Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Apple Talk => Topic started by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:01:18 am

Title: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:01:18 am
 :lulz:

Requia, you're a fucking psycho.

 :lulz:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 03:08:06 am
I undid the ban.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:08:36 am
I undid the ban.

Who gives a fuck?  The fact is, you did it.  Now go the fuck away, you fucking freak.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 03:42:14 am
Logs?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:43:01 am
Logs?

You're gonna have to ask Req for 'em, because I didn't screen shot.  Not that I think Req has the integrity to post 'em.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 01, 2009, 03:43:58 am
I DO IT

BRB
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 01, 2009, 03:47:07 am

[9:45pm] TGRR: the maintenance crew isn't on strike, too?
[9:45pm] kel: bbiab
[9:45pm] kel runs off
[9:45pm] ThornIs: no just the miners
[9:45pm] TGRR: It's MY fucking internets
[9:45pm] ThornIs: different unions
[9:45pm] TGRR: It's in MY computer.
[9:45pm] TGRR: No sympathy strike?
[9:45pm] TGRR: Hang on, THornis
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: whee
[9:45pm] Requiem set a ban on *!*Mibbit@*.hsd1.az.comcast.net.
[9:46pm] TGRR: banned
[9:46pm] TGRR was kicked from the chat room by Requiem. (Requiem)
[9:46pm] ThornIs: they can't do that anymore due to the equpiment, its no dangerious if the equipment isn't maintained
[9:46pm] Requiem: somebody remind me to undo that in 10 minutes or so
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: undo what?
[9:47pm] Requiem: the ban
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: who'd you ban?
[9:47pm] Requiem: TGRR
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: ... oh.
[9:47pm] Requiem: for beepping me repeatedly
[9:48pm] Requiem removed the ban on *!*Mibbit@*.hsd1.az.comcast.net.



TA DAAAAAAAA

-THIS FRED DELIVERS!
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:47:50 am
You left the earlier argument off.

It's different when it's in context.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 01, 2009, 03:48:37 am
You left the earlier argument off.

It's different when it's in context.

OH WELL BRB AGAIN :D
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:48:54 am
Also...

Quote
[9:46pm] Requiem: somebody remind me to undo that in 10 minutes or so

Someone remind me to regain my respect for Requiem in never or so.

 :lulz:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 03:49:56 am
-THIS FRED DELIVERS!

UNLIKE THAT OTHER FRED  :argh!:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: derpsichord on September 01, 2009, 03:51:42 am
 :mad: INTERNET : you know the rest
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:52:44 am
:mad: INTERNET : you know the rest

You need to learn to see the humor in these things...you know, instead of posting trite, overdone bullshit that gets in the way of the funny.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 01, 2009, 03:53:54 am
 :argh!: ALL FREDS DELIVER!

GODDAMNIT EVERYONE STOP POSTING WHEN IM TRYING TO THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE TO HIT SUBMIT BUTTON



[9:30pm] TGRR: Requiem is the same as Requia on PD, right?
[9:31pm] TGRR: Same person?
[9:31pm] Requiem: yes
[9:31pm] TGRR: Fuck off, I wasn't talking to you.
[9:31pm] ThornIs: the only thing i know about dnd is i got this first edition hard cover dungeon masters guide gary gygax book that everyone wants so...
[9:31pm] TGRR: I was talking about you.
[9:31pm] TGRR: It had nothing to do with DND
[9:31pm] ThornIs: oh i thought it did
[9:31pm] TGRR: It had to do with me cracking a joke, and requia being a total fucking asshole about it.
[9:31pm] TGRR: I GUESS I'M "SLIPPING".
[9:32pm] TGRR: Eat a dick
[9:32pm] Requiem: Apparently criticizing TGRR's put downs is a cardinal sin
[9:32pm] TGRR: SORRY, I'M SLIPPING AND CAN'T BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR MY WORDS.
[9:32pm] TGRR: And it wasn't a put down, you lying piece of shit.
[9:33pm] TGRR was granted voice by Requiem.
[9:33pm] ThornIs: i dont got into any dvd thread so i have idea what is going on
[9:33pm] TGRR: It was a joke, and it was aimed at a particular comment, not to "put someone down", unlike what you said, you fucking hypocrite.
[9:33pm] TGRR: So here's a possible solution, Requiem:
[9:34pm] TGRR: You never, ever speak to me again, and I will return the favor.  Deal?
[9:34pm] TGRR: Or about, for that matter
[9:34pm] Requiem: I'll think about it
[9:34pm] TGRR: Fuck off.
[9:34pm] TGRR: It was a one time offer
[9:34pm] Requiem: that makes the decision easy then
[9:34pm] TGRR: So now I guess I'll just start throwing shit non-stop
[9:35pm] ThornIs: well back to commercials form the 80's
[9:35pm] TGRR: Shut it, you obnoxious piece of vermin.
[9:35pm] TGRR: Sorry, Thornis.  There's only one conversation as long as the fuckwad and I are both here.
[9:36pm] TGRR: I can't fucking stand a liar.  Which Requiem is.
[9:37pm] ThornIs: im confuses as always lol
[9:37pm] ThornIs: confused
[9:37pm] TGRR: It's easy.
[9:37pm] TGRR: I made a joke.
[9:37pm] Requiem: ThornIs: you know how to make an eyeroll smiley with ASCII?
[9:37pm] TGRR: Requiem decided to turn it into a personal attack aginst me.
[9:37pm] TGRR: And then she lied.
[9:37pm] TGRR: It's really just that simple.
[9:38pm] ThornIs: no i know no ascii lol
[9:39pm] TGRR: Sorry, liar, I ave you a chance to avoid this shit.
[9:39pm] TGRR: Which will, of course, go on forever.
[9:39pm] TGRR: *gave
[9:39pm] ThornIs: so why are my irl friends up in sudbury so fucking boring and lazy and never wanna do anything
[9:40pm] TGRR: Because it's Sudbury
[9:40pm] TGRR: They all have sulfide poisoning.
[9:40pm] ThornIs: at least the ones in thunder bay are always up for something even just a bottle of scotch and a movie
[9:40pm] TGRR: In Sudbury, a wild night is spending the evening in front of the TV in Mom's basement.
[9:40pm] TGRR: smoking shitty ditchweed
[9:40pm] ThornIs: the mines have been on strike for a month now so we're all huddled in the house cause the miners are getting antsy and violent
[9:41pm] ENKI-][: (*).(*) is probably not eyeroll. it is probably tits.
[9:41pm] TGRR: So join them
[9:41pm] ENKI-][: damn tits.
[9:41pm] TGRR: This place is better when I remember to ignore Enki.
[9:41pm] TGRR: I wish I could ignore Requiem, but she's a halfop
[9:42pm] TGRR: One of MS's less wise moves.
[9:42pm] ThornIs: apparently the miners are starting to beat up the scabs now
[9:42pm] ThornIs:  :eek:
[9:42pm] TGRR: Good.
[9:42pm] TGRR: Fucking scabs
[9:43pm] Requiem: Unless you actually want me to respond, call me the fuckwit or something, it beeps me when you use the full name.
[9:43pm] TGRR: (I come from a family of Hamilton wobblies)
[9:43pm] TGRR: Shut up, asshole.
[9:43pm] TGRR: I'll fucking beep you if I want to.
[9:43pm] TGRR: Hey
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] kel: STOP IT
[9:43pm] ThornIs: my sisters boyfriend is a machanic for the mines.. basically for the last month hes been going to work and getting paid to sit there and play cards
[9:43pm] TGRR: hehe
[9:44pm] kel: :P
[9:44pm] TGRR: It's my internets, I can do what I want. :P
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:56:48 am
So, in order...

:argh!: ALL FREDS DELIVER!

