The internet effect: A memetic analysis
This work attempts to hypothetize an answer to a number of questions about the effect of the internet on society:
Q: What are the effects of the advent of the internet on communication online?
A: Communication is reviewed and filtered on a lot more layers than normal communication, extending the level of complexity.
Q: What paradigms are developed and what paradigms disappear within the altered form of communication?
A: Internet opens the road to the devolopment of any paradigm.
However, if a paradigm is heavily resisted by the community it is introduced in,
it will take a great amount of effort on behalf of the individual trying to introduce the paradigm.
It could be likened to proselytizing to a machine, something a follower of God would probably frown upon in this country.
A number of important paradigms to web communities are:
Constructive, or Good, is Cooperation, striving towards a "greater good". The people who engage in Good are praised and showered in symbolic virtues and, if they contribute much, the power to change the rules.
These individuals often go on to become Moderators or Admins, typically answering to the community, a set of rules and the owner of the website, who tends to delegate much of his or her responsibility and power.
Destructive, or Evil, is conscious deception, attempting to bend the rules and mocking other members. The people who engage in evil activities are resisted by the community and the "powers that be", because they just might show the rules to be deficient.
Good is on-topic: in line with the communities' themes and memes.
Bad is off-topic: responding in a way which, according to the community, is seen as non-sequitur to the content of the thread.
To what degree are these changes in communication and paradigms translated to "real life"?
A paradigm that can gain widespread acceptance in a web community could well be translated into a widespread off-line belief.
A paradigm that can only affect a limited number of people in a web community will be unlikely to become a widely held belief, but may transpire to everyday life in part or as a whole in the few.
However, for these questions to be properly answered it is necessary to gain an extensive understanding of what online communication entails and how it has developed.
To this end, the first part shall consist of a number of investigatory essays into the nature of the information age.
Part I: The Information Age cometh
Subtopics:
- Concepts of the world wide web before its debut
In a sense, anyone who is and was capable of abstract thought built (or builds) their own web.
The world wide web can be seen as the resulting effort of all the people who have used it and all the people who have shaped it,
as they have all (though some in only a limited way), contributed to what it is in the present.
- The early days: mail, usenet and HTTP
How much more serious the web must have been in those days, when there were no shiny banners, no YouTube, no pornographic imagery, none of those things to interest the base strata of society.
All the world's depravity and genius is present on the web today, where it began as a project for intellectuals.
- The dream of free information
In 1983, the GNU project was announced. Driving it was Richard Stallman's dream that information can be shared freely on the internet, if the information you get in return suffices as enough reward to keep you sharing.
Perhaps Richard should have better considered the fact that introducing many to the internet would logically lead to an increase in depravity and a general decrease of content. (This poke at Stallman is pretty unwarranted, and inspired more by my personal beliefs than objective analysis. Consider, for example, his Unix Beard (http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Unix_beard).)
- Instant communication: IRC and instant messengers
Instant messaging evokes the illusion of dialogue, while robbing it of most physical aspects. In an IM conversation you are not going to be guided by body language, tone of voice, facial expression, or any other distraction we commonly encounter in real life. Exchange of ideas is filtered merely through the grasp of the others' language. One might thus consider communication online to be more "pure". However, the prospect of this purity can be scary to those who are guided more by physical aspects than by thought. Perhaps this is why convincing those on the other side of the "digital divide" proves so hard.
- Towards internet communities: Social networking, BBS, Blogs, imageboards and wikis
This is where proper exploration still lies in wait... One could imagine a sociological model in addition to a memetic or mechanistic one. I like memes. (and acid, obv ;) )
Did you seriously use the word "paradigm" more than once in your life a thread?
Now, was there a point to all that rambling?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:15:50 AM
Did you seriously use the word "paradigm" more than once in your life a thread?
Now, was there a point to all that rambling?
Trolls can do anything. You can fuck an internet community up beyond recognition. You can fuck up individuals in an internet community beyond recognition.
Then you start trolling IRL and you can fuck with the rules of society as well as individuals, but obviously never the rules of nature (for thou shalt not pursue Siddhi's! obv obv)
Hey, I use 'paradigm' all the time.
Don't go comparing me to that ball of fail in the OP.
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:24:02 AM
Hey, I use 'paradigm' all the time.
Don't go comparing me to that ball of fail in the OP.
How about you shut the fuck up and let the professionals handle this, alright baby?
wait, professional? people actually *pay* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Not Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:28:35 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:24:02 AM
Hey, I use 'paradigm' all the time.
Don't go comparing me to that ball of fail in the OP.
How about you shut the fuck up and let the professionals handle this, alright baby?
