Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Or Kill Me => Topic started by: The Good Reverend Roger on August 31, 2004, 10:20:49 AM

Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on August 31, 2004, 10:20:49 AM
(http://socaldemocrat.freeservers.com/slide_shows/no_jobs/shull.gif)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: ~~~~Closed~~~~ on August 31, 2004, 12:46:17 PM
seeing as I can't vote, I'll have to pass on that offer.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: gnimbley on August 31, 2004, 04:00:17 PM
Quote from: Slate Magazine take on yesterday's papersUSA Today reefers its own poll showing that Bush is gaining on or leading Kerry in two key battleground states that Al Gore won in 2000. Although within the margin of error, Bush leads Kerry 48% to 45% in Wisconsin and has pulled even with Kerry at 47% in Pennsylvania. But there's good news for Kerry, too: a Columbus Dispatch poll, shows that he's tied with the president at 46% in Ohio, a state that went red last time around. And Knight-Ridder has an "exclusive" on a Zogby poll profiling that tiny but crucial demographic of undecided voters, who are more likely to be Libras, Virgos, and Capricorns, and only 13% of whom, it turns out, are actually NASCAR fans. Pollsters also asked, "Who would you more likely vote for for president--the Tin Man, who is all brains and no heart, or the Scarecrow, who is all heart and no brain?" It was a landslide: Tin Man 49% to Scarecrow 13%.

Too bad they didn't ask if they would vote for George - no brains and no heart. The same poll said which cable news channel undecided vote watch. The overwhelming favorite, over 40%, was Fox. ::shudders::
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on August 31, 2004, 04:23:24 PM
Quote from: gnimbley
Quote from: Slate Magazine take on yesterday's papersUSA Today reefers its own poll showing that Bush is gaining on or leading Kerry in two key battleground states that Al Gore won in 2000. Although within the margin of error, Bush leads Kerry 48% to 45% in Wisconsin and has pulled even with Kerry at 47% in Pennsylvania. But there's good news for Kerry, too: a Columbus Dispatch poll, shows that he's tied with the president at 46% in Ohio, a state that went red last time around. And Knight-Ridder has an "exclusive" on a Zogby poll profiling that tiny but crucial demographic of undecided voters, who are more likely to be Libras, Virgos, and Capricorns, and only 13% of whom, it turns out, are actually NASCAR fans. Pollsters also asked, "Who would you more likely vote for for president--the Tin Man, who is all brains and no heart, or the Scarecrow, who is all heart and no brain?" It was a landslide: Tin Man 49% to Scarecrow 13%.

Too bad they didn't ask if they would vote for George - no brains and no heart. The same poll said which cable news channel undecided vote watch. The overwhelming favorite, over 40%, was Fox. ::shudders::

Tsk, what about the Daily Show?
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: chaosgraves:agentoferis on August 31, 2004, 05:19:11 PM
Quote from: CannedLizardTsk, what about the Daily Show?
I'm sure this is closer to the truth , but I have the sneaking suspicion that this choice was not in the poll.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Phantom Trollax on September 01, 2004, 02:23:44 AM
*stares* I dunno? I suppose I'd vote for the party least-likely to screw my particular interest group over should they be elected, whilst still attempting to make use of my vote. Given that this is america we're talking about I vote for Mr. Magoo...

(http://www.toonopedia.com/magoo.jpg)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: President Bush on September 01, 2004, 03:11:43 AM
(http://img5.exs.cx/img5/1259/cagle00.jpg)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on September 01, 2004, 06:04:13 AM
If Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.













...











FOUR MORE YEARS!
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Trollax on September 01, 2004, 06:06:46 AM
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on September 01, 2004, 06:24:18 AM
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Horab Fibslager on September 01, 2004, 08:03:16 AM
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Trollax on September 01, 2004, 08:32:29 AM
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Horab Fibslager on September 01, 2004, 08:58:48 AM
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on September 01, 2004, 04:59:13 PM
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2004, 07:29:58 AM
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)

After Mike Harris, Ontario will be lib FOREVER.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Horab Fibslager on September 02, 2004, 07:45:57 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)

After Mike Harris, Ontario will be lib FOREVER.


yeah unfortunately. the teachers and bureaucrats did an extremely job of vilifying him, tho his reforms were actually pretty good, and no unprecedented by any means..
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on September 02, 2004, 02:57:16 PM
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)

After Mike Harris, Ontario will be lib FOREVER.


yeah unfortunately. the teachers and bureaucrats did an extremely job of vilifying him, tho his reforms were actually pretty good, and no unprecedented by any means..