GODDAMNIT EVERYONE STOP POSTING WHEN IM TRYING TO THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE TO HIT SUBMIT BUTTON



[9:30pm] TGRR: Requiem is the same as Requia on PD, right?
[9:31pm] TGRR: Same person?
[9:31pm] Requiem: yes
[9:31pm] TGRR: Fuck off, I wasn't talking to you.
[9:31pm] ThornIs: the only thing i know about dnd is i got this first edition hard cover dungeon masters guide gary gygax book that everyone wants so...
[9:31pm] TGRR: I was talking about you.
[9:31pm] TGRR: It had nothing to do with DND
[9:31pm] ThornIs: oh i thought it did
[9:31pm] TGRR: It had to do with me cracking a joke, and requia being a total fucking asshole about it.
[9:31pm] TGRR: I GUESS I'M "SLIPPING".
[9:32pm] TGRR: Eat a dick
[9:32pm] Requiem: Apparently criticizing TGRR's put downs is a cardinal sin
[9:32pm] TGRR: SORRY, I'M SLIPPING AND CAN'T BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR MY WORDS.
[9:32pm] TGRR: And it wasn't a put down, you lying piece of shit.
[9:33pm] TGRR was granted voice by Requiem.
[9:33pm] ThornIs: i dont got into any dvd thread so i have idea what is going on
[9:33pm] TGRR: It was a joke, and it was aimed at a particular comment, not to "put someone down", unlike what you said, you fucking hypocrite.
[9:33pm] TGRR: So here's a possible solution, Requiem:
[9:34pm] TGRR: You never, ever speak to me again, and I will return the favor.  Deal?
[9:34pm] TGRR: Or about, for that matter
[9:34pm] Requiem: I'll think about it
[9:34pm] TGRR: Fuck off.
[9:34pm] TGRR: It was a one time offer
[9:34pm] Requiem: that makes the decision easy then
[9:34pm] TGRR: So now I guess I'll just start throwing shit non-stop
[9:35pm] ThornIs: well back to commercials form the 80's
[9:35pm] TGRR: Shut it, you obnoxious piece of vermin.
[9:35pm] TGRR: Sorry, Thornis.  There's only one conversation as long as the fuckwad and I are both here.
[9:36pm] TGRR: I can't fucking stand a liar.  Which Requiem is.
[9:37pm] ThornIs: im confuses as always lol
[9:37pm] ThornIs: confused
[9:37pm] TGRR: It's easy.
[9:37pm] TGRR: I made a joke.
[9:37pm] Requiem: ThornIs: you know how to make an eyeroll smiley with ASCII?
[9:37pm] TGRR: Requiem decided to turn it into a personal attack aginst me.
[9:37pm] TGRR: And then she lied.
[9:37pm] TGRR: It's really just that simple.
[9:38pm] ThornIs: no i know no ascii lol
[9:39pm] TGRR: Sorry, liar, I ave you a chance to avoid this shit.
[9:39pm] TGRR: Which will, of course, go on forever.
[9:39pm] TGRR: *gave
[9:39pm] ThornIs: so why are my irl friends up in sudbury so fucking boring and lazy and never wanna do anything
[9:40pm] TGRR: Because it's Sudbury
[9:40pm] TGRR: They all have sulfide poisoning.
[9:40pm] ThornIs: at least the ones in thunder bay are always up for something even just a bottle of scotch and a movie
[9:40pm] TGRR: In Sudbury, a wild night is spending the evening in front of the TV in Mom's basement.
[9:40pm] TGRR: smoking shitty ditchweed
[9:40pm] ThornIs: the mines have been on strike for a month now so we're all huddled in the house cause the miners are getting antsy and violent
[9:41pm] ENKI-][: (*).(*) is probably not eyeroll. it is probably tits.
[9:41pm] TGRR: So join them
[9:41pm] ENKI-][: damn tits.
[9:41pm] TGRR: This place is better when I remember to ignore Enki.
[9:41pm] TGRR: I wish I could ignore Requiem, but she's a halfop
[9:42pm] TGRR: One of MS's less wise moves.
[9:42pm] ThornIs: apparently the miners are starting to beat up the scabs now
[9:42pm] ThornIs:  :eek:
[9:42pm] TGRR: Good.
[9:42pm] TGRR: Fucking scabs
[9:43pm] Requiem: Unless you actually want me to respond, call me the fuckwit or something, it beeps me when you use the full name.
[9:43pm] TGRR: (I come from a family of Hamilton wobblies)
[9:43pm] TGRR: Shut up, asshole.
[9:43pm] TGRR: I'll fucking beep you if I want to.
[9:43pm] TGRR: Hey
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] kel: STOP IT
[9:43pm] ThornIs: my sisters boyfriend is a machanic for the mines.. basically for the last month hes been going to work and getting paid to sit there and play cards
[9:43pm] TGRR: hehe
[9:44pm] kel: :P
[9:44pm] TGRR: It's my internets, I can do what I want. :P
..

[9:45pm] TGRR: the maintenance crew isn't on strike, too?
[9:45pm] kel: bbiab
[9:45pm] kel runs off
[9:45pm] ThornIs: no just the miners
[9:45pm] TGRR: It's MY fucking internets
[9:45pm] ThornIs: different unions
[9:45pm] TGRR: It's in MY computer.
[9:45pm] TGRR: No sympathy strike?
[9:45pm] TGRR: Hang on, THornis
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: whee
[9:45pm] Requiem set a ban on *!*Mibbit@*.hsd1.az.comcast.net.
[9:46pm] TGRR: banned
[9:46pm] TGRR was kicked from the chat room by Requiem. (Requiem)
[9:46pm] ThornIs: they can't do that anymore due to the equpiment, its no dangerious if the equipment isn't maintained
[9:46pm] Requiem: somebody remind me to undo that in 10 minutes or so
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: undo what?
[9:47pm] Requiem: the ban
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: who'd you ban?
[9:47pm] Requiem: TGRR
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: ... oh.
[9:47pm] Requiem: for beepping me repeatedly
[9:48pm] Requiem removed the ban on *!*Mibbit@*.hsd1.az.comcast.net.



TA DAAAAAAAA

-THIS FRED DELIVERS!
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 03:57:24 am
 :lol:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 03:58:26 am
:lol:

As I'm sure you've noticed, I was being very civil.   :lol:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 03:59:00 am
As always.
So there must of been some argument even before that, correct?
Was that in the forums?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 01, 2009, 03:59:28 am
so i did it back asswards but eventually FRED DELIVERED. now whares her tip!
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: derpsichord on September 01, 2009, 03:59:58 am
:mad: INTERNET : you know the rest

You need to learn to see the humor in these things...you know, instead of posting trite, overdone bullshit that gets in the way of the funny.
:horrormirth:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:00:03 am
As always.
So there must of been some argument even before that, correct?
Was that in the forums?

Yeah, it was in the DND thread.  I was joking around, doing the omniscient Rain God bit, and she decided to get nasty for no reason.

BRB with link.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 04:00:46 am
now whares her tip!
(http://bitterpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/q-tip.jpg)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:00:55 am
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=18505.135

Starts with 2d post down.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:01:16 am
:mad: INTERNET : you know the rest

You need to learn to see the humor in these things...you know, instead of posting trite, overdone bullshit that gets in the way of the funny.
:horrormirth:

How is that horrormirth?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: derpsichord on September 01, 2009, 04:02:27 am
It's a mixed bag.  :rimshot:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:02:52 am
It's a mixed bag.  :rimshot:

Oy
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 04:03:22 am
(http://content.etilize.com/Large/11962324.jpg)
Before this shit gets nasty
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 04:03:51 am
Me or derpsichord?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:04:22 am
Me or derpsichord?