Professional? You? :lol:
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:35:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Not Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
This thread is going places. :lulz:
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:36:47 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:35:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Not Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
This thread is going places. :lulz:
One would have to be deluded not to recognize a thread on a Discordianist forum wouldn't derail if you posted "srs business".
*mad cackle*
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:39:39 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:36:47 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:35:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Not Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
This thread is going places. :lulz:
One would have to be deluded not to recognize a thread on a Discordianist forum wouldn't derail if you posted "srs business".
*mad cackle*
Naw. I was just commenting that this thread has gotten everything it deserved.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:42:25 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:39:39 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:36:47 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:35:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay-* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
This thread is going places. :lulz:
One would have to be deluded not to recognize a thread on a Discordianist forum wouldn't derail if you posted "srs business".
*mad cackle*
Naw. I was just commenting that this thread has gotten everything it deserved.
Perhaps it has for you. Have you read it?
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:44:45 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:42:25 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:39:39 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:36:47 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:35:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay-* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
This thread is going places. :lulz:
One would have to be deluded not to recognize a thread on a Discordianist forum wouldn't derail if you posted "srs business".
*mad cackle*
Naw. I was just commenting that this thread has gotten everything it deserved.
Perhaps it has for you. Have you read it?
Kind of. It's too badly written to really follow for long.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:51:39 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:44:45 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:42:25 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:39:39 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:36:47 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:35:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem on September 11, 2008, 01:31:14 AM
wait, professional? people actually *pay-* you to be a self important prick?
And here I thought scientologists were deluded.
I meant to say little beyond "You Are Pro."
But you do show promise.
Perhaps, with the proper training, you would not suck so badly at the internet.
This thread is going places. :lulz:
One would have to be deluded not to recognize a thread on a Discordianist forum wouldn't derail if you posted "srs business".
*mad cackle*
Naw. I was just commenting that this thread has gotten everything it deserved.
Perhaps it has for you. Have you read it?
Kind of. It's too badly written to really follow for long.
1. What is your litmus test for bad writing?
2. I figured as much. One could say that my megalomania blinds me, but you could also see it as my mind showing me a different possibility...
I got to about half way until it started reading as an oblique and uninformed criticism of either "us", or people like "us", "us" being the denizens of PD.
And not a particularly original or thought provoking critique either.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:54:32 AM
1. What is your litmus test for bad writing?
2. I figured as much. One could say that my megalomania blinds me, but you could also see it as my mind showing me a different possibility...
1. Whether it's a coherent piece, or whether I have to struggle through angsty bullshit for no gain.
2. Or you're just another fucked up moron with delusions of grandeur. One or the other.
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 01:54:49 AM
I got to about half way until it started reading as an oblique and uninformed criticism of either "us", or people like "us", "us" being the denizens of PD.
And not a particularly original or thought provoking critique either.
I didn't even get that much out of it.
No paragraph structure, no apparent point, and overuse of Dilbert words...just another pseudo-intellectual looking for a Starbucks.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:56:03 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:54:32 AM
1. What is your litmus test for bad writing?
2. I figured as much. One could say that my megalomania blinds me, but you could also see it as my mind showing me a different possibility...
1. Whether it's a coherent piece, or whether I have to struggle through angsty bullshit for no gain.
2. Or you're just another fucked up moron with delusions of grandeur. One or the other.
1. How do you know you stand to gain nothing if you haven't read it all the way through?
2. I like to consider more than just two possibilities. Which one do you think it is?
3. So here we go. Keep up, will you?
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:00:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:56:03 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:54:32 AM
1. What is your litmus test for bad writing?
2. I figured as much. One could say that my megalomania blinds me, but you could also see it as my mind showing me a different possibility...
1. Whether it's a coherent piece, or whether I have to struggle through angsty bullshit for no gain.
2. Or you're just another fucked up moron with delusions of grandeur. One or the other.
1. How do you know you stand to gain nothing if you haven't read it all the way through?
2. I like to consider more than just two possibilities. Which one do you think it is?
3. So here we go. Keep up, will you?
Keeping up with you would involve walking backwards.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:00:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:56:03 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:54:32 AM
1. What is your litmus test for bad writing?
2. I figured as much. One could say that my megalomania blinds me, but you could also see it as my mind showing me a different possibility...
1. Whether it's a coherent piece, or whether I have to struggle through angsty bullshit for no gain.
2. Or you're just another fucked up moron with delusions of grandeur. One or the other.
1. How do you know you stand to gain nothing if you haven't read it all the way through?
2. I like to consider more than just two possibilities. Which one do you think it is?
3. So here we go. Keep up, will you?
1. For the same reason I don't need to read an L Ron Hubbard novel all the way through to know it's crap.
2. Who cares what you like? Seriously? You. Nobody else. And since you have done your level best to insult everyone since your arrival, I am reasonably certain nobody is going to give you a chance at posting much of anything. I know I won't.
