Messages

Weird.  You totally don't sound like someone who has a college education.


Or, for a sad statement on the type of education kids are getting there days, you do.

I am humbled by your astute knowledge of what passes for a college education mr phd

I am outraged by your lack of knowledge involving simple punctuation and grammar.

What medical school admitted you?

I am outraged by your redundancy: punctuation is an integral part of grammar.

Oh my, you've found me out! LULS!

No, please.  DO tell us about all the girls you're pulling down while in year 3 of medical school.  I am a captive audience, sir.

Study groups are just so wonderful, homeboy.

Yeah, case in point.

It's completely possible to state a contrary position without being a dick about it.

But, perhaps that's the only communication style you've ever used.


In which case, sorry about your future.

I'm not.  I get off on watching snotty little entitlement cases run into the real world in this manner.

Hopefully, he'll stick around a while, and we can hear how THOSE IDIOTS refuse to hire him, and how THOSE SLUTS won't date him, etc.

hm. three years into med school. and i don't have girl problems. lmfao. gg bro.

No girls, no problems. 

And you're not in med school.  Sorry.  You have a bit of a credibility problem here.

Oh my, you've found me out! LULS!

Like I give a shit about my credibility on this bullshit board.

I anticipated free minds. I got a bunch of "boo hoo I'm a victim the world hates me and there's a huge conspiracy against me and blah blah blah" pissing and whining and when I argue counter that point I get ganged up on. Hahaha.

Man, fuck this place. What a waste of several hours of my life.

Weird.  You totally don't sound like someone who has a college education.


Or, for a sad statement on the type of education kids are getting there days, you do.

I am humbled by your astute knowledge of what passes for a college education mr phd

Yeah, case in point.

It's completely possible to state a contrary position without being a dick about it.

But, perhaps that's the only communication style you've ever used.


In which case, sorry about your future.

I'm not.  I get off on watching snotty little entitlement cases run into the real world in this manner.

Hopefully, he'll stick around a while, and we can hear how THOSE IDIOTS refuse to hire him, and how THOSE SLUTS won't date him, etc.

hm. three years into med school. and i don't have girl problems. lmfao. gg bro.

[using engineered viruses]

I remember hearing - ages ago - about how scientists were considering using engineered viruses to fight cancer.  It was still at a very theoretical stage back then.  It's good to see progress is being made, tentative as it is.

This is being done today. Viruses are currently being used in genetic engineering as well.

What do you think those bolded words mean, Sparky? Or do you just like repeating what other people have said as if it's new news?

Please don't tell me you need me to be so specific as to highlight the fact that the viruses being used in treatment are modified and not in their natural form.

Dude, we don't even know you.

What you're doing is simply considered rude in any social situation.

Which, first and foremost, this is.

Heaven forbid someone be rude in the search for enlightenment.

Nothing to see here, folks. Just go home and go back to your beds and be good folks and follow accepted social mores no matter how much shit you see is wrong. Don't offend anyone with your opinions and keep your mouths shut, otherwise you're just plain rude!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x3dTA_2DSw

Shame you can't type comprehensibly.

Sucks that you continuously resort to ad hominem.

I have often found that the best way to display my superior e-penis (and thus increase my chances of e-mating) is to find a very respected member of a board I have just joined, and pick a fight with him...Much in the manner that timber wolves will employ.

This doesn't WORK, of course, because even if you were Albert Einstein with a PhD in reddit, the simple fact remains that people will not listen to you when you do that, even if you're RIGHT (doubtful), because they LIKE the established member and they don't know you from Martin Bormann.

Is that "fair"?  Of course not.  Allow me to welcome you to all of human history.

That is all.  Carry on.

Yeah, this wasn't my intent at all. I only saw some bullshit and said "WTF?!"

Further, I don't care how popular you are, if you're bullshitting, you're bullshitting.

"It doesn't matter how many followers you have: Hitler had millions, Jesus only had 12."

I hope they are simple enough for you to comprehend.

You're not really here to talk to people, right?

Oh I was, but received such a shitstorm over such stupid shit that I've realized that there isn't gonna be much discussion here... you either agree or get shot down by everyone else.

Eg. I state a simple scientific truth of the day and receive a gif waving away my post, which I can only assume is because I said something to bother this person on another post. Yay!

I was legit anticipating free minds here, but you're all a hive mind centered around each other.

Spouting the party lines. Mind you, it's the anti-party, but what's the difference between the party lines and the anti-party lines?

Discuss.

Never mind.  He's a facebook discordian.

Doesn't meet the standard.

Hm. Perhaps in reply to my level of caring about your "standard" I should quote your avatar.

Let's not even get into "Facebook Discordian^tm" and "free range tard^tm".

I remember hearing - ages ago - about how scientists were considering using engineered viruses to fight cancer.  It was still at a very theoretical stage back then.  It's good to see progress is being made, tentative as it is.

This is being done today. Viruses are currently being used in genetic engineering as well.

http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/therapy/procedures
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/263385.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vectors_in_gene_therapy#Viruses
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/experts-gene-therapy/

"Gene therapy is the addition of new genes to a patient's cells to replace missing or malfunctioning genes. Researchers typically do this using a virus to carry the genetic cargo into cells, because that's what viruses evolved to do with their own genetic material.

The treatment, which was first tested in humans in 1990, can be performed inside or outside of the body. When it's done inside the body, doctors may inject the virus carrying the gene in question directly into the part of the body that has defective cells. This is useful when only certain populations of cells need to be "fixed." For example, researchers are using it to try to treat Parkinson's disease, because only part of the brain must be targeted. This approach is also being used to treat eye diseases and hemophilia, an inherited disease that leads to a high risk for excess bleeding, even from minor cuts."


The links I posted provide a very simplified version of the methods currently in use. I hope they are simple enough for you to comprehend.

So....you have no proof to back up your claim that I said, that negotiations for a pipeline equalled acceptance of an invasion?

Come now, an invasion, preparations for an invasion by spec ops forces, wanna split hairs here, really?

She didn't approve of them moving spec ops in and fomenting unrest for a future invasion.
So you were claiming she was a hypocrite for wanting a pipeline, and then deciding she didn't like Russia.
Well, now we're ~3 months out from your comment, and not only were her negative feelings toward Russia correct but they have invaded and occupied a decent swath of her country. She was right, you were wrong, get over it dude.

No troops were deployed until the government was overthrown by the new group that russia does not recognise and most of those troops were withdrawn today.

Oooh so if the Mexican government is overthrown by a group that the US does not recognize we should invade. Right!

Thank you.

Still waiting for that quote, sparky.

Here you go, buddy.
Lord Byron: "Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves."

Get over it. You insinuated that she was a hypocrite, but she was right. The fact that your post was ~3 months ago only proves my point further. Russia had not invaded, so to you, her fears were unjustified, and she was just some anti-russian cunt. Some asshole who was willing to profit off of Russia but now she's profiting on being the "darling of the western-liberal anti-russians", as you said. But now Russia has invaded Ukraine, so her fears were proved right, and your rhetoric reactionist bullshit was proved wrong. She wasn't just some cunt who disliked Russia to be the "darling". She actually smelled something funny coming. And come it did - all over poor Crimea's face.

But of course, that doesn't change your desire to argue over semantics and wordplay. You were wrong and she was right and the specific words used do not invalidate your argument any less.