Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when girls are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
:um:
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all women care about.
Let's just look at that again, shall we?
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all men care about.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all Black people care about.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all Gays care about.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all stupid fucking misogynists care about.
Where's the interesting concept? I've clearly missed something.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 01:39:33 PM
Where's the interesting concept? I've clearly missed something.
2 years ago August, as I recall.
This guy doesn't have fuck-all to say that's worth listening to, does he?
Shallow people try to attract shallow people, fail, blame it on them being shallow, make sweeping generalizations in the process.
More news at 11.
Politically correct version; for the politically correct people!
Literally all 'people' in general care about.
When getting a first impression of you.
(Call them the uninformed if you like)
1. How tall you are, or at least if you are not way too short or too tall for them
2. How big your dick is, metaphorically speaking
3. How much money you make.
4. The quality of your hair
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How 'striking' you are
First impressions cannot be taken back.
Quote from: Jet City Hustle on March 05, 2014, 02:12:24 PM
This guy doesn't have fuck-all to say that's worth listening to, does he?
Not really, yes this was the best I could come up with.
Quote from: Cain on March 05, 2014, 02:13:36 PM
Shallow people try to attract shallow people, fail, blame it on them being shallow, make sweeping generalizations in the process.
More news at 11.
Thanks for the input Mr. sugar cain. Always a pleasure!
Still waiting on this "interesting concept". This still appears to be idiocy.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:17:19 PM
:lulz:
Politically correct version; for the politically correct people! :fap:
I stopped reading right there.
You are having a communications problem. I can elaborate on that, if it will help.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:04:57 PM
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 01:39:33 PM
Where's the interesting concept? I've clearly missed something.
2 years ago August, as I recall.
Well, that answers the question, "When's the interesting concept"
"literally all XXXXXX" statements are never correct. Some people will always be too smart/brain damaged to conform to your chosen demographic.
Not to say a whole bunch of these things won't hold true for a large percentage, given that a large percentage of any group are usually idiots. Ask any anthropologist why the list makes sense and it's pretty straightforward monkey brain wiring. However, as we discussed recently, monkey brain wiring is not fixed. assume otherwise at your peril.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:17:19 PM
:lulz:
Politically correct version; for the politically correct people! :fap:
I stopped reading right there.
You are having a communications problem. I can elaborate on that, if it will help.
Actually, elaborations such as that might help me start contributing something; instead of just being a perpetual energy suck.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:19:01 PM
Thanks for the input Mr. sugar cain. Always a pleasure!
Actually, I won't elaborate.
I'll just put this guy on ignore, because he lacks the ability or the desire to communicate. What he does is treat people like shit. I am guessing he doesn't know that this is what he's doing. I don't care.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:23:40 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:17:19 PM
:lulz:
Politically correct version; for the politically correct people! :fap:
I stopped reading right there.
You are having a communications problem. I can elaborate on that, if it will help.
Actually, elaborations such as that might help me start contributing something; instead of just being a perpetual energy suck.
See above post. You aren't worth the time. You have failed the TGRR humanity test, which consists of one question: "Are you able to view other humans as human?" You are not, as is evidenced by your continual lame attempts to humiliate Cain.
Fuck off now.
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:23:16 PM
"literally all XXXXXX" statements are never correct. Some people will always be too smart/brain damaged to conform to your chosen demographic.
Not to say a whole bunch of these things won't hold true for a large percentage, given that a large percentage of any group are usually idiots. Ask any anthropologist why the list makes sense and it's pretty straightforward monkey brain wiring. However, as we discussed recently, monkey brain wiring is not fixed. assume otherwise at your peril.
That sounds comforting; yet I am not yet convinced that people care about more than that.
Which leads to my discomfort in experiencing any form of agreement with said monkey.
Okay, here's a no brainer. All women care about dick size. Some women are lesbians. Your argument is invalid.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:25:53 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:23:40 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:17:19 PM
:lulz:
Politically correct version; for the politically correct people! :fap:
I stopped reading right there.
You are having a communications problem. I can elaborate on that, if it will help.
Actually, elaborations such as that might help me start contributing something; instead of just being a perpetual energy suck.
See above post. You aren't worth the time. You have failed the TGRR humanity test, which consists of one question: "Are you able to view other humans as human?" You are not, as is evidenced by your continual lame attempts to humiliate Cain.
Fuck off now.
Well, sorry to hear that.
Thanks for the courtesy posts anyway.
I thought he would just get angry about it and thrash my stupidity.
Everything else I said to him was in no way meant to be an insult.
Does he really take the Cain thing so serious? Its a cool screen name, really.
Thats why I thought it was impervious.
Look at my dumb screen name,
~Oderpety Resigderpity.
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:32:47 PM
Okay, here's a no brainer. All women care about dick size. Some women are lesbians. Your argument is invalid.
You are essentially arguing with PUA/MRA "mentality", as embodied by Poptard, if Poptard was serious and not trolling.
Just saying.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:34:33 PM
Well, sorry to hear that.
Thanks for the courtesy posts anyway.
I thought he would just get angry about it and thrash my stupidity.
Everything else I said to him was in no way meant to be an insult.
Does he really take the Cain thing so serious? Its a cool screen name, really.
Thats why I thought it was impervious.
Look at my dumb screen name,
~Oderpety Resigderpity.
It doesn't matter if Cain got angry; I doubt he has even bothered to respond since you started calling him that...Not because of butthurt, but because you're ASININE.
What matters is that other people aren't people to you.
I demand better.
I think I've made my case; in any event, I've satisfied my personal sense of fairness, so I can cut you loose now.
Have fun babbling to yourself or whatever.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:35:27 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:32:47 PM
Okay, here's a no brainer. All women care about dick size. Some women are lesbians. Your argument is invalid.
You are essentially arguing with PUA/MRA "mentality", as embodied by Poptard, if Poptard was serious and not trolling.
Just saying.
I aint arguing shit. New poster seems to be infected with a few highly virulent faulty logic memes. Just offering a hand with that before I wade in with dogs abuse. :evil:
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:39:45 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:35:27 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:32:47 PM
Okay, here's a no brainer. All women care about dick size. Some women are lesbians. Your argument is invalid.
You are essentially arguing with PUA/MRA "mentality", as embodied by Poptard, if Poptard was serious and not trolling.
Just saying.
I aint arguing shit. New poster seems to be infected with a few highly virulent faulty logic memes. Just offering a hand with that before I wade in with dogs abuse. :evil:
Well, it's pretty obvious that if you begin a message with mockery and/or derision, that is the ONLY part of the message that another human will receive; everything else vanishes as if you had never wasted the time to type it.
This is what the New Thing does. Either it is too stupid to know it, or it knows it and doesn't care. In either case, just start ladeling out the horrid abuse.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:38:02 PM
It doesn't matter if Cain got angry; I doubt he has even bothered to respond since you started calling him that...Not because of butthurt, but because you're ASININE.
This is 100% correct.
Hold on a sec. Let's look at this list.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
If we remove the implications and go soley with the text, it turns out that it doesn't put a judgement on each category.
For example, "How tall you are" may imply that women like tall men better, but that isn't stated. A woman who likes short men can care about how tall you are, and reject you if you're over 5'2".
The same thing can be applied to each category, so you can use it to describe just about any person you want to as desirable.
But that's just fun with semantics. The real problem is with "literally all". In that there isn't as
single other thing women care about when considering potential mates. Children? Drug use? Libertarian? Pet lover? Prone to violence? There is a
shit ton of factors people care about more than the above 10.
Also, leaving off the qualifier "when meeting men" or whatever implies that women don't care about
anything else in their lives except for certain qualities of a man.
Which reduces women to objects, without agency.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 02:58:18 PM
Hold on a sec. Let's look at this list.
Why? His actual message was "contempt".
Quote
Which reduces women to objects, without agency.
OR doesn't view any humans as humans with any sort of agency.
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:32:47 PM
Okay, here's a no brainer. All women care about dick size. Some women are lesbians. Your argument is invalid.
With that specific wording the point if forced into concession. You are completely right,but there was an intended practical application for that sentence which is obvious.
Lesbians are women, but they are lesbian women. It would be 'Shintoist Pig-Like' to say that they are different, but they are different in many ways. It would be very hard to befriend them if you do not fall into their target demographic. I can't say this empirically, but many (of course not all) lesbians have certain expectation and defense mechanisms set up because the issues surrounding a controversial lifestyle.
In many cases making it socially unacceptable to them for ones appendage to exist in any size.
Sigh.... I just know this is going to anger more people, but I can't fear attempting to continue this debate.
What debate?
You posted stupid shit, and asked us to tell you why it's stupid.
We're just giving you what you asked for.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 03:02:19 PM
What debate?
You posted stupid shit, and asked us to tell you why it's stupid.
We're just giving you what you asked for.
Then whats your gripe?
