Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Literate Chaotic => Topic started by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on November 20, 2008, 02:58:29 AM

Title: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on November 20, 2008, 02:58:29 AM
I was just reading Wikipedia (yeah, I know) and came across this:

Quote
In Hesiod's Works and Days 11–24, two different goddesses named Eris "Strife" are distinguished:

    So, after all, there was not one kind of Strife alone, but all over the earth there are two. As for the one, a man would praise her when he came to understand her; but the other is blameworthy: and they are wholly different in nature.
    For one fosters evil war and battle, being cruel: her no man loves; but perforce, through the will of the deathless gods, men pay harsh Strife her honour due.
    But the other is the elder daughter of dark Night (Nyx), and the son of Cronus who sits above and dwells in the aether, set her in the roots of the earth: and she is far kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless to toil; for a man grows eager to work when he considers his neighbour, a rich man who hastens to plough and plant and put his house in good order; and neighbour vies with his neighbour as he hurries after wealth. This Strife is wholesome for men. And potter is angry with potter, and craftsman with craftsman, and beggar is jealous of beggar, and minstrel of minstrel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(mythology)

I had always thought the ancients perceived Our Lady as a royal bitch and pain in the ass, it's kind of nice to see that they recognized that there was a Hodge to her Podge.


Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: Kai on November 20, 2008, 03:14:25 AM
Quote from: Nigel on November 20, 2008, 02:58:29 AM
I was just reading Wikipedia (yeah, I know) and came across this:

Quote
In Hesiod's Works and Days 11–24, two different goddesses named Eris "Strife" are distinguished:

    So, after all, there was not one kind of Strife alone, but all over the earth there are two. As for the one, a man would praise her when he came to understand her; but the other is blameworthy: and they are wholly different in nature.
    For one fosters evil war and battle, being cruel: her no man loves; but perforce, through the will of the deathless gods, men pay harsh Strife her honour due.
    But the other is the elder daughter of dark Night (Nyx), and the son of Cronus who sits above and dwells in the aether, set her in the roots of the earth: and she is far kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless to toil; for a man grows eager to work when he considers his neighbour, a rich man who hastens to plough and plant and put his house in good order; and neighbour vies with his neighbour as he hurries after wealth. This Strife is wholesome for men. And potter is angry with potter, and craftsman with craftsman, and beggar is jealous of beggar, and minstrel of minstrel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(mythology)

I had always thought the ancients perceived Our Lady as a royal bitch and pain in the ass, it's kind of nice to see that they recognized that there was a Hodge to her Podge.




I remember Cain mentioning this before. Its a cool thing.
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: hooplala on November 20, 2008, 01:08:38 PM
Quote from: Nigel on November 20, 2008, 02:58:29 AM
I was just reading Wikipedia (yeah, I know) and came across this:

Quote
In Hesiod's Works and Days 11–24, two different goddesses named Eris "Strife" are distinguished:

    So, after all, there was not one kind of Strife alone, but all over the earth there are two. As for the one, a man would praise her when he came to understand her; but the other is blameworthy: and they are wholly different in nature.
    For one fosters evil war and battle, being cruel: her no man loves; but perforce, through the will of the deathless gods, men pay harsh Strife her honour due.
    But the other is the elder daughter of dark Night (Nyx), and the son of Cronus who sits above and dwells in the aether, set her in the roots of the earth: and she is far kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless to toil; for a man grows eager to work when he considers his neighbour, a rich man who hastens to plough and plant and put his house in good order; and neighbour vies with his neighbour as he hurries after wealth. This Strife is wholesome for men. And potter is angry with potter, and craftsman with craftsman, and beggar is jealous of beggar, and minstrel of minstrel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(mythology)

I had always thought the ancients perceived Our Lady as a royal bitch and pain in the ass, it's kind of nice to see that they recognized that there was a Hodge to her Podge.




True, but a lot of classical people refused to believe Eris could do any good and instead chose to believe there were two of her.  One that was beneficial and one that was anything but. 
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: LMNO on November 20, 2008, 01:22:20 PM
As usual, I blame Aristotle.
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on November 20, 2008, 05:23:58 PM
Quote from: BAWHEED on November 20, 2008, 01:08:38 PM
Quote from: Nigel on November 20, 2008, 02:58:29 AM
I was just reading Wikipedia (yeah, I know) and came across this:

Quote
In Hesiod's Works and Days 11–24, two different goddesses named Eris "Strife" are distinguished:

    So, after all, there was not one kind of Strife alone, but all over the earth there are two. As for the one, a man would praise her when he came to understand her; but the other is blameworthy: and they are wholly different in nature.
    For one fosters evil war and battle, being cruel: her no man loves; but perforce, through the will of the deathless gods, men pay harsh Strife her honour due.
    But the other is the elder daughter of dark Night (Nyx), and the son of Cronus who sits above and dwells in the aether, set her in the roots of the earth: and she is far kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless to toil; for a man grows eager to work when he considers his neighbour, a rich man who hastens to plough and plant and put his house in good order; and neighbour vies with his neighbour as he hurries after wealth. This Strife is wholesome for men. And potter is angry with potter, and craftsman with craftsman, and beggar is jealous of beggar, and minstrel of minstrel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eris_(mythology)

I had always thought the ancients perceived Our Lady as a royal bitch and pain in the ass, it's kind of nice to see that they recognized that there was a Hodge to her Podge.




True, but a lot of classical people refused to believe Eris could do any good and instead chose to believe there were two of her.  One that was beneficial and one that was anything but. 

That is what it says in the article.
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: hooplala on November 20, 2008, 05:32:27 PM
I just meant that they seemed unable to put beneficial aspects to her character without splitting her off into a separate deity with the exact same name.
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on November 20, 2008, 06:53:34 PM
Quote from: BAWHEED on November 20, 2008, 05:32:27 PM
I just meant that they seemed unable to put beneficial aspects to her character without splitting her off into a separate deity with the exact same name.

They did seem to compartmentalize kind of heavily.
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: hooplala on November 20, 2008, 06:55:31 PM
It does seem to give credit to Hill and Thornley's idea that the ancient Greeks just really didn't understand Eris, and didn't want to try.
Title: Re: The positive side of classical Eris
Post by: Cain on November 21, 2008, 02:28:42 PM
Its probably due to cultural change.  Both Hermes and Eris were originally portrayed negatively, because of attitudes towards trade prevalent from the 10th-6th centuries BC.  Because of a spate of tyrannies during the 6th century, alot of traditions got chucked by the wayside and merchants gained much more power.

In a military context, competition is bad (see: Thucydides), however in a trade context it is usually good.  But that trade context really did not exist much before the 6th century, and was distrusted by aristocratic elites and their priest allies.  As times changed, so did attitudes.