atomised individualism, as was mentioned earlier.
and conventions.
and conventions.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on December 20, 2010, 02:03:58 PM
That doesn't explain why you have a flipped cat in your avatar instead of a dog.
Quote from: BadBeast on December 21, 2010, 06:07:28 PMQuote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 05:33:22 PMI agree completely Rog, and her Hooliganism is the main thing that endears her to us. I mean, she married a Greek Gangster ffs! But then we've never been all that stipulative about our Monarchs. So long as they don't attempt to get "Political" that is. (That's ((partly)) why "The Idiot" will never be King) William will be OK though, because his MotherQuote from: BadBeast on December 21, 2010, 04:28:29 PMQuote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 21, 2010, 02:14:05 PMSeconded. (Although the Queen is technically, and genetically more German than English)Quote from: LMNO, PhD on December 21, 2010, 12:54:41 PMQuote from: flipdog on December 21, 2010, 10:19:56 AM
i think of grammar as a convenience, as i do words and conventions.
Welcome. We may end up not liking each other.
Concur. The jury's still out, but mangling the Queen's English out of laziness isn't a good sign.
So is about a third of the English language, at least at its roots.
And Germans would never put up with her hooliganism, so she's English.
had proper Royal Blood. (That's why it got splattered all over an ancient Temple of Diana) So it goes.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 03, 2010, 04:57:49 PMQuote from: Persona Facade on December 03, 2010, 04:57:01 PM
Don't worry reading the story doesn't help it make anymore sense. However, if you want to confuse someone or make them think 'WHY!?' this story is great.
I prefer doing that by being a horrible cunt, rather than with word salad.
Quote from: geekdad on December 16, 2010, 04:50:05 AMQuote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on December 15, 2010, 01:18:23 PM
For me, the PD was something of a catalyst. That is, when I read it, it wasn't really one of those "Eureka" moments. It sort of brought together a lot of thoughts and philosophies I already had, but hadn't quite pieced together. It was like, I realized I was always a Discordian. I just hadn't ever had a proper title for it. It crystallized for me so many of the reasons I left the Christian faith of my youth for a more expansive, self-regulated and self-determined religion/spirituality.
As for the book itself, it's been awhile since I've read it. But there are parts that resonate with me in particular and I suspect they are the same passages that resonate with many of you. Nonsense as Salvation, Sermon on Ethics and Love, the Sacred Chao (text)/Reality grids, and of course Greyface.
I still think of myself as a Discordian. I don't really go around telling other people I'm a Discordian. I generally avoid the discussion of religion around friends and family as it doesn't seem to be a very fruitful discussion.
Anyway, not sure where I'm going with this anymore so I'll stop right about here.
This sums up my feelings and past exactly.
As far as philosopies as ladders analogy, I like it but don't think it quite fits.
There are times that instead of it being a ladder it's a compass, showing where to go. Each ideology or philosophy has a compass that points in different directions (with similar ones pointing to similer places). It depends on yourself to know what direction you want. If you go too far in one direction, then you pick up a different philosophy that points closer to the place you want to be.
Now that I've taken that analogy to the breaking point I'll also stop.