Yeah.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 04:05:58 am
Me or derpsichord?
derpsichord


Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:07:08 am
Me or derpsichord?
derpsichord




Party pooper.   :lulz:

Gotta admit, you seem to be right about derpsichord, though.  But Requia isn't much higher up the food chain.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: derpsichord on September 01, 2009, 04:09:00 am
Me or derpsichord?
derpsichord




Party pooper.   :lulz:

Gotta admit, you seem to be right about derpsichord, though.  But Requia isn't much higher up the food chain.
QFT  8)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Thurnez Isa on September 01, 2009, 04:10:24 am
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=18505.135

Starts with 2d post down.

sorry I tried

but I dont understand ANY of that thread
 :?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 04:10:47 am
Just saying Deprischord is a 3 times a week troll
Not really worth the flaming
If you ask me
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 04:11:07 am
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=18505.135

Starts with 2d post down.

sorry I tried

but I dont understand ANY of that thread
 :?

That makes a couple dozen of us
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:11:53 am
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=18505.135

Starts with 2d post down.

sorry I tried

but I dont understand ANY of that thread
 :?

Okay, I cracked a joke, she overreacted.

There was a reason for this, of course.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Captain Utopia on September 01, 2009, 04:18:45 am
 :| I think you should come back on anyway. No good reason, except for a love of fine drama.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:22:00 am
:| I think you should come back on anyway. No good reason, except for a love of fine drama.

Naw.  I wouldn't give the unethical fucktard the satisfaction.

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 05:06:50 am
There probably should be some limitations on the amount of Mods on IRC at a certain time
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 05:09:05 am
There are only two right now I think.  At least, MS and Eve haven't said anything.  So I assume its me and maybe Fred.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 05:10:01 am
Seems reasonable.
Are there any set rules for IRC?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 01, 2009, 05:33:22 am
There probably should be some limitations on the amount of Mods on IRC at a certain time
wait what?
so mods have to coordinate what times we can be on with each other? PFFFT :\

we are distributed across several time zones already theres not much more we can do about that

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Sir Squid Diddimus on September 01, 2009, 06:01:58 am
christ.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 01, 2009, 08:43:32 am
Looks like IRC mods maybe should be more selected not to ban for reasons of personal conflict.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 01, 2009, 11:08:47 am
There are actually very few rules in IRC as regards the OPS and H-OPS, now anyway.

Used to be everyone was OPped, as standard. Kicking and banning was not allowed then due to the hideous possibilities ( :lulz: ). Recently, MS made the decision to limit the amount of OPs (I can't remember why exactly). Fred and myself remained as OPs largely cause we've been in IRC for a long assed time, since the Chat Solutions days with Cyberus in fact. Eve is MS's 2nd in command or some shit, cause the Maddshark guys like her or something I dunno. And the Half-Ops were, I believe, supposed to rotate on a regular basis.

I don't ban anyone except for spamming (like actual spam, not setting off someone's name-bleep which I incidentally have turned off), or for persistent chat-fail (wade, daruko or StStephen style, over weeks or months). I'll also put in a 10-minute ban if one of the permanent lurkers (I hate those fuckers) is having connection problems but also has auto-join turned on. Sometimes I'll look at chat and the ONLY thing that has happened in the last half hour is John Blaze has left and rejoined 10 times.

I do kick people, occasionally for fatuous reasons, but only when I reckon that person will "get it". Like kicking Pixie a second time for the FacebookForHerCat thing. I try to at least make the kicking thing funny and to think about whether the kicked will see it as such.

The only other time I kick is when someone is doing it wade, daruko or StStephen style and someone requests I kick them to get chat going again.

Fuck coordinating when the OPs are on and how many, fuck making a bunch of rules for #Discord, and to fuck with banning someone from the channel for doing something that irritates you alone.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pope Pixie Pickle on September 01, 2009, 11:36:11 am
There are actually very few rules in IRC as regards the OPS and H-OPS, now anyway.

Used to be everyone was OPped, as standard. Kicking and banning was not allowed then due to the hideous possibilities ( :lulz: ). Recently, MS made the decision to limit the amount of OPs (I can't remember why exactly). Fred and myself remained as OPs largely cause we've been in IRC for a long assed time, since the Chat Solutions days with Cyberus in fact. Eve is MS's 2nd in command or some shit, cause the Maddshark guys like her or something I dunno. And the Half-Ops were, I believe, supposed to rotate on a regular basis.

I don't ban anyone except for spamming (like actual spam, not setting off someone's name-bleep which I incidentally have turned off), or for persistent chat-fail (wade, daruko or StStephen style, over weeks or months). I'll also put in a 10-minute ban if one of the permanent lurkers (I hate those fuckers) is having connection problems but also has auto-join turned on. Sometimes I'll look at chat and the ONLY thing that has happened in the last half hour is John Blaze has left and rejoined 10 times.

I do kick people, occasionally for fatuous reasons, but only when I reckon that person will "get it". Like kicking Pixie a second time for the FacebookForHerCat thing. I try to at least make the kicking thing funny and to think about whether the kicked will see it as such.

The only other time I kick is when someone is doing it wade, daruko or StStephen style and someone requests I kick them to get chat going again.

Fuck coordinating when the OPs are on and how many, fuck making a bunch of rules for #Discord, and to fuck with banning someone from the channel for doing something that irritates you alone.

haha i get booted regularly for being a spag, and yes, I find it funny.

Payne and Fred only seriously boot when people come in being all homophobe or talking about rape porn. (2 recent examples) but I've never seen em ban anyone and I spent a lot of time on the channel. they only boot when the offendr is offending the room.

I figure that Requia would have been very annoyed by Rog's constant poking, but a boot for being a spag and a ban for being a spag is 2 different levels of action, the latter being unwarranted.

all this drama is just boring, anyway.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Kai on September 01, 2009, 12:31:37 pm

all this drama is just boring, anyway.

Bad attitude to have when have the content around here is built on drama, past present and future.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 01, 2009, 12:42:25 pm

all this drama is just boring, anyway.

Bad attitude to have when have the content around here is built on drama, past present and future.

Some of the best shit we have around here really did come from drama of one kind or another. The problem is harnessing it and forming it into something usable.

I've tried in the past to create stuff from drama (The Gospel According to Payne, for example, and most of my WOMPs). And the BIP was built from the rubble of the great schism iirc.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 03:06:18 pm
I don't ban anyone except for spamming (like actual spam, not setting off someone's name-bleep which I incidentally have turned off), or for persistent chat-fail (wade, daruko or StStephen style, over weeks or months). I'll also put in a 10-minute ban if one of the permanent lurkers (I hate those fuckers) is having connection problems but also has auto-join turned on. Sometimes I'll look at chat and the ONLY thing that has happened in the last half hour is John Blaze has left and rejoined 10 times.

I do kick people, occasionally for fatuous reasons, but only when I reckon that person will "get it". Like kicking Pixie a second time for the FacebookForHerCat thing. I try to at least make the kicking thing funny and to think about whether the kicked will see it as such.

The only other time I kick is when someone is doing it wade, daruko or StStephen style and someone requests I kick them to get chat going again.

That seems like a good policy
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 01, 2009, 03:25:10 pm
I don't ban anyone except for spamming (like actual spam, not setting off someone's name-bleep which I incidentally have turned off), or for persistent chat-fail (wade, daruko or StStephen style, over weeks or months). I'll also put in a 10-minute ban if one of the permanent lurkers (I hate those fuckers) is having connection problems but also has auto-join turned on. Sometimes I'll look at chat and the ONLY thing that has happened in the last half hour is John Blaze has left and rejoined 10 times.

I do kick people, occasionally for fatuous reasons, but only when I reckon that person will "get it". Like kicking Pixie a second time for the FacebookForHerCat thing. I try to at least make the kicking thing funny and to think about whether the kicked will see it as such.

