They had been watching Max fumble the innvocation for over twenty minutes now. Megan got up and went to the snack table, only to discover someone had eaten all of the rice crispy squares. This was the worst satanic ritual she had ever been too.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: The Littlest Ubermensch on March 11, 2008, 05:31:49 AM
Perhaps. A lot of the creative process isn't necessarily intentional, so much as it's stumbling across something interesting in the subconscious/collective unconscious/whatever.
Quote from: GoddesS PurpleriS "Καλλίστη" on December 13, 2008, 08:56:17 PM
Mommy... Can I go out to kill tonite? I feel, I feel like takin' a Life..
Quote from: LMNOMalcoid, did I read right that you're not in High School yet?
Quote from: Malcoid the Magnanimous ManateeI had a strong interest in exploring metaphysics in high school. Im more inclinded these days blah blah blah
Quote from: Cain on December 10, 2008, 10:45:18 AM
Paradigm shift is the phrase I think I have been looking for. Planks of the old system have been abused to the point of death, but most world leaders wish to retain that old system - because they understand, because they profit from it and because their financial backers have a vested interest in an ordered future they know how to exploit. They want to live in the past, to how things were, and I'm not sure this is entirely possible.
Quote from: Vene on December 11, 2008, 02:18:20 AMQuote from: Malcoid the Malcontent on December 11, 2008, 01:55:01 AMYes I know, the tough guy doesnt always win. If that was the case, humans probably would not be the dominant species on the planet. Its more likely that higher brain function and better social cooperation allowed us to claim the top of the shit pile. So, I would suggest its possible that the concept of morality and ethics arose in conjunction with the evolution of our brain.You think we're the dominant speciesVarious insects and bacteria have got us beat.
Quote
If you don't fucking understand it, don't fucking apply it. You don't have an understanding of evolution, so don't try and apply it. That's what caused social darwinism.
Quote from: Vene on December 11, 2008, 12:33:48 AMQuote from: Malcoid the Malcontent on December 10, 2008, 11:31:37 PMBesides, I find your assertion that morality arises 'out of nowhere, out of Chaos' to be as unsatisfactory as those who claim it is directed by God.I never fucking said that you motherfucking twat.
Quote
That is not evolution, that is a creotard strawman. Actual evolutionary theory states that those who live long enough to fuck and have offspring will spread more of their traits into the general population. They could do it by being the biggest badass, until a bigger predator kills and eats it. A lot of times the pretty boy has a greater fitness, because he got laid unlike mister badass who fights every motherfucking thing he sees. Or you have a badass lone wolf, who gets chased out of the pack by the weaker members for being a dick. He's not getting laid, he's working too hard to sustain himself on rats.
Also, I fucking hate it that species-centric fucks always focus on animals. Your strawman means nothing in the world of plants. An aggressive flower is just fucking moronic and I don't care which flower is the most imposing, if bees aren't attracted to it's petals it ain't reproducing. The REAL theory applies to these circumstances, your idiotic version where the tough guys always win fails.
Quote from: BAWHEED on December 11, 2008, 12:06:31 AM
I believe morals were invented by man to fulfill the intense need people have to tell others how they should behave.
End of story.
Quote from: GA on December 11, 2008, 12:04:48 AMQuote from: Malcoid the Malcontent on December 10, 2008, 11:58:01 PMQuote from: GA on December 10, 2008, 11:50:19 PM
Are we talking about the map or the territory here? I'd agree that what people think of as moral might have something to do with sociobiology, but to say that something is objectively Wrong or objectively Good because of how animo acids happened to work out seems to be the height of stupidity.
I thought we had already cleared up that misconception. No, I certainly do not suggest we have specific morals, or any objective sense of morality because of biology.
Im simply speculating that the need for morals grew out of some combination of biological evolution and the increasingly complex social interactions that arose from higher brain functions.
Seems like a fairly reasonable idea to me...
How do you feel about metaphysics?
Quote from: GA on December 10, 2008, 11:50:19 PM
Are we talking about the map or the territory here? I'd agree that what people think of as moral might have something to do with sociobiology, but to say that something is objectively Wrong or objectively Good because of how animo acids happened to work out seems to be the height of stupidity.
Quote from: Vene on December 10, 2008, 10:31:52 PM
Just stop, please stop. Evolution says shit all about our morality. Biology says shit all about morality. Science says shit all about morality. Not to mention you are applying evolutionary biology to an area it was never meant for. In this case it is a useless model. Not to mention you are oversimplifying the entire thing so much it's not even useful in a biological sense.
Quote from: BAWHEED on December 10, 2008, 08:29:27 PM
Malcoid, why are you so concerned about the morals or ethics of others?