3. Nope. I plan to just keep harping on the same old shit until this thread is pretty much ruined.
How about you?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 02:05:54 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:00:29 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 01:56:03 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:54:32 AM
1. What is your litmus test for bad writing?
2. I figured as much. One could say that my megalomania blinds me, but you could also see it as my mind showing me a different possibility...
1. Whether it's a coherent piece, or whether I have to struggle through angsty bullshit for no gain.
2. Or you're just another fucked up moron with delusions of grandeur. One or the other.
1. How do you know you stand to gain nothing if you haven't read it all the way through?
2. I like to consider more than just two possibilities. Which one do you think it is?
3. So here we go. Keep up, will you?
1. For the same reason I don't need to read an L Ron Hubbard novel all the way through to know it's crap.
2. Who cares what you like? Seriously? You. Nobody else. And since you have done your level best to insult everyone since your arrival, I am reasonably certain nobody is going to give you a chance at posting much of anything. I know I won't.
3. Nope. I plan to just keep harping on the same old shit until this thread is pretty much ruined.
How about you?
1. L Ron is an asshole. I'm not.
2. Do you think I've really done my
best to insult you guys?
3. Not the third level? Then I surmise you are a pussy :lol:
Oh, and:
Egoist.
What if I am?
Give and receive.
Yup. And right now I'm taking. Which means I'm receiving while dishing out. TAKE IT!
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:11:30 AM
1. L Ron is an asshole. I'm not.
L Ron Hubbard is a festering corpse. You are, in fact, an asshole.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:11:30 AM
2. Do you think I've really done my best to insult you guys?
Actually, yeah, I do.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:11:30 AM
3. Not the third level? Then I surmise you are a pussy :lol:
Who cares? You don't matter, really. It's not like anything you've said so far has any value at all.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 02:11:30 AM
Oh, and:
Egoist.
What if I am?
Give and receive.
Yup. And right now I'm taking. Which means I'm receiving while dishing out. TAKE IT!
Posting gibberish doesn't help your case. Of course, nothing will now, so knock yourself out.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
The internet effect: A memetic analysis
Bullshit, there is no memetic analysis here, you're just using a buzzword without actually considering what it means. I HAET that shit.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
This work attempts to hypothetize an answer to a number of questions about the effect of the internet on society:
If it did that, great, but all it does afaics is make shallow observations about communication and not much else.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
Q: What are the effects of the advent of the internet on communication online?
A: Communication is reviewed and filtered on a lot more layers than normal communication, extending the level of complexity.
We could get online before the internet?!
The answer is probably true, in that before we could get online, we couldn't get online, and therefore couldn't communicate online.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
Q: What paradigms are developed and what paradigms disappear within the altered form of communication?
A: Internet opens the road to the devolopment of any paradigm.
However, if a paradigm is heavily resisted by the community it is introduced in,
it will take a great amount of effort on behalf of the individual trying to introduce the paradigm.
It could be likened to proselytizing to a machine, something a follower of God would probably frown upon in this country.
If you are using the word paradigm in the way I think you are, there is nothing special about this taking place online, it could happen in any form of communication.
You can never convince someone you are right if they truly believe you are wrong. It just doesn't work. And this has been happening since long before the internet.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
A number of important paradigms to web communities are:
Constructive, or Good, is Cooperation, striving towards a "greater good". The people who engage in Good are praised and showered in symbolic virtues and, if they contribute much, the power to change the rules.
These individuals often go on to become Moderators or Admins, typically answering to the community, a set of rules and the owner of the website, who tends to delegate much of his or her responsibility and power.
Destructive, or Evil, is conscious deception, attempting to bend the rules and mocking other members. The people who engage in evil activities are resisted by the community and the "powers that be", because they just might show the rules to be deficient.
Good is on-topic: in line with the communities' themes and memes.
Bad is off-topic: responding in a way which, according to the community, is seen as non-sequitur to the content of the thread.
You are making assumptions, and painting with too broad a brush. Whats "good" and whats "bad" can change from community to community.
What seldom changes is the need to speak in a language everyone else understands, not because it's bad, but because if they can't understand you, why will they listen?
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
To what degree are these changes in communication and paradigms translated to "real life"?
A paradigm that can gain widespread acceptance in a web community could well be translated into a widespread off-line belief.
A paradigm that can only affect a limited number of people in a web community will be unlikely to become a widely held belief, but may transpire to everyday life in part or as a whole in the few.
Communication is communication, and people are people. Offline or off. As I've said, these methods and limitations in communication have existed for longer than the internet. A "Paradigm" from real life is as or more likely to transfer to the internet. Real life is bigger.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
However, for these questions to be properly answered it is necessary to gain an extensive understanding of what online communication entails and how it has developed.
