Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xXRon_Paul_42016Xxx(weed)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 49
16
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Generic split from AI/political threads
« on: December 16, 2016, 01:47:24 am »
Theres also this, which no one is talking about:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AisvBNXPdG8

Because it's the same tedious bullshit you keep throwing up?

1 - "Russia Insider"

2- Let's look at some of their other sterling content, ignoring the video (as we're clearly doing here)
Such gems as

"Important. Please share!!"
 - Mounting Evidence: Does Hillary Have Parkinson's?
 - BUSTED: German ZDF TV pays Russian drunk to act as a "Russian mercenary" in their Putin documentary
 - SHOCKING: Ukrainian inquisition against the Orthodox Christians by Kiev regime in Ukraine
 -Putin: US / NATO is irreversibly pushing the world towards nuclear war
 -Putin crushes CNN smartass Fareed Zakaria on Donald Trump and US elections
 - Russia Insider Editor Awarded Major Russian Journalism Prize - The Oles Buzina ( :lulz: :lulz: :horrormirth:)
 - WHOA: Obama praises Putin for engineering a remarkable climb in Russia's strength in only 2 years!

Or how about some of their most popular?
 - FUNNY: ISIS attempts to shoot down Russian jet and see what happens... (This is sad and embarrasing. Particularly if you recognise the footage)

Fuck it, I don't need to go on any further. You either get that whoever is operating this is so firmly up putin's arse that their official job title is "Buttplug" or you're just being wilfully fucking stupid.


Hey Roger, Remember when Propaganda was subtle?

So is the Norwegian journalist asking the question a plant? Is the whole Press Conference just a sound stage? They didnt make this video they just Tivoed it on CSPAN2 and uploaded it to youtube.

Heres the same video hosted by a different account:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VNQGsiP8M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heEHmXTmLlE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebE3GJfGhfA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uap0GwBYdBA

Like, I know you guys are obsessed with appealing to authority, but I didnt know that it was to such an extent that a bad source uploading a video they had no part in making corrupts it and makes all points within null and void.

17
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Generic split from AI/political threads
« on: December 16, 2016, 01:19:35 am »
Theres also this, which no one is talking about:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AisvBNXPdG8

18
Boy Rodger sure ducked out of this thread fast.

I've been at work, you stupid Nazi cunt.

Eggcelent I thought you flounced on me. Now we can pick up where we left off.

Sure.  I love the irony of the situation.  So what?

So you dont approve of it at all then?

19
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Generic split from AI/political threads
« on: December 15, 2016, 10:59:40 pm »
interesting that arming and aiding Al Qaeda isnt considered having a spine too, Id call that a downright ballsy move.

20
Boy Rodger sure ducked out of this thread fast.

I've been at work, you stupid Nazi cunt.

Eggcelent I thought you flounced on me. Now we can pick up where we left off.

21
Pepe wins again.

22


Again, Rodger is a big boy he can weasel out of owning up to his own words himself. He can also explain that he is too SMARTtm to bother wasting his time on me(except for when he just did, and all the times he inevitably will in the future) himself before yall play that card. Let the man speak for himself.

23
Boy Rodger sure ducked out of this thread fast.

24
Joseph.

Apparently, Nazi's just have 'wrong opinions'.  :lol:

What has Richard Spencer actually done besides state controversial things?

Quote
It appears that he needs to invent a villain to justify his association with fascism. I don't think anyone here would defend attacking innocent families, no matter who their offspring were. Pointing out the irony on the other hand? YMMV. Or, more specifically, HMMV.

Dont speak for Rodger. Hes a big boy and can backpeddle for himself.

25
Right now, the sole thing I am judging people on is what they believe in, and what they are willing to do to defend those beliefs and, not coincidentally, the people around them.

So just to clarify. If someone has wrong opinions their families deserve to be targeted. Even if their families dont even share those wrong opinions. This is what you are willing to do to defend "the people around you" who dont include anyone related to a racist.

I mean its real brave, going after a dudes mother to protect people from his mean words.

Imagine that:  what he wants to do to 30% of the population is happening to his kin. Because of him.

Look what you made me do.

Also thank you for clearing up your stance on attacking the families of people who have wrong opinions. But of course youre totally for free speech because something something first amendment only applies to government.


I'm having trouble understanding how you're interpreting this in some sort of personal violence context.

For real. YOU AND ONLY YOU went there.

I didnt say it was violent. Sorry if youre too stupid to understand what "attack" means in the context of legally bullying someones mother out of their home.

26
Right now, the sole thing I am judging people on is what they believe in, and what they are willing to do to defend those beliefs and, not coincidentally, the people around them.

So just to clarify. If someone has wrong opinions their families deserve to be targeted. Even if their families dont even share those wrong opinions. This is what you are willing to do to defend "the people around you" who dont include anyone related to a racist.

I mean its real brave, going after a dudes mother to protect people from his mean words.

27
Because of him.

Look what you made me do.

Also thank you for clearing up your stance on attacking the families of people who have wrong opinions. But of course youre totally for free speech because something something first amendment only applies to government.

28
1. No confirmation that's what the ordinance is.

2. Local news article did not detail the proposed ordinance.


Either get your shit together, or get back to fucking chickens.

Quote
100 people, led by a group known as “Love Lives Here,” packed into Whitefish’s small town city council chambers demanding our local government pass an ordinance prohibiting Richard Spencer and the National Policy Institute he represents from doing business or having offices in Whitefish.

What short of publishing the entire proposal would satisfy you? What more details do you need? What details could possibly make this not as bad as it looks?

29
Ok here is a play by play:

I should know better than to respond, but there is quite literally nothing in that article that states what Love Lives Here's actions in regards to the building even are.

To which I responded with two links outlining Love Lives Here's support of an ordinance that would ban Richard Spencer from owning an office in Whitefish. Richard Spencers mother lives in his former home which is still listed as one of Richards offices from when he lived there. Now even if this doesnt pass, what it has done is brought a lot of negative publicity and hate down on Richard Spencers mother, who hasnt done anything besides giving birth to Richard Spencer and him occasionally visiting.

Ok, getting closer.  A proposed ordinance.

Still nothing about what the text of the ordinance is, nor how likely it is to pass.

And apparently a local news article detailing the ordinance is not enough proof. Until they publish the full text of the proposal. Which is totally something that happens all the time and a standard of proof that you would ask for in all other situations.

These are you only posts on this topic by the way. I am desperately searching for any more but I just cant find them. As previously stated I am stupid.

30
I have.  Comprehension is not your friend, is it?

No it isnt. Please quote or link to it as I am a very stupid man.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 49