Fuck you. That is all.

No offence or anything,

I could argue my point, but screw that.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: MedeoPlusPlus on September 02, 2004, 04:46:46 PM
I hate election year.... people make such a big deal out of the changing of the puppets...

Bella for President. Sooner or later, you'll agree.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: chaosgraves:agentoferis on September 02, 2004, 06:49:34 PM
YOUR MORE FEARS!
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: fluffy on September 02, 2004, 09:46:06 PM
phhffftttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Horab Fibslager on September 02, 2004, 10:04:56 PM
Quote from: MedeoI hate election year.... people make such a big deal out of the changing of the puppets...


teh perfect time to feed yog sotthoth, whiel no one is looking and everyone is dstracted by fanfare.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on September 03, 2004, 02:23:20 PM
End the Metaquotes.

For Malaul's sake.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Malaul on September 03, 2004, 02:48:29 PM
thank you
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 15, 2004, 07:55:20 PM
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)

After Mike Harris, Ontario will be lib FOREVER.


yeah unfortunately. the teachers and bureaucrats did an extremely job of vilifying him, tho his reforms were actually pretty good, and no unprecedented by any means..

Are you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Marl Fublewonker on September 15, 2004, 08:35:40 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)

After Mike Harris, Ontario will be lib FOREVER.


yeah unfortunately. the teachers and bureaucrats did an extremely job of vilifying him, tho his reforms were actually pretty good, and no unprecedented by any means..

Are you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

That's alot of quotes.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on September 15, 2004, 08:45:03 PM
Now without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Horab Fibslager on September 15, 2004, 09:40:50 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: treemonster
Quote from: CannedLizard
Quote from: St. Trollax, ODD
Quote from: CannedLizardIf Bush is voted out, so many political satirists would become unemployed, and liberals wouldn't be able to continue their publishing spree.
FOUR MORE YEARS!

At the Rate Bush is going they'll have to move 2012 to 2006...

You guys should come live in Canada. We don't have set years for our elections, the reigning party calls them (they usually go for four years, one under the max time allowed, five years, [ :shock: ] but under the Chretien Liberals, they had elections every three and a half years) (they also call elections if a vote of no-confidence is made in parliment...you guys need that in the US).

on the other hand, the rulignparty often sets the election dates when they're support is stringest, which is possibly why(cept for a very crappy and un-united right for most of it) the liberals were able tostay in power so long and so strongly. now they're still in power, but at least it's not a majority deal thing.



as for the poltical satirists, and whatnto, i think they had a bigger heyday with the clinton that bush, heck they've prettymuch left bush alone. i mean clinton had whitewater and lewinsky, bush has had so many of these scandals it's fuckin ridiculous in comparison(and earns me more respect for clinton, whcih unliek the pervy but oh so moral americans, wasn;t lsot when the lewinsky affair happend- i knew clinton was a pretty damn decent president, which can be proven by his three hour state of the union speeches which had less to do with pisspoor ideolgy and mroe to do with the state of the union).

no if anything, a democrat in office only brings the politcal leech writers back from vacation.

Don't be too sure the liberals stay in power in the canadian system. The current heads of state in Oz (where the system is very similar) are the borderline fascists (ironically called "the liberal party" as some sort of sick joke) have been in power for nearly 10 years now. and this federal election will probably see them stay in power meaning the gap between rich and poor in this country is only going to get bigger.

heh, they're only called "the liberal party" which in candian politk sp33k means roughly the "appeal to everyone, especially ontario and quebec" party. rather than fascism, it mroe resembles the vanguard party system of soviet russia, where the party members elected the legislature which elected the president which chose the party members and told them who to elect to the legislature adn then further told them who to vote for president. not unliek the soviet sytem it breeds a great deal of corruption. i reckon if the governemtnt cut out only it's corruption we could have a reasonable military and a sustainable effective public health care system. throw in a paradigm shift towards a more corporate like atmosphere in the bureaucratic elements, and we could ahve a public day care service too....
throw soem responsible economics on top, and we might even get lower taxes out of the deal(or maybe public post secondary education). the amount of money wasted on compeltely retarded bullshit is incredible.

Yeah, Ontario, Quebec and the territories are Liberal (or Bloc Quebecois in Quebec, like this time), the prairies and BC are Conservative, and the maritimes are for anyone who bothers to do door-to-door, what with the several miles between each house.

