Messages

I have no shame.

So Hitler himself was an active homosexual. And some people wonder, didn't the Germans, didn't the Nazis, persecute homosexuals? And it is true they did; they persecuted effeminate homosexuals. But Hitler recruited around him homosexuals to make up his Stormtroopers, they were his enforcers, they were his thugs. And Hitler discovered that he could not get straight soldiers to be savage and brutal and vicious enough to carry out his orders, but that homosexual solders basically had no limits and the savagery and brutality they were willing to inflict on whomever Hitler sent them after. So he surrounded himself, virtually all of the Stormtroopers, the Brownshirts, were male homosexuals.

link

Oh, AFA, how full of lulz you are.

One of these days one of those batshit 50yr old serious looking politicians is going to stop midsentence and yell "Hahahahaha Psych! i was just fucking with you all"
Maybe ripping of his fake face as well.
Maybe this racist politician was really a coffee coloured prankster.
Now taking bets on who it will be.

I notice you never see Palin and Obama in the same room.

I think it's because she's afraid that he'll turn into the image of what most (if not all) Rebublicans, including herself, are hoping he'll turn out to be: Ghetto, and shank her, or something.

Shank her with his black cawk.

[The consequence was that that even your idiot neighbor could get elected - you know, the guy who you don't trust to drive a car, let alone make high-impact societally affecting decisions? So they tossed out that one.]

If the political system corrupts everybody who goes through it, I'm wondering what the merits might be of a completely random leader selection process that is repeated every couple years or so. Maybe something like jury duty. I mean, the general public does contain all sorts of schmucks that should probably never be in power, but at least the results should be entertaining.

Wait, why am I even posting this?

the greeks experimented with a system in which the senators would be chosen by lottery.

They thought that elections tend to select a certain type of people, and that group of people can't possibly represent the general pubic. Maybe it's better to have a random sampling of elected leaders, thereby ensuring that the government is a reflection of the populace.

The consequence was that that even your idiot neighbor could get elected - you know, the guy who you don't trust to drive a car, let alone make high-impact societally affecting decisions? So they tossed out that one.

[emphasis added]

I am quoting from earlier in this thread to offer a thought on the bolded selection. Michele Bachmann was elected, she can make high-impact societally affecting decisions. I wouldn't trust her to drive a car.

That is all.

I'm wondering if it would be better to have campaign funds granted by the government, where you can use those funds however you want, but you can't use any other money than that. I'm just not sure how this would be implemented in such a way that makes it possible for new parties to form as well as making it so that there's not 20 different candidates who entered just to take the money and keep it for themselves.

I was under the impression that was the exact purpose of this thread. To try and think up solutions without this becoming a thread about Libertarianism. Not what works personally for you for your own selfish reasons.

It was derailed on page fucking one. Damn libertarians. NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT YOU!

Dawn of War

Think about it, I could be brainwashed for the Emperor and die in a shithole of a planet with my flashlight. Or! I could join a Chaos cult and go stark, raving mad. Even better, I could defeat to the alien communists and live in a concentration camp.

But, most likely, I wouldn't even get killed by an ork with a rusty blade, I'd probably get shot by the adeptus arbites (space cops) for not praying loud enough.

Relationships are hard, but you are smart and will learn quickly how to navigate their depths.

It occurs to me that this wasn't the most sensitive post, but dammit, my mind is filled with perversions.

Two things,

for Nigel

And, just going to add that I hate the stigma against sex workers. Because I'm going to pretend that my opinion matters!

There was another census thread around but I'm too lazy to continue to look for it so I'm posting this here just for shits and grins.

The census is not kept private. All info becomes public after 70 years.

Ok-that is all.

72. At that point, the information is pretty much useless (unless you're geneaology diving), because who's life stays exactly the same for 72 years? For fuck's sake, shut the fuck up, and cooperate you (generalized, not YOU specifically) iggerant fucktards. Goddammit.

Thing is, in 72 years my grandchildren will have their parent's place of where they grew up be public.
It's a matter of principle. The census folks keep saying everything is kept private. Well-bullshit it is not.

Personally, I think that census workers should be flown to people's homes in black helicopters. I don't care that it would be an exorbitant waste of money. The lulz, think of the lulz.

#6?? Who the fuck was that? If they earned a place in the same sentence as AKK I need to see this shit!

http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=24803.0

enjoy.

Jesus aperaping fuck! 40 pages??? I made it to about 6   

I got 22 pages in.

I almost regret missing that. Then I realized that I'd have to actually, you know, put up with the spag.

Interesting stories.

So, I'm looking into what it takes to become an actuary.  Growing field, involves maths, seems like my kind of thing.

Probably more rewarding, and less dangerous than Law enforcement. I say "Probably"
but I don't actually have a clue what an Actuary is. Sounds quite clever though. At least, I'm impressed. (But that's no biggy, I'm easily impressed) I'm going to go and find out what it is now, before I say anything else, that might be construed as stupid.
Er.

They play with numbers and figure out things like financial risk and shit.

At least we shouldn't be seeing any more in Minnesota for a while, the state set aside money and is using/has used it to update the infrastructure.

If anybody can confirm this was a troll, well, that's about the only way I'd actually watch the damn thing.

Over here, you don't jump off the bridge, the bridge jumps for you.