I directed, produced, filmed, and editing several pieces of bizarre pornography, starring myself.
Is there any interest in the link?
No. I'm not kidding.
sure yeah whatever.
Quote from: I_Kicked_Kennedy on September 23, 2009, 01:54:49 AM
I directed, produced, filmed, and editing several pieces of bizarre pornography, starring myself.
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a95/discordman/bin/happy-kids.gif)
http://www.xtube.com/play_re.php?v=mAjOI-J728-&c=myv&page=1
Appallingly NSFW.
Click on the profile, there's three more in the series.
Let's just say its proof the mind is the only erogenous zone.
the internet has ruined me. When I heard "bizarre pornography", my imagination went far past the mark you set.
Yes I do.
:oops:
I saw your weiner.
Impressive.
that took balls
:rimshot:
This thread is missing something...
I wish I could do that!
Also, that was the most boring porn ever.
Agreed.
I'm not the only pd'er that has been seen nekked and ejacumalating on this board, am I?
Quote from: I_Kicked_Kennedy on September 23, 2009, 10:15:57 PM
Agreed.
I'm not the only pd'er that has been seen nekked and ejacumalating on this board, am I?
Yes, but not by me.
I have STANDARDS for my porn, sir, and one of those standards is that a female be at least peripherally involved. I had calculated the odds of you being able to convince a woman to rub your bits at all, let alone on camera, and elected not to click.
WE DEMAND WEIRDER PORN
/
(http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb163/wompcabal/forum/horrormirth1-1.gif)
Quote from: I_Kicked_Kennedy on September 23, 2009, 10:15:57 PM
Agreed.
I'm not the only pd'er that has been seen nekked and ejacumalating on this board, am I?
I really hope this wasn't the only reason you posted this. In which case I take back my earlier comment.
(http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/spiff_bucket/worthlesswithoutpics.gif)
Quote from: fictionpuss on September 24, 2009, 02:09:25 AM
(http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/spiff_bucket/worthlesswithoutpics.gif)
No, it's worthless WITH pics. His third post, IIRC.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 24, 2009, 02:21:29 AM
No, it's worthless WITH pics. His third post, IIRC.
True, but if I'd changed the gif animation to that, it'd have been too obvious.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on September 24, 2009, 02:21:29 AM
Quote from: fictionpuss on September 24, 2009, 02:09:25 AM
(http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/spiff_bucket/worthlesswithoutpics.gif)
No, it's worthless WITH pics. His third post, IIRC.
HAH! Missed that. You could have just shortened it to "THIS THREAD IS WORTHLESS".
Quote from: fictionpuss on September 24, 2009, 02:09:25 AM
(http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/spiff_bucket/worthlesswithoutpics.gif)
:mittens:
yoink
Ok, saw it.
My main problem with it is that, while you have a very nice cock, it took you 8 minutes to get fully erect.
Not only that, you reached full erection as you were cumming!
Really now, those of us who enjoy looking an a nice hard cock want more than 8 minutes of "whatever" and then POP!
... Were you listening to 'Jackpot'?
http://www.isabellavalentine.com/2008/03/22/erotic-hypnosis-mp3-jackpot-no-hands/ for those who aren't a 4channer or wherever else this shit was spammed for no reason.
Quote from: LMNO on October 07, 2009, 06:03:48 AMMy main problem with it is that, while you have a very nice cock, it took you 8 minutes to get fully erect.
Not only that, you reached full erection as you were cumming!
I assumed that was part of the cumming by meditation routine. I mean, getting your penis erect by sheer force of will is not that big (lolpun) a feat. Just imagine/visualize some sexy things and it should get up within the minute, no?
The least he could have done is put a hat on it and done a little dance.
WHY DID I JUST WATCH THAT
luckily it was on fast forward and lasted 10 seconds
Quote from: Fredtastic! on October 07, 2009, 04:31:41 PM
WHY DID I JUST WATCH THAT
luckily it was on fast forward and lasted 10 seconds
its funny in fast forward. :lulz:
Quote from: Pixie O'Fubar on October 07, 2009, 04:49:24 PM
Quote from: Fredtastic! on October 07, 2009, 04:31:41 PM
WHY DID I JUST WATCH THAT
luckily it was on fast forward and lasted 10 seconds
its funny in fast forward. :lulz:
...confusing in reverse.
And by the by, someone asking about the fact I was only erect during the tail end:
If you watch some of the other videos I've made (also meditation wanks) I'm erect a little longer in the 3rd and 4th ones.
:lulz:
In the name of science, details!
Do you use audio-stimulation or are you able to pull this one off the classic way? Tantra?
I DEMAND DETAILS...
The two "hands-free" torrents that are out there aren't really working for me. But I had a strange mind to begin with.
