Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Aneristic Illusions => Topic started by: tyrannosaurus vex on August 24, 2010, 03:43:03 PM

Title: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: tyrannosaurus vex on August 24, 2010, 03:43:03 PM
Fun with Facebook Liberals (young, computer-literate, hip, informed, and concerned people who know what's going on):

(http://www.disc0rd.com/images/loldems.png)

Turns out they are pretty much the same kind of people who get boners for Palin, except they are mostly women, and their boners are for Obama.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on August 24, 2010, 04:22:32 PM
Well, he is an attractive man.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: tyrannosaurus vex on August 24, 2010, 04:34:05 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on August 24, 2010, 04:22:32 PM
Well, he is an attractive man.

:hashishim:
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on August 24, 2010, 04:53:26 PM
Quote from: vexati0n on August 24, 2010, 04:34:05 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on August 24, 2010, 04:22:32 PM
Well, he is an attractive man.

:hashishim:

My assessment is incorrect?
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Freeky on August 24, 2010, 05:48:14 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on August 24, 2010, 04:53:26 PM
Quote from: vexati0n on August 24, 2010, 04:34:05 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on August 24, 2010, 04:22:32 PM
Well, he is an attractive man.

:hashishim:

My assessment is incorrect?

Not really.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 07:25:32 PM
Obama, oh he's a PILF.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Thurnez Isa on August 24, 2010, 07:27:19 PM
Dont worry Bush Obama will protect you from terrorism economic collapse
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 07:29:34 PM
Did the rightwingers wanna screw George Bush?

I don't think so.

But womens' panties have been wet for Obama since he hit the scene in the early 2000's.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Bebek Sincap Ratatosk on August 24, 2010, 08:14:05 PM
Quote from: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 07:29:34 PM
Did the rightwingers wanna screw George Bush?

I don't think so.

But womens' panties have been wet for Obama since he hit the scene in the early 2000's.

I recall some women thinking he was sexy in that "I'm a rancher" kind of way... that was during the 2000 election I think.... when they kept showing footage of him clearing brush etc.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on August 24, 2010, 08:17:03 PM
To be fair, W was more attractive than Gore and Kerry, just as Clinton was more attractive than Bush v1.0 and Dole, and just as Obama was more attractive than McCain. Appearances do matter a lot if you're a politician. I think that I read somewhere that the taller candidate also always wins.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Cain on August 24, 2010, 08:18:40 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on August 24, 2010, 08:14:05 PM
Quote from: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 07:29:34 PM
Did the rightwingers wanna screw George Bush?

I don't think so.

But womens' panties have been wet for Obama since he hit the scene in the early 2000's.

I recall some women thinking he was sexy in that "I'm a rancher" kind of way... that was during the 2000 election I think.... when they kept showing footage of him clearing brush etc.

Also, the GOP ARE the party of repressed homosexual urges, so the chances of rightwingers having an unconscious woody for Bush seem moderately high.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on August 24, 2010, 08:19:45 PM
Quote from: Cain on August 24, 2010, 08:18:40 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on August 24, 2010, 08:14:05 PM
Quote from: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 07:29:34 PM
Did the rightwingers wanna screw George Bush?

I don't think so.

But womens' panties have been wet for Obama since he hit the scene in the early 2000's.

I recall some women thinking he was sexy in that "I'm a rancher" kind of way... that was during the 2000 election I think.... when they kept showing footage of him clearing brush etc.

Also, the GOP ARE the party of repressed homosexual urges, so the chances of rightwingers having an unconscious woody for Bush seem moderately high.

:lulz:
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 08:25:59 PM
:lulz:  Well, having never BEEN on that side of the coin during the Bush administration, I wouldn't know.  But I never heard anyone talking about it.  With Obama, it came right away. 


No pun intended, promise.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Bebek Sincap Ratatosk on August 24, 2010, 08:26:51 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on August 24, 2010, 08:17:03 PM
To be fair, W was more attractive than Gore and Kerry, just as Clinton was more attractive than Bush v1.0 and Dole, and just as Obama was more attractive than McCain. Appearances do matter a lot if you're a politician. I think that I read somewhere that the taller candidate also always wins.