Am I supposed to raise a question, and then sit back and listen and just repeat, "Okay, Okay, Okay, Okay" over and over again? What would be the point of that?
Do you guys feel trolled? I feel trolled right now....
This seems to imply that there is no possible reason to discuss this accept for answering my request.
Which would be really kind of you, but it would also be a waist of both of our time.
Thanks for 'humoring my asininity' , but it just does nothing if this is not a discussion.
HEY GUYS, SMASHING MY BALLS WITH A HAMMER HURTS. SHOULD I CONTINUE?
THIS FOOD CONTAINS NUTS AND I HAVE AN EXTREME ALLERGY. SHOULD I EAT IT?
MY CAR IS ON FIRE. SHOULD I FIND ANOTHER MODE OF TRANSPORT?
Quote from: Cain on March 05, 2014, 02:45:40 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 02:38:02 PM
It doesn't matter if Cain got angry; I doubt he has even bothered to respond since you started calling him that...Not because of butthurt, but because you're ASININE.
This is 100% correct.
Good. No one is forcing anyone to pay attention to me at all.
I see that it just makes me look bad, and drives people away from the thread.
Just as you have absolutely no obligation to reply to me,
I also have no obligation to please you and be entertaining.
That said, I'll lay off the asinine re-naming.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 02:58:18 PM
Hold on a sec. Let's look at this list.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
If we remove the implications and go soley with the text, it turns out that it doesn't put a judgement on each category.
For example, "How tall you are" may imply that women like tall men better, but that isn't stated. A woman who likes short men can care about how tall you are, and reject you if you're over 5'2".
The same thing can be applied to each category, so you can use it to describe just about any person you want to as desirable.
But that's just fun with semantics. The real problem is with "literally all". In that there isn't as single other thing women care about when considering potential mates. Children? Drug use? Libertarian? Pet lover? Prone to violence? There is a shit ton of factors people care about more than the above 10.
Also, leaving off the qualifier "when meeting men" or whatever implies that women don't care about anything else in their lives except for certain qualities of a man.
Which reduces women to objects, without agency.
Thanks for playing devils advocate for a sec.
That's interesting that you concluded that it objectifies women,
but the list is (now proven by previous posts to be) a false view of woman's view of men.
So more accurately, it labels women as always objectifying men.
That is a demeaning dehumanizing generalization of woman.
Yes this is all over now.
I half-expect to not be humored any longer.
Thanks for trying in the first place seeing as how
that is more than I deserved according to you guys.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:29:42 PM
So more accurately, it labels women as always objectifying men.
That is a demeaning dehumanizing generalization of woman.
Wrong.
The list was not made by women, and it is not for women.
The list was made by men, and is for men. It doesn't exist to help understand a thought process, it exists to give a strawman excuse for hating women.
I'm not sure why you don't recognize this. The blatant misogyny is so strong in the OP, it gives the average reader here the impression you're either very, very dumb, or are attempting a troll.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 03:35:55 PM
The list was made by men, and is for men. It doesn't exist to help understand a thought process, it exists to give a strawman excuse for hating women.
This
QuoteI'm not sure why you don't recognize this. The blatant misogyny is so strong in the OP, it gives the average reader here the impression you're either very, very dumb, or are attempting a troll.
and that
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 03:35:55 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:29:42 PM
So more accurately, it labels women as always objectifying men.
That is a demeaning dehumanizing generalization of woman.
Wrong.
The list was not made by women, and it is not for women.
The list was made by men, and is for men. It doesn't exist to help understand a thought process, it exists to give a strawman excuse for hating women.
I'm not sure why you don't recognize this. The blatant misogyny is so strong in the OP, it gives the average reader here the impression you're either very, very dumb, or are attempting a troll.
Wow, you may have hit the nail on the head there.
Everyone here smashed this list with ease.
Perhaps I was blinded by my general hatred of women.
(and my agonizing stupidity)
I didn't make the list, I just couldn't competently disprove the list. You all gave very good reasons why it was a shitty list, and my only apology is for not being able to put my finger on the lists obvious flaws instead of asking you guys for answers that are obvious.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 02:58:18 PM
Hold on a sec. Let's look at this list.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
If we remove the implications and go soley with the text, it turns out that it doesn't put a judgement on each category.
For example, "How tall you are" may imply that women like tall men better, but that isn't stated. A woman who likes short men can care about how tall you are, and reject you if you're over 5'2".
The same thing can be applied to each category, so you can use it to describe just about any person you want to as desirable.
But that's just fun with semantics. The real problem is with "literally all". In that there isn't as single other thing women care about when considering potential mates. Children? Drug use? Libertarian? Pet lover? Prone to violence? There is a shit ton of factors people care about more than the above 10.
Also, leaving off the qualifier "when meeting men" or whatever implies that women don't care about anything else in their lives except for certain qualities of a man.
Which reduces women to objects, without agency.
That is just such a good comprehension/analysis of this. Well done!
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 03:57:50 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:52:56 PM
Perhaps I was blinded by my general hatred of women.
Wow.
Changed it to be a little bit more accurate for you.
Doesn't matter. I am blinded by my blinding hatred of those who hate women. This is reinforced by the fact that I have a mother, a wife, and a daughter, and I don't like people who hate them. So let's just say I have a vested interest in making your stay here as miserable as possible; because you're a bad person.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 04:07:38 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 03:57:50 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:52:56 PM
Perhaps I was blinded by my general hatred of women.
Wow.
Changed it to be a little bit more accurate for you.
Doesn't matter. I am blinded by my blinding hatred of those who hate women. This is reinforced by the fact that I have a mother, a wife, and a daughter, and I don't like people who hate them. So let's just say I have a vested interest in making your stay here as miserable as possible; because you're a bad person.
You do realize that I don't universally hate all women.
I don't think lesser of them either, and in fact there are a lot of ways that they are better than men.
To say that men and women are complete equals is simply wrong, just as saying one is better than the other is completely wrong too.
By hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with women. I don't blame them either; my own terrible flaws is what causes the experiences to go bad. (I have had great experiences too, but those don't scar me so its like the bad times are the dominant gene and the good times are receive)
Though I'm saying this to humor you because this post wasn't supposed to be about me. This was supposed to be about this list. I'm not sure why I effect you so much if you think so little of me. Maybe this is your favorite on-line home, and I am a contagion; these reactions being a healthy imune system.
It just seems like you would have ignored me if that were the case.
For sake of better understanding and bridging the communication gap. Was there someone in your life who was very negative to you who left you scars for you to feel and remember them by?
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:20:53 PM
You do realize that I don't universally hate all women.
Some of your best friends are women, right?
QuoteBy hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with women.
Hmmm...
QuoteBy hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with black people.
or
QuoteBy hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with Hispanics.
:lol:
QuoteI don't blame them either;
I am certain that they all just breathed a sigh of relief.
QuoteThough I'm saying this to humor you because this post wasn't supposed to be about me. This was supposed to be about this list.
I fail to see any functional difference; the list is about misogyny, and so are you.
QuoteI'm not sure why I effect you so much if you think so little of me.
Because I am bored.
QuoteMaybe this is your favorite on-line home, and I am a contagion; these reactions being a healthy imune system.
No, it's more like someone stepped in poo and tracked it onto the carpet. Unpleasant, but not threatening.
QuoteFor sake of better understanding and bridging the communication gap. Was there someone in your life who was very negative to you who left you scars for you to feel and remember them by?
Of course. But I didn't suddenly lump all members of whatever gender or race they were into whatever I was angry about. That would be both illogical and weak.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 04:29:35 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:20:53 PM
You do realize that I don't universally hate all women.
Some of your best friends are women, right?
QuoteBy hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with women.
Hmmm...
QuoteBy hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with black people.
or
QuoteBy hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with Hispanics.
:lol:
QuoteI don't blame them either;
I am certain that they all just breathed a sigh of relief.
QuoteThough I'm saying this to humor you because this post wasn't supposed to be about me. This was supposed to be about this list.
I fail to see any functional difference; the list is about misogyny, and so are you.
QuoteI'm not sure why I effect you so much if you think so little of me.
Because I am bored.
QuoteMaybe this is your favorite on-line home, and I am a contagion; these reactions being a healthy imune system.
No, it's more like someone stepped in poo and tracked it onto the carpet. Unpleasant, but not threatening.
QuoteFor sake of better understanding and bridging the communication gap. Was there someone in your life who was very negative to you who left you scars for you to feel and remember them by?
Of course. But I didn't suddenly lump all members of whatever gender or race they were into whatever I was angry about. That would be both illogical and weak.
You're better than me. Must be that simple. Your superiority obviously gives you the right to judge others from a high chair and imply yourself to be a perfect holier than thou person. Your actions obviously seem to be the actions that a logical and strong person would make.
Why do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:46:36 PM
You're better than me. Must be that simple.
Apparently, I am. In this particular case, though, that's like being the skinniest kid at fat camp.
