Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Apple Talk => Topic started by: Nephew Twiddleton on September 30, 2010, 09:37:15 PM

Title: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on September 30, 2010, 09:37:15 PM
Did you knock over my bank?

http://www.metro.us/boston/local/article/649233--roxbury-bank-robber-loose
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Cramulus on September 30, 2010, 09:56:11 PM
SHIT, I DID NOT EXPECT THAT THIS WOULD HIT THE WEB LIKE THIS, SHIT SHIT SHIT
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Freeky on September 30, 2010, 10:32:23 PM
Quote from: Metro's BannerHOT TOPICS > Patriots > Pets > Sex > Red Sox

I find it perturbing that they come in that order.
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on October 01, 2010, 05:12:45 AM
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on September 30, 2010, 10:32:23 PM
Quote from: Metro's BannerHOT TOPICS > Patriots > Pets > Sex > Red Sox

I find it perturbing that they come in that order.

I know, It should go Sex>Red Sox>Pets>Patriots

-Blight,
Not a fan of football
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on October 01, 2010, 05:13:39 AM
Quote from: Cramulus on September 30, 2010, 09:56:11 PM
SHIT, I DID NOT EXPECT THAT THIS WOULD HIT THE WEB LIKE THIS, SHIT SHIT SHIT

Dude, you should have stopped by for tea. For fucks sake.
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Telarus on October 02, 2010, 09:33:37 AM
ATTN CRAMULUS:

Check this shit ~  you totally called it.

http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/09/29/1954245/Does-A-Company-Deserve-the-Same-Privacy-Rights-As-You

Posted by samzenpus on Wednesday September 29, @04:51PM
from the won't-somebody-please-think-of-the-business dept.
privacy/ business/ government/ court/ politics

An anonymous reader writes
Quote"The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an important case to determine whether or not AT&T deserves 'personal privacy' rights (http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100928/22435711204/supreme-court-agrees-to-see-whether-or-not-at-t-has-personal-privacy-rights.shtml). The company claimed that the FCC should not be allowed to distribute (under a Freedom of Information Act request) data it had collected concerning possible fraud and overbilling related to the e-rate program. The FCC argued that the information should be made public and that companies had no individual right to 'personal privacy,' the way individuals do. As it stands right now, the appeals court found that companies like AT&T do deserve personal privacy rights, and now the Supreme Court will take up that question as well. Given the results of earlier 'corporation rights' cases, such as Citizens United, at some point you wonder if the Supreme Court will also give companies the right to vote directly."
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Cramulus on October 02, 2010, 01:35:54 PM
HAH! the idea of AT&T having a right to privacy absolutely nauseates me, given how compliant they've been in invading our privacy. BUT THEY SHOULD TOTALLY ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADOPT TOO
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Freeky on October 02, 2010, 04:37:57 PM
Quote from: Cramulus on October 02, 2010, 01:35:54 PM
BUT THEY SHOULD TOTALLY ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADOPT TOO

Can anyone say "Free Labor"?

:vom: 
Title: Re: ATTN: Cramulus
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on October 02, 2010, 04:47:32 PM
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on October 02, 2010, 04:37:57 PM
Quote from: Cramulus on October 02, 2010, 01:35:54 PM
BUT THEY SHOULD TOTALLY ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADOPT TOO

Can anyone say "Free Labor"?

:vom: 

Yep. Child labor laws don't really apply if you're working part time at a store owned by your parents