Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Aneristic Illusions => Topic started by: Cain on October 19, 2009, 05:01:42 PM

Title: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Cain on October 19, 2009, 05:01:42 PM
Oh you have to be shitting me.

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/14/down-10000-market/

QuoteFor months and months, conservatives blamed President Obama for the slumping stock market. "Obama, since he's elected, has tanked the markets," Fox News' Sean Hannity said in March. Now that the Dow has rebounded to over 10,000, what are the conservatives saying? On his Fox News today, Neil Cavuto claimed the stock market rebound is evidence of a "Bush recovery"

Why not claim this recovery is based on Palin's future Presidency somehow changing the past (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=22592.0)?  At least some science is involved there.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: AFK on October 19, 2009, 05:06:05 PM
And so it begins.   
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: LMNO on October 19, 2009, 05:06:53 PM
I think the next band I'm in will be called The Revisionists.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: AFK on October 19, 2009, 05:10:45 PM
The logical gymnastics are going to be astounding.  The idiots who've been decrying bank bailouts and auto bail-outs for the past 10 months are going to have to start defending them if they want to give Bush any credit for this turnaround.  And I guarantee you someone out there, when it comes to the Stimulus, are going to pull a "Well Bush thought of it first!".  Or "Bush would've done it better!" 
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Thurnez Isa on October 19, 2009, 05:15:28 PM
The idea that Bush saved us from the Obama recession and overspending makes me very happy...
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Jenne on October 19, 2009, 07:11:09 PM
They're applying this because it's what was said about the dotcome bubble burst in the 90's when Bill Clinton was president.  They blamed Bush Sr.'s policies.  I've noticed that this is now the never-ending cycle of spindoctored bullshit that supersedes manning up and copping to the b.s. that each administration pulls.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: on October 19, 2009, 09:33:43 PM
Quote from: Jenne on October 19, 2009, 07:11:09 PM
They're applying this because it's what was said about the dotcome bubble burst in the 90's when Bill Clinton was president.  They blamed Bush Sr.'s policies.  I've noticed that this is now the never-ending cycle of spindoctored bullshit that supersedes manning up and copping to the b.s. that each administration pulls.

Accountability has nothing to do with politiks.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Jenne on October 19, 2009, 10:23:48 PM
Quote from: Z³ on October 19, 2009, 09:33:43 PM
Quote from: Jenne on October 19, 2009, 07:11:09 PM
They're applying this because it's what was said about the dotcome bubble burst in the 90's when Bill Clinton was president.  They blamed Bush Sr.'s policies.  I've noticed that this is now the never-ending cycle of spindoctored bullshit that supersedes manning up and copping to the b.s. that each administration pulls.

Accountability has nothing to do with politiks.

Of course it doesn't.  That's why bumper stickers that I see like "Throw all the bums out!" are just so much crying in the wilderness.

Well, that, the ploy is false because other, worse bums will just take their places.

In fact, Sacramento soooo does not give a shit what you say or think these days, that even *I* am throwing in the towel.  I just got a letter from fucking Nathan Fletcher the other day, and my husband got one from Brian Bilbray.  Fletcher's was on education, Bilbray on health care (my husband and I each have our bailiwicks, after all).  Both letters were long, long, long diatribes on why they, the piggies we have in office, are so very very right in backstabbing their constituency, while their lobbyists pay pay pay for their campaigns.

I've stopped reading their letters after the first paragraph or so anymore.  It all reads the same.  Like some dipshit brochure on why they're so morally superior than their ESTIMED colleagues across the aisle, instead of focusing on the rotten handbasket we're all in.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: the other anonymous on October 19, 2009, 10:47:28 PM
If we throw all the bums out, how will we sit?

And:

If we throw all the bums out, how will we shit?

-toa,
politics is like a tin-foil hat...
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Requia ☣ on October 20, 2009, 12:37:35 AM
Quote from: Jenne on October 19, 2009, 10:23:48 PM
Quote from: Z³ on October 19, 2009, 09:33:43 PM
Quote from: Jenne on October 19, 2009, 07:11:09 PM
They're applying this because it's what was said about the dotcome bubble burst in the 90's when Bill Clinton was president.  They blamed Bush Sr.'s policies.  I've noticed that this is now the never-ending cycle of spindoctored bullshit that supersedes manning up and copping to the b.s. that each administration pulls.

Accountability has nothing to do with politiks.

Of course it doesn't.  That's why bumper stickers that I see like "Throw all the bums out!" are just so much crying in the wilderness.

Well, that, the ploy is false because other, worse bums will just take their places.

In fact, Sacramento soooo does not give a shit what you say or think these days, that even *I* am throwing in the towel.  I just got a letter from fucking Nathan Fletcher the other day, and my husband got one from Brian Bilbray.  Fletcher's was on education, Bilbray on health care (my husband and I each have our bailiwicks, after all).  Both letters were long, long, long diatribes on why they, the piggies we have in office, are so very very right in backstabbing their constituency, while their lobbyists pay pay pay for their campaigns.

I've stopped reading their letters after the first paragraph or so anymore.  It all reads the same.  Like some dipshit brochure on why they're so morally superior than their ESTIMED colleagues across the aisle, instead of focusing on the rotten handbasket we're all in.

I have one of those from Hatch.  About how we have to balance freedom with safety, and how he never supported the patriot act (even though I *know* he voted for it).
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on October 20, 2009, 03:57:18 AM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on October 20, 2009, 12:37:35 AM
About how we have to balance freedom with safety,

(http://i476.photobucket.com/albums/rr126/TGRR/patrick-henry1.jpg)
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Requia ☣ on October 20, 2009, 05:27:28 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on October 20, 2009, 03:57:18 AM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on October 20, 2009, 12:37:35 AM
About how we have to balance freedom with safety,

(http://i476.photobucket.com/albums/rr126/TGRR/patrick-henry1.jpg)

Post of the fucking year.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Halfbaked1 on October 20, 2009, 08:45:01 AM
Pardon me but...What the ever lovin fuck are they talking about?!  Bush?  Saved us?  From obama?  GAH!  The recession aint Obama or Bush's fault, its the result of years of mismanagement!  I just...I mean...Oh for the love of...GAH!  I think my brain is melty.
Title: Re: The "Bush recovery"?
Post by: Bruno on October 20, 2009, 09:25:23 AM
Heh, heh, heh.

My bad.
         \
(http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk316/Jerry_Frankster/FlamingReaganHead2small.png)