QuoteYour superiority obviously gives you the right to judge others from a high chair and imply yourself to be a perfect holier than thou person. Your actions seem obviously be the actions that a logical and strong person would make.
No, my status as Holy Man™ gives me that right; my "superiority" in this case just means "has satisfied the bare minimum requirements to be a biped".
QuoteWhy do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?
Because my friends do not enjoy the vast amounts of free time/fuck off time I enjoy. They are busy during the daytime. Nigel, Cain, and LMNO in particular. Ergo, I am bored. As I believe I've already mentioned.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 04:50:17 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:46:36 PM
You're better than me. Must be that simple.
Apparently, I am. In this particular case, though, that's like being the skinniest kid at fat camp.
QuoteYour superiority obviously gives you the right to judge others from a high chair and imply yourself to be a perfect holier than thou person. Your actions seem obviously be the actions that a logical and strong person would make.
No, my status as Holy Man™ gives me that right; my "superiority" in this case just means "has satisfied the bare minimum requirements to be a biped".
QuoteWhy do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?
Because my friends do not enjoy the vast amounts of free time/fuck off time I enjoy. They are busy during the daytime. Nigel, Cain, and LMNO in particular. Ergo, I am bored. As I believe I've already mentioned.
There's a common ground we both share. I have nothing but tons of fuck around time too.
I just completely waisted an entire year screwing around too much.
I just want you to know, that is why I am here to stay. I'm trying to spend my time becoming better, because I am aware that I suck.
This is why I am leaving myself exposed to so many criticisms and being completely honest about my flaws. If I cannot be honest to myself, I can at least be honest to other people about myself.
This is why, if you are right about me, I will let you know.
This is also partially why you have seen such a dark side of me.
( Ha... that implies I have any redeemable factors what so-ever )
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 05:06:29 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 04:50:17 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:46:36 PM
You're better than me. Must be that simple.
Apparently, I am. In this particular case, though, that's like being the skinniest kid at fat camp.
QuoteYour superiority obviously gives you the right to judge others from a high chair and imply yourself to be a perfect holier than thou person. Your actions seem obviously be the actions that a logical and strong person would make.
No, my status as Holy Man™ gives me that right; my "superiority" in this case just means "has satisfied the bare minimum requirements to be a biped".
QuoteWhy do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?
Because my friends do not enjoy the vast amounts of free time/fuck off time I enjoy. They are busy during the daytime. Nigel, Cain, and LMNO in particular. Ergo, I am bored. As I believe I've already mentioned.
There's a common ground we both share. I have nothing but tons of fuck around time too.
I just completely waisted an entire year screwing around too much.
I just want you to know, that is why I am here to stay. I'm trying to spend my time becoming better, because I am aware that I suck.
This is why I am leaving myself exposed to so many criticisms and being completely honest about my flaws. If I cannot be honest to myself, I can at least be honest to other people about myself.
This is why, if you are right about me, I will let you know.
This is also partially why you have seen such a dark derp side of me.
( Ha... that implies I have any redeemable factors what so-ever )
Fxt.
Also, yeah, there's clearly no other side.
Alty,
Welcome Wagoning.
I guess dark was giving myself too much credit.
Thats a much much better way of putting it.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when guys are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all men care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your breasts are
3. How much money you make
4. How long your hair is
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How pretty you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
:emo:
Quote from: Nigel on March 05, 2014, 05:26:08 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when guys are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all men care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your breasts are
3. How much money you make
4. How long your hair is
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How pretty you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
It's half tempting to post that on a couple of PUA forums just to see the reaction.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:52:56 PM
Perhaps I was blinded by my general hatred of women.
Well, I'm done.
(http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?id=HN.608029741248283386&pid=1.7)
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:28:28 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:23:16 PM
"literally all XXXXXX" statements are never correct. Some people will always be too smart/brain damaged to conform to your chosen demographic.
Not to say a whole bunch of these things won't hold true for a large percentage, given that a large percentage of any group are usually idiots. Ask any anthropologist why the list makes sense and it's pretty straightforward monkey brain wiring. However, as we discussed recently, monkey brain wiring is not fixed. assume otherwise at your peril.
That sounds comforting; yet I am not yet convinced that people care about more than that.
Which leads to my discomfort in experiencing any form of agreement with said monkey.
Either you only care abut those things, in which case why does it bother you that other people are the same way? Or else you care about more than that, in which case not all people are that way.
I think this thread shows the real hilarity that results from echo chamber mentalities. TDS is basically a pack of puerile little freaks who spend their time trying to out-edgy each other, vying for who can be the most misogynistic as a means of proving their bravery to the rest.
Then one of them wanders out from underneath their fart-huffing blanket and says something that is - in their eyes - perfectly normal. And everyone laughs at him like he was some kind of sideshow geek. Which, obviously, he is...Having spent a great deal of time and effort to make himself one.
Then come the excuses. "I hate women because of trauma." FFS. He got his widdle heart chipped and that's a reason to hate ALL women. Well done. Well fucking done.
Compare that to wossname, "Gonad" or whatever it was, also from TDS. The FUNNIEST part is that they accuse US of being an echo chamber, despite records of us dismembering each other that go back 11 years. Why are we an echo chamber? Because we disagree with and mock their precious bigotries and their deeply-cherished cowardice.
Compare to tumblr oppression boards for cheap laughs.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 07:07:44 PMThe FUNNIEST part is that they accuse US of being an echo chamber, despite records of us dismembering each other that go back 11 years.
Newsfeed! :evil:
My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?
Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?
Quote from: Pæs on March 05, 2014, 08:28:01 PM
My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?
Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?
I know it makes me salivate like a fucking steppe wolf in a chickenhouse.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
a friend zone thing anyway.
YOU ARE RUNNING ON A METRIC FUCKTON OF BAD SIGNAL.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
THIS IS A SELF-DEFENSIVE DELUSION YOU HAVE LATCHED ON TO, EXPLAINING AWAY YOUR PAST REJECTION BY DEMONISING YOUR REJECTORS RATHER THAN TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PARTS OF YOURSELF THAT ARE DETESTABLE.
BY REDUCING WOMEN TO THESE CONCERNS, YOU CAN COMFORTABLE BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE OTHER REDEEMING QUALITIES WHICH WOULD MAKE YOU ATTRACTIVE IF ONLY WOMEN WERE NOT SO SHALLOW, BUT AT THE SAME TIME BETRAYING THE FACT THAT 'WINNING PERSONALITY' CANNOT BE ONE OF THESE REDEEMING QUALITIES.
NOW STOP MOPING AND BETTER YOURSELF.
Quote from: Pæs on March 05, 2014, 08:28:01 PM
My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?
Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?
If I had to guess, I'd say "No" to both questions
:facepalm:
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:46:36 PM
Why do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?
Herp-da-derp... forums are about give and take. Did you
seriously expect to just state whatever you wanted without anyone answering?
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 05:06:29 PM
I just want you to know, that is why I am here to stay.
Let's not be hasty here...
Well, I for one would like to thank Nigel for inviting the TDS freaks over.
Because I giggled my arse off all day.
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 05:29:09 PM
:emo:
Thats a really lame emo-emote...
It apears to be perpendicular and not parrallel to the veins.
Quote from: Hoopla on March 05, 2014, 11:43:17 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:46:36 PM
Why do you take this so serious in the first place?
What is accomplished by righting wrongs and laying down judgment within the confounds of an small ambiguous forum when you could be enjoying yourself talking with your friends in the other threads?
Herp-da-derp... forums are about give and take. Did you seriously expect to just state whatever you wanted without anyone answering?
I did address that issue earlier, I said:
Quote
Am I supposed to raise a question, and then sit back and listen and just repeat, "Okay, Okay, Okay, Okay" over and over again? What would be the point of that?
Quote from: Nigel on March 05, 2014, 05:26:08 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when guys are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all men care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your breasts are
3. How much money you make
4. How long your hair is
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How pretty you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
Thank you Nigel for the third version of the list, I'll keep all 3 in the same text file.
Male, female, and gender neutral.
Then putting said list into my file hell folder.
(Where all obsolete notions go to die for eternity.)
Maybe this list should say, "All that shallow ingrates care about is."
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 05:39:31 PM
Quote from: Nigel on March 05, 2014, 05:26:08 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when guys are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all men care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your breasts are
3. How much money you make
4. How long your hair is
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How pretty you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
It's half tempting to post that on a couple of PUA forums just to see the reaction.
Lol....
Quote from: Pergamos on March 05, 2014, 06:57:13 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:28:28 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:23:16 PM
"literally all XXXXXX" statements are never correct. Some people will always be too smart/brain damaged to conform to your chosen demographic.
Not to say a whole bunch of these things won't hold true for a large percentage, given that a large percentage of any group are usually idiots. Ask any anthropologist why the list makes sense and it's pretty straightforward monkey brain wiring. However, as we discussed recently, monkey brain wiring is not fixed. assume otherwise at your peril.
