh right of course! Thanks for clarifying, Triple Zero! I was taking it too literally.
Fine regards, sir,
bc
While waiting for the publication of the next few books, here's some more of the Goetica illustrations I did...
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_EXTRA_GOETICA_005.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_EXTRA_GOETICA_006.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_EXTRA_GOETICA_007.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_EXTRA_GOETICA_008.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BC_EXTRA_GOETICA_009.jpg)
As always, NICE :D
As ever 000, you are the dude! Looks like I'll finally have a .cbz for you soon...
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/NOT_ART.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ZZZEN_COLOR.jpg)
I love all of it. Nice sense of humor mixed with creativity mixed with a pinch of mystical inspiration. :thumb:
Quote from: St. Epimetheus on August 29, 2010, 07:30:01 AM
I love all of it. Nice sense of humor mixed with creativity mixed with a pinch of mystical inspiration. :thumb:
I really appreciate that, St. Epimetheus! THX :fnord:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/JOHN_ADAMS_EZ.jpg)
AO Everybody!
I just bought up the project wonderful ad space at the bottom of the PD forum.
(which may or may not still be there by the time you read this)
Just trying to put some hustle behind this muscle here,
so I've got my website set up to post some new art everyday at 8:08 AM EST.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/BC_BANNER_2.jpg)
http://www.bobbycampbell.org/ (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/BobbyCampbell (http://feeds.feedburner.com/BobbyCampbell)
It's my same old bullshit routine, just on a regular schedule.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/CATERPILLAR.jpg)
Obviously I'll still post art here, but having finally looked at my webstats after several years of neglect, I found them rather pathetic!
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/TERENCE_INTERNET.jpg)
So pop on over come morning time, if you're so obliged, and I'll see what kind of dog and pony show I can scare up.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/REAPER.jpg)
fine regards as ever,
bc
DUDE YOU GOTTA TELL ME THE ANSWER TO THAT LAST ONE
AM I A LIGHTBULB, OR THE PATTERN THAT SHAPED THE PROCESS OF SWITCHING?
(IM NOT THE LIGHT THAT WOULD MAKE NO SENSE)
I KNOW, SPOILERS RIGHT
BUT BUT BUT
:asplode:
Well interpreted, Triple Zero!
I'd say it looks like you've got it! :fnord:
Bobby, I'm a HUGE pen and ink fan and i just absolutely love your interpretation of the medium. I too love working in that style and I have to say after following your play these past years you've been quite inspiring. :)
Anyway just a little feedback from the peanut gallery ;)
Quote from: Burns on September 14, 2010, 04:12:56 AM
Bobby, I'm a HUGE pen and ink fan and i just absolutely love your interpretation of the medium. I too love working in that style and I have to say after following your play these past years you've been quite inspiring. :)
Anyway just a little feedback from the peanut gallery ;)
I really appreciate that, Burns!
I sometimes suspect there might be a few people out there following along, but it's hard to tell!
Where can I see some of your work?
Speaking of pen & ink...
(http://www.buddhafart.com/09/DAMN_YOUR_EYES.jpg)
So here are some "highlights" from my daily 8:08 postings
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/BC_BANNER_2.jpg)
http://www.bobbycampbell.org (http://www.bobbycampbell.org)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/TOYNBEE_TILE_2.jpg)
There was some expository illustrated prose re: the Toynbee Tiles
http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/toynbee-tiles.html (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/toynbee-tiles.html)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BAJA_BLAST.jpg)
I drank too much blue mountain dew
http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/i-am-become-baja.html (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/i-am-become-baja.html)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/MICHAEL_VICK.jpg)
I accepted the absurdity of being a Michael Vick fan
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/273.jpg)
Tupac played tonsil hockey w/ Amelia Earhart
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/GHOST-MONKEY-ROBOT.gif)
There was some talk of epistemology
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/SOUTHPAW_SELF_PORTRAIT.jpg)
I drew a self portrait w/ my left hand
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/HYPERCUBISM.jpg)
I totally dissed abstract art
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/VIKING_FUNERAL.jpg)
The fuck if I know!