To this end, the first part shall consist of a number of investigatory essays into the nature of the information age.
Online communication is no different than any other. It's still words and/or concepts transmitted from person to person, usually in a common language.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
Part I: The Information Age cometh
Subtopics:
- Concepts of the world wide web before its debut
In a sense, anyone who is and was capable of abstract thought built (or builds) their own web.
The world wide web can be seen as the resulting effort of all the people who have used it and all the people who have shaped it,
as they have all (though some in only a limited way), contributed to what it is in the present.
And here you say what I have been saying, communication is communication, regardless of the medium.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
- The early days: mail, usenet and HTTP
How much more serious the web must have been in those days, when there were no shiny banners, no YouTube, no pornographic imagery, none of those things to interest the base strata of society.
All the world's depravity and genius is present on the web today, where it began as a project for intellectuals.
I thought this was a discussion of communication, not a discussion of demeanor? Are YOU failing to communicate now, are you drifting off into some other topic?
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
- The dream of free information
In 1983, the GNU project was announced. Driving it was Richard Stallman's dream that information can be shared freely on the internet, if the information you get in return suffices as enough reward to keep you sharing.
Perhaps Richard should have better considered the fact that introducing many to the internet would logically lead to an increase in depravity and a general decrease of content. (This poke at Stallman is pretty unwarranted, and inspired more by my personal beliefs than objective analysis. Consider, for example, his Unix Beard (http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Unix_beard).)
Perhaps, but Stallman was more interested in colleges and universities using this new method of communication. It was never really considered that every tom dick and harry would have a home computer on his desk in '83.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
- Instant communication: IRC and instant messengers
Instant messaging evokes the illusion of dialogue, while robbing it of most physical aspects. In an IM conversation you are not going to be guided by body language, tone of voice, facial expression, or any other distraction we commonly encounter in real life. Exchange of ideas is filtered merely through the grasp of the others' language. One might thus consider communication online to be more "pure". However, the prospect of this purity can be scary to those who are guided more by physical aspects than by thought. Perhaps this is why convincing those on the other side of the "digital divide" proves so hard.
Here you are saying that communication is robbed of it's physical aspects, but yet you pursue a dialogue over the internet anyway?
I'm not sure you're actually following ANY train of though here, you really are just rambling and saying whatever comes into your head.
While what you say above is in many cases true, I'm not sure the conclusions you draw from it are valid, or that pointing it out actually MEANS anything in this context.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 01:10:26 AM
- Towards internet communities: Social networking, BBS, Blogs, imageboards and wikis
This is where proper exploration still lies in wait... One could imagine a sociological model in addition to a memetic or mechanistic one. I like memes. (and acid, obv ;) )
WOW! You finally got around to mentioning memes in your memetic analysis! And exploration of todays internet communities entails, again, an exploration of ALL communication, because it's all the same.
An idea you still fail to grasp, and I doubt will even consider on reading this.
Why oh why did I waste my time reading and writing this all out?
Payne, you must be bored and wired on something at this time of night.
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 02:45:49 AM
Payne, you must be bored and wired on something at this time of night.
Insomnia.
My hate is keeping me awake.
PURGE! THOU MUST PURGE!
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:17:10 AM
Why oh why did I waste my time reading and writing this all out?
The evidence would suggest a foolish sense of optimism.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 02:48:53 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:17:10 AM
Why oh why did I waste my time reading and writing this all out?
The evidence would suggest a foolish sense of optimism.
I should have unleashed on the fucker.
There is always tomorrow when he comes back and gets all retarded over my replies.
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:51:35 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 02:48:53 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:17:10 AM
Why oh why did I waste my time reading and writing this all out?
The evidence would suggest a foolish sense of optimism.
I should have unleashed on the fucker.
There is always tomorrow when he comes back and gets all retarded over my replies.
No need, I'm here.
Now, do you want to "unleash" now, as you say, or do you want me to respond to every one of your comments individually?
I won't restrain myself too much, so to make a bit of a head start:
Yes communication is robbed of its physical aspect, and yes I still pursue a dialogue.
And I wasn't following a train of though, I was following a train of thought.
O YES I AM A GRAMMAR
NAZI TOO NOW
Edit: spelling
:boring:
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:09:49 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:51:35 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 02:48:53 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:17:10 AM
Why oh why did I waste my time reading and writing this all out?
The evidence would suggest a foolish sense of optimism.
I should have unleashed on the fucker.
There is always tomorrow when he comes back and gets all retarded over my replies.
No need, I'm here.
Now, do you want to "unleash" now, as you say, or do you want me to respond to every one of your comments individually?