The only other time I kick is when someone is doing it wade, daruko or StStephen style and someone requests I kick them to get chat going again.

That seems like a good policy

It's not really a policy. It's just how I personally and generally prefer to work. It doesn't always work this way, and I have no idea if the other ops have any similar kind of thing.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 01, 2009, 03:31:14 pm
To me inconsistent moderation doesn't seem like a good thing. Not to say that mods in IRC shouldn't be able to operate within their own discretion but it would be nice to make sure that most mods are on at least the same page when it comes to what is and isn't considered a bannable/kickable offense
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 03:43:08 pm
Looks like IRC mods maybe should be more selected not to ban for reasons of personal conflict.

He was deliberately harassing me, and flooding the channel in order to do it.  Payne is probably right that I should have just kicked first though.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 01, 2009, 03:45:24 pm
Looks like IRC mods maybe should be more selected not to ban for reasons of personal conflict.

He was deliberately harassing me, and flooding the channel in order to do it.  Payne is probably right that I should have just kicked first though.

Or you could have tried to actually sort the shit out without having to resort to kicking or banning at all, which is what I would have done.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 03:48:47 pm
Attempting to reason with Roger had been tried, and he escalated his behavior in response.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: LMNO on September 01, 2009, 04:00:52 pm
The hell?

You've been here long enough.  You should know what to do.

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:22:05 pm
Attempting to reason with Roger had been tried, and he escalated his behavior in response.

You're a damn liar, and a stupid one at that.  Anyone looking at the logs can see I offered you a truce, and you felt the need to continue your bullshit.

You fucking idiot.   :lulz:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:23:47 pm
Looks like IRC mods maybe should be more selected not to ban for reasons of personal conflict.

He was deliberately harassing me, and flooding the channel in order to do it.  Payne is probably right that I should have just kicked first though.

Or you could have tried to actually sort the shit out without having to resort to kicking or banning at all, which is what I would have done.

I offered her a deal:  She pretends I don't exist, and I reciprocate.  She decided to continue being an asshole.  She had no interest in sorting shit out.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 04:25:31 pm
Attempting to reason with Roger had been tried, and he escalated his behavior in response.

You're a damn liar, and a stupid one at that.  Anyone looking at the logs can see I offered you a truce, and you felt the need to continue your bullshit.

You fucking idiot.   :lulz:

"I'll think about it" is a declaration of war now?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 04:27:00 pm
I asked you to stop beeping my name.  Note that if you had *ignored* me, I'd have no real legitimate complaint.  But you responded by flooding the damned channel.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:27:10 pm
Attempting to reason with Roger had been tried, and he escalated his behavior in response.

You're a damn liar, and a stupid one at that.  Anyone looking at the logs can see I offered you a truce, and you felt the need to continue your bullshit.

You fucking idiot.   :lulz:

"I'll think about it" is a declaration of war now?

It was a flippant response to a genuine offer.  

Please make an attempt at honesty.  So far you're batting zero (between this issue, and the "put down" you accused me of on the DND thread).
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:28:42 pm
I asked you to stop beeping my name.  Note that if you had *ignored* me, I'd have no real legitimate complaint.  But you responded by flooding the damned channel.

Yep, I sure as hell did, and if I WAS to go back there, I'd do it again, instantly.  You attacked me here.  I offered you a truce there.  You mocked the offer, so I retaliated for the original bullshit you pulled.

I fail to see how this is so fucking hard to understand.

Also, you never asked me to stop, unless you're Kel.  Liar.  You just immediately banned me.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:30:16 pm
Yep.  Just checked the log...So that's THREE lies.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 04:32:43 pm
I asked you to stop beeping my name.  Note that if you had *ignored* me, I'd have no real legitimate complaint.  But you responded by flooding the damned channel.

Yep, I sure as hell did, and if I WAS to go back there, I'd do it again, instantly.  You attacked me here.  I offered you a truce there.  You mocked the offer, so I retaliated for the original bullshit you pulled.

I fail to see how this is so fucking hard to understand.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:33:24 pm
I asked you to stop beeping my name.  Note that if you had *ignored* me, I'd have no real legitimate complaint.  But you responded by flooding the damned channel.

Yep, I sure as hell did, and if I WAS to go back there, I'd do it again, instantly.  You attacked me here.  I offered you a truce there.  You mocked the offer, so I retaliated for the original bullshit you pulled.

I fail to see how this is so fucking hard to understand.

Your point?  Also, you never asked me to stop beeping your name.  Why do you lie?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Requia ☣ on September 01, 2009, 04:34:09 pm
Quote
[9:43pm] Requiem: Unless you actually want me to respond, call me the fuckwit or something, it beeps me when you use the full name.
[9:43pm] TGRR: (I come from a family of Hamilton wobblies)
[9:43pm] TGRR: Shut up, asshole.
[9:43pm] TGRR: I'll fucking beep you if I want to.
[9:43pm] TGRR: Hey
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem

I asked you to stop, you escalated, attacking the whole channel in the process.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 04:35:44 pm
Quote
[9:43pm] Requiem: Unless you actually want me to respond, call me the fuckwit or something, it beeps me when you use the full name.
[9:43pm] TGRR: (I come from a family of Hamilton wobblies)
[9:43pm] TGRR: Shut up, asshole.
[9:43pm] TGRR: I'll fucking beep you if I want to.
[9:43pm] TGRR: Hey
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem

I asked you to stop, you escalated, attacking the whole channel in the process.

You never asked me to stop.  You made a statement of fact, BEFORE I flooded you.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Bebek Sincap Ratatosk on September 01, 2009, 04:41:39 pm
LAEM argument is LAEM.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fuquad on September 01, 2009, 04:53:02 pm
Attempting to reason with Roger had been tried, and he escalated his behavior in response.

You're a damn liar, and a stupid one at that.  Anyone looking at the logs can see I offered you a truce, and you felt the need to continue your bullshit.

You fucking idiot.   :lulz:

"I'll think about it" is a declaration of war now?

The war was already started. A truce was offered. You didn't accept.

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pope Pixie Pickle on September 01, 2009, 07:27:06 pm

all this drama is just boring, anyway.

Bad attitude to have when have the content around here is built on drama, past present and future.

Some of the best shit we have around here really did come from drama of one kind or another. The problem is harnessing it and forming it into something usable.

I've tried in the past to create stuff from drama (The Gospel According to Payne, for example, and most of my WOMPs). And the BIP was built from the rubble of the great schism iirc.

ok, fair point. I was having a meh moment, and, well, that last line shoulld have just read....

meh.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Golden Applesauce on September 01, 2009, 09:52:55 pm
So, in order...

:argh!: ALL FREDS DELIVER!

