Just so you guys are aware, the affidavit plaintiff/defendant title, etc.... looks like this:
Evidence on Commission means that if the State disputes your evidence, as stated in your Affidavit, then since you live outside South Africa, I can request the STate to approve a 'Commission' (a Magistrate), who then goes to wherever you are, with a list of questions, for you to answer under oath, to testify to your 'expert witness testimony', to the questions from the STate and Defendant.
I mean, can you imagine the High Court Judges face!!!

Somehow I don't think the State will dispute that your statement of 'catma' is not catma; do you?
Priceless!
Lara
PS:
Two other Affidavits currently being worked on/editted/debated.... are:
1. evidencing (i) the legal, psychological and socio-political relevance of Dr. Stanley Milgram's studies on Obedience; & (ii) their relevance to the application of the common law 'reasonableness test' in cases of 'civil disobedience', and the Nuremberg Principles
2. evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company
Quote--------------------------------------------
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE WESTERN CAPE
--------------------------------------------
Mag.Crt: 14/1198/08 [17/1384/07]
CT.CAS: 1340/7/07 [Grg: 572/02]
State:
Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID Primary Plaintiff / Respondent
Mr. Thabo Mbeki, Former President Secondary Plaintiff / Respondent
Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, Former NPA Secondary Plaintiff / Respondent
Mr. J.S. Selebi, Former SAPS Secondary Plaintiff / Respondent
Mr. BM Skosana, Former Min. Corrections Secondary Plaintiff / Respondent
Mr. Nelson Mandela, Former President Secondary Plaintiff / Respondent
v.
Lara Johnstone Defendant / Applicant-----------------------------------------------------------------
Affidavit of ......... [Name]......., evidencing [the following as Discordian Catma: Holy 23, Rule of Fives, Operation Mindfuck.....]; in terms of Criminal Procedure Act 51, of 1977: § 213: Proof of Written Statement by Consent; & § 171 & 172: Evidence on Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Evidence on Commission means that if the State disputes your evidence, as stated in your Affidavit, then since you live outside South Africa, I can request the STate to approve a 'Commission' (a Magistrate), who then goes to wherever you are, with a list of questions, for you to answer under oath, to testify to your 'expert witness testimony', to the questions from the STate and Defendant.
I mean, can you imagine the High Court Judges face!!!


Somehow I don't think the State will dispute that your statement of 'catma' is not catma; do you?
Priceless!
Lara
PS:
Two other Affidavits currently being worked on/editted/debated.... are:
1. evidencing (i) the legal, psychological and socio-political relevance of Dr. Stanley Milgram's studies on Obedience; & (ii) their relevance to the application of the common law 'reasonableness test' in cases of 'civil disobedience', and the Nuremberg Principles
2. evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company