That sounds comforting; yet I am not yet convinced that people care about more than that.
Which leads to my discomfort in experiencing any form of agreement with said monkey.
Either you only care abut those things, in which case why does it bother you that other people are the same way? Or else you care about more than that, in which case not all people are that way.
If the vast mojority of people were that way; why point out the few abnormalities and give the bulk of the population the credit?
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 07:07:44 PM
I think this thread shows the real hilarity that results from echo chamber mentalities. TDS is basically a pack of puerile little freaks who spend their time trying to out-edgy each other, vying for who can be the most misogynistic as a means of proving their bravery to the rest.
Then one of them wanders out from underneath their fart-huffing blanket and says something that is - in their eyes - perfectly normal. And everyone laughs at him like he was some kind of sideshow geek. Which, obviously, he is...Having spent a great deal of time and effort to make himself one.
Then come the excuses. "I hate women because of trauma." FFS. He got his widdle heart chipped and that's a reason to hate ALL women. Well done. Well fucking done.
Compare that to wossname, "Gonad" or whatever it was, also from TDS. The FUNNIEST part is that they accuse US of being an echo chamber, despite records of us dismembering each other that go back 11 years. Why are we an echo chamber? Because we disagree with and mock their precious bigotries and their deeply-cherished cowardice.
Compare to tumblr oppression boards for cheap laughs.
The technical definition of a geek describes me quite well.
Calling that self deprecation would be insulting geeks of the world, careful!
(Sorry for the late reply, decided to enter sleep mode and then re-read all of this to get a seccond impression.)
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 11:52:53 PM
Well, I for one would like to thank Nigel for inviting the TDS freaks over.
Because I giggled my arse off all day.
Because you are equating this human to a sideshow,
You have failed the TGRR humanity test, which consists of one question:
"Are you able to view other humans as human?"
Quote from: Pæs on March 05, 2014, 08:28:01 PM
My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?
Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?
Maybe if they offered social skill classes in the first place people wouldn't be making lists like this.
It seems more like people are causing the deprecation to stray from the issue simply to make the point that the issue isn't worth their attention.
Then using that to conclude that I am somehow the same quality as my question.
Quote from: Pæs on March 05, 2014, 09:50:00 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
a friend zone thing anyway.
YOU ARE RUNNING ON A METRIC FUCKTON OF BAD SIGNAL.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
THIS IS A SELF-DEFENSIVE DELUSION YOU HAVE LATCHED ON TO, EXPLAINING AWAY YOUR PAST REJECTION BY DEMONISING YOUR REJECTORS RATHER THAN TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PARTS OF YOURSELF THAT ARE DETESTABLE.
BY REDUCING WOMEN TO THESE CONCERNS, YOU CAN COMFORTABLE BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE OTHER REDEEMING QUALITIES WHICH WOULD MAKE YOU ATTRACTIVE IF ONLY WOMEN WERE NOT SO SHALLOW, BUT AT THE SAME TIME BETRAYING THE FACT THAT 'WINNING PERSONALITY' CANNOT BE ONE OF THESE REDEEMING QUALITIES.
I like the way you put that.
So belief in this would be a 'shell' to break out of.
Quote from: Hoopla on March 05, 2014, 11:44:13 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 05:06:29 PM
I just want you to know, that is why I am here to stay.
Let's not be hasty here...
Are you referring to the 3 day troll fest mention in one of the locked threads?
Is that really that common for people to come here, participate, and get harassed for their efforts?
Quote
NOW STOP MOPING AND BETTER YOURSELF.
Much easier said than done. I am human, and I am sorry.
You are human, therefore you were once not bettered too.
I will continue down the path as fast as I can.
PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.
I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.
You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:
:troll:
You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.
You get your own reply Junkenstein.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 02:20:15 PM
Still waiting on this "interesting concept". This still appears to be idiocy.
The concept was executed poorly.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:16:05 PM
HEY GUYS, SMASHING MY BALLS WITH A HAMMER HURTS. SHOULD I CONTINUE?
Implying you have balls....
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:17:22 PM
THIS FOOD CONTAINS NUTS AND I HAVE AN EXTREME ALLERGY. SHOULD I EAT IT?
Only if you don't enjoy life.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:17:45 PM
MY CAR IS ON FIRE. SHOULD I FIND ANOTHER MODE OF TRANSPORT?
Without fire, cars would not be possible. Don't be such a wimp.
"It seems more like people are causing the deprecation to stray from the issue simply to make the point that the issue isn't worth their attention."
It doesn't seem like that to me at all. It seems to me more like you are rolling onto your belly and submitting at the first sniff of criticism, grovel grovel, "I am not worthy."
Communication can only happen among equals and you're not behaving like you consider yourself to be one of those.
AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE NOT GROVELLING, YOU'RE BEING INEFFECTIVELY ASSERTIVE BY WAY OF PASSIVE AGGRESSION AND COWARDLY LITTLE SNIPES LIKE "SUGAR CAIN". HOLY FUCKING BALLS.
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 03:59:51 AM
PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.
I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.
You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:
:troll:
You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.
Well close your mind at your pleasure. I would hope you are judging points on their own merit, and not based on how you feel about the person saying them.
Still desperately trying to find reasons why it might be unfair that people aren't engaging with you respectfully?
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:05:01 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 03:59:51 AM
PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.
I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.
You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:
:troll:
You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.
:troll:
Quote from: Pæs on March 06, 2014, 04:04:38 AM
Communication can only happen among equals and you're not behaving like you consider yourself to be one of those.
Wrong.
Quote from: Pæs on March 06, 2014, 04:04:38 AM
AND THEN WHEN YOU'RE NOT GROVELLING, YOU'RE BEING INEFFECTIVELY ASSERTIVE BY WAY OF PASSIVE AGGRESSION AND COWARDLY LITTLE SNIPES LIKE "SUGAR CAIN". HOLY FUCKING BALLS.
I just don't take it personally. You guys on the other hand, really seem to.
The reaction, "HOLLY FUCKING BALLS" , is exactly why called him that in the first place.
If they are just cowardly little snipes, then why would they effect you?
I would think someone proficient like yourself would be above such petty inaneness.
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 04:09:36 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:05:01 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 03:59:51 AM
PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.
I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.
You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:
:troll:
You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.
:troll:
I was never trying to show anyone anything. I was just being, "sexist and Racist" to shed light on why that is wrong, so kill me.
Quote from: Pæs on March 06, 2014, 04:08:09 AM
Still desperately trying to find reasons why it might be unfair that people aren't engaging with you respectfully?
Whats the harm in trying? Don't know for sure until you try.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:15:09 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 04:09:36 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:05:01 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 03:59:51 AM
PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.
I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.
You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:
:troll:
You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.
:troll:
:bacon:
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 04:19:10 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:15:09 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 04:09:36 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:05:01 AM
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 03:59:51 AM
PROTIP: When you are trying to show THE WHOLE WORLD how mean and unreasonable the kind and loving souls at PD.com are, don't lead with sexist and racist horseshit. It sort of weakens the point.
I, for one, don't really care about any particular point you have to make from here on out.
You can put all the care and effort you want into your inane bullshit, but all I am gonna see is:
:troll:
You dumbasses just dive right in the pool and jump the first inflatable shark you see. No skill, no class.
:troll:
:bacon:
Bacon kills. Turkey Bacon isn't as good, but its more heart friendly.
That's what bugs me so much about dada and pineal types. There's not point in even giving them shit. They got no teeth. It's gums all the way down.
Stupid, stupid gums.
Quote from: Alty on March 06, 2014, 04:39:04 AM
That's what bugs me so much about dada and pineal types. There's not point in even giving them shit. They got no teeth. It's gums all the way down.
Stupid, stupid gums.
Teethe should be used for eating; nourishing one's self.
Not for fighting.
Using the metaphorical teeth as a weapon is simply an imitation of predators.
We are not predators, we are hunter/gatherers.
What is the difference between a hunter and a predator? " Access your Pineal gland " for the answer.
( Access your Pineal gland Literally translates to, " Think for yourself " )
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:15:09 AM
I was never trying to show anyone anything. I was just being, "sexist and Racist" to shed light on why that is wrong, so kill me.
So you're saying it was all a sociological experiment?
Sweet merciful tits, step one of social competency, learn which tropes not to run into in the community you find yourself in.
Do not learn this by running headfirst into them.
Quote from: Pæs on March 06, 2014, 05:19:07 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:15:09 AM
I was never trying to show anyone anything. I was just being, "sexist and Racist" to shed light on why that is wrong, so kill me.
So you're saying it was all a sociological experiment?
Sweet merciful tits, step one of social competency, learn which tropes not to run into in the community you find yourself in.
I always just avoid everyone and arbitrarily choose who to talk to.
Basing the rest of my interactions with that person on how that encounter concludes.
Quote
Do not learn this by running headfirst into them.
