This is Annie Lobert a former Las Vegas call girl who runs an non-profit called "Hookers for Jesus" which tries to get women out of the sex industry
http://www.hookersforjesus.net/home.cfm
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/Anniegirltank.jpg/401px-Anniegirltank.jpg)
And this is the cover of "hookers for Jesus" a publication of the Children of God cult concerning their infamous "flirty fishing" practice which involved using sex a recruitment technique.
(http://www.xfamily.org/images/9/9d/414px-Jhooker.jpg)
Is this organization trying to get people to stop being prostitutes, or just get them to hand out bible pamphlets afterward?
:lulz: :lulz:
Who cares they said hooker
I dont see why you are making fun of her, she obviously made some mistakes (just like everyone does), and now that she finally understands it, she is trying to help others that have strayed from the pack; she should be praised for what shes doing. Dont you think people deserve second chances?
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 05, 2010, 10:44:54 PM
Is this organization trying to get people to stop being prostitutes, or just get them to hand out bible pamphlets afterward?
Annie Lobert is trying to get people to stop being prostitutes. The Children of God were just trying to get guys to hand out Bible pamphlets afterward.
Quote from: JohNyx on January 05, 2010, 11:16:30 PM
I dont see why you are making fun of her, she obviously made some mistakes (just like everyone does), and now that she finally understands it, she is trying to help others that have strayed from the pack; she should be praised for what shes doing. Dont you think people deserve second chances?
Just in case you missed it, allow me to break this down Barney style: she gave her organization the exact same name as a handbook produced by a dangerous cult that brainwashed women into having sex for Jesus. I'm ridiculing her complete inability to spend the 2 seconds on Google it would've taken her to figure out that she didn't want to be mistaken for the kind of person that turns Jesus into the Pimp of All Pimps. But now that you mention it, I guess that's not funny at all. Where's the High Sadness forum?
I think italics now indicates sarcasm. Or a reference, or something.
I wonder if a guy that looks like the stereotypical Jesus image approached her, whether she would be aroused...
old habits, mixing job signals, etc.
Guess some people swing that way
Quote from: Lord Quantum on January 06, 2010, 12:51:30 AM
...she didn't want to be mistaken for the kind of person that turns Jesus into the Pimp of All Pimps
SHIKSE SAY WUT?
_____\
(http://i45.tinypic.com/1zdpt12.gif)
Quote from: GA on January 06, 2010, 01:08:44 AM
I think italics now indicates sarcasm. Or a reference, or something.
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=23598.0 (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=23598.0)
Im not good at it, but at least im trying.
Maybe because its the wrong target audience, but i gotta practice somewhere.
On the other hand, seeing how LQ reacted, seems it works at least for the purpose of inciting polarization.
Ha. You're fine, man--it was pretty clearly sarcasm.
This thread needs more pictures of hookers and pimp Jesus.
I would of been suprised if it were anything but sarcasm
Quote from: GA on January 06, 2010, 01:08:44 AM
I think italics now indicates sarcasm. Or a reference, or something.
Ah crap. And here I thought that we were about to get into a debate or something. Maybe I'll post this on the 700 club's forum.
Quote from: 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (New International Version)19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.
How can you argue with that? Women are weaker and not as smart as men, how else can they efficiently honor God's word? I think her approach is innovative.
Quote from: JohNyx on January 06, 2010, 03:13:42 AM
Quote from: 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (New International Version)19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.
How can you argue with that? Women are weaker and not as smart as men, how else can they efficiently honor God's word? I think her approach is innovative.
If only you would harness this power for evil, you would be the best troll ever.
Quote from: JohNyx on January 06, 2010, 03:13:42 AM
Quote from: 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (New International Version)19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.
How can you argue with that? Women are weaker and not as smart as men, how else can they efficiently honor God's word? I think her approach is innovative.
It's not so much that they are weaker, than their naivete born of purity leads them unto temptation more easily. this is why they must be protected from themselves. It would be insulting to refer to their inherent ignorance as lack of intelligence, although the distinction is subtle...
Quote from: Brotep on January 06, 2010, 01:21:09 AM
Quote from: Lord Quantum on January 06, 2010, 12:51:30 AM
...she didn't want to be mistaken for the kind of person that turns Jesus into the Pimp of All Pimps
SHIKSE SAY WUT?
_____\
(http://i45.tinypic.com/1zdpt12.gif)
Now if we could just get someone to photoshop that onto Annie we'd have a "Jesus is My Pimp" shirt.