I won't restrain myself too much, so to make a bit of a head start:
Yes communication is robbed of its physical aspect, and yes I still pursue a dialogue.
And I wasn't following a train of though, I was following a train of thought.
O YES I AM A GRAMMAR NAZI TOO NOW
Edit: spelling
What a dumbass.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:25:10 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:09:49 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:51:35 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 02:48:53 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 11, 2008, 02:17:10 AM
Why oh why did I waste my time reading and writing this all out?
The evidence would suggest a foolish sense of optimism.
I should have unleashed on the fucker.
There is always tomorrow when he comes back and gets all retarded over my replies.
No need, I'm here.
Now, do you want to "unleash" now, as you say, or do you want me to respond to every one of your comments individually?
I won't restrain myself too much, so to make a bit of a head start:
Yes communication is robbed of its physical aspect, and yes I still pursue a dialogue.
And I wasn't following a train of though, I was following a train of thought.
O YES I AM A GRAMMAR NAZI TOO NOW
Edit: spelling
What a dumbass.
Yes, I know he is. Does that give you the right to take over?
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:31:14 AM
Yes, I know he is.
YOU SO PHUNNAY! :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
And that is why you are the moderator I suppose... Because you're not a simple tool.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Well, I wouldn't be able to do it, were I of the same bent. I was talking logistics I suppose.
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Well, I wouldn't be able to do it, were I of the same bent. I was talking logistics I suppose.
Suck-up.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:47:50 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Well, I wouldn't be able to do it, were I of the same bent. I was talking logistics I suppose.
Suck-up.
You kiss yo mommo wiff dat mouf?
What I was s-p-e-l-l-i-n-g out was that I can NOT, physically, move threads around...Rog = moderator, so he CAN.
/so obvious, it hUrTs
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:52:17 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:47:50 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Well, I wouldn't be able to do it, were I of the same bent. I was talking logistics I suppose.
Suck-up.
You kiss yo mommo wiff dat mouf?
What I was s-p-e-l-l-i-n-g out was that I can NOT, physically, move threads around...Rog = moderator, so he CAN.
/so obvious, it hUrTs
You said you wouldn't be able to do it if you were of the same bent. What does that even mean?
COME BACK HERE ROGER, WHAT WILL I DO WITHOUT MY ONE TRUE LOVE?
If I WANTED to do it, I COULDN'T.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:55:49 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:52:17 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:47:50 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Well, I wouldn't be able to do it, were I of the same bent. I was talking logistics I suppose.
Suck-up.
You kiss yo mommo wiff dat mouf?
What I was s-p-e-l-l-i-n-g out was that I can NOT, physically, move threads around...Rog = moderator, so he CAN.
/so obvious, it hUrTs
You said you wouldn't be able to do it if you were of the same bent. What does that even mean?
COME BACK HERE ROGER, WHAT WILL I DO WITHOUT MY ONE TRUE LOVE?
Dammit, dude, don't bait the tiger. Srsly.
LURK MOAR.
/done
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:59:14 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:55:49 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:52:17 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 03:47:50 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:34:50 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 11, 2008, 03:33:43 AM
Quote from: Jenne on September 11, 2008, 03:31:42 AM
He's uh...the moderator for Or Kill Me. So yes.
Nope. That doesn't give me the right. The fact that I don't value Janvier's bullshit gives me that option.
Whether or not I'm an admin.
Well, I wouldn't be able to do it, were I of the same bent. I was talking logistics I suppose.
Suck-up.
You kiss yo mommo wiff dat mouf?
What I was s-p-e-l-l-i-n-g out was that I can NOT, physically, move threads around...Rog = moderator, so he CAN.
/so obvious, it hUrTs
You said you wouldn't be able to do it if you were of the same bent. What does that even mean?
COME BACK HERE ROGER, WHAT WILL I DO WITHOUT MY ONE TRUE LOVE?
Dammit, dude, don't bait the tiger. Srsly.
LURK MOAR.
/done
Who is the tiger?
RAWR!
Will he get in line to get spanked like the rest of you?
Come on, Roger, show your face or I'll pedunculate you!
The Good Reverend Roger is evil. He's not only a brutal dictator, but a dictator who runs his forum like it's his own private Disney World. That forum, Or Kill Me, is a former Soviet republic sitting strategically between Iran and Afghanistan.
Go hard, that's my motto. No need to reach low at the start unless you're convinced you can't handle the upper echelons.
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
Who do you think is better at bullshitting? Me or Roger?
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:11:57 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
Who do you think is better at bullshitting? Me or Roger?
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON'T STOP EVIL ROBO STEPHEN HAWKING (http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html)
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:15:30 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:11:57 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
Who do you think is better at bullshitting? Me or Roger?
