Author Topic: 2012-14.mth  (Read 1708 times)

hirley0

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 23525
    • View Profile
    • TNM
Re: 2012-14.mth
« Reply #45 on: May 13, 2013, 10:41:16 am »
will i ever LeaRn ? i doubt it .1 i see no need
for constants {invarients | 4Me it all changes | including time & space
Time is thought not only to change but in fact can reverse itself under
proper conditions, an as for space being continuous? i see no reason to
suspect that rule either, i see no reason why space cannot have holes
in it | & 'poise discontinuity  here there & everywhere actually

So bac2BS BYome stretch of imagination i concluded earth Mass to have
doubled { no wait i meab earth Diameter has doubled  since day 1
i wonder if i can find the link 12/31 & 1/1
http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,33962.0.html  1/1 Link
12/31 R47
3-W.int

ok
i agree it makes little sence
My main point is the Earth Diameter increased & Earth mass also
{ a lot
Next point? Moon also increased in mass | some 24e7 Years
currently Moon receeds from Earth |orbital period increases. | at day 1
Moon Launch from Earth the Lunar Rotation was same as Earth, as it
moved away | thus falling behind the Earths rotation, The outbound moon
must hav had near escape velocity to be where it is now.

escape from the Earth; it is 11.3 km/sec or 25,300 mph.
in my theory of the Lunar{from earth Launch) reached an
insert event, resulting in the Moons present parameters 
{moving away
thus? A plot {animation | of the formative days should be possible and a table
of lunar distance {from Earth the first 1/3 of a day
distance from Earth to the Moon is 384,400 km  /11.3Km/s = 34000 seconds
=567 Min == 9 hrs |(imo} had there been no second event (insert} there
would be no Moon today, thank U object 2 {insert.tit | Make ¢ents?
« Last Edit: May 13, 2013, 11:57:13 am by hirley0 »

hirley0

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 23525
    • View Profile
    • TNM
Re: 2012-14.mth
« Reply #46 on: May 13, 2013, 08:19:12 pm »
ad 1649 4get the prior BS , get on with agreements{Lov dis+agree{Hat & 2con{Na
ok? thUS, i rebegin from a table of numbers that
Me Myself & i will call "GIVENS"
GIVENS themselves are not considered constants
in fact givens are assumed to be variables
& are only expressed as numbers for convience
Givens again {i say to myself) are variables
the rate OR random way they vary are probable
unknow, & maybe unknowable at this stage of
the game.

given 1 is a distance, distance itself is
considered by me not to be a constant but
a fluctuation {never mind F's for now ..
G1 = diameter of Earth takes the followin #'$
G1_Me http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzdiameter.htm 12.7Kkm
G1_SelF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth (12) -
G1_i http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_diameter_of_the_Earth (13) +
i round up to 13 for a # some when in the future +
Myself rounds down to a real time in the past  -
& Me, Me, Me accepts a geographic term of Thousands of kilometers
Na2
« Last Edit: May 13, 2013, 09:26:58 pm by hirley0 »

hirley0

  • Deserved It
  • ****
  • Posts: 23525
    • View Profile
    • TNM
Re: 2012-14.mth
« Reply #47 on: May 13, 2013, 09:18:53 pm »
moving right along to the next ad 1654
Me? volume of a sphere = 4/3πr³
 1 http://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-the-Volume-of-a-Sphere
 2 http://www.aaamath.com/exp79_x8.htm
 volume of EARTH
 3 http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html
MYSELF ? parameters ^ 22 ? OF 24
I DID NOT SEE ELECTRICAL CHARGE or state of ionization
Mass (10^24 kg)                 5.9736
Volume (10^10 km3)             108.321
density g/cc  ????/    maybe 6/110 5.4545..*10^12 Kg/Km^3

ad 1672 fade?1686Δ14 oK Lemme thin' i mean offer the blood .. i arrived
at the spin period of earth ? THAT i'poise changed as mass was added?
Faster[_] Slower[_]? with an abrupt alteration at Lunar Launch day
i'LL call it LL_0 &then2 Lunar orbital period in terms of Earth spin time
v Ephemeris T {is that spelled correctly?
Did you mean: ephemeris time?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeris
ad 1699 -ad 1700
Alright ?ES 3:11 2013 05/18 MY question is about Mass
how does{did) the orbit of isS change as mass was added
it seams rather straignt forward and simple. find data.
-
Ok: never mind then, if it does not exist why look 4iT
i must star some where! Right? preA
Mass is not =2 Cartesian or Keplerian |a e i ω Ω ν| aei
= =
Trad DaTa
03:45 ?

????
Semi-major axis    a    Defines the size of the orbit.
Eccentricity    e    Defines the shape of the orbit.
Inclination    i    Defines the orientation of the orbit with respect to the Earth's equator.<
Argument of Perigee       Defines where the low point, perigee, of the orbit is with respect to the Earth's surface.
Right Ascension of the Ascending Node       Defines the location of the ascending and descending orbit locations with respect to the Earth's equatorial plane.
True/Mean Anomaly       Defines where the satellite is within the orbit with respect to perigee.

04:06 http://www.projectpluto.com/find_orb.htm#download
04:33 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_Propulsion_Laboratory_Development_Ephemeris
initial conditions were both constants such as planetary masses, from outside sources,
 and parameters such as initial positions and velocities,
2003 masses for the planets Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and the Earth-Moon system
were updated to newer research. ////\/EW constants
2007 minor inconsistencies which remained in the planets' masses due to time ?
2008 latest estimates of planetary masses //////\/EW new$
5:15 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Science_Laboratory
« Last Edit: Today at 12:20:44 pm by hirley0 »