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/JOHN_TITOR_01.jpg)
There was a John Titor Run down
http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/john-titor.html (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/john-titor.html)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/777/LAM_UFO.jpg)
I made a case for a neuro-chemical interpretation of alien contact experiences
http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/ufos-on-lam.html (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/09/ufos-on-lam.html)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BABY_ANIMAL_CANDY_PARTY.jpg)
THERE WAS A BABY ANIMAL CANDY PARTY
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/FEMA.jpg)
I showed my credentials
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/DREAM_SCENE.jpg)
Unfortunately described a dream
and made a youtube art/video for that They Might Be Giants song "Hopeless Bleak Despair"
http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/10/tmbg-hopeless-bleak-despair.html (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/10/tmbg-hopeless-bleak-despair.html)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ROY_HALLADAY.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ROY_HALLADAY_ANIMATION.gif)
Quote from: Bobby Campbell on October 06, 2010, 06:57:00 PM
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ROY_HALLADAY.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ROY_HALLADAY_ANIMATION.gif)
:crankey:
I've had quite a bit of school work to contend w/, so the daily posts at http://www.bobbycampbell.org have been a bit catch as catch can:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/RON_HEXTALL.jpg)
A recreation of a shirt fondly remembered from my youth.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ROY_OSWALT.jpg)
ROY "KINGFISH" OSWALT totally dominated them cork soaking Giants!
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/MURPH_COLONEL_SURF.jpg)
Inside Joke
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/FLOW-ER.jpg)
Random drawing from 10 years ago
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/FORCE_GEOMETRY.jpg)
@gnosis! character origins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk103VnXF_g&feature=player_embedded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk103VnXF_g&feature=player_embedded)
Limited animation music video of THE HEADIES "DO THE GREMLIN"
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/FOOLPROOF.jpg)
Freelance work for a friend.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/POOKHA_LANDSCAPE.jpg)
Cheer up drawing for a girl.
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/POOK.jpg)
Visual album review for the bloodthirsty lovers "delicate seam" published in the Tric Zine 5 years ago
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ORRS_LAW.jpg)
RAW stuff
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/HAMLET_777.jpg)
HAMLET for school
So fantastic.
Quote from: Placid Dingo on October 19, 2010, 07:39:14 AM
So fantastic.
I know you are but what am I?
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/CHERRY_ISLAND.jpg)
"Where in the waste is the wisdom?" FW pg 114
I was once asked to explain the meaning of this here scribble, w/ interesting results!
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Bobby Campbell
Date: Jun 26, 2007 1:53 PM
Hello J!
Cherry Island is a landfill where I often work in my job as a land surveyor. I'm outfitted there w/ the tools for to set fill limit grade stakes. By which the workers can determine how much more garbage a given area can house before reaching capacity.
The quote is from Terence Mckenna, re: his fractal spacetime model.
Have a Good'n!
bc
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: J
Date: Jun 28, 2007 12:45 AM
Isn't that a 24" gauge & a common gavel?
You a travelin man?
----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Bobby Campbell
Date: Jun 28, 2007 11:28 PM
From the west and traveling to the east, in search of light!
Actually I had never heard of any of that until I googled "24" gauge & common gavel" a minute ago. They're really an extendable prism pole and a sledge hammer, but I see what you mean!
-----------------------------------------------------------
Alright well maybe the results weren't that interesting, but it is kinda funny getting asked if you belong to a secret society!
My artwork in the new editions of "THE EARTH WILL SHAKE" & "THE WIDOW'S SON" will probably make it seem even more like I am a mason, at least, but nah!