GODDAMNIT EVERYONE STOP POSTING WHEN IM TRYING TO THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE TO HIT SUBMIT BUTTON



[9:30pm] TGRR: Requiem is the same as Requia on PD, right?
[9:31pm] TGRR: Same person?
[9:31pm] Requiem: yes
[9:31pm] TGRR: Fuck off, I wasn't talking to you.
[9:31pm] ThornIs: the only thing i know about dnd is i got this first edition hard cover dungeon masters guide gary gygax book that everyone wants so...
[9:31pm] TGRR: I was talking about you.
[9:31pm] TGRR: It had nothing to do with DND
[9:31pm] ThornIs: oh i thought it did
[9:31pm] TGRR: It had to do with me cracking a joke, and requia being a total fucking asshole about it.
[9:31pm] TGRR: I GUESS I'M "SLIPPING".
[9:32pm] TGRR: Eat a dick
[9:32pm] Requiem: Apparently criticizing TGRR's put downs is a cardinal sin
[9:32pm] TGRR: SORRY, I'M SLIPPING AND CAN'T BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR MY WORDS.
[9:32pm] TGRR: And it wasn't a put down, you lying piece of shit.
[9:33pm] TGRR was granted voice by Requiem.
[9:33pm] ThornIs: i dont got into any dvd thread so i have idea what is going on
[9:33pm] TGRR: It was a joke, and it was aimed at a particular comment, not to "put someone down", unlike what you said, you fucking hypocrite.
[9:33pm] TGRR: So here's a possible solution, Requiem:
[9:34pm] TGRR: You never, ever speak to me again, and I will return the favor.  Deal?
[9:34pm] TGRR: Or about, for that matter
[9:34pm] Requiem: I'll think about it
[9:34pm] TGRR: Fuck off.
[9:34pm] TGRR: It was a one time offer
[9:34pm] Requiem: that makes the decision easy then
[9:34pm] TGRR: So now I guess I'll just start throwing shit non-stop
[9:35pm] ThornIs: well back to commercials form the 80's
[9:35pm] TGRR: Shut it, you obnoxious piece of vermin.
[9:35pm] TGRR: Sorry, Thornis.  There's only one conversation as long as the fuckwad and I are both here.
[9:36pm] TGRR: I can't fucking stand a liar.  Which Requiem is.
[9:37pm] ThornIs: im confuses as always lol
[9:37pm] ThornIs: confused
[9:37pm] TGRR: It's easy.
[9:37pm] TGRR: I made a joke.
[9:37pm] Requiem: ThornIs: you know how to make an eyeroll smiley with ASCII?
[9:37pm] TGRR: Requiem decided to turn it into a personal attack aginst me.
[9:37pm] TGRR: And then she lied.
[9:37pm] TGRR: It's really just that simple.
[9:38pm] ThornIs: no i know no ascii lol
[9:39pm] TGRR: Sorry, liar, I ave you a chance to avoid this shit.
[9:39pm] TGRR: Which will, of course, go on forever.
[9:39pm] TGRR: *gave
[9:39pm] ThornIs: so why are my irl friends up in sudbury so fucking boring and lazy and never wanna do anything
[9:40pm] TGRR: Because it's Sudbury
[9:40pm] TGRR: They all have sulfide poisoning.
[9:40pm] ThornIs: at least the ones in thunder bay are always up for something even just a bottle of scotch and a movie
[9:40pm] TGRR: In Sudbury, a wild night is spending the evening in front of the TV in Mom's basement.
[9:40pm] TGRR: smoking shitty ditchweed
[9:40pm] ThornIs: the mines have been on strike for a month now so we're all huddled in the house cause the miners are getting antsy and violent
[9:41pm] ENKI-][: (*).(*) is probably not eyeroll. it is probably tits.
[9:41pm] TGRR: So join them
[9:41pm] ENKI-][: damn tits.
[9:41pm] TGRR: This place is better when I remember to ignore Enki.
[9:41pm] TGRR: I wish I could ignore Requiem, but she's a halfop
[9:42pm] TGRR: One of MS's less wise moves.
[9:42pm] ThornIs: apparently the miners are starting to beat up the scabs now
[9:42pm] ThornIs:  :eek:
[9:42pm] TGRR: Good.
[9:42pm] TGRR: Fucking scabs
[9:43pm] Requiem: Unless you actually want me to respond, call me the fuckwit or something, it beeps me when you use the full name.
[9:43pm] TGRR: (I come from a family of Hamilton wobblies)
[9:43pm] TGRR: Shut up, asshole.
[9:43pm] TGRR: I'll fucking beep you if I want to.
[9:43pm] TGRR: Hey
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:43pm] kel: STOP IT
[9:43pm] ThornIs: my sisters boyfriend is a machanic for the mines.. basically for the last month hes been going to work and getting paid to sit there and play cards
[9:43pm] TGRR: hehe
[9:44pm] kel: :P
[9:44pm] TGRR: It's my internets, I can do what I want. :P
..

[9:45pm] TGRR: the maintenance crew isn't on strike, too?
[9:45pm] kel: bbiab
[9:45pm] kel runs off
[9:45pm] ThornIs: no just the miners
[9:45pm] TGRR: It's MY fucking internets
[9:45pm] ThornIs: different unions
[9:45pm] TGRR: It's in MY computer.
[9:45pm] TGRR: No sympathy strike?
[9:45pm] TGRR: Hang on, THornis
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: Requiem
[9:45pm] TGRR: whee
[9:45pm] Requiem set a ban on *!*Mibbit@*.hsd1.az.comcast.net.
[9:46pm] TGRR: banned
[9:46pm] TGRR was kicked from the chat room by Requiem. (Requiem)
[9:46pm] ThornIs: they can't do that anymore due to the equpiment, its no dangerious if the equipment isn't maintained
[9:46pm] Requiem: somebody remind me to undo that in 10 minutes or so
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: undo what?
[9:47pm] Requiem: the ban
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: who'd you ban?
[9:47pm] Requiem: TGRR
[9:47pm] ENKI-][: ... oh.
[9:47pm] Requiem: for beepping me repeatedly
[9:48pm] Requiem removed the ban on *!*Mibbit@*.hsd1.az.comcast.net.



TA DAAAAAAAA

-THIS FRED DELIVERS!

So Roger was being rude to Req, and then Req was rude back, or maybe there was quantum, a-causal rudeness happening or something.

I don't see what there is to be upset about.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 01, 2009, 10:17:26 pm
So Roger was being rude to Req, and then Req was rude back, or maybe there was quantum, a-causal rudeness happening or something.

I don't see what there is to be upset about.

Req was rude to me in a thread here, so I tormented her there, so she banned me.

:lol:

TGRR,
Isn't upset.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: -Kel- on September 02, 2009, 01:39:10 am
You guys took out me trying to get into an argument that ITS MY INTERNETS, NOT ROGERS!!!

MINE! MINE! ALLL MINE!!! MUHAHAHNAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

(but i had to run off to do stuff....stupid stuff)

ALL MINE!
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2009, 02:11:39 am
You guys took out me trying to get into an argument that ITS MY INTERNETS, NOT ROGERS!!!

MINE! MINE! ALLL MINE!!! MUHAHAHNAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

(but i had to run off to do stuff....stupid stuff)

ALL MINE!

If it was YOURS, it wouldn't be in MY computer.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Thurnez Isa on September 02, 2009, 05:07:15 am
you're all wrong
it's MY Internets
i just don't police it
cause im lazy
 :sad:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 02, 2009, 09:20:17 am
Actually, it used to be my internet but I gave it to Roger when he greased up his dick and stuck it in my email inbox. I can't think of anyone who'd want it after that.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pope Pixie Pickle on September 02, 2009, 10:00:53 am
Actually, it used to be my internet but I gave it to Roger when he greased up his dick and stuck it in my email inbox. I can't think of anyone who'd want it after that.
:horrormirth:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2009, 02:05:54 pm
Actually, it used to be my internet but I gave it to Roger when he greased up his dick and stuck it in my email inbox. I can't think of anyone who'd want it after that.

BEA

FUCKING

ARTHUR
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 02, 2009, 03:10:50 pm
Actually, it used to be my internet but I gave it to Roger when he greased up his dick and stuck it in my email inbox. I can't think of anyone who'd want it after that.

BEA

FUCKING

ARTHUR

Well played.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2009, 03:12:26 pm
Actually, it used to be my internet but I gave it to Roger when he greased up his dick and stuck it in my email inbox. I can't think of anyone who'd want it after that.

BEA

FUCKING

ARTHUR

Well played.

I am a professional, sir.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 02, 2009, 03:18:06 pm
Actually, it used to be my internet but I gave it to Roger when he greased up his dick and stuck it in my email inbox. I can't think of anyone who'd want it after that.