A handy map! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Can2004.PNG)

After Mike Harris, Ontario will be lib FOREVER.


yeah unfortunately. the teachers and bureaucrats did an extremely job of vilifying him, tho his reforms were actually pretty good, and no unprecedented by any means..

Are you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.


heh yeah. actually politicans have been takign turns destroying our health care system for decades. the guy before him liked to close down entire hospitals while laying off legions of registered nurses in favour of less trained and less qualified ran's.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 16, 2004, 07:57:43 AM
Quote from: CannedLizardNow without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.

I'm an Expat Newfie.

No shit.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on September 16, 2004, 08:35:02 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizardNow without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.

I'm an Expat Newfie.

No shit.

And you're back!

*Pounce*  Fearless leader!

*GLOMP*
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Horab Fibslager on September 16, 2004, 10:01:33 AM
livign in ontario is hard right now, the reason i'm not in ontario. they've needed changes to the shit for ever. ontario has soemthign liek the 2nd or third largest economy in canada, btu half of it goes to one government or another.

what do you think about equalization roger?
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 16, 2004, 10:30:54 AM
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizardNow without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.

I'm an Expat Newfie.

No shit.

And you're back!

*Pounce*  Fearless leader!

*GLOMP*

Yes, I am back.  I had an extended hiatus, due to all the minions of darkness crawling out of the compost heap over the last two weeks or so.

Worse than crabgrass or even Mormon missionaries.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on September 16, 2004, 10:36:05 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizardNow without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.

I'm an Expat Newfie.

No shit.

And you're back!

*Pounce*  Fearless leader!

*GLOMP*

Yes, I am back.  I had an extended hiatus, due to all the minions of darkness crawling out of the compost heap over the last two weeks or so.

Worse than crabgrass or even Mormon missionaries.

I prayed to Paladine every night for your safe return, that I may once again bask in your learning and knowledge.  I'm so glad your back.  Place isn't the same without you.  But the SLA has been keeping up the show, though in many subtler means.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 16, 2004, 10:57:13 AM
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizardNow without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.

I'm an Expat Newfie.

No shit.

And you're back!

*Pounce*  Fearless leader!

*GLOMP*

Yes, I am back.  I had an extended hiatus, due to all the minions of darkness crawling out of the compost heap over the last two weeks or so.

Worse than crabgrass or even Mormon missionaries.

I prayed to Paladine every night for your safe return, that I may once again bask in your learning and knowledge.  I'm so glad your back.  Place isn't the same without you.  But the SLA has been keeping up the show, though in many subtler means.

Maybe so, but I fear that I may have a bone to pick with you.

It seems you've been a naughty little monkey.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on September 16, 2004, 11:00:53 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: CannedLizardNow without meta-quotes. For Malaul's sake.

Quote from: The Good Reverend RogerAre you MAD?  He DESTROYED your health care system.

Damn straight. My parents both worked in health care, my mum was a nurse and my dad was a equipment porter (to think he used to be a paramedic :P). My mum's hospital was closed, and my dad was laid-off...in about the same week. So we went to England...to find that the price of living is even higher there, so we came back.

I'm surprised that you, an American, actually knows anything about Canadian politics. No offence, or anything.

I'm an Expat Newfie.

No shit.

And you're back!

*Pounce*  Fearless leader!

*GLOMP*

Yes, I am back.  I had an extended hiatus, due to all the minions of darkness crawling out of the compost heap over the last two weeks or so.

Worse than crabgrass or even Mormon missionaries.

I prayed to Paladine every night for your safe return, that I may once again bask in your learning and knowledge.  I'm so glad your back.  Place isn't the same without you.  But the SLA has been keeping up the show, though in many subtler means.

Maybe so, but I fear that I may have a bone to pick with you.

It seems you've been a naughty little monkey.

...

Alekto?  Tisiphone?  Maegera?  That you?

Send me a PM, then, boss.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: gnimbley on September 16, 2004, 02:52:47 PM
::sees Roger is back::

::puts the bail money back into the jar::
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Malaul on September 16, 2004, 03:24:35 PM
ROGER!!! OMG

YOU ARE STILL ALIVE!!!

HURRAY!!!!


^^HUGS^^








sorry caps attack, but it seemed fitting
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Donkeyotay on September 16, 2004, 08:09:41 PM
Quote from: Dirty Little SecretROGER!!! OMG

YOU ARE STILL ALIVE!!!