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON'T STOP EVIL ROBO STEPHEN HAWKING (http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html)
I'm just laughing watching a wannabe troll run himself round in circles. Its entertaining when they don't realize they have no clue what they are doing.
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:22:16 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:15:30 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:11:57 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
Who do you think is better at bullshitting? Me or Roger?
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON'T STOP EVIL ROBO STEPHEN HAWKING (http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html)
I'm just laughing watching a wannabe troll run himself round in circles. Its entertaining when they don't realize they have no clue what they are doing.
Because, you know, I have no idea what I'm doing.
that much is obvious.
Quote from: East Coast Hustle on September 11, 2008, 04:50:54 AM
that much is obvious.
NO, NO, THAT WAS SARCASM! :argh!:
I meant to say that I understand perfectly what I am doing@
Janvier, have you considered http://www.churchofgoogle.org? I think they would love you there.
Quote from: Nigel on September 11, 2008, 05:23:02 PM
Janvier, have you considered http://www.churchofgoogle.org? I think they would love you there.
:lulz:
NINE! NINE PARADIGGUMZ!! Ah! Ah! Ah! AAAAAAAAAHHHH!
\
(http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/thumb/7/70/Countpresents9.jpg/200px-Countpresents9.jpg)
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on September 11, 2008, 08:02:14 PM
NINE! NINE PARADIGGUMZ!! Ah! Ah! Ah! AAAAAAAAAHHHH!
\
(http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/thumb/7/70/Countpresents9.jpg/200px-Countpresents9.jpg)
That picture, without the 9, needs to be an emote.
We could use it for counting paradigms, semi colons, and retarded trolls.
Hey... Janvier...
Climb in:
(http://www.devicepedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/rusty-retro-fridge.jpg)
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
Come on, Roger, show your face or I'll pedunculate you!
The Good Reverend Roger is evil. He's not only a brutal dictator, but a dictator who runs his forum like it's his own private Disney World. That forum, Or Kill Me, is a former Soviet republic sitting strategically between Iran and Afghanistan.
Go hard, that's my motto. No need to reach low at the start unless you're convinced you can't handle the upper echelons.
:lulz:
this is great
too bad its too long for our news reel
:sad:
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
Come on, Roger, show your face or I'll pedunculate you!
Hmmm, yes. I have open sores that are more frightening that you.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
The Good Reverend Roger is evil.
Okay. I can see why you'd say that, Tent.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
He's not only a brutal dictator,
No, that's Enrico.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
but a dictator who runs his forum like it's his own private Disney World.
Because I interfere when you deliberately set out to destroy threads in the essay/rant section? Okay.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
That forum, Or Kill Me, is a former Soviet republic sitting strategically between Iran and Afghanistan.
It's also the 5th Beatle, and the other half of Mama Cass's sandwich.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
Go hard, that's my motto.
Then perhaps you should begin.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
No need to reach low at the start unless you're convinced you can't handle the upper echelons.
Reach to do what?
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:52:19 AM
Quote from: East Coast Hustle on September 11, 2008, 04:50:54 AM
that much is obvious.
NO, NO, THAT WAS SARCASM! :argh!:
I meant to say that I understand perfectly what I am doing@
Destroying any trace of your own credibility? Okay.
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:54:09 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
Come on, Roger, show your face or I'll pedunculate you!
Hmmm, yes. I have open sores that are more frightening that you.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
The Good Reverend Roger is evil.
Okay. I can see why you'd say that, Tent.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
He's not only a brutal dictator,
No, that's Enrico.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
but a dictator who runs his forum like it's his own private Disney World.
Because I interfere when you deliberately set out to destroy threads in the essay/rant section? Okay.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
That forum, Or Kill Me, is a former Soviet republic sitting strategically between Iran and Afghanistan.
It's also the 5th Beatle, and the other half of Mama Cass's sandwich.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
Go hard, that's my motto.
Then perhaps you should begin.
Quote from: Janvier on September 11, 2008, 04:05:40 AM
No need to reach low at the start unless you're convinced you can't handle the upper echelons.
Reach to do what?
Only the last question got me. I want to overthrow the Dutch democracy, you see. I like conspiracies like that. But don't tell anyone, or I might get paranoid! :X
pledge.
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
I like yours more than mine.
This website is filth! Let's clean it up!
(http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb163/wompcabal/forum/pledge.gif)
pledge
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:06 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Having fun yet?
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:39 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:06 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Having fun yet?
I wonder if I could break the forum like this >: D
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:36:34 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:39 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:06 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Having fun yet?
I wonder if I could break the forum like this >: D
Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
He seems to know a lot about you, Roger...
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:37:14 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:36:34 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:39 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:06 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Having fun yet?