Out of courtesy to them, or rather out of fear of what will happen when my head hits them?
(Experiment, true, but the positive connotation of experimentation implies that science was involved in this)
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 05:34:20 AM
Quote from: Pæs on March 06, 2014, 05:19:07 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:15:09 AM
I was never trying to show anyone anything. I was just being, "sexist and Racist" to shed light on why that is wrong, so kill me.
So you're saying it was all a sociological experiment?
Sweet merciful tits, step one of social competency, learn which tropes not to run into in the community you find yourself in.
I always just avoid everyone and arbitrarily choose who to talk to.
Basing the rest of my interactions with that person on how that encounter concludes.
Quote
Do not learn this by running headfirst into them.
Out of courtesy to them, or rather out of fear of what will happen when my head hits them?
(Experiment, true, but the positive connotation of experimentation implies that science was involved in this)
:lolchix:
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:01:56 AM
You get your own reply Junkenstein.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 02:20:15 PM
Still waiting on this "interesting concept". This still appears to be idiocy.
The concept was executed poorly.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:16:05 PM
HEY GUYS, SMASHING MY BALLS WITH A HAMMER HURTS. SHOULD I CONTINUE?
Implying you have balls....
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:17:22 PM
THIS FOOD CONTAINS NUTS AND I HAVE AN EXTREME ALLERGY. SHOULD I EAT IT?
Only if you don't enjoy life.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:17:45 PM
MY CAR IS ON FIRE. SHOULD I FIND ANOTHER MODE OF TRANSPORT?
Without fire, cars would not be possible. Don't be such a wimp.
Jesus fucking wept. Consider me told eh? The "concept" turns out to be you're a misogynistic little prick incapable of understanding even basic concepts unless explained at length.
Congratulations, you've proved to my satisfaction that you bring nothing to the table and all you have to offer is fucking stupidity.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 06, 2014, 07:38:59 AM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 04:01:56 AM
You get your own reply Junkenstein.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 02:20:15 PM
Still waiting on this "interesting concept". This still appears to be idiocy.
The concept was executed poorly.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:16:05 PM
HEY GUYS, SMASHING MY BALLS WITH A HAMMER HURTS. SHOULD I CONTINUE?
Implying you have balls....
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:17:22 PM
THIS FOOD CONTAINS NUTS AND I HAVE AN EXTREME ALLERGY. SHOULD I EAT IT?
Only if you don't enjoy life.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:17:45 PM
MY CAR IS ON FIRE. SHOULD I FIND ANOTHER MODE OF TRANSPORT?
Without fire, cars would not be possible. Don't be such a wimp.
Jesus fucking wept. Consider me told eh? The "concept" turns out to be you're a misogynistic little prick incapable of understanding even basic concepts unless explained at length.
Congratulations, you've proved to my satisfaction that you bring nothing to the table and all you have to offer is fucking stupidity.
Well, I'm sorry you 'feel' that way.
If you cannot give a simple explanation, then maybe you do not understand the material enough to be teaching it to somebody.
If we just accept what we're told without asking questions, then that is memorizing and following.
There would be no learning involved.
Just ignore me or something. Wouldn't that solve everything for you?
You seem to be implying you are capable of learning.
This thread provides empirical evidence to the contrary. The "material" is basic fucking empathy and understanding that not all X are Y. This is not difficult. It may be news to fucking Aristotle, but we've got a bit more information than him now.
You may find this forum more suitable when your mental age reaches 12+.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 06, 2014, 08:13:39 AM
You seem to be implying you are capable of learning.
This thread provides empirical evidence to the contrary. The "material" is basic fucking empathy and understanding that not all X are Y. This is not difficult. It may be news to fucking Aristotle, but we've got a bit more information than him now.
You may find this forum more suitable when your mental age reaches 12+.
I resent that statement. Perhaps you've found a vulnerability in me that you can exploit.
Maybe when I become middle aged and overweight I will meet your standard.
Until then, I might not wise enough to understand why looking good in your eyes has any relevance whatsoever.
You suggested ignoring you would "solve things". Ignoring you does not solve the problem of your insufferable stupidity. Ignoring problems in general isn't generally a good way to fix them. Again, something you'd understand if you were a functioning adult.
Why do you resent statements pointing out obvious problems with your thinking and behaviour? Insecurity?
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 06, 2014, 08:35:48 AM
You suggested ignoring you would "solve things". Ignoring you does not solve the problem of your insufferable stupidity. Ignoring problems in general isn't generally a good way to fix them. Again, something you'd understand if you were a functioning adult.
Why do you resent statements pointing out obvious problems with your thinking and behaviour? Insecurity?
Yes, it would solve the problem for you. Out of sight, out of mind. You are simply causing a conflict because there is no plausible productivity that could result from you being malicious.
Tons of insecurity. Its like when a cartoon character tries to plug up a leaking wall.
After fixing one problem, I become able to see more.
All of those problems being fixed causes another series of branches to reveal themselves.
Ignorance is bliss and perfection is impossible. Tempting just to sink into not giving a fuck about being faulty and just continue to hate the world from afar.
Well that's also pretty fucking stupid and until you can figure out why, there really is no point interacting with you.
Good day.
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 06, 2014, 08:53:03 AM
Well that's also pretty fucking stupid and until you can figure out why, there really is no point interacting with you.
Good day.
Good day to you too, sir!
Finally showing some dignity.
Farewell!
At the risk of reopening a can of worms that has only recently been sealed, has it never occurred to you that maybe you have problems with women because they don't like the kind of people that view them as shallow caricatures and retreat into pathetic half-assed defense mechanisms and predictable tropes the moment their assertions are questioned?
Quote from: President Television on March 06, 2014, 09:17:01 AM
At the risk of reopening a can of worms that has only recently been sealed, has it never occurred to you that maybe you have problems with women because they don't like the kind of people that view them as shallow caricatures and retreat into pathetic half-assed defense mechanisms and predictable tropes the moment their assertions are questioned?
STFU - if he figures that one out, the bastard might actually manage to reproduce :argh!:
Quote from: President Television on March 06, 2014, 09:17:01 AM
At the risk of reopening a can of worms that has only recently been sealed, has it never occurred to you that maybe you have problems with women because they don't like the kind of people that view them as shallow caricatures and retreat into pathetic half-assed defense mechanisms and predictable tropes the moment their assertions are questioned?
/thread!
Perfect!
When I'm being polite it hides the fact that I am like this.
Then 'when' they figure out who I really am;
their behavior and attitude towards me changes suddenly.
My emotions lead me to interpret those changes as some form of betrayal.
My foolishness twists the feeling of betrayal into evidence of something about the girl.
When I should be taking their reaction as evidence of my repulsiveness.
Oh how foolish I was being. I'm not saying this is in any way solved,
but I think I'm starting to get a picture of which direction I should go in.
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 06, 2014, 09:41:55 AM
Quote from: President Television on March 06, 2014, 09:17:01 AM
At the risk of reopening a can of worms that has only recently been sealed, has it never occurred to you that maybe you have problems with women because they don't like the kind of people that view them as shallow caricatures and retreat into pathetic half-assed defense mechanisms and predictable tropes the moment their assertions are questioned?
STFU - if he figures that one out, the bastard might actually manage to reproduce :argh!:
:regret:
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 06, 2014, 09:41:55 AM
Quote from: President Television on March 06, 2014, 09:17:01 AM
At the risk of reopening a can of worms that has only recently been sealed, has it never occurred to you that maybe you have problems with women because they don't like the kind of people that view them as shallow caricatures and retreat into pathetic half-assed defense mechanisms and predictable tropes the moment their assertions are questioned?
STFU - if he figures that one out, the bastard might actually manage to reproduce :argh!:
That is so funny. If only I wasn't the one being laughed at....
(If only I wasn't the bud of the joke, of course they are laughing at your wonderful since of humor)
wrong - it's funny regardless.
P3nT - producing empirically funny since 1982
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 06, 2014, 09:47:04 AM
wrong - it's funny regardless.
P3nT - producing empirically funny since 1982
"empirically funny" Common since says its true, logic says its an oxymoron....
Congratulations - you just got a whole joke, all on your own. Now go tell it to some hawt chicks - I hear they get wet for shit like that
Taking jokes too serious is my favorite thing.
(Not trolling)
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 03:48:34 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 07:07:44 PM
I think this thread shows the real hilarity that results from echo chamber mentalities. TDS is basically a pack of puerile little freaks who spend their time trying to out-edgy each other, vying for who can be the most misogynistic as a means of proving their bravery to the rest.
Then one of them wanders out from underneath their fart-huffing blanket and says something that is - in their eyes - perfectly normal. And everyone laughs at him like he was some kind of sideshow geek. Which, obviously, he is...Having spent a great deal of time and effort to make himself one.
Then come the excuses. "I hate women because of trauma." FFS. He got his widdle heart chipped and that's a reason to hate ALL women. Well done. Well fucking done.
