How We Protect At-Risk Kids.

[AFK]

I do kind of hope he sticks around for another five years because the inevitable meltdown when his kids start smoking pot is going to be amazing.

Well, my son is only 3, so that seems pretty far-fetched.

The dead girl in the OP was only 2.

And apparently his daughter doesn't count, because, well, in RWHN's world females don't HAVE agency.

You said "kids start smoking".  I'm simply pointing out the stupidity of that.  I'm not very worried about my daughter.  She's a vert strong-minded young lady and is all about making safe and healthy choices.  She doesn't even drink soda.  She knows what I do for work and understands why I do it.  We talk and check-in a lot which automatically puts her in a good position.

I know a lot of people who are way into health and won't touch soda.
Or alcohol.
Most of them do weed, though. 

They are way into health and don't see how inhaling and holding hot, carcnogenic sm

Sentence ended funny.  Are you drunk right now?

Seltzer doesn't contain alcohol silly.

[Ben Shapiro]

If RWHN actually smoked pot he wouldn't be such a unbearable piece of shit, and his wife would have stayed with him.

My ex-wife would be a serious down-grade.

Of course. You're the best Maine has to offer.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

[Junkenstein]

Ahem:



Carry on.

[Ben Shapiro]

I do kind of hope he sticks around for another five years because the inevitable meltdown when his kids start smoking pot is going to be amazing.

Well, my son is only 3, so that seems pretty far-fetched.

The dead girl in the OP was only 2.

And apparently his daughter doesn't count, because, well, in RWHN's world females don't HAVE agency.

You said "kids start smoking".  I'm simply pointing out the stupidity of that.  I'm not very worried about my daughter.  She's a vert strong-minded young lady and is all about making safe and healthy choices.  She doesn't even drink soda.  She knows what I do for work and understands why I do it.  We talk and check-in a lot which automatically puts her in a good position.

I know a lot of people who are way into health and won't touch soda.
Or alcohol.
Most of them do weed, though. 

They are way into health and don't see how inhaling and holding hot, carcnogenic sm

Sentence ended funny.  Are you drunk right now?

Seltzer My butthurt doesn't contain alcohol silly.

[AFK]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

No, Nigel's a friend I wish I had.

Oh god no.  I'd rather hang out with my crazy ex-mother-in-law.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Oh god no.  I'd rather hang out with my crazy ex-mother-in-law.

Wait.  The one that "agreed with you" about your ex-wife?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

No, Nigel's friend.

Yeah, that's what I said.  An MPH, rather than a policy wonk.

It's not like she's dedicated her life to actual harm reduction starting when she was interning in clinics on Haight 20 years ago, or anything.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

Let's recap:

The Daily Mail is a reputable source.
MPHs have no training.
The NIH doesn't know what it's talking about.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

It's not like she's dedicated her life to actual harm reduction starting when she was interning in clinics on Haight 20 years ago, or anything.

Well, we have to stack that up against RWHN's favored source.

The Daily Mail.

[AFK]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

No, Nigel's friend.

Yeah, that's what I said.  An MPH, rather than a policy wonk.

MPHs are good program coordinators.  It's the MPPs that get shit done.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

MPHs are good program coordinators. 

Without training?  How interesting.

[AFK]

If RWHN actually smoked pot he wouldn't be such a unbearable piece of shit, and his wife would have stayed with him.

My ex-wife would be a serious down-grade.

From your imaginary GF?

Guess I have a very vivid and sensory-inducing imagination.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

If RWHN actually smoked pot he wouldn't be such a unbearable piece of shit, and his wife would have stayed with him.

My ex-wife would be a serious down-grade.

From your imaginary GF?

Guess I have a very vivid and sensory-inducing imagination.

I guess so.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866706/