https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr7/text
I'm not even gonna describe this.
It was the next logical step in the 4 year tantrum over the ACA.
They won't fucking let up, will they?
Quote from: (Doktor (Nephew Twiddleton (Twid)) Blight) on April 16, 2014, 04:00:20 PM
They won't fucking let up, will they?
Religious fanatics typically don't.
There's a really nasty provision in there.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 16, 2014, 04:19:25 PM
Quote from: (Doktor (Nephew Twiddleton (Twid)) Blight) on April 16, 2014, 04:00:20 PM
They won't fucking let up, will they?
Religious fanatics typically don't.
There's a really nasty provision in there.
Section 308? Edit: No I think I misread that.
Quote from: Faust on April 16, 2014, 04:24:00 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 16, 2014, 04:19:25 PM
Quote from: (Doktor (Nephew Twiddleton (Twid)) Blight) on April 16, 2014, 04:00:20 PM
They won't fucking let up, will they?
Religious fanatics typically don't.
There's a really nasty provision in there.
Section 308? Edit: No I think I misread that.
It's 308.
Because the woman would have to PROVE rape or abortion to be exempted. Now, how long does it take to convict a rapist?
About 2.5 years.
This one?
QuoteNo health care service furnished—
(1)by or in a health care facility owned or operated by the Federal Government; or
(2)by any physician or other individual employed by the Federal Government to provide health care services within the scope of the physician's or individual's employment, may include abortion.
or does it get worse?
Oh
Quote309.Application to District of Columbia
In this chapter:
(1)Any reference to funds appropriated by Federal law shall be treated as including any amounts within the budget of the District of Columbia that have been approved by Act of Congress pursuant to section 446 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (or any applicable successor Federal law).
(2)The term Federal Government includes the government of the District of Columbia.
Also:
Quote4.Prohibiting taxpayer funded abortions
I'm morally opposed to having my tax dollars pay for warfare and capital punishment. Can I have that prohibited too? Err.... on second thought having private companies run that would be far worse.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 16, 2014, 04:28:29 PM
Quote from: Faust on April 16, 2014, 04:24:00 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 16, 2014, 04:19:25 PM
Quote from: (Doktor (Nephew Twiddleton (Twid)) Blight) on April 16, 2014, 04:00:20 PM
They won't fucking let up, will they?
Religious fanatics typically don't.
There's a really nasty provision in there.
Section 308? Edit: No I think I misread that.
It's 308.
Because the woman would have to PROVE rape or abortion to be exempted. Now, how long does it take to convict a rapist?
About 2.5 years.
Damn, missed that implication.
Quote from: (Doktor (Nephew Twiddleton (Twid)) Blight) on April 16, 2014, 04:30:27 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 16, 2014, 04:28:29 PM
Quote from: Faust on April 16, 2014, 04:24:00 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on April 16, 2014, 04:19:25 PM
Quote from: (Doktor (Nephew Twiddleton (Twid)) Blight) on April 16, 2014, 04:00:20 PM
They won't fucking let up, will they?
Religious fanatics typically don't.
There's a really nasty provision in there.
Section 308? Edit: No I think I misread that.
It's 308.
Because the woman would have to PROVE rape or abortion to be exempted. Now, how long does it take to convict a rapist?
About 2.5 years.
Damn, missed that implication.
That's because you live in a sane environment.
Out here, it's how you think.
"Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean They aren't paranoid, too."