Compare that to wossname, "Gonad" or whatever it was, also from TDS. The FUNNIEST part is that they accuse US of being an echo chamber, despite records of us dismembering each other that go back 11 years. Why are we an echo chamber? Because we disagree with and mock their precious bigotries and their deeply-cherished cowardice.
Compare to tumblr oppression boards for cheap laughs.
The technical definition of a geek describes me quite well.
Calling that self deprecation would be insulting geeks of the world, careful!
(Sorry for the late reply, decided to enter sleep mode and then re-read all of this to get a seccond impression.)
What the hell are you talking about? You're addressing me, not Paes, who said the shit about self-depreciation.
QuoteQuote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 11:52:53 PM
Well, I for one would like to thank Nigel for inviting the TDS freaks over.
Because you are equating this human to a sideshow,
You have failed the TGRR humanity test, which consists of one question:
"Are you able to view other humans as human?"
Except that, you having failed the test, the test doesn't apply to this situation.
QuoteQuote
NOW STOP MOPING AND BETTER YOURSELF.
Much easier said than done. I am human, and I am sorry.
You are human, therefore you were once not bettered too.
I will continue down the path as fast as I can.
This is a trollbear.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on March 05, 2014, 03:35:55 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:29:42 PM
So more accurately, it labels women as always objectifying men.
That is a demeaning dehumanizing generalization of woman.
Wrong.
The list was not made by women, and it is not for women.
The list was made by men, and is for men. It doesn't exist to help understand a thought process, it exists to give a strawman excuse for hating women.
I'm not sure why you don't recognize this. The blatant misogyny is so strong in the OP, it gives the average reader here the impression you're either very, very dumb, or are attempting a troll.
So many bingo.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:52:56 PM
Perhaps I was blinded by my general hatred of women.
Really? Because if you haven't figured it out yet, this board's userbase is made up of about half women. If you have a "general hatred" of us, you can just go fuck right off now.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:20:53 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 04:07:38 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 05, 2014, 03:57:50 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 03:52:56 PM
Perhaps I was blinded by my general hatred of women.
Wow.
Changed it to be a little bit more accurate for you.
Doesn't matter. I am blinded by my blinding hatred of those who hate women. This is reinforced by the fact that I have a mother, a wife, and a daughter, and I don't like people who hate them. So let's just say I have a vested interest in making your stay here as miserable as possible; because you're a bad person.
You do realize that I don't universally hate all women.
I don't think lesser of them either, and in fact there are a lot of ways that they are better than men.
To say that men and women are complete equals is simply wrong, just as saying one is better than the other is completely wrong too.
By hatred, I am referring to a series of defense mechanisms that I have set up because of my past experiences with women. I don't blame them either; my own terrible flaws is what causes the experiences to go bad. (I have had great experiences too, but those don't scar me so its like the bad times are the dominant gene and the good times are receive)
Though I'm saying this to humor you because this post wasn't supposed to be about me. This was supposed to be about this list. I'm not sure why I effect you so much if you think so little of me. Maybe this is your favorite on-line home, and I am a contagion; these reactions being a healthy imune system.
It just seems like you would have ignored me if that were the case.
For sake of better understanding and bridging the communication gap. Was there someone in your life who was very negative to you who left you scars for you to feel and remember them by?
Sounds like an all-purpose excuse for bigotry, you giant piece of shit.
I was molested as a little girl, raped as a young woman, and sexually assaulted on the street just a couple of years ago. Each time, by a white man. According to your coward's logic, that would be a totally excellent excuse for me to hate men and be racist against whites, and I bet all the horrible, horrible "pain" that women have caused you was nothing nearly as awful.
In other words, you're just a weak, pathetic shitstain who uses the ordinary setbacks in life, such as people not liking you, not as lessons in how to better yourself, but as an excuse to blame others and sit in a state of perpetual self-indulgence.
Go fuck yourself, it's obvious with your attitude that NO ONE ELSE EVER WILL.
Quote from: President Television on March 06, 2014, 09:17:01 AM
At the risk of reopening a can of worms that has only recently been sealed, has it never occurred to you that maybe you have problems with women because they don't like the kind of people that view them as shallow caricatures and retreat into pathetic half-assed defense mechanisms and predictable tropes the moment their assertions are questioned?
Dingdingdingdingding
Quote from: Pæs on March 05, 2014, 08:28:01 PM
My God, this thread. Do they offer remedial classes in social skills where you live?
Holy fuck, can you not feel how incredibly unsubtle the whole 'self-deprecation to defend against criticism' is and how it makes you respected less and so treated worse?
It's childish and manipulative, is what it is.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 03:48:34 AM
The technical definition of a geek describes me quite well.
:lulz: :lulz: :lulz: Oh don't even. I know geeks. I grew up with geeks, and most of my IRL close friend circle are geeks. You're no geek; you aren't worthy of the term.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 08:05:00 AM
Just ignore me or something. Wouldn't that solve everything for you?
Actually, yeah, that's what's coming up next. :lol: Given that you've proven yourself not worth the effort.
Well Nigel, I respectfully and remorsefully offer you my condolences. Weather that means anything to you or not. Yes, getting dumped is utterly and humiliatingly trivial compared to the darkness you have endured.
I just really never imagined that such a petty over generalization of a group as diverse as humanity itself would lead to so much indignation. I thought raising this seemingly inconsequential question would be an easy and fun way to lay it to rest further.
I see now that I was wrong to attempt this so crudely because of the possibility that I am talking to someone who has faced real life treachery.
This is in no way a bad experiences contest, but I am no stranger to tragedy either.
Right when I was on my way to my dad's funeral, my childhood pet of 14 years started yelping in pain; had to be brought to the vet on the way and was put to sleep during without getting to say goodbyes. I was alone for months immediately afterward, and life has just never felt the same since.
Thanking you doesn't mean I'm not a complete ingrate, but thank you for the time you have spent answering my unintelligible questions. I understand if I'm irredeemable. Everyone writes me off as bull shit, I'm used to it.
Fuck though, I've had like 5 concussion, how many stitches have you had on your head? The most stitched I've had were 24. I got called hairy potter growing up because of the big scar on my forehead. Dyslexia/adhd and keeping up in school is a struggle involving a lot of effort with very poor grades. If anyone says otherwise who claims to have those things, they are miss diagnosed. I've almost failed every English class I have ever taken and have had to pull a lot of all nighters to receive a failing grade. I have to spell check every single sentence. I'm glad for you guys that you are so fucking literate.
I never once claimed to be a good person or qualified to be a forum poster, I just wanted to try it out. All I have done is spent 3 entire days trying to involve myself in a very eccentric non-pointless on-line community which I think deserves as much attention from people much less shitty than me.
So kill me.....
That being said, however this ends, this has not been a waist of my time, because I am taking self-reform serious.
Boo fucking hoo and bullshit. Grow some balls and take responsibility for your behaviour.
What the fuck is this wall of bullshit?
I've also had 5 concussions, two of which put me in the hospital, and am epileptic, most likely as a result of repeated concussions in childhood. Do you really want to start playing the "who's had it worse" game? Do you actually think that comparing childhood (or adult) tragedies, illnesses, and setbacks will generate some kind of excuse for piss-poor behavior? For trivializing and dehumanizing other groups of people with "petty overgeneralizations"?
Instead of being a shitty person and then beating yourself up or making excuses for being a shitty person, why not just try to be a better person? Maybe a thoughtful person instead of a thoughtlessly petty overgeneralizing person?
There's also the question of why you'd expect us to care enough to bother reading your sob story when you clearly don't care about half the human race enough not to resort to categorism.
I strongly suspect this guy is about 15 years old.
So, yeah.
Dumb fucking post full of whiny excuses as to why he said a shitty thing.
Angry response
Angry response
Angry response
Roger calls him out on his spelling.
:lulz:
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 07:33:30 PM
Fuck though, I've had like 5 concussion, how many stitches have you had on your head?
Stop landing on your head.
TGRR,
Full of lots of useful advice yet doesn't care about your problems.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 06, 2014, 08:55:41 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 07:33:30 PM
Fuck though, I've had like 5 concussion, how many stitches have you had on your head?
Stop landing on your head.
TGRR,
Full of lots of useful advice yet doesn't care about your problems.
5??? I used to skateboard, ffs, half of my teens teens were spent concussed. My head has bona fide dents in.
Yeah, I spent my adolescence literally being brainwashed by a misogynist and I don't use that as an excuse to hate women.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when girls are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
Just seeing this now. Seems like trolling. But, I'll play:
Item 1: I'm the low end of average height, just above the high end of short. I've done well enough in the past.
Item 2: TMI territory, but I've measured it and compared it to reported averages, and I'm exactly average. But the thing is there, the chick's gotta be interested in you in the first place before she even takes a look. And if you're so small at that point that she tells you to put your pants back on, you're pretty fucking small. Chicks aren't interested in the size of your dick until they're actually interested in it to begin with.