BEA

FUCKING

ARTHUR

Well played.

I am a professional, sir.

(http://home.hio.no/sevu/Pi3web/bilder/ET%20computer%20kid%20happy%20surprised2.jpg)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 02, 2009, 06:45:30 pm
PD is no longer affiliated with IRC.
PD is always no longer affiliated with IRC.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 02, 2009, 09:52:03 pm
PD is no longer affiliated with IRC.
PD is always no longer affiliated with IRC.

I think PD was always not affiliated with IRC. Or maybe it was the other way round. But yeah, I know what you mean.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2009, 10:58:27 pm
Does this mean I'm not allowed to spazz out about it here?   :?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 02, 2009, 11:01:10 pm
No, I think this means you HAVE to spazz about it here.

Massive trolling escapades have been launched for far less against sites and boards not affiliated with PD, after all. Jihad, perhaps?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 02, 2009, 11:01:38 pm
Does this mean I'm not allowed to spazz out about it here?   :?

PD isn't affiliated with ANYTHING, except prolapse.

Does that stop any of us from spazzing out about anything, from our retarded sexual and romantic failures to what the fuck we're eating for dinner to whether or not our jobs are fulfilling on spiritual levels?

OH FUCK NO.

...I'm not saying it's ALLOWED.

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2009, 11:25:29 pm
No, I think this means you HAVE to spazz about it here.

Massive trolling escapades have been launched for far less against sites and boards not affiliated with PD, after all. Jihad, perhaps?

I think we must cleanse the temple.

WITH FIRE
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 02, 2009, 11:26:08 pm
Does this mean I'm not allowed to spazz out about it here?   :?

PD isn't affiliated with ANYTHING, except prolapse.

Does that stop any of us from spazzing out about anything, from our retarded sexual and romantic failures to what the fuck we're eating for dinner to whether or not our jobs are fulfilling on spiritual levels?

OH FUCK NO.

...I'm not saying it's ALLOWED.

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.

Yeah, I'm that way myself.  See sig.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 03, 2009, 12:35:12 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 03, 2009, 12:55:28 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.

I think saying we're so CRAZY and up to CRAZY antics and a zany ol' bag of insanity sounds a bit too much like, well... outlandishness. I don't think, for the most part, that the majority of people here are AIMING for anything like that. In many of the subforums, a lot of good thought and interesting stuff goes on. On the other hand, in a subforum like Apple Talk, we're pretty much just spewing whatever the crap comes to mind in classic diarrhea fashion.

And we spew a lot of rather ridiculous stuff that is unrelated to much of anything. So, in the sense of "can we rant about IRC, when IRC is not affiliated with PDCOM?" then the answer is "yes, because we rant about all kinds of completely unrelated shit." Not necessarily CRAAAAZY or ZANY or OUTLANDISH shit. Just random-ass shit that comes to mind.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 01:33:55 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

Yeah, Jesus, what's up with that? 

Sometimes it's okay to be funny. 

Sometimes it's okay to be nice.  <---if you tell anyone I said that, I'll deny it, and shit in your lungs.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 01:35:42 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 03, 2009, 01:41:22 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.

BETTER LOOKIN'
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 01:42:14 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.

BETTER LOOKIN'

THE WIMMENS, ANYWAY. :fap:

HERE'S LOOKIN' AT YOU, JIGGLY-BUTT!  (woowoo!)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 03, 2009, 01:43:16 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.

BETTER LOOKIN'

THE WIMMENS, ANYWAY. :fap:

HERE'S LOOKIN' AT YOU, JIGGLY-BUTT!  (woowoo!)

Aaaaaaaand that is what I am now calling myself.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 01:44:04 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.

BETTER LOOKIN'

THE WIMMENS, ANYWAY. :fap:

HERE'S LOOKIN' AT YOU, JIGGLY-BUTT!  (woowoo!)

Aaaaaaaand that is what I am now calling myself.

 :lol:

TGRR,
Digs the butt.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Cramulus on September 03, 2009, 01:44:48 am
(http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb163/wompcabal/AAAAAPLETAAAAAALK.jpg)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 03, 2009, 01:49:13 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.

BETTER LOOKIN'

THE WIMMENS, ANYWAY. :fap:

HERE'S LOOKIN' AT YOU, JIGGLY-BUTT!  (woowoo!)

Aaaaaaaand that is what I am now calling myself.

 :lol:

TGRR,
Digs the butt.

Wow, I really never thought about it, but the butt really is what separates us from the other apes.

HUMANITY: THE DIFFERENCE IS THE ASS.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:02:19 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

It is definitely possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical. PD certainly has its moments.


Justifiably so.  We may not be SMARTER than the monkeys, but we are BETTER than them.

BETTER LOOKIN'

THE WIMMENS, ANYWAY. :fap:

HERE'S LOOKIN' AT YOU, JIGGLY-BUTT!  (woowoo!)

Aaaaaaaand that is what I am now calling myself.

 :lol:

TGRR,
Digs the butt.

Wow, I really never thought about it, but the butt really is what separates us from the other apes.

HUMANITY: THE DIFFERENCE IS THE ASS.

(http://kiwipolemicist.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/baboon_ass2.jpg)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 03, 2009, 02:03:02 am
TGRR, my ass is way cuter than that.

That's how you know I'm human.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:04:47 am
TGRR, my ass is way cuter than that.

That's how you know I'm human.

In your case, that is true.  But it is not a test for humanity.

(http://www.sondrak.com/archive/fat-ass-l.jpg)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Pariah on September 03, 2009, 02:51:46 am
TGRR, my ass is way cuter than that.

That's how you know I'm human.

In your case, that is true.  But it is not a test for humanity.

http://www.sondrak.com/archive/fat-ass-l.jpg

:vom:
NSFM
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:52:44 am
TGRR, my ass is way cuter than that.

That's how you know I'm human.

In your case, that is true.  But it is not a test for humanity.

http://www.sondrak.com/archive/fat-ass-l.jpg


:vom:
NSFM

This ain't gonna be your century.   :lulz:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 03, 2009, 03:29:46 am
OMG

That is like every other person who works at my work.

When I go to meetings, I always feel compelled to turn anorexic for at least a few hours afterwards.

Sometimes I am afraid that if I look directly into the folds, I will lose my soul.

SO MANY CHINS. :x

In your case, that is true.  But it is not a test for humanity.

No, that was definitely not a human.

Humanoid, yes.

Deserving of being referred to as part of humanity? I beg to differ.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 03:36:56 am
OMG

That is like every other person who works at my work.

When I go to meetings, I always feel compelled to turn anorexic for at least a few hours afterwards.

Sometimes I am afraid that if I look directly into the folds, I will lose my soul.

SO MANY CHINS. :x

In your case, that is true.  But it is not a test for humanity.

No, that was definitely not a human.

Humanoid, yes.

Deserving of being referred to as part of humanity? I beg to differ.

Then humans are thin on the ground, yes?   :lulz:

Um...wait.  DAMN YUO, RWHN!
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 03, 2009, 05:33:52 am
The human ass is quite different from the baboon ass because of the shape of the buttocks. I stand my ground.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Darth Cupcake on September 03, 2009, 05:35:30 am
The human ass is quite different from the baboon ass because of the shape of the buttocks. I stand my ground.

Listen to Nigel.

She is a professional.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Jenne on September 03, 2009, 06:42:18 am
BADONK!   I'M TELLIN YAS--> FEEDS, SOOTHES and CARESSES TEH INNER SOUL!

(sheesh!)
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Cain on September 03, 2009, 10:20:45 am

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

Yeah, Jesus, what's up with that?  

Sometimes it's okay to be funny.  

Sometimes it's okay to be nice.  <---if you tell anyone I said that, I'll deny it, and shit in your lungs.