I wonder if I could break the forum like this >: D
Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
He seems to know a lot about you, Roger...
I googled him and dug up an old thread...
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:38:00 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:37:14 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:36:34 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:39 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:06 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Having fun yet?
I wonder if I could break the forum like this >: D
Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
He seems to know a lot about you, Roger...
I googled him and dug up an old thread...
Are you afraid?
Is that fear I'm smelling? Just because I *could* possibly be someone?
Come on, I'm just a 20 year old philosophy student from the Netherlands who has a knack for figuring out how things work, and how to move them around on a basic level. That's all the way across the fucking ocean.
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:38:00 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:37:14 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:36:34 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:39 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 13, 2008, 01:35:06 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 12, 2008, 08:44:05 PM
Quote from: trippinprincezz13 on September 12, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
Hm. Really?
Then I will go with the Quote from: Hoopla on September 12, 2008, 08:05:31 PM
(http://www.pearrocltd.co.uk/imagefiles/PLW12.jpg)
Alright, now you're making me curious. Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
I'm going to keep quoting this until you like it
Having fun yet?
I wonder if I could break the forum like this >: D
Who the fuck is Tentasticle?
He seems to know a lot about you, Roger...
I googled him and dug up an old thread...
Nice try, Tent. You really are a fucking psycho, you know that? :lulz:
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 12, 2008, 05:23:57 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
That is TOO rich, Roger.
Fuck. Tent?
I think so. And if I'm wrong, well, I haven't falsely accused anyone who
matters, right?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 13, 2008, 06:57:37 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 12, 2008, 05:23:57 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
That is TOO rich, Roger.
Fuck. Tent?
I think so. And if I'm wrong, well, I haven't falsely accused anyone who matters, right?
I think you might be clever enough to be be attempting a troll by calling me Tentasticle. If I didn't though, I'd totally jump on that role just for the sake of pissing you guys off :banana:
PS: I don't have any grudge with you except the fact that I think you angsty American douchebags make Goddess look bad. I'm an Episkopos of the Mad Libitum Understanding Cabal, and it seemed like a wonderful plan to piss all over you guys to get my kicks (and inspiration for my gospel).
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:04:21 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 13, 2008, 06:57:37 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 12, 2008, 05:23:57 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
That is TOO rich, Roger.
Fuck. Tent?
I think so. And if I'm wrong, well, I haven't falsely accused anyone who matters, right?
I think you might be clever enough to be be attempting a troll by calling me Tentasticle. If I didn't though, I'd totally jump on that role just for the sake of pissing you guys off :banana:
PS: I don't have any grudge with you except the fact that I think you angsty American douchebags make Goddess look bad. I'm an Episkopos of the Mad Libitum Understanding Cabal, and it seemed like a wonderful plan to piss all over you guys to get my kicks (and inspiration for my gospel).
That's nice. Now run along and write the gospel that nobody will ever read.
Thanks.
Bye, now.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 14, 2008, 11:24:26 PM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:04:21 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 13, 2008, 06:57:37 AM
Quote from: Dr. Payne on September 12, 2008, 05:23:57 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 12, 2008, 03:55:26 AM
Quote from: Kai on September 11, 2008, 04:10:54 AM
:lulz:
You are an idiot. :lulz:
He is Tentasticle. :lulz:
That is TOO rich, Roger.
Fuck. Tent?
I think so. And if I'm wrong, well, I haven't falsely accused anyone who matters, right?
I think you might be clever enough to be be attempting a troll by calling me Tentasticle. If I didn't though, I'd totally jump on that role just for the sake of pissing you guys off :banana:
PS: I don't have any grudge with you except the fact that I think you angsty American douchebags make Goddess look bad. I'm an Episkopos of the Mad Libitum Understanding Cabal, and it seemed like a wonderful plan to piss all over you guys to get my kicks (and inspiration for my gospel).
That's nice. Now run along and write the gospel that nobody will ever read.
Thanks.
Bye, now.
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:28:13 PM
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Because you're a bore? Because nobody likes you? Because you never really had anything to say?
There are many reasons you should go, and none for you to stay.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 14, 2008, 11:38:25 PM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:28:13 PM
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Because you're a bore? Because nobody likes you? Because you never really had anything to say?
There are many reasons you should go, and none for you to stay.
From my side of the screen, you are wrong on all acounts...
(http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p254/whyismyusernametaken/bizarroworld.jpg)
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:50:09 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 14, 2008, 11:38:25 PM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:28:13 PM
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Because you're a bore? Because nobody likes you? Because you never really had anything to say?
There are many reasons you should go, and none for you to stay.
From my side of the screen, you are wrong on all acounts...
