Messages

@ Nigel

I won't make excuses why I acted in opposition to my principles with regard to making assumptions. Suffice it to say there's a reason I did and it won't be happening again.

@ Payne

There's quite an expanse between trolling a person's opinions and personal attacks of one's character. ECH wasn't singled out by me as a target until he chose to get personal.

If one doesn't wish to become a target, one shouldn't resort to name calling. 

Just sayin'

I'm just going by what ove seen. Until I see otherwise, I'll stick with "can't."

And "win an argument without" was an unfortunate choice of words on my part. "Can't argue without" would gotten my point across much better.

Firewillow is an absolutely irredeemable shitneck who does not now and never will rate having me start a thread directed at him.

You're just pissy because you can't win an argument without resorting to ad hominem tactics.  

A lot of people here have earned my respect since I started posting here.  You, however, have yet to show me anything that remotely resembles humor or projects intelligence.

So keep going with your 3rd grade name-calling tactics.  It makes you look uberkewl to the other kids.  I, however, and completely unimpressed, and will file you among the lowlife cretin that I not to associate with.

Have a nice day.

Also: EoC, I'm not trooling. I was just going along with what was going on in the thread.

Also THIS.

I can honestly say that I've never trooled once on these boards.

         ...though I MAY troll from time to time...in the name of science...

                      ...and for teh lulz.

Also: EoC, I'm not trooling. I was just going along with what was going on in the thread. Also, I didn't come over from TCC (if you were implying that).

Nevertheless, you all just got a check next to your name on the blackboard.  If you get two, you are sent to the kitten furnaces (they need comforting before they are burned).  However, if you get seven, you are rightfully able to challenge the rule.

Will there be a TU we can "cool off" in?

So, were arguing about who specifically inspired a thread thats about people assuming that posts aimed a large group of people were specifically aimed at them.

Yeah...so it would appear.

Frankly, I'm a little disappointed that I wasn't the inspiration.  

I was kinda hoping that this whole forum would be about me.

Also: EoC, I'm not trooling. I was just going along with what was going on in the thread.

Also THIS.

I can honestly say that I've never trooled once on these boards.

         ...though I MAY troll from time to time...in the name of science...

                      ...and for teh lulz.

[Just because we troll one thread that was an apparent attack on us]

I call BS on this.  Just because we troll one thread that was an apparent attack on us, that means we are trolling the entire forum?  I'm afraid you're assertion is going to require a little more evidence to be credible.

Oh holy shit  please tell me you meant that to be funny!

Pretty sure this was aimed at Charley and I for being dipsticks on the copyright thread.   

I didn't read that one, but I've seen maybe a dozen instances of exactly what he's talking about in the OP in the last month, and I may have participated in them. But none of them were FW or Cheese.

I found what transpired over the last couple of days in the open bar to be a little more than coincidental with the appearance of this thread.

I also find the corollary of mention of the forum from whence I came a bit suspicious as well. *shrugs*

Nope.  This thread was started because Charley and I were being shitheads in the copyright thread in OKM.

Well then, don't I feel like the horse's ass. 

This is a perfect example of what happens when one makes assumptions...

[Just because we troll one thread that was an apparent attack on us]

I call BS on this.  Just because we troll one thread that was an apparent attack on us, that means we are trolling the entire forum?  I'm afraid you're assertion is going to require a little more evidence to be credible.

Oh holy shit   please tell me you meant that to be funny!

Pretty sure this was aimed at Charley and I for being dipsticks on the copyright thread.  

I didn't read that one, but I've seen maybe a dozen instances of exactly what he's talking about in the OP in the last month, and I may have participated in them. But none of them were FW or Cheese.

I found what transpired over the last couple of days in the open bar to be a little more than coincidental with the appearance of this thread.

I also find the corollary of mention of the forum from whence I came a bit suspicious as well. *shrugs*

If Freeky took offense to what I said, then I would like to offer up an apology.  I intended no ill will toward her.  I was simply playing a word game.

We only troll our own if it's funny, not mean, or we actually dislike them.

I'm sorry, but I don't see where anyone was being "mean."

But I suppose discourtesy to newer members of forums and ad hominem attacks are COMPLETELY ACCEPTABLE.

Hey, this just stopped being funny.

Conveniently, we can now be certain that Phox, Firewillow, and Fuck it whoever that other TCC asshole is (that's not Coyote) are here for trolling purposes alone.

I call BS on this.  Just because we troll one thread that was an apparent attack on us, that means we are trolling the entire forum?  I'm afraid you're assertion is going to require a little more evidence to be credible.

Hey, this just stopped being funny.

Yeah...you do have a point.

The huge text This whole thread is beyond retarded, and fucks with my tiny ass.
With Meathammers.

The huge text This whole thread is beyond retarded, and fucks with my tiny ass.

Jackasses.