I think Faust has a point.  Not in this particular case, but generally, there are a few posters here who are egotistical, and not on their own merits, like you or ECH or LMNO are, but based on the forum identity.

It annoys me because it smells of nationalism.  Same stupidity, different packages.  Some people here have giant egos, and the actions, history and work to back it up.  And some people have giant egos and nothing in the way of accomplishments to justify it, except beyond being a member.

I know I'm not saying exactly what Faust is any longer, but his post just reminded me of something I found annoying on occasions, but never really spoke about before.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Triple Zero on September 03, 2009, 10:55:54 am
In your case, that is true.  But it is not a test for humanity.

No, that was definitely not a human.

Humanoid, yes.

Deserving of being referred to as part of humanity? I beg to differ.

Not even humanoid. It's a heap of pudding.

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:24:33 pm
The human ass is quite different from the baboon ass because of the shape of the buttocks. I stand my ground.

But humans have to MAKE badonk.  Baboons are BORN with it.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:26:01 pm
The human ass is quite different from the baboon ass because of the shape of the buttocks. I stand my ground.

Listen to Nigel.

She is a professional.

Yes, she is.  However, an expert on ass is not an expert on what makes humans different from the animals.  You need a religious sage for that, and that's where I come in.  I'm like Ralph Waldo Emerson with Tourettes.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: LMNO on September 03, 2009, 02:26:31 pm
Can we go back to admiring DCup's ass now?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:31:36 pm
Can we go back to admiring DCup's ass now?

Obviously.  She needs to shake that shit like Shakira, if you ask me.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: LMNO on September 03, 2009, 02:40:36 pm
Oh, someone needs to post that gif from jj.am.  I can't do it, I'm at work.

www.jj.am (NSFW material inside)
-> Gifs
-> Celebreties
-> Shakira_Booty.gif

:1fap::1fap::1fap::1fap::aaa::1fap::1fap::1fap::1fap:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Payne on September 03, 2009, 02:44:37 pm
Oh, someone needs to post that gif from jj.am.  I can't do it, I'm at work.

www.jj.am (NSFW material inside)
-> Gifs
-> Celebreties
-> Shakira_Booty.gif

:1fap::1fap::1fap::1fap::aaa::1fap::1fap::1fap::1fap:

OCTO-FAP

(http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/129884-1/Shakira_booty_shake.gif)

Edit: Fucked up linking of pic
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Richter on September 03, 2009, 02:48:19 pm
I love how this thread derailed into a booty praise fest.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 02:52:46 pm
I love how this thread derailed into a booty praise fest.

IT'S MY FREAD, AND I CAN TALK ABOUT ASS IF I WANT!
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Cramulus on September 03, 2009, 03:27:43 pm
hahahahahah

NSFW: http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/129649-1/Baseball_cockbat.gif
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: LMNO on September 03, 2009, 03:29:00 pm
I'm so glad I could be able to introduce jj.am to the PD.com boards.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Cramulus on September 03, 2009, 03:42:27 pm
I've been scrolling through the porn blooper section since you posted it

http://4gifs.com/gallery/v/PornBloopers/










in other news, my girlfriend is no longer talking to me.


I think it had something to do with this: http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/127299-2/Mouse_Trap_facial.gif

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on September 03, 2009, 07:18:57 pm
The human ass is quite different from the baboon ass because of the shape of the buttocks. I stand my ground.

But humans have to MAKE badonk.  Baboons are BORN with it.

So ass is also what makes baboons different from the other monkeys. So?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 08:18:46 pm
The human ass is quite different from the baboon ass because of the shape of the buttocks. I stand my ground.

But humans have to MAKE badonk.  Baboons are BORN with it.

So ass is also what makes baboons different from the other monkeys. So?

So I think we've established that baboons are the superior monkeys, and will rule the world when we blow ourselves up, as opposed to mountain gorillas as proposed by that fraud Charleton Heston.

TGRR,
Welcomes our new red-assed overlords.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: LMNO on September 03, 2009, 08:20:12 pm
I'd still rather hit it with DCup than a baboon.


Just saying.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 08:29:08 pm
I'd still rather hit it with DCup than a baboon.


Just saying.

Me, too, but I'm up for any program.

TGRR,
Slack-jawed monkey fucker.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 08:40:01 pm

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

One other thought:  Where did a small ego ever get anyone?

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 03, 2009, 09:44:32 pm

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

One other thought:  Where did a small ego ever get anyone?


Its worked for some, and failed for many many more.
Its not what dcup said specifically that bothered me, its something i've been seeing more and more here on the forum. Yes, we are better then most other forums out there, but a lot of the time when I see it it does come off as the outlandish attitude thing.
Or its me painting everything in a bad light at the moment, I'm on the down and there some bad shit biasing my views.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 09:48:21 pm

I'm just saying that we're about as rational and regulated as a bunch of retarded cracked out lemmings in zero G.
yeah were so CRAZY, never know what kind of CRAZY antics we're gonna see on old PD.com.

...
It seems naive and egotistical to think that this place is a zany ol' bag of insanity.
Is it possible for a forum to be collectively egotistical?
I suppose it is, we've seen it on other sites...

sorry I'm a bit bitchy lately

One other thought:  Where did a small ego ever get anyone?


Its worked for some, and failed for many many more.
Its not what dcup said specifically that bothered me, its something i've been seeing more and more here on the forum. Yes, we are better then most other forums out there, but a lot of the time when I see it it does come off as the outlandish attitude thing.
Or its me painting everything in a bad light at the moment, I'm on the down and there some bad shit biasing my views.

I see a bunch of people having FUN for a change.  So it's a little silly?  It's not like the board has turned into a bunch of AKKs.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 03, 2009, 09:50:55 pm
No I suppose not
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Bebek Sincap Ratatosk on September 03, 2009, 10:07:32 pm
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH OUTLANDISH?  :wink:

Yeah, some Discordians fail to see the difference between being free and being weird.. or being free and being iconoclast... or being free and being Outlandish.

But, at the end of the day... being weird, iconoclast or Outlandish can be fun too. As long as its not a single repetitive shtick, a stagnant personality or a THIS IS HOW YOU DISCORDIAN, then I fail to see why it would be bad.

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 03, 2009, 10:09:23 pm
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH OUTLANDISH?  :wink:

Yeah, some Discordians fail to see the difference between being free and being weird.. or being free and being iconoclast... or being free and being Outlandish.

But, at the end of the day... being weird, iconoclast or Outlandish can be fun too. As long as its not a single repetitive shtick, a stagnant personality or a THIS IS HOW YOU DISCORDIAN, then I fail to see why it would be bad.



Doctor Rat Bastard is right.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on September 04, 2009, 12:58:45 am
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH OUTLANDISH?  :wink:

Yeah, some Discordians fail to see the difference between being free and being weird.. or being free and being iconoclast... or being free and being Outlandish.

But, at the end of the day... being weird, iconoclast or Outlandish can be fun too. As long as its not a single repetitive shtick, a stagnant personality or a THIS IS HOW YOU DISCORDIAN, then I fail to see why it would be bad.



If Discordianism ever got a marketing campaign, this would be its tagline.

A man in a business suit walks down a sidewalk, glancing at his watch and determinedly ignoring his surroundings.  He stops at a street and as he presses the button to cross his eyes fall upon a sheet of paper just above where his thumb rests.  It reads "Congratulations you've found clue #5.  The old lady will give you your next clue."  He chuckles and when he begins walking again he slows his pace, looking for all the little things he's missed along his daily route.  He passes another man in an innocuous button down shirt and khakis holding a clip board.  The camera pans on the clipboard to show a stack of the very same papers we just saw.  Fade to lettering "This is how I Discordian."
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 04, 2009, 01:03:25 am
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH OUTLANDISH?  :wink:

Yeah, some Discordians fail to see the difference between being free and being weird.. or being free and being iconoclast... or being free and being Outlandish.

