News:

We've got artists, scientists, scholars, pranksters, publishers, songwriters, and political activists.  We've subjected Discordia to scrutiny, torn it apart, and put it back together. We've written songs about it, we've got a stack of essays, and, to refer back to your quote above, we criticize the hell out of each other.

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - JBookup

#1
Okay last string I posted is "whatupplaya". This is an somewhat more complicated string unfortunately I did not incorporate Faust's idea of reversing and counting differences. Its straightforward no rearranging needed, only mathematical ingenuity. And if you figure out the math you might have to guess around a little bit as to what your final numbers correspond to. In the end you are gonna have 4 numbers that correspond to 4 letters of the alphabet in numerical and alphabetical order but not 1-26. This is a 4 letter word please try to solve.

78642008877532165994187424169990
#2
I like how I say its super easy and you go and do something complicated. But I'm actually loving the idea of that and will probably make something that works like that. But as of right now it is really simple.
#3
Super easy no legend needed...

831331247748569838838296247655247
#4
To make it harder to decipher. You decipher once and get a noncoherent message that is readable but makes no sense.
#5
They would have the legend and know exactly what it translates to without using a program.
#6
How effective would something like this be?

Bhijadrbo = adverbial = rbxtiavrf = encrypted
#7
Really I was just trying to make a way to encrypt the alphabet through the use of math. As to what the encryption is intended for I have no idea. At the moment I am bouncing around in which ever direction holds the most promise for what I've already made, though I have what I think are better processes for creating a larger scale more complex legend. Though I am waiting for the results of this first test. The first string I posted does not include random letters, numbers, or symbols. And is fairly obvious. The second string that has Example: preceding it does include random numbers, letters, and symbols.

#8
Impossible to decrypt without the key/legend. With the legend the person decrpyting would know which letters, numbers, and symbols didn't belong. The method used for creating my legend is impossible to reverse engineer. Without the introduction of random numbers, letters, or symbols a brute force attack could easily break through. But with the introduction of numbers, letters, or symbols at random intervals I think a brute force attack would be ineffective.

As to the question about the multiple letters with the same encrypted counterpart, I didn't really think that through... I guess at the moment they would have to do a lot of guess and check work to decrypt it even with the legend.
#9
This is why I came here. To learn these things. I now realize the password protection plan is flawed. But hope is still alive in the encrypted message aspects. I think anyways O.o
#10
It could be numbers, symbols, or letters that need to be skipped. This is for encrypting passwords and what not to make it impossible for them to decrypt. Now if me and someone were exchanging encrypted messages. Obviously that other person would have the key and would be able to figure out what doesn't belong. Also these are not programs, I know nothing of those sort of things, though very soon will be trying for I have an ingenious idea. But for the time being these are written out on paper and calculated in my head.
#11
That's why I was worried about the brute force thing but after given some thought if I wrote out a different string and incorporated numbers,letters, or symbols that are not encrpyted and plugged them in randomly it would take a lot of work to figure out which ones need to be changed and which ones stay the same.

Example: k^dg6ks2a0$9gcsf
#12
Okay so this seems ridiculously simple to me, and only took about 1 min to write. But ill post it anyways. So imma post the original string in this new method then anyone can ask for me to write their sample in it too.

99699633333936396
#13
Thank you for welcoming me. Man I'm so confused. I have no idea what any of you are talking about. The best I can tell you is there is no dots or spaces. It is strictly a-z. I would like to take your samples and convert them but it would give away too much because its a set in stone key. There is no variation.

A=
B=
C=
Etc.

But I do believe I can make an algorithm that would allow sample testing. Though it would be still set in stone, but with multiple letters having the same encrypted counterpart.
#14
Lol. Hilarious. I guess I can elaborate. It's not solely just what it means that affected my judgement. It was a multitude of things that caught my attention. Starting with it's meaning being principles of disorder. Just that in itself somehow calls to me. Then I find out its a book and I'm immediately impressed and I can tell that this is a book that of read and understood properly it would teach value and affect ones views. Value and views that I'm certain parallel mine. And that is what the name of this website is, awesome. Then I read the topics of discussion and everything is in one way or another relevant to my interests.
#15
I might not find what I'm looking for here, but I knew this place was for me as soon as I found out what principia discordia meant.