http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39956839/ns/us_news-life/
Stone age bastards, each and every one of you.
May as well hand the fucking country over to the teabaggers, for all the democrats are worth.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 02:56:26 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39956839/ns/us_news-life/
Stone age bastards, each and every one of you.
May as well hand the fucking country over to the teabaggers, for all the democrats are worth.
On the other hand, if any more recruiters bother me, I can ask them if it's okay that I fuck guys in the ass to make them leave me alone. :horrormirth:
Quote from: Kai on November 02, 2010, 03:05:19 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 02:56:26 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39956839/ns/us_news-life/
Stone age bastards, each and every one of you.
May as well hand the fucking country over to the teabaggers, for all the democrats are worth.
On the other hand, if any more recruiters bother me, I can ask them if it's okay that I fuck guys in the ass to make them leave me alone. :horrormirth:
The alternative is to just tell them to fuck off.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 03:09:48 AM
Quote from: Kai on November 02, 2010, 03:05:19 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 02:56:26 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39956839/ns/us_news-life/
Stone age bastards, each and every one of you.
May as well hand the fucking country over to the teabaggers, for all the democrats are worth.
On the other hand, if any more recruiters bother me, I can ask them if it's okay that I fuck guys in the ass to make them leave me alone. :horrormirth:
The alternative is to just tell them to fuck off.
Yeah.
But I'm with Cain on this one. I think all Americans should be exempt from the American military.
"Oh, you're an american? Well, keep it under your hat and you can stay in the service."
I found out recently from my french roommate that the french think we are totally incoherent and moronic for our military's DADT policy.
Are they wrong?
Quote from: Sigmatic on November 02, 2010, 03:51:45 AM
Are they wrong?
I have always trusted the French on all matters military.
Quote from: Sigmatic on November 02, 2010, 03:51:45 AM
Are they wrong?
No. I just find it fun how we are the laughing stock of the entire world. :lulz:
That's because we're so funny. We're so funny we'll laugh their heads off.
Quote from: Liam on November 02, 2010, 03:54:47 AM
QuoteNo. I just find it fun how we are the laughing stock of the entire world.
It's uh, been like that for quite some time outside of America. It's getting to the point of actual racism. Which I don't find too funny like.
We do it on purpose, you know.
Quote from: Sigmatic on November 02, 2010, 03:55:33 AM
That's because we're so funny. We're so funny we'll laugh their heads off.
Saddam giggled and danced, they say.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 02:56:26 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39956839/ns/us_news-life/
Stone age bastards, each and every one of you.
May as well hand the fucking country over to the teabaggers, for all the democrats are worth.
IT'S
for the gays own good, don't cha know
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 02:56:26 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39956839/ns/us_news-life/
Stone age bastards, each and every one of you.
May as well hand the fucking country over to the teabaggers, for all the democrats are worth.
:facepalm:
And three steps backwards.
Perhaps, but their "once" set the gold standard. :lulz:
I think it is better for him to appeal now, rather than leaving it sit until the next President decides to pick it up.
Quote from: First City Hustle on November 02, 2010, 03:10:06 PM
Perhaps, but their "once" set the gold standard. :lulz:
This is why French soldiers should never be led by French officers. Put a Corsican midget in front of them, and they own the fuck out of everyone.
Well, except in Russia. Napoleon got really stupid with age.
Rule 1) Be sure of conditions on the ground which may affect your logistics train and, in particular, food supplies. Russia is not Germany or the Italian Alps, FFS.
Rule 2) Do not deviate from the plan due to what looks like unexpected Russian weakness. Never ever ever.
Rule 3) Russians kinda have these dudes called Cossacks fighting for them. They will hamper your attempts at intelligence gathering and foraging. Do not expect your cavalry to outclass them.
You'd think Napoleon had never actually been to Russia, the way he acted...
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
Cain, eventually EVERY European warmonger takes a swing at Russia.
It's like messing with sasquatch. They can't help it.
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
Yep. He's doing what he's told.
Quote from: Doktor Howl on November 02, 2010, 03:39:06 PM
Cain, eventually EVERY European warmonger takes a swing at Russia.
It's like messing with sasquatch. They can't help it.
They should learn to do it properly (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Rus%27). This is what we pay historians for.
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
I see no evidence to confirm that Congress are capable of even dealing with one thing at a time.
Quote from: Ratatosk on November 02, 2010, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
Optimist.
Quote from: Ratatosk on November 02, 2010, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
There is a time limit on how long you can wait before filing an appeal, and Obama's seat is secure for two years.
Well, depending how well Teabagger attempts to impeach him for a being Muslim-Kenyan-Marxist-Black Power militant go. Or how convincingly they threaten him in order to to get the executive to act as they want.
Not that he needs much in the way of threats, coercion or arguments in order to pre-emptively cave in to the GOP crazy wing, as history shows us.
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 04:07:54 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on November 02, 2010, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
There is a time limit on how long you can wait before filing an appeal, and Obama's seat is secure for two years.
There is also an option for a Federal Court to reopen the Appeal time for 14 days if certain criteria are met. If Obama takes it the the Supreme Court now, then the book gets closed one way or the other.
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on November 02, 2010, 03:55:42 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on November 02, 2010, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
Optimist.
This is the "but Obama is really smart and during his campaign also really charismatic so he must have a big trick up his sleeve to make it all right within the next two years"-optimism, right?
Quote from: Triple Zero on November 02, 2010, 08:04:58 PM
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on November 02, 2010, 03:55:42 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on November 02, 2010, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
Optimist.
This is the "but Obama is really smart and during his campaign also really charismatic so he must have a big trick up his sleeve to make it all right within the next two years"-optimism, right?
HOPE
Quote from: Triple Zero on November 02, 2010, 08:04:58 PM
Quote from: Mistress Freeky, HRN on November 02, 2010, 03:55:42 PM
Quote from: Ratatosk on November 02, 2010, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on November 02, 2010, 03:38:43 PM
I have to agree on the appellate court in this case. Having a bunch of people come out of the closet in the military, only to have DADT upheld by SCOTUS, would be very bad for the plaintiffs.
Also, fuck Obama for making this necessary.
And you realize that if he doesn't take this to the SC, that the next 'Tea Party' President could?
Personally, I'd rather see it go to the top and either get kicked out and done with, or hope that Congress will repeal it before then.
Letting it sit, only means that the next administration could bring the mess back to the surface. I don't think Obama has a better option... unless it would have been pushing Congress to deal with this two years ago. Granted, he was trying to stop the country from entering a great depression, but I think Congress may be capable of dealing with more than one thing at once... though thats just a theory.
Optimist.
This is the "but Obama is really smart and during his campaign also really charismatic so he must have a big trick up his sleeve to make it all right within the next two years"-optimism, right?
What really pisses me off is that I saw him as yet another smarmy politican for months, but as the election got close and all the other sheep were running I though "Well, maybe! Wow, could it be a real politican that actually cares about ..."
Stupid Fucking Monkey Brain. :argh!:
Quote from: Liam on November 03, 2010, 02:13:04 PM
You all got 'Tony Blaired'.
Burns eh?
:horrormirth: