http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/06/29/20100629sarah-palin-mocked-by-reporters-politico.html
Those quotes don't even sound all that mocking.
*I* could say WAY worse. And would.
But then I'm not a Fox-affiliated sycophant, either.
I mean, c'mon SHE HAD SHIT WRITTEN ON HER HAND!
Not this time maybe, but Jeez.
The comments to the article have some great LULZ.
Quote from: Ratatosk on June 29, 2010, 08:17:29 PM
The comments to the article have some great LULZ.
That they do.
On that note... why are there still birthers? Bah, never mind. Conspiracy sells. Too bad the conspiracy nuts are looking in all the wrong places.
Law of Fives
Quote from: Jenne on June 29, 2010, 07:45:09 PM
Those quotes don't even sound all that mocking.
*I* could say WAY worse. And would.
But then I'm not a Fox-affiliated sycophant, either.
Anything said that remotely critical of or sarcastic about Princess Sarah is going to be exaggerated and made into a lot more than it is.
They sounded pretty frazzled to me - "what the hell can we say she said? What DID she say? How am I going to fill my inches?"
Quote from: Hover Cat on June 29, 2010, 11:50:11 PM
Quote from: Jenne on June 29, 2010, 07:45:09 PM
Those quotes don't even sound all that mocking.
*I* could say WAY worse. And would.
But then I'm not a Fox-affiliated sycophant, either.
Anything said that remotely critical of or sarcastic about Princess Sarah is going to be exaggerated and made into a lot more than it is.
They sounded pretty frazzled to me - "what the hell can we say she said? What DID she say? How am I going to fill my inches?"
Sounds more accurate of the situation. And expected.