I'm NWO Wolfpac 4 Life!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIrcjgj1rRE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIrcjgj1rRE)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/DIB_ABU_SPEAKS.gif)
This story is an old favorite of mine, refurbished. Years ago I conversed w/ an African ambassador on a bus ride to NYC while tripping on magic mushrooms. The formatting kind of doesn't lend itself to bbs forums so please feel cordially invited! http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/10/dublin-is-burning.html (http://www.bobbycampbell.org/2010/10/dublin-is-burning.html)
Also, not a Mets fan. But I used to play one on TV.
Quote from: Doktor Princess on October 20, 2010, 05:09:55 PM
Also, not a Mets fan. But I used to play one on TV.
Fair enough! I'm still going to take your outrage to mean you think my drawing is kinda good. :fnord:
Thanks, Liam!
That's an over the top cross hatch & pointillist drawing from the days before carpal tunnel calmed me down a bit. Glad you enjoy it!
I live in Philadelphia so on a normal day I probably walk over at least 6 Toynbee tiles a day! I could see dropping some linoleum in the asphalt some day, though wheat paste currently has peaked my curiosity in street art.
Peace!
bc
I'm taking a break from the daily 8:08 AM new post schedule while I "teach" a course at the Maybe Logic Academy
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/GLOBAL_VILLAGE_PROMO_1.jpg)
Here's some of the recent nonsense out of http://www.bobbycampbell.org
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/TRANSMOGRIFICATION.gif)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/RAW_EPIPHANY.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/DIY.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/PROSPERO.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ROY_VS_PAT.jpg)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_npyAufxBTXA/TME-wmfE4ZI/AAAAAAAAAD4/5qlXR3CSHwE/s1600/FLETCH_ANGEL.jpg)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_npyAufxBTXA/TMFFmtvWoeI/AAAAAAAAAD8/aJ02Hq9-BYM/s1600/IDEAL_INSOMNIA.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/KRZY_KARL.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/HALLOWEEN.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BUCKY_FULLER.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/BELINDA_THE_HEN.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/ABRAXAS_OMEN.jpg)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/MS_CLEO.gif)
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/HAPPY_TRAILS.jpg)
Hey Bobby, is this one your work, or inspired by it? It certainly rings a bell, with the crosshatching and all:
(http://cdni.wired.co.uk/620x413/w_z/warrenport.png)
from http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2010/12/start/warren-ellis
Unrelated to me, except but I do very much enjoy Warren Ellis!
That stuff w/ the robotic head of Jack Kirby is real talk!
Can I use the chicken one and any others u (astronaut?) like for my issue of intermittens?
Quote from: Pēleus on November 21, 2010, 07:53:53 AM
Can I use the chicken one and any others u (astronaut?) like for my issue of intermittens?
You can use anything you like! :fnord:
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/10/LAO_TZU.jpg)
Bobby hasn't been here in a while, but I wanted to post this because it reminded me of this place.
It's called "Anti-Futurists"
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/11/ANTI-FUTURISTS.jpg)
clearly that is nigel on the far right with the tomahawk.
I must be the moustachio'd character with the sword :lulz:
Quote from: Cramulus on August 22, 2011, 05:01:44 PM
Bobby hasn't been here in a while, but I wanted to post this because it reminded me of this place.
It's called "Anti-Futurists"
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/11/ANTI-FUTURISTS.jpg)
clearly that is nigel on the far right with the tomahawk.
I must be the moustachio'd character with the sword :lulz:
I'm the girl with the pretty dress and the bazooka.
Dok,
Will do anything for a bazooka.
Quote from: Cramulus on August 22, 2011, 05:01:44 PM
Bobby hasn't been here in a while, but I wanted to post this because it reminded me of this place.
It's called "Anti-Futurists"
(http://www.bobbycampbell.net/11/ANTI-FUTURISTS.jpg)
clearly that is nigel on the far right with the tomahawk.
I must be the moustachio'd character with the sword :lulz:
Squeeeeeeeeeee!!!
Clearly he's browsing Spagbook, because the resemblance between me and the one with the afro is uncanny.