http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502657.html
QuoteUnlike past treaty restrictions, ICBMs are not prohibited from bombers. This means that Russia is free to mount a nearly unlimited number of ICBMs on bombers — including MIRVs (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles) or multiple warheads — without tripping the treaty's limits.
.....
:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Mounting...ICBMs....on....bombers.... :lulz:
:facepalm:
Haha? :?
looooool
You really don't know whether to laugh, cry or throw something! :|
Strapping an ICBM onto a bomber is more badass than BEAR CAVALRY.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present the Washington Post op-ed page!
(https://jspivey.wikispaces.com/file/view/2007.08.17icbm.JPG/34489797/2007.08.17icbm.JPG)
I want more Romney. He's FUNNY. :lulz:
Dear god. I just wanna see the bomber capable of carrying one, much less launching one.
It's more like strapping the bomber to the missile, rather than the other way around.
Quote from: LMNO on July 08, 2010, 06:55:42 PM
It's more like strapping the bomber to the missile, rather than the other way around.
"In other news the new Titanic Series ICBM Bombers will be on sale this week only for $1.5 Billion US."
Cross reference this story with the NASA story and you have:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcW_Ygs6hm0
Replace the crazy white guy with a crazy Muslim guy with a space suit.
I'mma going to photoshop a ICBM on a B-52...brb.
Bak.
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a356/theonlyang/romneyicbm.jpg)
It brings mutually assured destruction to an all new level:
Even if they can mount it on a bomber, and get the go ahead for use from command, the actual pilots would then have to launch knowing full well then ignition would blow them out of the sky.
The missile is literally half the size of a fucking B-52. If that Mormon dork ever intends to become president, he needs to learn to warfare.
Or not. It's funnier this way, as Bush and Obama have proven.
True...
This just reassures me that voting for Romney in 2012 will be the rightmost hilarious choice.
Quote from: Suu on July 09, 2010, 12:09:10 AM
Bak.
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a356/theonlyang/romneyicbm.jpg)
Needs an Irish Setter (http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html) on the roof of the plane.
Quote from: Cain on July 08, 2010, 03:43:06 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502657.html
QuoteUnlike past treaty restrictions, ICBMs are not prohibited from bombers. This means that Russia is free to mount a nearly unlimited number of ICBMs on bombers — including MIRVs (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles) or multiple warheads — without tripping the treaty's limits.
.....
:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Mounting...ICBMs....on....bombers.... :lulz:
On a bomber?
\
:chickenhawk:
Uh, well Romney said to do it so... I guess... just uh... fuck man, I don't know, we'll do it with magnets and duct tape and shit.
\
:chickenhawk:
Bump
Do you suppose anyone told him.
*pssst* Hey. Hey Mitt! *shakes head*
I doubt it. And even if they did, I kinda figure Romney doesn't give a shit, especiallynknow ing the type of person who is likely to vote for him in the general.
Romney was probably just thinking about a big old strap-on. :lol:
maybe he was trying to think ahead (without telling anyone he was doing it), with only knowing that icbm's deliver nukes
the nuclear devices themselves aren't all that large, so you could, hypothetically, get a re-entry capable craft into a position to deliver just like a MIRV would.
It wouldn't be efficient, but this is Mitt we're talking about.
a Secret Soviet Special Orbital Bomber Squadron (SSOBS)
Quote from: Jasper on July 08, 2010, 06:00:51 PM
(https://jspivey.wikispaces.com/file/view/2007.08.17icbm.JPG/34489797/2007.08.17icbm.JPG)
I want more Romney. He's FUNNY. :lulz:
From the Careful What You Wish For Department.
It occurs to me there is no treaty that prevents ICBMs being mounted on bear cavalry. On bombers. On submarines.
Clearly, we need more international treaties to solve this issue.
:lulz:
BUT IS THERE A BAYONET?