But, at the end of the day... being weird, iconoclast or Outlandish can be fun too. As long as its not a single repetitive shtick, a stagnant personality or a THIS IS HOW YOU DISCORDIAN, then I fail to see why it would be bad.



If Discordianism ever got a marketing campaign, this would be its tagline.

A man in a business suit walks down a sidewalk, glancing at his watch and determinedly ignoring his surroundings.  He stops at a street and as he presses the button to cross his eyes fall upon a sheet of paper just above where his thumb rests.  It reads "Congratulations you've found clue #5.  The old lady will give you your next clue."  He chuckles and when he begins walking again he slows his pace, looking for all the little things he's missed along his daily route.  He passes another man in an innocuous button down shirt and khakis holding a clip board.  The camera pans on the clipboard to show a stack of the very same papers we just saw.  Fade to lettering "This is how I Discordian."

I will kill us all before I allow that.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 04, 2009, 01:05:08 am
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH OUTLANDISH?  :wink:

Yeah, some Discordians fail to see the difference between being free and being weird.. or being free and being iconoclast... or being free and being Outlandish.

But, at the end of the day... being weird, iconoclast or Outlandish can be fun too. As long as its not a single repetitive shtick, a stagnant personality or a THIS IS HOW YOU DISCORDIAN, then I fail to see why it would be bad.



Its worked for some, and failed for many many more.
Its not what dcup said specifically that bothered me, its something i've been seeing more and more here on the forum. Yes, we are better then most other forums out there, but a lot of the time when I see it it does come off as the outlandish attitude thing.
Or its me painting everything in a bad light at the moment, I'm on the down and there some bad shit biasing my views.

As I said, its something I'm seeing as a trend.
But then as said, thats not the issue, it is that its just some fun. I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 04, 2009, 01:19:05 am
I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.

Why not?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Eater of Clowns on September 04, 2009, 01:20:00 am
If Discordianism ever got a marketing campaign, this would be its tagline.

A man in a business suit walks down a sidewalk, glancing at his watch and determinedly ignoring his surroundings.  He stops at a street and as he presses the button to cross his eyes fall upon a sheet of paper just above where his thumb rests.  It reads "Congratulations you've found clue #5.  The old lady will give you your next clue."  He chuckles and when he begins walking again he slows his pace, looking for all the little things he's missed along his daily route.  He passes another man in an innocuous button down shirt and khakis holding a clip board.  The camera pans on the clipboard to show a stack of the very same papers we just saw.  Fade to lettering "This is how I Discordian."

I will kill us all before I allow that.


A camera crew is wrapping up a shot on corner of a cordoned off street.  Two men at the focus of their equipment, one dressed in a business suit and the other in an innocuous button down shirt and khakis, talk amiably about their next day's work.  Suddenly, a shout goes up amongst the assembled workers.  We see TGRR, his face contorted in hate-shitting rage, leap upon the director and fix his hands in a firm lock around his neck.  A few individuals with presence of mind attempt to wrest the attacker free to no avail.  The shot freezes on the twisted features of our assailant and fades to lettering "This is how I Discordian."
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 04, 2009, 01:20:36 am
If Discordianism ever got a marketing campaign, this would be its tagline.

A man in a business suit walks down a sidewalk, glancing at his watch and determinedly ignoring his surroundings.  He stops at a street and as he presses the button to cross his eyes fall upon a sheet of paper just above where his thumb rests.  It reads "Congratulations you've found clue #5.  The old lady will give you your next clue."  He chuckles and when he begins walking again he slows his pace, looking for all the little things he's missed along his daily route.  He passes another man in an innocuous button down shirt and khakis holding a clip board.  The camera pans on the clipboard to show a stack of the very same papers we just saw.  Fade to lettering "This is how I Discordian."



I will kill us all before I allow that.


A camera crew is wrapping up a shot on corner of a cordoned off street.  Two men at the focus of their equipment, one dressed in a business suit and the other in an innocuous button down shirt and khakis, talk amiably about their next day's work.  Suddenly, a shout goes up amongst the assembled workers.  We see TGRR, his face contorted in hate-shitting rage, leap upon the director and fix his hands in a firm lock around his neck.  A few individuals with presence of mind attempt to wrest the attacker free to no avail.  The shot freezes on the twisted features of our assailant and fades to lettering "This is how I Discordian."

Oh, Goddammit.   :x

I can't beat TV.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 04, 2009, 01:35:03 am
I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.

Why not?


I don't know. I normally swing down into a depression for about a week every month or so but this has been a slow drudging kind of thing.
Its nothing for the forum and it will go away eventually, I'd rather just bitch about the IRC treehouse to be honest.

Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 04, 2009, 01:36:59 am
I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.

Why not?


I don't know. I normally swing down into a depression for about a week every month or so but this has been a slow drudging kind of thing.
Its nothing for the forum and it will go away eventually, I'd rather just bitch about the IRC treehouse to be honest.



Go shooting.  That always cheers me up.

And what IRC treehouse?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 04, 2009, 01:54:40 am
I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.

Why not?


I don't know. I normally swing down into a depression for about a week every month or so but this has been a slow drudging kind of thing.
Its nothing for the forum and it will go away eventually, I'd rather just bitch about the IRC treehouse to be honest.



Go shooting.  That always cheers me up.

And what IRC treehouse?


IRC is a treehouse.
You go in, everyone is just sitting around bored or gossiping or not talking, its a hang out, with its own social politics or whatever.
Its kinda sad that something that is mainly a drivel pit has to have people banning others on it, its not like its protecting some sacrosanct IRC high quality or anything.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Fredfredly ⊂(◉‿◉)つ on September 04, 2009, 01:56:52 am
I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.

Why not?


I don't know. I normally swing down into a depression for about a week every month or so but this has been a slow drudging kind of thing.
Its nothing for the forum and it will go away eventually, I'd rather just bitch about the IRC treehouse to be honest.



Go shooting.  That always cheers me up.

And what IRC treehouse?


IRC is a treehouse.
You go in, everyone is just sitting around bored or gossiping or not talking, its a hang out, with its own social politics or whatever.
Its kinda sad that something that is mainly a drivel pit has to have people banning others on it, its not like its protecting some sacrosanct IRC high quality or anything.

we usually only ban spambots  :cry:
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 04, 2009, 02:08:49 am
I haven't felt anything remotely like enjoyment for some months so its probably just me getting irritable at repetition.

Why not?


I don't know. I normally swing down into a depression for about a week every month or so but this has been a slow drudging kind of thing.
Its nothing for the forum and it will go away eventually, I'd rather just bitch about the IRC treehouse to be honest.



Go shooting.  That always cheers me up.

And what IRC treehouse?


IRC is a treehouse.
You go in, everyone is just sitting around bored or gossiping or not talking, its a hang out, with its own social politics or whatever.
Its kinda sad that something that is mainly a drivel pit has to have people banning others on it, its not like its protecting some sacrosanct IRC high quality or anything.

Look on the bright side...99% of the assfuckery is going on THERE, and not HERE.  This spillover is NOTHING.  This shit between Badges and I is about to assume Wagnerian proportions.  I assume you'll be happier if it happens there?
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: Faust on September 04, 2009, 02:12:53 am
I was actually blissfully unaware of whats going on in irc tonight, so it DOES work, as a sponge anyway.
Title: Re: So...banned on IRC.
Post by: The Good Reverend Roger on September 04, 2009, 02:16:35 am
I was actually blissfully unaware of whats going on in irc tonight, so it DOES work, as a sponge anyway.

There you go.

And it's not just tonight, this spat has been brewing for a week.