Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Or Kill Me => Topic started by: Meunster on January 01, 2015, 08:22:05 AM

Title: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Meunster on January 01, 2015, 08:22:05 AM
I need to write this down so it's out of my head and I can fap before bed.

So basically my bud cant understand wittgenstein, so I'm going to use an analogy.


It's like playing texas hold 'em. Your two cards are your life experiences and everything you know, the other persons two cards is everything they know, and the 3 cards in the middle are the conversation. You both can be having the same flop, but it's the cards you hold that determine your reaction. In poker you could always ask to see the other persons hand, how ever in a conversation it's impossible, because when they start to tell you about their life, and why they are like they are. It becomes the flop/conversation and your 2 cards/life effect how you perceive it. So you can never truly understand their cards and how/why they are what ever they are, and why they have those reactions.

Wittgenstein realized something like this, and said "1.1 this leaves to much confusion, 1.2 to solve this shit we can all talk like lawyer dictionary robots. " That way we take alot of ourselves out of the conversation.  So instead of texas you play 52 card pick up.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: The Johnny on January 01, 2015, 11:57:49 AM
Next time, jack off before writing, or do it till you pass out.

Happy New Years.

Sincerily,

Teh Johnyx
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Reginald Ret on January 01, 2015, 07:27:43 PM
That sounds about right.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Meunster on January 01, 2015, 08:16:49 PM
Quote from: The Johnny on January 01, 2015, 11:57:49 AM
Next time, jack off before writing, or do it till you pass out.

Happy New Years.

Sincerily,

Teh Johnyx


I tried, but I kept thinking of Wittgenstein. It was a real boner kill.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on January 01, 2015, 10:14:29 PM
Hey so I don't know if you know this, but Muenster isn't spelled like that.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Meunster on January 01, 2015, 10:48:13 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on January 01, 2015, 10:14:29 PM
Hey so I don't know if you know this, but Muenster isn't spelled like that.

I know, but who cares?
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on January 01, 2015, 10:51:45 PM
Quote from: Meunster on January 01, 2015, 10:48:13 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on January 01, 2015, 10:14:29 PM
Hey so I don't know if you know this, but Muenster isn't spelled like that.

I know, but who cares?

Exactly.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Doktor Howl on January 02, 2015, 03:06:54 AM
Who the fuck plays Texas Hold 'Em?

Worst version of poker ever.  In fact, it's not poker.  It's some retarded crap FROM TEXAS.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on January 02, 2015, 05:09:46 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on January 02, 2015, 03:06:54 AM
Who the fuck plays Texas Hold 'Em?

Worst version of poker ever.  In fact, it's not poker.  It's some retarded crap FROM TEXAS.

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Cainad (dec.) on January 05, 2015, 04:34:26 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on January 02, 2015, 03:06:54 AM
Who the fuck plays Texas Hold 'Em?

Worst version of poker ever.  In fact, it's not poker.  It's some retarded crap FROM TEXAS.

I'm really glad that I'm not alone in this feeling. I don't know why it's the dominant version of poker these days.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: P3nT4gR4m on January 05, 2015, 06:31:53 PM
Poss related to the fact that taylor swift is the dominant form of music?
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Junkenstein on January 05, 2015, 06:37:41 PM
Quote from: Cainad (dec.) on January 05, 2015, 04:34:26 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on January 02, 2015, 03:06:54 AM
Who the fuck plays Texas Hold 'Em?

Worst version of poker ever.  In fact, it's not poker.  It's some retarded crap FROM TEXAS.

I'm really glad that I'm not alone in this feeling. I don't know why it's the dominant version of poker these days.

Because you only have two cards to deal with. This is much less complicated than 5 or gods forbid, 7.

It also allows larger numbers of rubes on the same table. Ever wonder why/who made it the "dominant new form of poker"? Clue - Casinos.
Title: Re: Wittgenstein for the laid man.
Post by: Cain on January 06, 2015, 07:21:24 AM
Quote from: Junkenstein on January 05, 2015, 06:37:41 PM
Quote from: Cainad (dec.) on January 05, 2015, 04:34:26 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on January 02, 2015, 03:06:54 AM
Who the fuck plays Texas Hold 'Em?

Worst version of poker ever.  In fact, it's not poker.  It's some retarded crap FROM TEXAS.

I'm really glad that I'm not alone in this feeling. I don't know why it's the dominant version of poker these days.

Because you only have two cards to deal with. This is much less complicated than 5 or gods forbid, 7.

It also allows larger numbers of rubes on the same table. Ever wonder why/who made it the "dominant new form of poker"? Clue - Casinos.

Texans unable to count beyond two confirmed.