This thread is now about Furries, for some reason. Formerly: "So. Anonymous."

[shadowfurry23]

Furries DO go to great lengths to pretend to be childish animals in order to have sex.

You really don't get it - you have no idea what you're talking about.  I'm trying to tell you that you're wrong but you're not accepting it.  You are slandering an entire community of which you know little to nothing.  You are no different than the person that claims that homosexuals recruit young children.  

I'm done trying to explain it to you though.  You go right on being a bigot, if that's what makes you happy.  

[Bruno]

Nope. Dead serious.

Perhaps you can explain to me the difference.

I'd rather just call you an idiot for comparing furries with transsexuals.

That's definitely the easier choice.

Its also the choice with greater capacity for lulz.

Lulz away then, sugarpance. I accept your concession and declare victory.

[Kai]

Nope. Dead serious.

Perhaps you can explain to me the difference.

I'd rather just call you an idiot for comparing furries with transsexuals.

That's definitely the easier choice.

Its also the choice with greater capacity for lulz.

Lulz away then, sugarpance. I accept your concession and declare victory.

I've been laughing at you since you said you were serious. 

[Kai]

Furries DO go to great lengths to pretend to be childish animals in order to have sex.

You really don't get it - you have no idea what you're talking about.  I'm trying to tell you that you're wrong but you're not accepting it.  You are slandering an entire community of which you know little to nothing.  You are no different than the person that claims that homosexuals recruit young children. 

I'm done trying to explain it to you though.  You go right on being a bigot, if that's what makes you happy. 

If hating racists make me a bigot, then I am a bigot.

[Bruno]

Nope. Dead serious.

Perhaps you can explain to me the difference.

I'd rather just call you an idiot for comparing furries with transsexuals.

That's definitely the easier choice.

Its also the choice with greater capacity for lulz.

Lulz away then, sugarpance. I accept your concession and declare victory.

I've been laughing at you since you said you were serious. 

First they laughed at the Jews.
I didn't give a shit ...Jews are funny!

[Kai]

Nope. Dead serious.

Perhaps you can explain to me the difference.

I'd rather just call you an idiot for comparing furries with transsexuals.

That's definitely the easier choice.

Its also the choice with greater capacity for lulz.

Lulz away then, sugarpance. I accept your concession and declare victory.

I've been laughing at you since you said you were serious. 

First they laughed at the Jews.
I didn't give a shit ...Jews are funny!

No see, I'm not even laughing at furries. I'm laughing at your idiocy in comparing furries with transsexuals. I'm laughing at YOU. 

[shadowfurry23]

Furries DO go to great lengths to pretend to be childish animals in order to have sex.

You really don't get it - you have no idea what you're talking about.  I'm trying to tell you that you're wrong but you're not accepting it.  You are slandering an entire community of which you know little to nothing.  You are no different than the person that claims that homosexuals recruit young children.  

I'm done trying to explain it to you though.  You go right on being a bigot, if that's what makes you happy.  

  Actually I lied, I've got one more:



"Childish animals."   LOL!

[Bruno]

No see, I'm not even laughing at furries. I'm laughing at your idiocy in comparing furries with transsexuals. I'm laughing at YOU.  

And yet you still can't explain the difference.

One thinks they're something they biologically are not.

The other thinks they're something they biologically are not.

Same --> Same

Granted, some furries don't actually believe that they're some anthropomorphic animal inside for realz, they just like dressing up like animals.

This is more analogous to cross-dressing.

[Kai]

No see, I'm not even laughing at furries. I'm laughing at your idiocy in comparing furries with transsexuals. I'm laughing at YOU. 

And yet you still can't explain the difference.

One thinks they're something they biologically are not.

The other thinks they're something they biologically are not.

Same --> Same

Granted, some furries don't actually believe that they're some anthropomorphic animal inside for realz, they just like dressing up like animals.

This is more analogous to cross-dressing.

There is biological rational for transsexuals. There is absolutely no biological rational for furries.

