Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Apple Talk => Topic started by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:04:14 PM

Title: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:04:14 PM
Something very close actually happened:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dom_Pedro_II

I can't find a single thing wrong with this guy.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: hooplala on December 21, 2010, 07:12:23 PM
I don't have time to read that at the moment ("Vagina waits for no man!" - Carrie Nation) - but it looks EPIC.  Can't believe I've never heard of this guy!  I have my evening reading all set up now, thanks Roger.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:16:10 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on December 21, 2010, 07:12:23 PM
I don't have time to read that at the moment ("Vagina waits for no man!" - Carrie Nation) - but it looks EPIC.  Can't believe I've never heard of this guy!  I have my evening reading all set up now, thanks Roger.

No problem.

There's nothing like an honest man that doesn't want to rule, as far as government goes.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

He got stuck with the job at age 5.  He wanted to be a scientist.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Phox on December 21, 2010, 07:36:37 PM
 :mittens:

This man is my hero.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Juana on December 21, 2010, 08:36:41 PM
I LIKE him! Wish there were more people like him over all, really.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Jasper on December 21, 2010, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

He got stuck with the job at age 5.  He wanted to be a scientist.

That might be a good strategy;  Find some kid who just wants to mind his own business, then force them into monarchy.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 08:53:30 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on December 21, 2010, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

He got stuck with the job at age 5.  He wanted to be a scientist.

That might be a good strategy;  Find some kid who just wants to mind his own business, then force them into monarchy.

Might wind up with someone like me.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Kurt Christ on December 21, 2010, 08:56:58 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on December 21, 2010, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.
This seems to be a hit or miss strategy- that's also how Rome ended up with Nero.
He got stuck with the job at age 5.  He wanted to be a scientist.

That might be a good strategy;  Find some kid who just wants to mind his own business, then force them into monarchy.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 08:59:04 PM
Quote from: Vartox on December 21, 2010, 08:56:58 PM
This seems to be a hit or miss strategy- that's also how Rome ended up with Nero.

Claudius.  Nero killed Britanicus for the job.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Jasper on December 21, 2010, 09:04:39 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 08:53:30 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on December 21, 2010, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

He got stuck with the job at age 5.  He wanted to be a scientist.

That might be a good strategy;  Find some kid who just wants to mind his own business, then force them into monarchy.

Might wind up with someone like me.

:lulz:  I am okay with this.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 09:06:15 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on December 21, 2010, 09:04:39 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 08:53:30 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on December 21, 2010, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on December 21, 2010, 07:33:42 PM
Quote from: Douglas Adams
The major problem — one of the major problems, for there are several — one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.
To summarize: it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

He got stuck with the job at age 5.  He wanted to be a scientist.

That might be a good strategy;  Find some kid who just wants to mind his own business, then force them into monarchy.

Might wind up with someone like me.

:lulz:  I am okay with this.

WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW, AMERICA?
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Kurt Christ on December 21, 2010, 09:06:46 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 08:59:04 PM
Quote from: Vartox on December 21, 2010, 08:56:58 PM
This seems to be a hit or miss strategy- that's also how Rome ended up with Nero.

Claudius.  Nero killed Britanicus for the job.
Nero killed him after he already had the job, though. I thought he was mostly trust into the position of emperor because his mother thought she could manipulate him. Claudius was not a child at his ascension, and succeeded his own nephew (over 20 years his junior) to the throne.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 09:12:21 PM
Quote from: Vartox on December 21, 2010, 09:06:46 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 08:59:04 PM
Quote from: Vartox on December 21, 2010, 08:56:58 PM
This seems to be a hit or miss strategy- that's also how Rome ended up with Nero.

Claudius.  Nero killed Britanicus for the job.
Nero killed him after he already had the job, though. I thought he was mostly trust into the position of emperor because his mother thought she could manipulate him. Claudius was not a child at his ascension, and succeeded his own nephew (over 20 years his junior) to the throne.

Um, wat?  What does that have to do with his willingness to be emperor?

Also, Nero was groomed for the throne by Claudius, and murdered Britanicus to maintain his grip on the throne.  I fail to see how this means "he didn't want the job".
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 09:19:22 PM
QuoteHowever, after the deaths of Caligula's wife and daughter, it became apparent that Cassius intended to go beyond the terms of the conspiracy and wipe out the imperial family. In the chaos following the murder, Claudius witnessed the German guard cut down several uninvolved noblemen, including many of his friends. He fled to the palace to hide. According to tradition, a Praetorian named Gratus found him hiding behind a curtain and suddenly declared him princeps.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudius

Just saying.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Kurt Christ on December 21, 2010, 09:20:31 PM
Looking into it more, I will concede the point about Nero, but Claudius doesn't seem to have been entirely unwilling, if only because he wanted to get the throne out of Caligula's hands. He did pardon Caligula's assassins, and change his name to legitimize his role as emperor. Though my refutation of Claudius was actually based on the line
QuoteThat might be a good strategy;  Find some kid who just wants to mind his own business, then force them into monarchy.
He may have been the Gerald Ford of Roman Emperors, but he was certainly not a kid.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on December 22, 2010, 03:32:36 AM
I'll just point out that Claudius' last address to the Roman Senate admonished Britannicus to grow up fast (read, so that Nero would not be Emperor).
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on December 22, 2010, 10:24:34 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:04:14 PM
Something very close actually happened:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dom_Pedro_II

I can't find a single thing wrong with this guy.

That dude was fucking awesome. We need one of him.

I am actually starting to see some value in monarchy over democracy.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on December 22, 2010, 01:50:26 PM
Quote from: Nigel on December 22, 2010, 10:24:34 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:04:14 PM
Something very close actually happened:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dom_Pedro_II

I can't find a single thing wrong with this guy.

That dude was fucking awesome. We need one of him.

I am actually starting to see some value in monarchy over democracy.

We have no king but Elvis, baby.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Suu on December 22, 2010, 02:22:08 PM
Claudius was fucked in the head anyway. He was one of his uncle's minnows, after all.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Bu🤠ns on December 22, 2010, 03:23:53 PM
QuoteHis name in full was Pedro de Alcântara João Carlos Leopoldo Salvador Bibiano Francisco Xavier de Paula Leocádio Miguel Gabriel Rafael Gonzaga

lol GREAT find Roger!

With a name like this how could he NOT end up being Emperor?
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on December 22, 2010, 05:38:07 PM
Quote from: Suu on December 22, 2010, 02:22:08 PM
Claudius was fucked in the head anyway. He was one of his uncle's minnows, after all.

Ugh, minnows....

:vom:
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: Suu on December 22, 2010, 10:09:47 PM
Yeah.

Imperial Rome was awesome.
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: BadBeast on December 23, 2010, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 07:04:14 PM
Something very close actually happened:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dom_Pedro_II

I can't find a single thing wrong with this guy.
I can't think of a better example of  Ruling done properly. And I'd never heard of him until half an hour ago.  I don't think I'm being too easily convinced either. The Bloke was a natural. A rare thing, these days, to see a Ruler, who knows the Art of Statecraft so well. (Or a Statesman, who knows how to Rule properly)
Title: Re: What if Emperor Norton had really been a reigning monarch?
Post by: the last yatto on January 01, 2011, 07:39:28 AM
http://imdb.com/title/tt0118736/