Quote from: Iptuous on January 06, 2010, 01:29:26 PM
Quote from: JohNyx on January 06, 2010, 03:13:42 AM
Quote from: 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (New International Version)19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.
How can you argue with that? Women are weaker and not as smart as men, how else can they efficiently honor God's word? I think her approach is innovative.
It's not so much that they are weaker, than their naivete born of purity leads them unto temptation more easily. this is why they must be protected from themselves. It would be insulting to refer to their inherent ignorance as lack of intelligence, although the distinction is subtle...
Eve herself tempted Adam; but that was because the snake seduced her with arrogance and the desire to be as God, or was it due to her ignorance? I think it was more of a lack of faith in God's word.
But i still think that with the attributes of women (seduction, beauty), they can put it to good use; instead of making people stray, to help them find the Lord.
Although you are right, there should be some men directing the endevour.
You know what, evil has misguided my thoughts.
Women should stay at the home taking care of their children and household, not preaching the Lord's Word to the heretics; that's a man's job, for only they possesses the clarity.Praised be!Quote from: Genesis 1:27So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him
Quote from: Iptuous on January 06, 2010, 01:12:53 AM
I wonder if a guy that looks like the stereotypical Jesus image approached her, whether she would be aroused...
old habits, mixing job signals, etc.
Quite a few "religious experiences" documented by nuns have a not very subtle undertone of sexual intimacy, as it happens.
I have to say, that picture of a woman impaled by a giant fish hook was fairly un-subtle.
Quote from: Cain on January 06, 2010, 02:49:05 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on January 06, 2010, 01:12:53 AM
I wonder if a guy that looks like the stereotypical Jesus image approached her, whether she would be aroused...
old habits, mixing job signals, etc.
Quite a few "religious experiences" documented by nuns have a not very subtle undertone of sexual intimacy, as it happens.
Ascetism and sublimation only can go so far, before you enter a nice schizophrenic erotic fit.
Quote from: Le Goff, Jacques "Une histoire du corps au Moyen Age", p.64Jean de Fécamp que escribe en su "Oración por la gracia de las lágrimas": "Dulce Cristo, buen Jesus, asi como yo te deseo, asi como yo te ruego con todo mi espíritu, dame tu amor santo y casto, que me llene, me sostenga, me posea por entero. Y dame el signo evidente de tu amor, la fuente abundante de lagrimas que chorrean continuamente, de modo que estas mismas lagrimas probaran tu amor por mi"
"Sweet Christ, good jesus, just as i desire you, just as a i plead with all my spirit, give me your holy and chaste love, that it should fill me, hold me, possess me entirely. And give me the sign of your evident love, the abundant fountain of tears that drip continously, in a manner that these same tears prove your love for me" -Jean de Fécamp
And dont forget about the little bitch crying that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_IX_of_France (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_IX_of_France) did.
Quote from: Cain on January 06, 2010, 02:49:05 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on January 06, 2010, 01:12:53 AM
I wonder if a guy that looks like the stereotypical Jesus image approached her, whether she would be aroused...
old habits, mixing job signals, etc.
Quite a few "religious experiences" documented by nuns have a not very subtle undertone of sexual intimacy, as it happens.
Oh, yes. I believe there was a phrase rolling around the 12th century France monasteries among other places, something about being "impregnated by Christ".
Quote from: LMNO on January 06, 2010, 02:52:28 PM
I have to say, that picture of a woman impaled by a giant fish hook was fairly un-subtle.
That was practically a master class in innuendo compared to the following. This by the way is the cover
of one of their instructional booklets.
(http://egolpio.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/flirt.jpg)
I figure that they should bring back temple prostitution. It worked for the Babylonians (I mean, until the Hebrews unloaded all their syphilitic women onto them as 'war prisoners').
The Children of God did practice temple prostitution. It's just that the Temple was a church and the church made house calls. As for everyone else, there's still the whole "prostitution is illegal" thing to contend with. But then again, freedom of religion means that it's ok as long as you do it in a church, right? At least that's the way the Catholics tell the story...
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 04:21:34 PM
I figure that they should bring back temple prostitution. It worked for the Babylonians (I mean, until the Hebrews unloaded all their syphilitic women onto them as 'war prisoners').
Syphilis didn't exist in the Old World until after white people started sexing Native Americans. Please to revise your account of history.
Quote from: Cainad on January 07, 2010, 05:58:25 PM
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 04:21:34 PM
I figure that they should bring back temple prostitution. It worked for the Babylonians (I mean, until the Hebrews unloaded all their syphilitic women onto them as 'war prisoners').