And no, I am not gonna find the resources for you.

Even if there WASN'T any biological explanation for transsexuals, the two things are still entirely different because transsexuals keep their identification within the same species.

[shadowfurry23]

Granted, some most furries don't actually believe that they're some anthropomorphic animal inside for realz, they just like dressing up like animals.

Fixed that for you.  A common misconception.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Furries DO go to great lengths to pretend to be childish animals in order to have sex.

You really don't get it - you have no idea what you're talking about.  I'm trying to tell you that you're wrong but you're not accepting it.  You are slandering an entire community of which you know little to nothing.  You are no different than the person that claims that homosexuals recruit young children. 

I'm done trying to explain it to you though.  You go right on being a bigot, if that's what makes you happy. 

  Actually I lied, I've got one more:



"Childish animals."   LOL!

When adults get too invested in things intended for children (anthropomorphic cartoons for fucks sake) there's probably something dysfunctional going on if not pathological.

For the record, I think most furries are harmless yet pathetic weirdos.

But, I think there is a larger proportion of animal abusers as well as child abusers in the furry demographic than you'd find in the general population.

People who torture animals are more likely to be violent and abusive towards human beings.

I don't think it's a leap of logic to say that people who sexually abuse animals are more likely to sexually abuse human beings.

If you have a larger proportion of bestiality shitnecks in the furry demographic, I doubt that abuse is limited strictly to animals.

It's the age-inappropriate theme that suggests this abuse would target children.

[shadowfurry23]

People who torture animals are more likely to be violent and abusive towards human beings.

The mere idea that anyone who calls themselves a furry would torture animals is beyond crazy, and anyone with even a passing knowledge of furries would know that.  Seriously, the mind boggles.  Again, the cartoon idea you have in your head of furries is utterly and completely wrong.

  In case it wasn't clear enough though: the vast majority of furries loathe and despise 'zoophiles' much as you do.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

People who torture animals are more likely to be violent and abusive towards human beings.

The mere idea that anyone who calls themselves a furry would torture animals is beyond crazy, and anyone with even a passing knowledge of furries would know that.  Seriously, the mind boggles.  Again, the cartoon idea you have in your head of furries is utterly and completely wrong.

  In case it wasn't clear enough though: the vast majority of furries loathe and despise 'zoophiles' much as you do.

Do they yiff before or after denouncing zoophiles?

[Bruno]

No see, I'm not even laughing at furries. I'm laughing at your idiocy in comparing furries with transsexuals. I'm laughing at YOU. 

And yet you still can't explain the difference.

One thinks they're something they biologically are not.

The other thinks they're something they biologically are not.

Same --> Same

Granted, some furries don't actually believe that they're some anthropomorphic animal inside for realz, they just like dressing up like animals.

This is more analogous to cross-dressing.

There is biological rational for transsexuals. There is absolutely no biological rational for furries.

And no, I am not gonna find the resources for you.

Even if there WASN'T any biological explanation for transsexuals, the two things are still entirely different because transsexuals keep their identification within the same species.

It's not necessary for you to find the resources. I am familiar enough with them.

All human fetuses are female for  a certain period of time. In males, testosterone causes physical changes that are sometimes not fully expressed, specifically, you can have a male body and a female brain. Some women produce higher levels of testosterone that can androgenize the brain of the female fetus.

Or something like that.

There is no known or explored biological rational for furries yet. But I think we can agree that the human species evolved from other species, and that we share a significant portion of our genome with other animals.

Also, countless other human cultures have had anthropomorphic animals as central figures in their cultures. It was also pretty damn common for people to dress up as animals for religious ceremonies, and for certain members of their society to take on an animal "familiar" as part of their own identity.

These behaviors are common enough in unrelated cultures, that it seems unlikely that there is no biological basis.

[Bruno]

When adults get too invested in things intended for children (anthropomorphic cartoons for fucks sake) there's probably something dysfunctional going on if not pathological.

So... adults....   who watch cartoons......      are pedophiles?