One of the Scot Adams 'Dilbert' books... The taller guy always wins, unless the other guy has much better hair.

Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on August 24, 2010, 08:27:52 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on August 24, 2010, 08:26:51 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on August 24, 2010, 08:17:03 PM
To be fair, W was more attractive than Gore and Kerry, just as Clinton was more attractive than Bush v1.0 and Dole, and just as Obama was more attractive than McCain. Appearances do matter a lot if you're a politician. I think that I read somewhere that the taller candidate also always wins.

One of the Scot Adams 'Dilbert' books... The taller guy always wins, unless the other guy has much better hair.



Obama's hair is certainly better than a comb over  :lulz:
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 08:29:40 PM
Yeah, but Sarah Palin might be perceived as more fuckable than Obama...so how does that pan out?

(I can't believe I'm talking about this seriously)
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: LMNO on August 24, 2010, 08:37:31 PM
As someone who has swung both ways, Obama > Palin.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: tyrannosaurus vex on August 24, 2010, 08:39:35 PM
As someone who hasn't swung both ways,

obama > palin
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on August 24, 2010, 08:43:25 PM
There's also the crazy town factor. Sarah Palin is clearly from Crazy Town.

Not that I find her to be particularly attractive myself, but some guys like that sort of thing I guess.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: tyrannosaurus vex on August 24, 2010, 08:49:50 PM
She's attractive, but no more so than most "hot librarian" types, and I don't have to sell my soul or take gag-suppressing drugs to hook up with one of those. Or go to Alaska, which is a plus.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Bebek Sincap Ratatosk on August 24, 2010, 08:55:25 PM
Palin is a MILF. But, honestly, a MILF isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of awesomeness... it basically means "Holy fuck, you've had kids and didn't turn into the typical shape of American Moms".

I wonder if you have to turn your flag in to the American Legion after using it as a gag?
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Jenne on August 24, 2010, 09:59:56 PM
:lulz:  Well, Milfitude aside, I think there's a certain, ahem, sector of our society that de-selects Obama on skin color alone.

Or perhaps I'm just cynical.

HOWEVER, before the ditzy broad came on board, Obama had it made in the shade with Mr. Potatohead and Pat (think SNL) running against him.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Kai on August 24, 2010, 10:02:54 PM
Obama is definitely PILF, or he was before he got out of shape doing president work. He's also way out of my age range of interest.

Palin? No, see, her face just yells STUPID. Her eyes especially. Obama, on the other hand, has a sexy mind even if he is selfish crafty politician. Maybe even more so because of it.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Thurnez Isa on August 24, 2010, 10:03:59 PM
As someone who only swings one way... Palins Fuckability is highly highly overrated

1) Her MILF status is more like, "hrmmm she's kind of a MILF, OK I'm over it" and not "WOW is she MILFY... yum yum"
2) She has a tendency to open her big fat whore mouth

It's only the crazy's who maintain a hard on for long, mainly cause they don't wanna be perceived by the other crazy's as gay
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Thurnez Isa on August 24, 2010, 10:12:37 PM
Quote from: Kai on August 24, 2010, 10:02:54 PM

Palin? No, see, her face just yells STUPID. Her eyes especially.

Stupid I can handle. It could be natural.
Bigots I can't. There is nothing more of a turn off.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Prince Glittersnatch III on August 25, 2010, 12:13:58 AM
McCain should have started a rumor that he was secretly a sparkly Vampire. 

Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Jenne on August 25, 2010, 05:30:00 AM
Quote from: Lord Carlos Esquire on August 25, 2010, 12:13:58 AM
McCain should have started a rumor that he was secretly a sparkly Vampire. 



Wouldn'ta worked.  Ugly is as fugly does.  ...or something to that effect.
Title: Re: On Democrats, Pt. 2
Post by: Prince Glittersnatch III on August 25, 2010, 05:55:48 AM
Quote from: Jenne on August 25, 2010, 05:30:00 AM
Quote from: Lord Carlos Esquire on August 25, 2010, 12:13:58 AM
McCain should have started a rumor that he was secretly a sparkly Vampire. 



Wouldn'ta worked.  Ugly is as fugly does.  ...or something to that effect.

Mabye he could of threw some glitter on Joe the plumber then?