HURRAY!!!!


^^HUGS^^










sorry caps attack, but it seemed fitting


You fools! Roger is immortal, didn't you know?
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on September 16, 2004, 10:25:32 PM
Quote from: Donkeyotay
Quote from: Dirty Little SecretROGER!!! OMG

YOU ARE STILL ALIVE!!!

HURRAY!!!!


^^HUGS^^










sorry caps attack, but it seemed fitting


You fools! Roger is immortal, didn't you know?

Let us say, not immortal, but rather the powers that be don't want him leaving the earthly plane.  His work is not yet done.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: CannedLizard on September 16, 2004, 10:49:05 PM
Rog! Ya back! And yer a damn dirty Newfie!  :P

I'd glomp you, but it's my girlfriend who's the bi-curious one...and the honourary newfie.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2004, 07:02:37 AM
Quote from: gnimbley::sees Roger is back::

::puts the bail money back into the jar::

Thanks.  Donk and I will be needing that, next week. :twisted:
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2004, 07:03:58 AM
Quote from: MalaulROGER!!! OMG

YOU ARE STILL ALIVE!!!

HURRAY!!!!


^^HUGS^^








sorry caps attack, but it seemed fitting

Yes, The Good Reverend is alive and well, thanks.

He is also taking a short vacation from weirdness, has a new job, and is concentrating on fucking with the local GOP headquarters.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Bella on September 17, 2004, 07:12:15 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: gnimbley::sees Roger is back::

::puts the bail money back into the jar::

Thanks.  Donk and I will be needing that, next week. :twisted:
::mind reels at the thought of Donk and Roger unleashed on an unsuspecting city together::
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2004, 07:32:32 AM
Quote from: SssBella, Oracle of Doom
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: gnimbley::sees Roger is back::

::puts the bail money back into the jar::

Thanks.  Donk and I will be needing that, next week. :twisted:
::mind reels at the thought of Donk and Roger unleashed on an unsuspecting city together::

With any luck at all, Wenchmaster might be there, too.

(http://bbs.fuckedcompany.com/icons/banana.gif)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Irreverend Hugh, KSC on September 17, 2004, 07:40:23 AM
Let me know. Maybe I should join yous. I have Fuck All to do when I get back to Chicago anyway. (But I have to tell you , Des Moines is fucking crazily open to mindfucking. Gods, today was satisfying.....) Tomorrow...heh. We'll see.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 17, 2004, 07:52:15 AM
Quote from: St. Hugh, KSCLet me know. Maybe I should join yous. I have Fuck All to do when I get back to Chicago anyway. (But I have to tell you , Des Moines is fucking crazily open to mindfucking. Gods, today was satisfying.....) Tomorrow...heh. We'll see.

Maybe you should.

You have my number, and I have tha booze.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Irreverend Hugh, KSC on September 17, 2004, 07:56:23 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: St. Hugh, KSCLet me know. Maybe I should join yous. I have Fuck All to do when I get back to Chicago anyway. (But I have to tell you , Des Moines is fucking crazily open to mindfucking. Gods, today was satisfying.....) Tomorrow...heh. We'll see.

Maybe you should.

You have my number, and I have tha booze.

Aww Yeeeah! Sounds like a plan. Just give a few days to get back to the Windy Fart City...plus I am drunker than a tequila worm at present (and probably shouldn't be in this hotel office room right now...but open doors is open doors, as I like to say....) ahem....well, I'll buzz you when I return to the smoke around monday evening....
Gods, this place is fucking spectacular for pranks...heh. wait they see what I did the the parking garage across the street....candy from a baby...well...it's time to go sleep.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 18, 2004, 06:26:27 AM
Quote from: St. Hugh, KSC
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: St. Hugh, KSCLet me know. Maybe I should join yous. I have Fuck All to do when I get back to Chicago anyway. (But I have to tell you , Des Moines is fucking crazily open to mindfucking. Gods, today was satisfying.....) Tomorrow...heh. We'll see.

Maybe you should.

You have my number, and I have tha booze.

Aww Yeeeah! Sounds like a plan. Just give a few days to get back to the Windy Fart City...plus I am drunker than a tequila worm at present (and probably shouldn't be in this hotel office room right now...but open doors is open doors, as I like to say....) ahem....well, I'll buzz you when I return to the smoke around monday evening....
Gods, this place is fucking spectacular for pranks...heh. wait they see what I did the the parking garage across the street....candy from a baby...well...it's time to go sleep.