Syphilis didn't exist in the Old World until after white people started sexing Native Americans. Please to revise your account of history.
Maybe it was some other STD. It's one of the few instances of biological warfare recorded both in the bible and in historical documents.
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 07:07:01 PM
Quote from: Cainad on January 07, 2010, 05:58:25 PM
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 04:21:34 PM
I figure that they should bring back temple prostitution. It worked for the Babylonians (I mean, until the Hebrews unloaded all their syphilitic women onto them as 'war prisoners').
Syphilis didn't exist in the Old World until after white people started sexing Native Americans. Please to revise your account of history.
Maybe it was some other STD. It's one of the few instances of biological warfare recorded both in the bible and in historical documents.
Yeah?
Link?
Better yet, a relevant Old Testament passage?
I'm on a kiosk at the moment, but I will find the relevant passage when I get home.
biblegateway.com
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 08:08:55 PM
I'm on a kiosk at the moment, but I will find the relevant passage when I get home.
I'm more interested in the historical verification.
TGRR,
Will be awaiting this with great interest.
Haven't you heard? The Old Testament is an Accurate Historical Document©!
Quote from: LMNO on January 07, 2010, 08:37:48 PM
Haven't you heard? The Old Testament is an Accurate Historical Document©!
HAR!
No, he specifically stated that there was outside verification.
Babylonian documents aren't much better, unfortunately. The king list has several people whose reign is over 300 years long.
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 08:50:10 PM
Babylonian documents aren't much better, unfortunately. The king list has several people whose reign is over 300 years long.
You said "historical", not "mythological".
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 08:50:10 PM
Babylonian documents aren't much better, unfortunately. The king list has several people whose reign is over 300 years long.
The list you're referring to is the Sumerian king's list. There is no "Babylonian Kings List".
Quote from: Lord Quantum on January 09, 2010, 01:39:52 AM
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 08:50:10 PM
Babylonian documents aren't much better, unfortunately. The king list has several people whose reign is over 300 years long.
The list you're referring to is the Sumerian king's list. There is no "Babylonian Kings List".
Hey now, being pedantic is MY job.
And yes, it's the Sumerian king's list. Then, Sargon (with the help of generations of Akkadian moles in the highest reaching places in the Sumerian priesthood) took over the whole place and it became the Akkadian empire. Then, Sargon II (no relation) took over some other shit, built Babylon, and dubbed the whole place the Babylonian empire. That doesn't mean that anywhere along the way their bookkeeping became significantly more accurate for things they weren't selling. Mind you, their bookkeeping was excellent for stuff they WERE selling, because they were totally ahead of the curve from inventing writing and mathematics for that purpose back around 4000 BC.
Quote from: Enki v. 2.0 on January 07, 2010, 08:50:10 PM
Akkadian moles in the highest reaching places in the Sumerian priesthood)
Moles in the priesthood? Why don't we have any of those? We need to infiltrate the Catholic church.
The priesthood *was* the government, there. They were also the educational system, more or less. The priesthood was also the only group allowed to buy and sell. It was like some kind of communist theocracy. So, over time, the akkadians (a semitic group coming from bordering lands) slowly moved into the sumerian cities, educated themselves in the sumerian school systems, got into the highest positions in the sumerian priesthood/government, and eventually (when the akkadians quite obviously outnumbered the racially distinct sumerians) declared themselves to be in charge and annexed the much larger and more profitable sumerian lands to the akkadian lands. It's a bit like if there were a conspiracy of mexican peasants to move into the united states, attend public schools, and then populate 80% of congress, then vote as a block to annex the united states to mexico.
Still waiting on the bible quotes and/or citations...
Quote from: LMNO on January 11, 2010, 07:17:54 PM
Still waiting on the bible quotes and/or citations...
Protip: Do not hold your breath.
Yeah there's way more verses on hookers than that in the Bible. For example, one of the main characters in Hosea (his wife, Gomer) is a prostitute. Or at least an adulteress. Same thing really (at least in the Bible anyway). There's even a prostitute in the lineage of Jesus.
Quote from: Lord Quantum on February 08, 2010, 06:05:11 AM
one of the main characters in Hosea (his wife, Gomer) is a prostitute. Or at least an adulteress. Same thing really (at least in the Bible anyway). There's even a prostitute in the lineage of Jesus.
And the root of the name Gomer means "finish"...
Could this be the Biblical equivalent of "happy ending"?
I'll have to check my Hebrew dictionary on that one, but you know, the Bible kinda frowns on happy endings (Gen 38). Unless she swallows.