Item 3: Hahaha. Yeah, I still have done alright for myself regardless
Item 4: See item 3.
Item 5: See items 3 and 4.
Item 6: I'm not overweight, but otherwise see items 3 through 5
Item 7: I don't have a car at all, nor have I ever owned one. My girlfriend does, and she usually drives unless it's night time and she asks me to because she has shitty night vision, where I am largely nocturnal by nature. I live in a city and can take public transportation, which is a good idea for me considering items 3 and 5. This might also contribute to me doing ok in the item number 6 department, since I walk a lot.
Item 8: See item 3, since it's directly related to that
Item 9: I'm a dork, but I'm generally a likeable person. What do you mean by popular, and by extension, how old are you? I'm 32. Popular isn't really a relevant term outside of high school, since once you reach adulthood, you've probably found a social circle where popularity doesn't really factor in.
Item 10: For a short, bald dude with relatively bad myopia and lack of muscle tone, I think I'm an alright looking dude. My eyes are apparently my prettiest feature. They're more noticeable when the glasses are off or I'm wearing contacts, but I'd say I'm about average.
Assessment: If you're not doing ok in the ladies department, it's your personality. Evidence to back this up: You had 10 items where you apparently have shortcomings and don't have any sort of mitigating personality traits, since these things aren't actually all that important if you're not a jackass.
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 06, 2014, 03:48:34 AM
Quote from: Pergamos on March 05, 2014, 06:57:13 PM
Quote from: Obligatory Resignation on March 05, 2014, 02:28:28 PM
Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on March 05, 2014, 02:23:16 PM
"literally all XXXXXX" statements are never correct. Some people will always be too smart/brain damaged to conform to your chosen demographic.
Not to say a whole bunch of these things won't hold true for a large percentage, given that a large percentage of any group are usually idiots. Ask any anthropologist why the list makes sense and it's pretty straightforward monkey brain wiring. However, as we discussed recently, monkey brain wiring is not fixed. assume otherwise at your peril.
That sounds comforting; yet I am not yet convinced that people care about more than that.
Which leads to my discomfort in experiencing any form of agreement with said monkey.
Either you only care abut those things, in which case why does it bother you that other people are the same way? Or else you care about more than that, in which case not all people are that way.
If the vast mojority of people were that way; why point out the few abnormalities and give the bulk of the population the credit?
You are assuming you are a special snowflake, you are probably not. In this case I know you aren't because I know I'm also an exception as are all the women I have been involve with. It's generally best to assume other human beings are like yourself unless given some reason to believe otherwise.
One time I looked out the window just in time to see my car get smashed by an SUV. Ever since then, I have hated windows.
Don't blame me if that doesn't make sense! I hit my head once when I was a kid (like you've every done that before)
Even the Truetm Believers in the righteousness of normalcy within the range of the Gauss Bell acknowledge that not everyone has the same priorities and same mind-set as themselves...
THIS MAKES YOU WORSE THAN THEM, at least a TrueBeliever acknowledges the existance of DIFFERENCE and OTHERNESS (satanizing it nevertheless or pathologizing it)
what you do is think that everyone thinks/feels the same way as you, and that is as egocentrical as a 5 year old - congratulations on having the analytical capacity of a pre-schooler.
Isn't the technical definition of 'geek' a carnival performer who does gross/crazy shit like bite the head off chickens for entertainment?
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on March 08, 2014, 04:28:05 AM
Isn't the technical definition of 'geek' a carnival performer who does gross/crazy shit like bite the head off chickens for entertainment?
Nope. Pretty sure you're thinking of the definition of Politician
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
Quote from: Cain on March 08, 2014, 07:47:51 AM
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
:lulz: Well I guess he showed us.
Quote from: Cain on March 08, 2014, 07:47:51 AM
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
fuckyourlivesallsuck.com domain is available. Open DNS google suggestions bring up an interesting youtube link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk3bqdrGyGc) Kinda having a hard time visualising how this works :eek:
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
Quote from: The Johnny on March 08, 2014, 03:40:58 AM
Even the Truetm Believers in the righteousness of normalcy within the range of the Gauss Bell acknowledge that not everyone has the same priorities and same mind-set as themselves...
THIS MAKES YOU WORSE THAN THEM, at least a TrueBeliever acknowledges the existance of DIFFERENCE and OTHERNESS (satanizing it nevertheless or pathologizing it)
what you do is think that everyone thinks/feels the same way as you, and that is as egocentrical as a 5 year old - congratulations on having the analytical capacity of a pre-schooler.
Was that directed at me?
Quote from: Nigel on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
Tons, actually. :)
Funny thing is, not a damn thing on that list factored into my selection of partner.
He's an awesome guy that treats me like I'm an real person, gives a shit what I care about, and treats me like a real person that he actually cares about.
Did you guys chase this one off before I could tear a strip off him?
Quote from: Luna on March 08, 2014, 10:06:23 PM
Quote from: Nigel on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
Tons, actually. :)
Funny thing is, not a damn thing on that list factored into my selection of partner.
He's an awesome guy that treats me like I'm an real person, gives a shit what I care about, and treats me like a real person that he actually cares about.
Did you guys chase this one off before I could tear a strip off him?
Yeah, he's gone off in a cloud of butthurt.
It's amazing how that whole "treats me like a real person" thing makes such a huge difference!
Quote from: Pergamos on March 08, 2014, 09:32:02 PM
Quote from: The Johnny on March 08, 2014, 03:40:58 AM
Even the Truetm Believers in the righteousness of normalcy within the range of the Gauss Bell acknowledge that not everyone has the same priorities and same mind-set as themselves...
THIS MAKES YOU WORSE THAN THEM, at least a TrueBeliever acknowledges the existance of DIFFERENCE and OTHERNESS (satanizing it nevertheless or pathologizing it)
what you do is think that everyone thinks/feels the same way as you, and that is as egocentrical as a 5 year old - congratulations on having the analytical capacity of a pre-schooler.
Was that directed at me?
No, the OP.
Quote from: Tom on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
:lulz:
"I'm here to stay!"
"FUCKYOUGUYSYARNGANARG!"
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 09, 2014, 03:45:37 AM
Quote from: Tom on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
:lulz:
"I'm here to stay!"
"FUCKYOUGUYSYARNGANARG!"
Yeah, that didn't take long.
"You people are challenging my precious beliefs!"
Quote from: Tom on March 09, 2014, 03:20:58 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 09, 2014, 03:45:37 AM
Quote from: Tom on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
:lulz:
"I'm here to stay!"
"FUCKYOUGUYSYARNGANARG!"
Yeah, that didn't take long.
"You people are challenging my precious beliefs!"
The most dangerous thing about the fart blanket is that it makes you unable to survive without it, socially, in a very real sense.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 09, 2014, 04:08:48 PM
Quote from: Tom on March 09, 2014, 03:20:58 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 09, 2014, 03:45:37 AM
Quote from: Tom on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
:lulz:
"I'm here to stay!"
"FUCKYOUGUYSYARNGANARG!"
Yeah, that didn't take long.
"You people are challenging my precious beliefs!"
The most dangerous thing about the fart blanket is that it makes you unable to survive without it, socially, in a very real sense.
My favorite part, actually, was this:
Quote from: Resigned Obligatorily on March 06, 2014, 07:33:30 PM
I just really never imagined that such a petty over generalization of a group as diverse as humanity itself would lead to so much indignation. I thought raising this seemingly inconsequential question would be an easy and fun way to lay it to rest further.
He just never imagined. That a petty overgeneralization about a group of people would lead to
indignation. :lulz:
Because misogyny is "inconsequential".
Evidently, wherever he normally hangs out, people treat it as such.
Because walking into a bar full of black people and telling a nigger joke is a GREAT way to lay racist stereotypes to rest, right? :lol:
Quote from: Tom on March 09, 2014, 04:17:23 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 09, 2014, 04:08:48 PM
Quote from: Tom on March 09, 2014, 03:20:58 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on March 09, 2014, 03:45:37 AM
Quote from: Tom on March 08, 2014, 08:53:16 PM
My only regret is that he left before all the female members of the board had a chance to tell him how much sex they're all having with people who aren't him.
:lulz:
"I'm here to stay!"
"FUCKYOUGUYSYARNGANARG!"
Yeah, that didn't take long.
"You people are challenging my precious beliefs!"
The most dangerous thing about the fart blanket is that it makes you unable to survive without it, socially, in a very real sense.
My favorite part, actually, was this:
Quote from: Resigned Obligatorily on March 06, 2014, 07:33:30 PM
I just really never imagined that such a petty over generalization of a group as diverse as humanity itself would lead to so much indignation. I thought raising this seemingly inconsequential question would be an easy and fun way to lay it to rest further.