But here in the real world, nobody wants you here. Sorry about that.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 15, 2008, 12:00:55 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:50:09 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 14, 2008, 11:38:25 PM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:28:13 PM
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Because you're a bore? Because nobody likes you? Because you never really had anything to say?
There are many reasons you should go, and none for you to stay.
From my side of the screen, you are wrong on all acounts...
But here in the real world, nobody wants you here. Sorry about that.
:cry:
Quote from: Janvier on September 15, 2008, 12:05:52 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 15, 2008, 12:00:55 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:50:09 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 14, 2008, 11:38:25 PM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:28:13 PM
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Because you're a bore? Because nobody likes you? Because you never really had anything to say?
There are many reasons you should go, and none for you to stay.
From my side of the screen, you are wrong on all acounts...
But here in the real world, nobody wants you here. Sorry about that.
:cry:
You should probably leave now.
Good boy.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 15, 2008, 12:16:32 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 15, 2008, 12:05:52 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 15, 2008, 12:00:55 AM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:50:09 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 14, 2008, 11:38:25 PM
Quote from: Janvier on September 14, 2008, 11:28:13 PM
:wave:
Wait, why am I leaving?
Because you're a bore? Because nobody likes you? Because you never really had anything to say?
There are many reasons you should go, and none for you to stay.
From my side of the screen, you are wrong on all acounts...
But here in the real world, nobody wants you here. Sorry about that.
:cry:
You should probably leave now.
Good boy.
:wave:
IANAR? IS THAT YUO?!
Seriously, once this twat turns to "ED this" and "ED that", I'm going to shart SRS BZNS.
In the meantime, :popcorn:
(http://www.fiorijanitorial.com/images/product/icon/279.jpg)
Quote from: Suu on September 15, 2008, 02:59:30 AM
IANAR? IS THAT YUO?!
Seriously, once this twat turns to "ED this" and "ED that", I'm going to shart SRS BZNS.
In the meantime, :popcorn:
JEWS DID WTC!
(http://www.healthinajiffy.co.uk/images/pledge-soapy-wood-cleaner.jpg)
Quote from: Hoopla on September 15, 2008, 11:40:46 PM
(http://www.healthinajiffy.co.uk/images/pledge-soapy-wood-cleaner.jpg)
We're not on planet Mudball anymore, spag!
(http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE3-4781317reg.jpg)
Quote from: Hoopla on September 16, 2008, 08:12:43 PM
(http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE3-4781317reg.jpg)
(http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p254/whyismyusernametaken/p_oscar.gif)
Quote from: Suu on September 15, 2008, 02:59:30 AM
IANAR? IS THAT YUO?!
Seriously, once this twat turns to "ED this" and "ED that", I'm going to shart SRS BZNS.
In the meantime, :popcorn:
Not IANAR. It's one of the mods from CoG.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2008, 04:23:09 AM
Quote from: Suu on September 15, 2008, 02:59:30 AM
IANAR? IS THAT YUO?!
Seriously, once this twat turns to "ED this" and "ED that", I'm going to shart SRS BZNS.
In the meantime, :popcorn:
Not IANAR. It's one of the mods from CoG.
I thought it was King Fisher?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2008, 04:23:09 AM
Quote from: Suu on September 15, 2008, 02:59:30 AM
IANAR? IS THAT YUO?!
Seriously, once this twat turns to "ED this" and "ED that", I'm going to shart SRS BZNS.
In the meantime, :popcorn:
Not IANAR. It's one of the mods from CoG.
You keep your barns helplessly uninformed.
I'll be whatever you guys think me to be, but only in your tiny cells. And in my own cell (though that is really the last thing I'd call it), I'm whatever I think I am. Are you really assuming I am someone you have met before? Looking for evidence to disprove, instead of support, your theory is a good way to figure out the "truth", however malleable it may be.
But to give you a fair shot at figuring out who I am, here is a screenshot of my desktop:
(http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p254/whyismyusernametaken/desktop.jpg)
Nobody cares.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2008, 04:23:09 AM
Quote from: Suu on September 15, 2008, 02:59:30 AM
IANAR? IS THAT YUO?!
Seriously, once this twat turns to "ED this" and "ED that", I'm going to shart SRS BZNS.
In the meantime, :popcorn:
Not IANAR. It's one of the mods from CoG.
almost want IANAR back now
Yeah, IANAR was much more entertaining.
:fap:
I love retarded arguments.
:fap:
Quote from: TheScarletReaper on September 28, 2008, 05:25:26 AM
:fap:
I love retarded arguments.
:fap:
There are a few more in the archives that dwarf this one for retardedness.
lol.
this thread went on for 8 pages.
actually this is only one of many of his threads wasnt it.
(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8021/koolaid5buj0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
hopes he isnt like that koolaid guy