~planeswalker
has been sexperimenting with his head(s) for years now, with interesting results.
Quote from: Triple Zero on October 07, 2009, 06:48:07 AM
Quote from: LMNO on October 07, 2009, 06:03:48 AMMy main problem with it is that, while you have a very nice cock, it took you 8 minutes to get fully erect.
Not only that, you reached full erection as you were cumming!
I assumed that was part of the cumming by meditation routine. I mean, getting your penis erect by sheer force of will is not that big (lolpun) a feat. Just imagine/visualize some sexy things and it should get up within the minute, no?
I certainly have no problem becoming completely aroused from mere thoughts, so it seems it should also not be difficult for a man to do so. Orgasming without physical stimulation, though, I can't do... at least, not while awake. Almost everyone can do it during sleep so obviously it's biologically possible.
Quote from: planeswalker on October 08, 2009, 02:08:54 AM
:lulz:
In the name of science, details!
Do you use audio-stimulation or are you able to pull this one off the classic way? Tantra?
I DEMAND DETAILS...
The two "hands-free" torrents that are out there aren't really working for me. But I had a strange mind to begin with.
~planeswalker
has been sexperimenting with his head(s) for years now, with interesting results.
They're not getting you to orgasm? It can take a time or two. But you also have to completely ignore any thoughts about how silly it is, and actually give yourself over to her.. there's a lot of controversy over the type of hypnosis she does, because she basically makes the people she uses this on her slaves, and they just keep throwing money at her because she tells them to. You have to be in the kind of mindset where you think if you don't do as she says, something bad will happen to you.
Quote from: La Terrorista on October 08, 2009, 04:11:19 AM
Quote from: planeswalker on October 08, 2009, 02:08:54 AM
:lulz:
In the name of science, details!
Do you use audio-stimulation or are you able to pull this one off the classic way? Tantra?
I DEMAND DETAILS...
The two "hands-free" torrents that are out there aren't really working for me. But I had a strange mind to begin with.
~planeswalker
has been sexperimenting with his head(s) for years now, with interesting results.
They're not getting you to orgasm? It can take a time or two. But you also have to completely ignore any thoughts about how silly it is, and actually give yourself over to her.. there's a lot of controversy over the type of hypnosis she does, because she basically makes the people she uses this on her slaves, and they just keep throwing money at her because she tells them to. You have to be in the kind of mindset where you think if you don't do as she says, something bad will happen to you.
That feeling of being a mental slave has ALWAYS been my problem with hypnosis.
I'll give it another try some time once I have sorted out some more pressing RL matters. There have been a few things in my life that kinda fucked up the mental aspects of my sexuality, causing certain consequences and hence my personal interest in fully mastering that area of my brain.
On another note: I prefer to share a "from out of this world" full body orgasm with a partner over dripping out my sperm as seen in the vid. But it would certainly be amusing to get this done.
Thanks for the pointer...
Interesting but I'll stick to masturbating for orgasm. It's more fun.
I once wanted to make absurdist porn. But then I realized that most porn is absurdist the dirrectors just didn't mean for it to be.
Quote from: glorfon on October 10, 2009, 12:26:09 AM
Interesting but I'll stick to masturbating for orgasm. It's more fun.
I once wanted to make absurdist porn. But then I realized that most porn is absurdist the dirrectors just didn't mean for it to be.
NSFW: http://www.pornotube.com/channels.php?channelId=202&m=1672938
All the weird porn you could ever lust:
(not safe for work or play, but it gets me off every day)
http://strangeweirdporn.com/
Quote from: I_Kicked_Kennedy on September 23, 2009, 02:45:57 AM
http://www.xtube.com/play_re.php?v=mAjOI-J728-&c=myv&page=1
Appallingly NSFW.
Click on the profile, there's three more in the series.
Let's just say its proof the mind is the only erogenous zone.
:golfclap:
Though, if you could place a significantly large, living spider on the tip of your penis and then orgasm with extreme force, with all of it landing neatly in the center of a beautiful woman's clenched, pulsating anus for a split second, and then, with a tremendous blaring moan it's rocketed back out with the spray of a vivid blue Kool Aid enema, landing the spider intact on your shoulder, I'd be REALLY impressed.
Bonus points if you can get slow-mo action of the spider catching a fly midair before it lands (like this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NQhWrs6GXI&feature=related)).
Weird Porn Olympics or GTFO.
Weird porn duelling should be a common past-time, along, with jenkem taking and haiku battles.
Kind of like, "I see your zombie midget sex, and I raise you bunny rabbit anal cosplay"?
Yes. And Simon Cowell, Ron Jeremy and Jenna Jameson could then rate them, live on national TV.
:spittake:
:cramstipated:
Holyshit, this needs to happen.