Problem is, without some incredible funding, no third party candidate is going to look any better than Nader. And in hindsight, the losing party will always blame the third party. That's how the two-party hegemony works. Anything other than the two appears as a threat to some established "good cause".
And sorry Dems, but Bush won for a zillion reasons other than Nader. Like the Florida debacle.
I didn't vote Nader, but I kinda wish I did since the democrats got so butthurt over it.

I don't live in Florida, so it srsly wouldn't have made a difference.