Messages

Agreed!

*crickets chirping*

Some of us have jobs, fuckstick.

And some of us own corporations, push buttons online, and are fond of Crickets.

As for the Fstick comment; interesting sexual visual ya got going there.   Does it hurt only when you smile!?    

jesus
not this again

We will march on a road of bones.

*Note to self; no barefoots*

Be afraid, be vewy afraid.  

*crickets chirping*

[you can't forget that.]

Moderators @ a discordian forum.
'nuff said.

And the taste like invisible goblins have been ejaculating into the space between your gums and your cheek while your back was turned,

you can't forget that.

Obviously, right!?

I don't even want to know how you know what that tastes like.

And , erm, tanks for sharing! No, really.

[It does indeed. That was excellent and Thank You!]

It does indeed. That was excellent and Thank You!  

.....        
..........                      
...............                    
.................        
..........      
......      

[your]

Thank you for asking. Perhaps I wasn't clear and that's the problem.

Basically; Isn't it absurd to have laws in Discordianism!? How does one meet out the other? Relative to the "don't believe everything you read" , and regardless. Discordians must believe something to label themselves as such, and by consequence is it not then redundancy!?

Akin to the imagery of Nihilists ascribing to commandments.

So, regardless of the 5 commandments, the 23 etc... what's your point in all this. (The term, "your", being relative to whomever chooses to read/answer my Q. )

I ask with all respect , because I find behaviors interesting, and I'm fond of looking for the "why" behind things, at times.  For instance, I've met "Fundamentalist Witches", that ascribe Wiccan doctrine dogmatic.
I've met Nihilists that hold there is a profile one must live up to, to truly call themselves Nihilist. I've met Buddhist Pagans, Etc...

For instance I've found  some people who proclaim a belief system and consequently subscribe to fundamental codes of behavior that are associated with that .  And ultimately many prove themselves to be contrary to everything they believe.

Ergo, why?

Why is it necessary to, for instance, subscribe to a theory of chaos, eris, discordianism, etc... and give it a name?!  I've read people on this site alone, who profess some are not "discordian", even though they share here.  
Which then boasts the query; Who says?

That's why I'm asking.
I thought I was clear initially, however I appreciate that your the only person that proffered the suggestion I may not have been so, long after 50+ reads.

That in itself speaks volumes.

Thanks Baron,  for speaking up.

No really. That's it?!  

Perhaps it's on the wrong board, or perhaps forum even. I'd think someone out there could provide a viewpoint other than just the one flippant reflective. Or is it considered Discordian to have so many readers drawing opinions,  while according TGRR the right to speak for everyone who are suppose to think for themselves schmuck, yet don't speak their mind!?


Just AKsin.

*sig. edit*

OMG!    Betty! You slut!

She certainly has aged well.

Did you guys ever see the SNL episode where they had Barbara Bush, Nancy Regan and Hillary reading the Vagina Monologues script? It was one of the funniest things I've ever seen.

I own the Vagina M. book. I would watch SNL if they ever announced they were going to replay that bit.

Talented noodle!

Fun site.

Must have made an impression.

[and]

mostly dead.

Dead and upstanding!? Woah!