:aaa: :aaa: :aaa:
http://youtu.be/Y_9vd4HWlVA
This is so incredibly awesome, I have no words for it. No words at all.
I sent the link to my photographer friend. Her husband moves so fast onstage, he tends to blur. :lulz:
this is awesome
First thing that pops into my mind is using this technique to find where the current flaws in laser ignition for nuclear fusion, but could be expensive due to the number of shots and fuel needed to get a good visible picture
Wow, as a CG Lighting artist this is some seriously impressive shit. Thanks for sharing Garbo!
Sweet Eris's blood soaked pinky toes. Did you catch what he said at the end there?
It took about 5 turns in my head to re-phrase outside of the realm of femto-potographic packets of photons (jeez, can I juse call them wavicles already?). Ready for this? [Note: As a holy man, I am not resposible for seizures caused by considering this new information.]
Realy serves you (a photoreceptor) information asynchroniously to the order that the events/phenomena happen in space-time. This holds true at the micro and macro levels the most. At our daily scales, the ammount of information proccessed from second to second tends to blur these asychronicities out into a smooth narrative. Past our daily scales (the local light radius) information tends to be more randomly out of synch with the order of events which served to transmit that information.
Wow... that is FUCKING AWESOME.
Quote from: Telarus on August 07, 2012, 06:10:03 AM
Sweet Eris's blood soaked pinky toes. Did you catch what he said at the end there?
It took about 5 turns in my head to re-phrase outside of the realm of femto-potographic packets of photons (jeez, can I juse call them wavicles already?). Ready for this? [Note: As a holy man, I am not resposible for seizures caused by considering this new information.]
Realy serves you (a photoreceptor) information asynchroniously to the order that the events/phenomena happen in space-time. This holds true at the micro and macro levels the most. At our daily scales, the ammount of information proccessed from second to second tends to blur these asychronicities out into a smooth narrative. Past our daily scales (the local light radius) informations tends to be more randomly out of synch with the order of events which served to transmit that information.
Yeah, no, I totally caught that and then my mind went OFUK! and I immediately stopped thinking about it. It needs to exist in my brain without analysis or evaluation until I have enough data to start making actual connections. BUT it may be relevant to some neurology studies I am only half-remembering.
That is scary awesome.
Quote from: Telarus on August 07, 2012, 06:10:03 AM
Sweet Eris's blood soaked pinky toes. Did you catch what he said at the end there?
It took about 5 turns in my head to re-phrase outside of the realm of femto-potographic packets of photons (jeez, can I juse call them wavicles already?). Ready for this? [Note: As a holy man, I am not resposible for seizures caused by considering this new information.]
Realy serves you (a photoreceptor) information asynchroniously to the order that the events/phenomena happen in space-time. This holds true at the micro and macro levels the most. At our daily scales, the ammount of information proccessed from second to second tends to blur these asychronicities out into a smooth narrative. Past our daily scales (the local light radius) information tends to be more randomly out of synch with the order of events which served to transmit that information.
Laymen's terms, we experience/perceive things in a certain order but it's
really not sequential???
OH NO! OBJECTIVISM ROONT
Quote from: TEXAS FAIRIES FOR ALL YOU SPAGS on August 07, 2012, 08:14:56 AM
Quote from: Telarus on August 07, 2012, 06:10:03 AM
Sweet Eris's blood soaked pinky toes. Did you catch what he said at the end there?
It took about 5 turns in my head to re-phrase outside of the realm of femto-potographic packets of photons (jeez, can I juse call them wavicles already?). Ready for this? [Note: As a holy man, I am not resposible for seizures caused by considering this new information.]
Realy serves you (a photoreceptor) information asynchroniously to the order that the events/phenomena happen in space-time. This holds true at the micro and macro levels the most. At our daily scales, the ammount of information proccessed from second to second tends to blur these asychronicities out into a smooth narrative. Past our daily scales (the local light radius) information tends to be more randomly out of synch with the order of events which served to transmit that information.
Laymen's terms, we experience/perceive things in a certain order but it's really not sequential???
The order that we perceive information about our environment is not the order the events generating the information happened in. But small time shifts, and we get info packets at an astonishing rate of trillions of times a second.
Quote from: Telarus on August 07, 2012, 08:42:40 AM
Quote from: TEXAS FAIRIES FOR ALL YOU SPAGS on August 07, 2012, 08:14:56 AM
Quote from: Telarus on August 07, 2012, 06:10:03 AM
Sweet Eris's blood soaked pinky toes. Did you catch what he said at the end there?
It took about 5 turns in my head to re-phrase outside of the realm of femto-potographic packets of photons (jeez, can I juse call them wavicles already?). Ready for this? [Note: As a holy man, I am not resposible for seizures caused by considering this new information.]
Realy serves you (a photoreceptor) information asynchroniously to the order that the events/phenomena happen in space-time. This holds true at the micro and macro levels the most. At our daily scales, the ammount of information proccessed from second to second tends to blur these asychronicities out into a smooth narrative. Past our daily scales (the local light radius) information tends to be more randomly out of synch with the order of events which served to transmit that information.