He just never imagined. That a petty overgeneralization about a group of people would lead to indignation. :lulz:
Because misogyny is "inconsequential".
Evidently, wherever he normally hangs out, people treat it as such.
I'm thinking "wherever he normally hangs out", it's just him and a tubesock
Quote from: Tom on March 09, 2014, 04:18:18 PM
Because walking into a bar full of black people and telling a nigger joke is a GREAT way to lay racist stereotypes to rest, right? :lol:
Would you stop giving me funny ideas that will get my ass kicked!
Dammit, now this plan is stuck in my head until i do something with it.
"TDS".
Check the IP. If it matches someone in Victoria, Australia. It's John Tate that Objectivist that Roger,Stella, and Nigel trolled a few times on my wall.
short, stumpdicked, poor, bald, plebian, chubby pedestrian, unemployed and unpopular I think
Quote from: Junkenstein on March 05, 2014, 03:16:05 PM
HEY GUYS, SMASHING MY BALLS WITH A HAMMER HURTS. SHOULD I CONTINUE?
Just read this whole thread start to finish. I love everyone so much.
Quote from: Slyph on August 20, 2014, 03:45:07 AM
short, stumpdicked, poor, bald, plebian, chubby pedestrian, unemployed and unpopular I think
Hey now, I know quite a few nice people that are any combination of short, poor, bald etc etc. Don't use things that aren't insults as insults.
Come to think of it, most insults usually aren't as insulting as the insulter thinks.
Quote from: Regret on August 20, 2014, 05:21:43 PM
Quote from: Slyph on August 20, 2014, 03:45:07 AM
short, stumpdicked, poor, bald, plebian, chubby pedestrian, unemployed and unpopular I think
Hey now, I know quite a few nice people that are any combination of short, poor, bald etc etc. Don't use things that aren't insults as insults.
Come to think of it, most insults usually aren't as insulting as the insulter thinks.
Uh, pretty sure he's ironically referring to the list of items in the OP.
Quote from: Resigned Obligatorily on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when girls are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
He pretty much described me fully. That's humbling.
I always had you pegged for well-hung.
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on March 08, 2014, 02:58:05 PM
Quote from: Cain on March 08, 2014, 07:47:51 AM
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
:lulz: Well I guess he showed us.
As email: nigger@nig.nog, i think i get his logic.
Hes been beaten in an argument and either
a)doesnt want the community to be able to dox him for extended hilarity (why i myself retained my idiot-email)
b) hes ragequit the argument and desired to delete his account so that he isnt tempted to ever return, but on finding it not deletable on the user end, changed his password to random characters, and altered his email to a dead end so that he cant recover it, effectively "deleting" himself
All your thetic categories are belong to us :evilmad:
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on August 21, 2014, 04:32:31 AM
I always had you pegged for well-hung.
That's why I said "pretty much", rather than "exactly". :wink:
Quote from: von on August 21, 2014, 05:58:57 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on March 08, 2014, 02:58:05 PM
Quote from: Cain on March 08, 2014, 07:47:51 AM
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
:lulz: Well I guess he showed us.
As email: nigger@nig.nog, i think i get his logic.
Hes been beaten in an argument and either
a)doesnt want the community to be able to dox him for extended hilarity (why i myself retained my idiot-email)
b) hes ragequit the argument and desired to delete his account so that he isnt tempted to ever return, but on finding it not deletable on the user end, changed his password to random characters, and altered his email to a dead end so that he cant recover it, effectively "deleting" himself
How can we convince you to do likewise?
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on August 21, 2014, 04:32:31 AM
I always had you pegged for well-hung.
To be fair, you're pretty good at pegging people.
Quote from: Hoopla on August 21, 2014, 01:23:56 PM
Quote from: von on August 21, 2014, 05:58:57 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on March 08, 2014, 02:58:05 PM
Quote from: Cain on March 08, 2014, 07:47:51 AM
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
:lulz: Well I guess he showed us.
As email: nigger@nig.nog, i think i get his logic.
Hes been beaten in an argument and either
a)doesnt want the community to be able to dox him for extended hilarity (why i myself retained my idiot-email)
b) hes ragequit the argument and desired to delete his account so that he isnt tempted to ever return, but on finding it not deletable on the user end, changed his password to random characters, and altered his email to a dead end so that he cant recover it, effectively "deleting" himself
How can we convince you to do likewise?
If I wanted this account removed, I'd simply ask.
I'm unsure of the administrative hierarchy, but I'm pretty sure faust is head cheese around here right?
And even in that case, I'd only be removing the account "von" to elliminate any infamy attached to that name. I'll be forthright and say if I had to, I roll an indeterminate number of alts via Tor...hell, since I'm used to identity-less communications, I'd probably be more sufferable that way anyway.
But no...I never plan to leave. I legitimately like it here and have some grand nostalgia for this place -- PD.com got me through some tough times in my younger years, so I could never abandon it.
Quote from: von on August 21, 2014, 02:43:10 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on August 21, 2014, 01:23:56 PM
Quote from: von on August 21, 2014, 05:58:57 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on March 08, 2014, 02:58:05 PM
Quote from: Cain on March 08, 2014, 07:47:51 AM
Just so you all know, the OP has changed his email to Shithead@fuckyourlivesallsuck.com
:lulz: Well I guess he showed us.
As email: nigger@nig.nog, i think i get his logic.
Hes been beaten in an argument and either
a)doesnt want the community to be able to dox him for extended hilarity (why i myself retained my idiot-email)
b) hes ragequit the argument and desired to delete his account so that he isnt tempted to ever return, but on finding it not deletable on the user end, changed his password to random characters, and altered his email to a dead end so that he cant recover it, effectively "deleting" himself
How can we convince you to do likewise?
If I wanted this account removed, I'd simply ask.
I'm unsure of the administrative hierarchy, but I'm pretty sure faust is head cheese around here right?
And even in that case, I'd only be removing the account "von" to elliminate any infamy attached to that name. I'll be forthright and say if I had to, I roll an indeterminate number of alts via Tor...hell, since I'm used to identity-less communications, I'd probably be more sufferable that way anyway.
But no...I never plan to leave. I legitimately like it here and have some grand nostalgia for this place -- PD.com got me through some tough times in my younger years, so I could never abandon it.
Faust won't delete your account, so save your breath.
And running an infinite number of alts with which to be insufferable has been done by a multitude of trolls before you, so don't go thinking you're original. :lol: We've all played that game.
Quote from: Regret on August 20, 2014, 05:21:43 PM
Quote from: Slyph on August 20, 2014, 03:45:07 AM
short, stumpdicked, poor, bald, plebian, chubby pedestrian, unemployed and unpopular I think
Hey now, I know quite a few nice people that are any combination of short, poor, bald etc etc. Don't use things that aren't insults as insults.
Come to think of it, most insults usually aren't as insulting as the insulter thinks.
Lot of that shit applies to me too. I'll let yall guess which. I'd say SOME of that applies to OP... Some of which he has a chip on his shoulder about.
Some people can rock the shortness, use the stump, own the poor, be the bald, possess plebianism, be a citadel of chubby, walk the fucking walk... roll the nickels and dimes... etc etc.
Sartre had a googly eye, Diogenes jerked it in public...
Then some people just fucking blow, attitudinally.
Re: OP - false. All those things suck, yet only to the extent that we allow them to perpetuate. The loss is how those designations affect us because we have not "located" the Self to which they refer - that would simply outstrip them all.
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on August 20, 2014, 07:53:41 PM
Quote from: Regret on August 20, 2014, 05:21:43 PM
Quote from: Slyph on August 20, 2014, 03:45:07 AM
short, stumpdicked, poor, bald, plebian, chubby pedestrian, unemployed and unpopular I think
Hey now, I know quite a few nice people that are any combination of short, poor, bald etc etc. Don't use things that aren't insults as insults.
Come to think of it, most insults usually aren't as insulting as the insulter thinks.
Uh, pretty sure he's ironically referring to the list of items in the OP.
Quote from: Resigned Obligatorily on March 05, 2014, 10:55:51 AM
Someone made this list, and I saved it because its an interesting concept.
How wrong is this?
I really think this is true for when you meet people.
This doesn't seem to apply when logic gives up and
a relationship takes over, or when girls are trying
to take pity on someone. Thats usually a friend zone thing anyway.
Literally all women care about.
1. How tall you are
2. How big your dick is
3. How much money you make
4. How much hair you have
5. Your social status
6. How fit you are
7. What car you drive (and other various status symbols)
8. What you do at work
9. How popular you are
10. How handsome you are
I'm hoping that some will try to prove or disprove this, inevitable creating some insight about life.
Either that, or you all can just kill me.
Look, just because i responded without reading properly... I forgot my point.
My realisation stands though: Insults don't have to be as insulting as the insulter thinks they are.
I dig, but the guy was all like "HERE'S WHAT I'M INSECURE ABOUT"
It was an outstandingly short list, congratulations!