Monday NIGHT.  I work until 12AM.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Donkeyotay on September 18, 2004, 09:40:17 PM
Me friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 18, 2004, 11:46:09 PM
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?

Bush/Cheney 2004:
The last election you'll ever need.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Irreverend Hugh, KSC on September 19, 2004, 12:48:42 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?

Bush/Cheney 2004:
The last election you'll ever need.

Let's not elect them again. We still know what the results will be.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 19, 2004, 06:28:26 AM
Quote from: St. Hugh, KSC
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?

Bush/Cheney 2004:
The last election you'll ever need.

Let's not elect them again. We still know what the results will be.


Whattaya mean, "again"? :lol:
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Irreverend Hugh, KSC on September 19, 2004, 06:35:25 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: St. Hugh, KSC
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?

Bush/Cheney 2004:
The last election you'll ever need.

Let's not elect them again. We still know what the results will be.


Whattaya mean, "again"? :lol:

I mispoke. I meant ' we didn't elect them the last time, so...again, let's noy elect them.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on September 19, 2004, 07:23:54 AM
Quote from: ainiWhere's the heir to the throne of Emperor Norton when we need him or her?

aini

Right here.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Irreverend Hugh, KSC on September 19, 2004, 08:38:02 AM
Quote from: Revered Son Eric
Quote from: ainiWhere's the heir to the throne of Emperor Norton when we need him or her?

aini

Right here.

Sounds like an idea that will work,

Except...
I already voted for Bella.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: gnimbley on October 05, 2004, 03:09:30 AM
(http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/041004/horsey.gif)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Trollax on October 05, 2004, 04:23:50 AM
Quote from: gnimbley(http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/041004/horsey.gif)

At least lil' caligula hasn't tried to have his way with his mother yet...
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Trollax on October 05, 2004, 04:25:00 AM
EDIT: anyone want a book called: 'the mind of bush?' might make for interesting reading... It was at this used bookstore in beaumont street if I get a response in the next few hours I'll pick it up and send it off to whomever wants it.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: chaosgraves:agentoferis on October 06, 2004, 10:40:23 PM
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?
Skull & Bones 2004
this time there is no lesser of two evils.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on October 07, 2004, 08:51:20 AM
Quote from: Psymoon
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?
Skull & Bones 2004
this time there is no lesser of two evils.

(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=32266&stc=1)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: Rupert Giles on October 07, 2004, 09:18:26 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Psymoon
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?
Skull & Bones 2004
this time there is no lesser of two evils.

(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=32266&stc=1)

Three nudges less gay than Sir Elton John.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: gnimbley on October 07, 2004, 09:19:25 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Psymoon
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?
Skull & Bones 2004
this time there is no lesser of two evils.

(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=32266&stc=1)

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=32266&stc=1

 


You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  1. You are not logged in. Fill in the form at the bottom of this page and try again.

  2. You do not have permission to access the page that you were trying to. Are you trying to edit someone else's post or trying to access
      administrative features? Check that you are allowed to perform this action in the Forum Rules.

  3. If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on October 08, 2004, 08:52:22 AM
Quote from: gnimbley
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger
Quote from: Psymoon
Quote from: DonkeyotayMe friend works at a print shop and can make us up some new signs :twisted:  One of my ideas was


       
BUSH & KERRY
                  IN '04....
WHAT"S THE DIFFERENCE ANYWAYS?
Skull & Bones 2004
this time there is no lesser of two evils.

(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=32266&stc=1)

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?attachmentid=32266&stc=1

 


You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  1. You are not logged in. Fill in the form at the bottom of this page and try again.

  2. You do not have permission to access the page that you were trying to. Are you trying to edit someone else's post or trying to access
      administrative features? Check that you are allowed to perform this action in the Forum Rules.

  3. If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Short version:  Do Never.
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: gnimbley, g.d.e. on October 19, 2004, 03:48:45 AM
GO GREEN BAY! BEAT BUSH! (http://www.snopes.com/sports/football/election.asp)
Title: Re-elect Bush in 2004!
Post by: gnimbley. ocg on October 20, 2004, 09:53:39 PM
Want to Vote for President of the US even if you don't live here.

http://www.technicola.com/globalvote2004/

You have to give a real email address or your vote doesn't count.
I tried giving GWB's email address. If they click on it he will have
voted for the Green Party.  :P

Bella is not on the ballot.  :x

All the candidates are white males. Note a pattern?