Laymen's terms, we experience/perceive things in a certain order but it's really not sequential???
The order that we perceive information about our environment is not the order the events generating the information happened in. But small time shifts, and we get info packets at an astonishing rate of trillions of times a second.
Small time shifts makes it a little less boggling. Thanks.
That is so, so cool. I wish they hadn't "fixed" the last photo, where the light went away from the viewer, because I just think it was better when light doesn't do what you think it ought to, what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Well said! We'll make a particle physicist out of you yet, by god!
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 08, 2012, 07:22:15 PM
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Well said! We'll make a particle physicist out of you yet, by god!
Balls. I just want to know if this camera is fast enough to:
1. Make shit DECIDE IF IT'S A PARTICLE OR A WAVE, and also
2. Catch Remington on film.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 08, 2012, 07:22:15 PM
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Well said! We'll make a particle physicist out of you yet, by god!
:D Biggest compliment ever. I has it.
(Edit for too much derp.)
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on August 08, 2012, 07:26:18 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 08, 2012, 07:22:15 PM
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Well said! We'll make a particle physicist out of you yet, by god!
Balls. I just want to know if this camera is fast enough to:
1. Make shit DECIDE IF IT'S A PARTICLE OR A WAVE, and also
2. Catch Remington on film.
1. It
looks like a wave...
2. Sadly, I don't think so.
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:30:45 PM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on August 08, 2012, 07:26:18 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 08, 2012, 07:22:15 PM
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Well said! We'll make a particle physicist out of you yet, by god!
Balls. I just want to know if this camera is fast enough to:
1. Make shit DECIDE IF IT'S A PARTICLE OR A WAVE, and also
2. Catch Remington on film.
1. It looks like a wave...
2. Sadly, I don't think so.
1. Yeah, and that's just what they WANT you to think.
2. THREE QUARKS FOR MUSTER REMINGTON, BY GOD!
It's a particle, it's just shaped like a wave. Like spaghetti.
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on August 08, 2012, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:30:45 PM
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on August 08, 2012, 07:26:18 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on August 08, 2012, 07:22:15 PM
Quote from: Freeky Queen of DERP on August 08, 2012, 07:18:05 PM
what with people living in macro and light, well, doesn't.
Well said! We'll make a particle physicist out of you yet, by god!
Balls. I just want to know if this camera is fast enough to:
1. Make shit DECIDE IF IT'S A PARTICLE OR A WAVE, and also
2. Catch Remington on film.
1. It looks like a wave...
2. Sadly, I don't think so.
1. Yeah, and that's just what they WANT you to think.
2. THREE QUARKS FOR MUSTER REMINGTON, BY GOD!
:lol:
Quote from: v3x on August 08, 2012, 07:36:37 PM
It's a particle, it's just shaped like a wave. Like spaghetti.
I'm gonna go with this.
Oh, and we're all getting shitfaced a week from Saturday. You need to come down from that awful fucking city and join us.
Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on August 08, 2012, 07:39:24 PM
Quote from: v3x on August 08, 2012, 07:36:37 PM
It's a particle, it's just shaped like a wave. Like spaghetti.
I'm gonna go with this.
Oh, and we're all getting shitfaced a week from Saturday. You need to come down from that awful fucking city and join us.
This may be a possibility!
More on photo work at this scale:
http://www.rdmag.com/News/2012/08/General-Science-Caught-On-Camera-Quantum-Mechanics-In-Action/
Is it too morbid to wish we had slow motion this awesome for reviewing the JFK assassination?
It would prove conclusively if oswald acted alone or not. But yeah this might have some interesting implications for video evidence.
It's kind of less than I was hoping for when I read the description though. If it can catch a packet of light traveling through a bottle, why does it not catch the light in mid-step traveling from the object to the camera?
Quote from: v3x on August 10, 2012, 01:11:42 AM
It's kind of less than I was hoping for when I read the description though. If it can catch a packet of light traveling through a bottle, why does it not catch the light in mid-step traveling from the object to the camera?
The image you are seeing is only the photons which have "bounced" and then hit the camera-sensor. (So the "waves" on the table are actually photons bounced from the initial-packet through the water, through the plastic, off the table, and then to the camera senor...) What's it going to bounce off?
Quote from: Telarus on August 10, 2012, 01:32:26 AM
Quote from: v3x on August 10, 2012, 01:11:42 AM
It's kind of less than I was hoping for when I read the description though. If it can catch a packet of light traveling through a bottle, why does it not catch the light in mid-step traveling from the object to the camera?
The image you are seeing is only the photons which have "bounced" and then hit the camera-sensor. (So the "waves" on the table are actually photons bounced from the initial-packet through the water, through the plastic, off the table, and then to the camera senor...) What's it going to bounce off?
i understand that's what i'm seeing, i just wish it looked more like an acid trip.
...then just watch it on acid
twid
problemsolver
You obviously do not know how hard LSD is to come by these days.
... :aaa:
That was incredible!